bripat9643: Dumbest liberal statements in USMB "Demand creates jobs"

[Uncensored2008]

According to Democrats, the more that are on unemployment the more money it would create and give us a better economy. The solution is more unemployment, the higher, the better.


Sent from my iPad using an Android.

That's satire, right?

no... ignorance.

Damn right it's ignorant - it's a quote from fucktard Obama.

 

[Uncensored2008]

If more people wanted Rolls Royces, they would produce more

Are you drunk?

I really hope so, for your sake.

 

[Camp]

Jobs come from tax cuts....Don't you know that?

Go demand a Rolls Royce, Comrade - then tell us how that works out....

If more people wanted Rolls Royces, they would produce more

Why wouldn't they? Fact is, many Rolls Royces are made to order and because of their demographics their sales are very predictable. They don't line them up in the parking lot outside of the dealership with the colored flags and balloons. There sales and thus, production, are directly connected to demand via advance customer orders. A better example for jobs connected directly to demand would be hard to find.

 

[rdean]

Go demand a Rolls Royce, Comrade - then tell us how that works out....

If more people wanted Rolls Royces, they would produce more

Why wouldn't they? Fact is, many Rolls Royces are made to order and because of their demographics their sales are very predictable. They don't line them up in the parking lot outside of the dealership with the colored flags and balloons. There sales and thus, production, are directly connected to demand via advance customer orders. A better example for jobs connected directly to demand would be hard to find.

Every one of your posts on this subject are so well worded that if you were on a debate team, you opponents would have a score of zero.

The saddest part is that so many will point to anticipated demand and say that's not demand. If they don't know that "supply and demand" are fundamental to economics, do they know what demand is, anticipated or not?

 

[bedowin62]

If more people wanted Rolls Royces, they would produce more

Why wouldn't they? Fact is, many Rolls Royces are made to order and because of their demographics their sales are very predictable. They don't line them up in the parking lot outside of the dealership with the colored flags and balloons. There sales and thus, production, are directly connected to demand via advance customer orders. A better example for jobs connected directly to demand would be hard to find.

Every one of your posts on this subject are so well worded that if you were on a debate team, you opponents would have a score of zero.

The saddest part is that so many will point to anticipated demand and say that's not demand. If they don't know that "supply and demand" are fundamental to economics, do they know what demand is, anticipated or not?

simply laughble

nice use of the Rolls Royce as an example though

nobody can afford to keep items that are partially hande-made, as Rolls' are; just sitting in inventory. their demand might be predictable in predictable times
but luxury items are the first to suffer when left-wing nutjobs carrying torches and hyperbole about getting the rich come to power


and the Left is equally oblivious to the effect that has on the REGULAR PEOPLE that makde those cars and components for them

 

[Camp]

Why wouldn't they? Fact is, many Rolls Royces are made to order and because of their demographics their sales are very predictable. They don't line them up in the parking lot outside of the dealership with the colored flags and balloons. There sales and thus, production, are directly connected to demand via advance customer orders. A better example for jobs connected directly to demand would be hard to find.

Every one of your posts on this subject are so well worded that if you were on a debate team, you opponents would have a score of zero.

The saddest part is that so many will point to anticipated demand and say that's not demand. If they don't know that "supply and demand" are fundamental to economics, do they know what demand is, anticipated or not?

simply laughble

nice use of the Rolls Royce as an example though

nobody can afford to keep items that are partially hande-made, as Rolls' are; just sitting in inventory. their demand might be predictable in predictable times
but luxury items are the first to suffer when left-wing nutjobs carrying torches and hyperbole about getting the rich come to power


and the Left is equally oblivious to the effect that has on the REGULAR PEOPLE that makde those cars and components for them

Intuitive thinking will only take you so far. You seem stuck there. Until you give critical, conceptual and innovative a shot you will just continue to be a boring nuisance.

 

[Uncensored2008]

If more people wanted Rolls Royces, they would produce more

Why wouldn't they? Fact is, many Rolls Royces are made to order and because of their demographics their sales are very predictable. They don't line them up in the parking lot outside of the dealership with the colored flags and balloons. There sales and thus, production, are directly connected to demand via advance customer orders. A better example for jobs connected directly to demand would be hard to find.

Every one of your posts on this subject are so well worded that if you were on a debate team, you opponents would have a score of zero.

The saddest part is that so many will point to anticipated demand and say that's not demand. If they don't know that "supply and demand" are fundamental to economics, do they know what demand is, anticipated or not?

Yo retard, stop running and explain the demand for the iPhone that led to it's creation?

Leftists, stupid as dog turds, but not as useful.....

 

[Uncensored2008]

Intuitive thinking will only take you so far. You seem stuck there. Until you give critical, conceptual and innovative a shot you will just continue to be a boring nuisance.

Yeah, but utter fucking stupidity results in, well you -- and no one wants that...

Standard Disclaimer: If anyone ever doubted that lack of education, ignorance, and outright stupidity are the foundation of the left, they need only read the posts by you and rdean in this thread. You two put the "WHOLLY FUCK" in "fucking stupid" - seriously.

 

[bripat9643]

Jobs come from tax cuts....Don't you know that?

Go demand a Rolls Royce, Comrade - then tell us how that works out....

If more people wanted Rolls Royces, they would produce more

Name one person who would turn down a Rolls Royce if it was offered to them.

 

[bripat9643]

Go demand a Rolls Royce, Comrade - then tell us how that works out....

If more people wanted Rolls Royces, they would produce more

Why wouldn't they? Fact is, many Rolls Royces are made to order and because of their demographics their sales are very predictable. They don't line them up in the parking lot outside of the dealership with the colored flags and balloons. There sales and thus, production, are directly connected to demand via advance customer orders. A better example for jobs connected directly to demand would be hard to find.

Now you're changing the goal line to "connected to demand." The claim you turds were originally defending is that demand creates jobs. That's obviously idiotic. Demand for a perpetual motion machine hasn't created a single job so far.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Go demand a Rolls Royce, Comrade - then tell us how that works out....

If more people wanted Rolls Royces, they would produce more

Name one person who would turn down a Rolls Royce if it was offered to them.

All you need do is demand, that's what these mental giants are telling us..

I demand a Rolls for $50

I shall stand here and wait, because rdean says demand drives production, so my $50 brand new Rolls will be along any moment..

LOL

Stupidity is the foundation of leftism.

 

[bripat9643]

If more people wanted Rolls Royces, they would produce more

Why wouldn't they? Fact is, many Rolls Royces are made to order and because of their demographics their sales are very predictable. They don't line them up in the parking lot outside of the dealership with the colored flags and balloons. There sales and thus, production, are directly connected to demand via advance customer orders. A better example for jobs connected directly to demand would be hard to find.

Every one of your posts on this subject are so well worded that if you were on a debate team, you opponents would have a score of zero.

Well worded idiocy is still idiocy, and it doesn't win debates, at least not until recently

The saddest part is that so many will point to anticipated demand and say that's not demand. If they don't know that "supply and demand" are fundamental to economics, do they know what demand is, anticipated or not?

So now it's "anticipated demand?" When I took economics, the instructor never used this term. The you switch from "anticipated demand" to "supply and demand." Is the "demand" in the later phrase the same as the "demand" in the prior?

You're dancing all over the place, deanie.

 

[bripat9643]

What a stupid response. Why would anyone need umbrellas if there were no rain?

Isn't the point also to create demand for stuff we don't really need? Like through advertising.

Advertising incites demand for that which there is a ready supply of - the supply must exist or the advertising would be stupid. If demand outstripped supply, advertising would be stupid.

One only advertises that which has a supply that exceeds demand.[/QUOTE]

One thing economic morons like deanie fail to grock is that supply generates demand. Every car Toyota produces puts dollars in the hands of its employees. They now have true demand - that is, dollars and a willingness to spend them. The supply was created before the demand existed.

 

[bripat9643]

I didn't see any Republicans who told this person they were wrong.

So the question is, "Do Republicans see any connection between "demand" and "jobs"?

My personal opinion is that demand if the foundation of every single job ever created in the entire 6,000 year history of the world.

If "demand" creates jobs, then rain creates umbrellas.

What a stupid response. Why would anyone need umbrellas if there were no rain?

The question you have to answer is why there were no umbrellas before a certain date even though there was plenty of rain.

 

[bripat9643]

Still, the question is "do Republicans see any connection between 'demand' and 'job creation'?"

The problem here is that economic ignoramuses like you don't understand the difference between a "necessary" condition and a "sufficient" condition. Obviously demand is for a product is necessary for a business to make money off it. However, it takes more than demand for jobs to miraculously pop into existence. It takes a human with imagination, drive and perseverance to see the need for the product, invent the product, perfect the product, and create a company to produce the product. Libturd economics wants to ignore that part because it wants people to believe that government can "create jobs" merely by handing out money.

 

[Camp]

Still, the question is "do Republicans see any connection between 'demand' and 'job creation'?"

Obviously demand is for a product is necessary for a business to make money off it.

So you are conceding that demand for a product or service is part of the equation that creates jobs and in fact the key factor. Is someone claiming that demand is the one and only factor that creates jobs? Who are you debating with?

 

[bripat9643]

Still, the question is "do Republicans see any connection between 'demand' and 'job creation'?"

Obviously demand is for a product is necessary for a business to make money off it.

So you are conceding that demand for a product or service is part of the equation that creates jobs and in fact the key factor. Is someone claiming that demand is the one and only factor that creates jobs? Who are you debating with?

It's no more part of the process of creating jobs than a lump of iron is part of the process for making cars. Of and by itself, a lump of iron creates nothing. It takes people to make a car. Likewise, creating jobs takes entrepreneurs and investors. That's the fact that you and all the other useless ticks in here are so desperately trying to evade.

According to your theory, I create jobs by throwing a brick through a glass window. That creates plenty of "demand,' doesn't it?

 

[Camp]

Obviously demand is for a product is necessary for a business to make money off it.

So you are conceding that demand for a product or service is part of the equation that creates jobs and in fact the key factor. Is someone claiming that demand is the one and only factor that creates jobs? Who are you debating with?

It's no more part of the process of creating jobs than a lump of iron is part of the process for making cars. Of and by itself, a lump of iron creates nothing. It takes people to make a car. Likewise, creating jobs takes entrepreneurs and investors. That's the fact that you and all the other useless ticks in here are so desperately trying to evade.

According to your theory, I create jobs by throwing a brick through a glass window. That creates plenty of "demand,' doesn't it?

You are correct. When you threw that brick through the glass window you created a demand for two things. One, a new window and two, a window repair person.
You continue to ask questions, but seem unable or unwilling to answer the one that was asked of you. What product or service exist that does not have a demand for it in it's equation? If demand is not the key element in job creation, why can you not name a product or service that exist without that key element?

 

[freedombecki]

bripat9643: Dumbest liberal statements in USMB "Demand creates jobs"
I didn't see any Republicans who told this person they were wrong.

So the question is, "Do Republicans see any connection between "demand" and "jobs"?

My personal opinion is that demand if the foundation of every single job ever created in the entire 6,000 year history of the world.

If you are going to flame somebody else you should do it in a flame thread, not in the distinguished economy boards at USMB.

For that I am rating your character assassination flame thread "terrible," although it's in the minus bracket and doesn't even deserve one star.

You should get some hate management training instead of wearing it on the short sleeve of your mudslinging shirt.

Naughty, naughty.

 

[freedombecki]

Why wouldn't they? Fact is, many Rolls Royces are made to order and because of their demographics their sales are very predictable. They don't line them up in the parking lot outside of the dealership with the colored flags and balloons. There sales and thus, production, are directly connected to demand via advance customer orders. A better example for jobs connected directly to demand would be hard to find.

Every one of your posts on this subject are so well worded that if you were on a debate team, you opponents would have a score of zero.

Well worded idiocy is still idiocy, and it doesn't win debates, at least not until recently

The saddest part is that so many will point to anticipated demand and say that's not demand. If they don't know that "supply and demand" are fundamental to economics, do they know what demand is, anticipated or not?

So now it's "anticipated demand?" When I took economics, the instructor never used this term. The you switch from "anticipated demand" to "supply and demand." Is the "demand" in the later phrase the same as the "demand" in the prior?

You're dancing all over the place, deanie.

It's called "the hokey spokie."