Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You’re kidding?
We know this.
Were campaign funds used is the issue.
We did NOT know until tonight that David Pecker of America Media must have gotten a 'deal' and he sang! And YOU ain't that smart to have figured it out. And you obviously don't know JACKSHIT about what is allowed under FEC rules. BRIBES aren't! Anything of 'value' to the candidate while running for office MUST BE REPORTED.
I'd say paying 2 women $130 and $150k to keep their mouths shut about a CANDIDATE running for President has 'value' to it!
Hell read my sig, the last 2 lines. It's all right in there!
If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States
What was the offense? How was the United States defrauded?
Apparently you haven’t been watching MSLSD and CNN who have stated 1,000,000 times that a payoff is illegal when used from campaign funds.You’re kidding?
We know this.
Were campaign funds used is the issue.
We did NOT know until tonight that David Pecker of America Media must have gotten a 'deal' and he sang! And YOU ain't that smart to have figured it out. And you obviously don't know JACKSHIT about what is allowed under FEC rules. BRIBES aren't! Anything of 'value' to the candidate while running for office MUST BE REPORTED.
I'd say paying 2 women $130 and $150k to keep their mouths shut about a CANDIDATE running for President has 'value' to it!
Hell read my sig, the last 2 lines. It's all right in there!
If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States
What was the offense? How was the United States defrauded?
F. E. C. F E D E R A L ELECTIONS COMMISSION. They write rules. You break them, you defraud the United States. If your lawyer doesn't know then you have no business using him for E L E C T I O N related counsel. Except in COHEN'S plea deal, he said he KNEW.
God we have stupid people on this board. (Yes, I expect people on a POLITICAL BOARD to know some shit)
You’re kidding?
We know this.
Were campaign funds used is the issue.
We did NOT know until tonight that David Pecker of America Media must have gotten a 'deal' and he sang! And YOU ain't that smart to have figured it out. And you obviously don't know JACKSHIT about what is allowed under FEC rules. BRIBES aren't! Anything of 'value' to the candidate while running for office MUST BE REPORTED.
I'd say paying 2 women $130 and $150k to keep their mouths shut about a CANDIDATE running for President has 'value' to it!
Hell read my sig, the last 2 lines. It's all right in there!
If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States
What was the offense? How was the United States defrauded?
F. E. C. F E D E R A L ELECTIONS COMMISSION. They write rules. You break them, you defraud the United States. If your lawyer doesn't know then you have no business using him for E L E C T I O N related counsel. Except in COHEN'S plea deal, he said he KNEW.
God we have stupid people on this board. (Yes, I expect people on a POLITICAL BOARD to know some shit)
Anything of value must be reported? Like a fucking dossier?
Contrast what is going on here with the treatment of the millions of dollars paid to a Democratic law firm which, in turn, paid out money to political research firm Fusion GPS and British spy Christopher Steele without listing them on any campaign expenditure form, despite crystal clear laws and regulations that the ultimate beneficiaries of the funds must be listed.
This rule was even tightened recently. There is no question that hiring spies to do opposition research in Russia is a campaign expenditure, yet no prosecutorial raids have been sprung on the law firm, Fusion GPS or Steele. The reason? It does not “get” Trump.
Cohen's plea deal is prosecutor's attempt to set up Trump
Left wing desperation... The mud thrown by Mueller isn't sticking and people are tired of the crap.. Keep pushing for impeachment... its going to lay waste to your party for decades..
No, that is not the issue. You dumbfucks don't even know what the argument is.You’re kidding?
We know this.
Were campaign funds used is the issue.
Ad hominem...being an angry Liberal does not define the law.No, that is not the issue. You dumbfucks don't even know what the argument is.You’re kidding?
We know this.
Were campaign funds used is the issue.
They suddenly think they know the law...Quite a few of cult45 do not know campaign finance law.
They will be experts by the time this is over.
LOLOLAd hominem...being an angry Liberal does not define the law.No, that is not the issue. You dumbfucks don't even know what the argument is.You’re kidding?
We know this.
Were campaign funds used is the issue.
From which university did you earn your law degree?LOLOLAd hominem...being an angry Liberal does not define the law.No, that is not the issue. You dumbfucks don't even know what the argument is.You’re kidding?
We know this.
Were campaign funds used is the issue.
You don’t even know which law to argue because you don’t know what the issue is.
Figure out what the actual issue is and try again.From which university did you earn your law degree?LOLOLAd hominem...being an angry Liberal does not define the law.No, that is not the issue. You dumbfucks don't even know what the argument is.You’re kidding?
We know this.
Were campaign funds used is the issue.
You don’t even know which law to argue because you don’t know what the issue is.
Last night I was on my community Facebook group reading the conversation between 5 lawyers.Figure out what the actual issue is and try again.From which university did you earn your law degree?LOLOLAd hominem...being an angry Liberal does not define the law.No, that is not the issue. You dumbfucks don't even know what the argument is.You’re kidding?
We know this.
Were campaign funds used is the issue.
You don’t even know which law to argue because you don’t know what the issue is.
Nope, that’s not it. Try again.Last night I was on my community Facebook group reading the conversation between 5 lawyers.Figure out what the actual issue is and try again.From which university did you earn your law degree?LOLOLAd hominem...being an angry Liberal does not define the law.No, that is not the issue. You dumbfucks don't even know what the argument is.
You don’t even know which law to argue because you don’t know what the issue is.
Not even 2 of them could come to an agreement on anything related to this specific issue.
So, once again, from which university did you receive your law degree?
Internet Law Degree...mazal tov!Nope, that’s not it. Try again.Last night I was on my community Facebook group reading the conversation between 5 lawyers.Figure out what the actual issue is and try again.From which university did you earn your law degree?LOLOLAd hominem...being an angry Liberal does not define the law.
You don’t even know which law to argue because you don’t know what the issue is.
Not even 2 of them could come to an agreement on anything related to this specific issue.
So, once again, from which university did you receive your law degree?
Nope, that’s still not it. Sadly, it appears as though you’ll never know what the actual issue is.Internet Law Degree...mazal tov!Nope, that’s not it. Try again.Last night I was on my community Facebook group reading the conversation between 5 lawyers.Figure out what the actual issue is and try again.From which university did you earn your law degree?LOLOL
You don’t even know which law to argue because you don’t know what the issue is.
Not even 2 of them could come to an agreement on anything related to this specific issue.
So, once again, from which university did you receive your law degree?
The fact that no one but yourself gets what you “get” is rather telling.Nope, that’s still not it. Sadly, it appears as though you’ll never know what the actual issue is.Internet Law Degree...mazal tov!Nope, that’s not it. Try again.Last night I was on my community Facebook group reading the conversation between 5 lawyers.Figure out what the actual issue is and try again.From which university did you earn your law degree?
Not even 2 of them could come to an agreement on anything related to this specific issue.
So, once again, from which university did you receive your law degree?
