healthmyths
Platinum Member
- Sep 19, 2011
- 29,073
- 10,551
- 900
It could be either. In many countries it is like police or fire, in others it is more like the mechanic. In our country it is a mix and that is why it is failing.
I do not personally believe those in our country are ready to treat it like the mechanic, if you have no money or no insurance the mechanic tells you to go away. Are the people of this country ready to have ER and hospitals do the same thing?
Forgive my suspicions, but I'm always leery about an argument that starts by redefining terms. What is it you're hoping to inject into the argument by doing so?
I mean, I ask what problems we are trying to solve with health care reform, and you dodge the question by saying we first have to redefine health care. That seems like a shell game to me.
The problems with our healthcare system all trace back to the fact we have some hybrid of commodity and service and it will never work. Try running a grocery store or the mechanic that way...some people give them money for their goods and services and some do not..how well will that work? How much more would you grocery store and mechanic have to charge you and me to make up for the people who do not pay?
I am not saying we have to redefine it, I am saying we have to define it, it has to be one or the other or, in my opinion, there is no fixing it.
So, to me the fix is to pick either healthcare is a commodity or it is a service and go forward from there.
So either way you are ok it sounds like with this MAJOR contributor to health care costs...i.e. almost $850 billion a year estimated by nearly 3,000 physicians in 2009?
And the proof is that...
"Physicians contracted by the federal government practice significantly less defensive medicine as they are protected by the 1946 Federal Tort Claims Act. "
BUT.....only 48% practice defensive medicine compared to 92% of non-government physicians."
PHYSICIAN STUDY: QUANTIFYING THE COST OF DEFENSIVE MEDICINE - Jackson Healthcare