Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Endangered species act ring any bells?
Endangered Species | Laws & Policies | Endangered Species Act
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6wJpGO8j4Q&feature=player_embedded
So where has property been condemned via eminent domain based on the Endangered Species act?
Where has property been "condemned" on this thread? BLM sought to make the Bundy's pay their bills for the use of a commons - the Bundy's tried to flood that commons with WAY more than the original arrangement stipulated, lost multiple legal challenges to those stipulations, are scofflaws to the bills that are due and payable for use of that commons, and are currently making the lot of you show your asses in support of countless illegal acts.
Keep your chins up - even Glen Beck and Fawx news may have abandoned you, but you'll always have KG and the insanity that wants to see women and children gunned down...for effect.
I've never seen barb do that. you on the other hand........
Keep, up. I did not call barb a lair, she's defending Wry Catcher. Or am I confused about some well known sock issue?
Nope. Wry is a different poster. I've never seen wry do that either, and I read the list. Prove the lie (s), every last one, or you lose. It really IS that simple. (with props to Sallow)
In his mind its his right.
In his mind its his right.
That's what the pioneers thought to when they took Indian land.
This thread has gone fine for me, and very poorly indeed for the anti-American pieces of shit who think the feds should fire on ranchers.
The feds weren't the ones setting up sniper positions.
Oh, "koshergrl"?Hi, you have received -7516 reputation points from koshergrl.
Reputation was given for this post.
Comment:
Wrong as usual.
Regards,
koshergrl
Note: This is an automated message.
This thread has gone fine for me, and very poorly indeed for the anti-American pieces of shit who think the feds should fire on ranchers.
The feds weren't the ones setting up sniper positions.
Oh, "koshergrl"?Hi, you have received -7516 reputation points from koshergrl.
Reputation was given for this post.
Comment:
Wrong as usual.
Regards,
koshergrl
Note: This is an automated message.
Federal rangers face off against armed protesters in Nevada 'range war' | World news | theguardian.com
In his mind its his right.
That's what the pioneers thought to when they took Indian land.
Yeah. Does the left really have anything other than cliches and hypocritical dispositions?
Answer: No.
Pioneers didn't take anything. Indians didn't recognize ownership of land. They thought the whites were morons for paying them for land, because they didn't think it COULD be owned. They took the money thinking they were ripping off whites.
By the time they realized they were wrong, there wasn't much they could do. Except continue to sell land the whites thought was theirs to sell.
They waded into something without preparing themselves and they got pwned. All the statist nutbags posting in this thread should be able to relate.
It's fun watching the Right defending a liar and moocher.
I've been saying it all along. Bundy is just a wacko freeloader with a lot of militia type hero worshipers. He is going to end up with nobody but the Idaho anti-government nuts as his friends and supporters. He is playing a losing hand in a losing game.
It's fun watching the Right defending a liar and moocher.
Okay, so I did some research, and came across a post in another forum
What do you think?
the land should not be owned by the feds period
You think it should be "given" to the rich? Not surprised.
Did you just compare a rancher/squatter standoff to Pearl Harbor? Really?
Sorry, I cannot agree with you on that one. The scope of these two things is just too different to make any logical comparison, imo.
No. Perhaps you should chill out, Stat. Actually you can. Come to think of it, you don't know something so small exists until it winds up making history. If the government fires even one shot at the protesters, it will be just as comprable to the Boston Massacre, or the shot heard round the world.
I didn't say I didn't respect your opinion, TK, I just said I don't agree with your opinion.
I am actually quite chilled out.
If you are saying that this little podunk-nowhere town could be the flashpoint or a turning point in history, I can't disagree with you. That is indeed possible, for it can happen anywhere, anytime, without protesters. Only, I wouldn't put it in the same category as Pearl Harbor.
the land should not be owned by the feds period
You think it should be "given" to the rich? Not surprised.
No, smartalec.
We want it given to the citizens of Nevada. All of them.
