Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only if you ignore what Bush's CIA briefer said........ can you please show proof that Mother Jones made it all upThe dummy which calls itself"Kosh" is claiming that mother Jones made up quotes from Bush's CIA briefer Michael Morell and that the dude did not really appear on MSNBC's Hardball...they made it all up...Kosh ought to be able to prove that right...Kosh you are dummy
And yet the far left still can not prove their religious narrative with any post..
Only if you ignore what Bush's CIA briefer said........ can you please show proof that Mother Jones made it all upThe dummy which calls itself"Kosh" is claiming that mother Jones made up quotes from Bush's CIA briefer Michael Morell and that the dude did not really appear on MSNBC's Hardball...they made it all up...Kosh ought to be able to prove that right...Kosh you are dummy
And yet the far left still can not prove their religious narrative with any post..
Kosh is an idiot
just waiting for Kosh to demonstrate that the quotes attributed to Bush's CIA briefer were made up quotes
Yes another far left drone posting known debunked information and expected others to prove them wrong!
]
Still expecting the far left to show how such comments fits their religious narrative.
yo dummy get bentYo, winger. tell us again what Bush is running for? What office are you trying to keep him from being elected to?
No......not even close to what we have in Germany, Japan or South KoreaIf the fire is put out and you let someone else start another one then it becomes your responsibility.Again Bush is not responsible for the current situation in Iraq. If you want to lay everything that happened in Iraq from 2003 to January of 2009 when Obama was sworn in on Bush fine after nope. At the time Obama was sworn in ISIS did not control a single town in Iraq nor did they take any while U.S. troops were still stationed there that did not happen till all American troops were withdrawn a decision you support it seems you support the way Obama is fighting ISIS no ground troops limited air strikes. So again Obama has done everything you want in regards to Iraq and ISIS which makes a blame Bush thread irrelevant.He broke it
The fact that future Presidents are unwilling to continue to waste American lives there is not relevant
Not any more than an arsonist is responsible after he has lit the match
The "fire" was far from put out
It required a constant US police force to maintain order. Along with that mission came a monthly death toll
I am an American who is unwilling to pay that toll
You mean like all the troops we still have in Japan, South Korea, Germany, Italy, after their wars ended in 1945 and the 1950s......you mean that force that we have kept their...and now those countries are completely functional.......and since you weren't in uniform...right? you weren't paying the toll....
ISIS did not exist. They were waiting to fill the power void as soon as we vacatedHow many towns did ISiS control in January of 2009 when Obama was sworn in? How large an area of Iraq were they in control of at that same time? The fire was out.If the fire is put out and you let someone else start another one then it becomes your responsibility.Again Bush is not responsible for the current situation in Iraq. If you want to lay everything that happened in Iraq from 2003 to January of 2009 when Obama was sworn in on Bush fine after nope. At the time Obama was sworn in ISIS did not control a single town in Iraq nor did they take any while U.S. troops were still stationed there that did not happen till all American troops were withdrawn a decision you support it seems you support the way Obama is fighting ISIS no ground troops limited air strikes. So again Obama has done everything you want in regards to Iraq and ISIS which makes a blame Bush thread irrelevant.He broke it
The fact that future Presidents are unwilling to continue to waste American lives there is not relevant
Not any more than an arsonist is responsible after he has lit the match
The "fire" was far from put out
It required a constant US police force to maintain order. Along with that mission came a monthly death toll
I am an American who is unwilling to pay that toll
Yo, winger. tell us again what Bush is running for? What office are you trying to keep him from being elected to?
Yo, winger. tell us again what Bush is running for? What office are you trying to keep him from being elected to?
We are looking at the same Republican regime anxious to make the same mistakes Bush made.......they are already grumbling about Iran and Iraq 3
Actually they did before they were ISIS they were Al-Qaeda in Iraq and yes I know they began under Bush. Yes they were waiting to fill that void which was exactly what all of Obamas military advisors were telling him would happen if the U.S. withdrew to soon . The right answer was to listen to the advice of your military commanders and not withdraw till they told you they were confident the Iraqis could handle security. If he had done that and the Iraqi forces still failed after we left he could have then said he followed the advice of the military and did everything possible to help the Iraqis handle security.ISIS did not exist. They were waiting to fill the power void as soon as we vacatedHow many towns did ISiS control in January of 2009 when Obama was sworn in? How large an area of Iraq were they in control of at that same time? The fire was out.If the fire is put out and you let someone else start another one then it becomes your responsibility.Again Bush is not responsible for the current situation in Iraq. If you want to lay everything that happened in Iraq from 2003 to January of 2009 when Obama was sworn in on Bush fine after nope. At the time Obama was sworn in ISIS did not control a single town in Iraq nor did they take any while U.S. troops were still stationed there that did not happen till all American troops were withdrawn a decision you support it seems you support the way Obama is fighting ISIS no ground troops limited air strikes. So again Obama has done everything you want in regards to Iraq and ISIS which makes a blame Bush thread irrelevant.
Not any more than an arsonist is responsible after he has lit the match
The "fire" was far from put out
It required a constant US police force to maintain order. Along with that mission came a monthly death toll
I am an American who is unwilling to pay that toll
That could have been one year.....could have been ten
Wouldn't have stopped them
If your answer is...then don't leave
it is the wrong answer
They are by their policiesYo, winger. tell us again what Bush is running for? What office are you trying to keep him from being elected to?
We are looking at the same Republican regime anxious to make the same mistakes Bush made.......they are already grumbling about Iran and Iraq 3
Not true, other than Jeb (who will not get nominated) not one of the GOP contenders is tied to bush.
Fuck IraqActually they did before they were ISIS they were Al-Qaeda in Iraq and yes I know they began under Bush. Yes they were waiting to fill that void which was exactly what all of Obamas military advisors were telling him would happen if the U.S. withdrew to soon . The right answer was to listen to the advice of your military commanders and not withdraw till they told you they were confident the Iraqis could handle security. If he had done that and the Iraqi forces still failed after we left he could have then said he followed the advice of the military and did everything possible to help the Iraqis handle security.ISIS did not exist. They were waiting to fill the power void as soon as we vacatedHow many towns did ISiS control in January of 2009 when Obama was sworn in? How large an area of Iraq were they in control of at that same time? The fire was out.If the fire is put out and you let someone else start another one then it becomes your responsibility.Not any more than an arsonist is responsible after he has lit the match
The "fire" was far from put out
It required a constant US police force to maintain order. Along with that mission came a monthly death toll
I am an American who is unwilling to pay that toll
That could have been one year.....could have been ten
Wouldn't have stopped them
If your answer is...then don't leave
it is the wrong answer
Never let a crisis go to waste.They succeeded in making most Americans accept the whole "false intel" story. After all.....lots of Dems fell for the FALSE INTEL too!
Problem is.....Bush and his staff knew that the intel was false. They fucking created the intel.
Plans For Iraq Attack Began On 9 11 - CBS News
Bush exploited an American public still in shock from 9-11
Invading Iraq would "make us safe"
So again you have gotten what you wanted from Obama so stop your fucking bitching about Bush.If you have issues with the situation in Iraq or the current policies on Iraq direct them at the current CIC instead of the man who has not held the title for five plus years now.Fuck IraqActually they did before they were ISIS they were Al-Qaeda in Iraq and yes I know they began under Bush. Yes they were waiting to fill that void which was exactly what all of Obamas military advisors were telling him would happen if the U.S. withdrew to soon . The right answer was to listen to the advice of your military commanders and not withdraw till they told you they were confident the Iraqis could handle security. If he had done that and the Iraqi forces still failed after we left he could have then said he followed the advice of the military and did everything possible to help the Iraqis handle security.ISIS did not exist. They were waiting to fill the power void as soon as we vacatedHow many towns did ISiS control in January of 2009 when Obama was sworn in? How large an area of Iraq were they in control of at that same time? The fire was out.If the fire is put out and you let someone else start another one then it becomes your responsibility.
The "fire" was far from put out
It required a constant US police force to maintain order. Along with that mission came a monthly death toll
I am an American who is unwilling to pay that toll
That could have been one year.....could have been ten
Wouldn't have stopped them
If your answer is...then don't leave
it is the wrong answer
We gave them ten years of our soldiers being killed to fend off the inevitable. Iraq was going to fall to secular violence unless we were there to stop it
Bush (they will treat us as liberators) should have known better
His father did
