*BUSTED* Obama, LIAR- Emails prove he KNEW about Libya attacks within 2 hours

You guys should read your own linked articles.

You should lie, because protecting the party is the only thing that matters.

{The emails, obtained by Reuters from government sources not connected with U.S. spy agencies or the State Department and who requested anonymity, specifically mention that the Libyan group called Ansar al-Sharia had asserted responsibility for the attacks.

The brief emails also show how U.S. diplomats described the attack, even as it was still under way, to Washington.

U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the Benghazi assault, which President Barack Obama and other U.S. officials ultimately acknowledged was a "terrorist" attack carried out by militants with suspected links to al Qaeda affiliates or sympathizers.

Administration spokesmen, including White House spokesman Jay Carney, citing an unclassified assessment prepared by the CIA, maintained for days that the attacks likely were a spontaneous protest against an anti-Muslim film.

While officials did mention the possible involvement of "extremists," they did not lay blame on any specific militant groups or possible links to al Qaeda or its affiliates until intelligence officials publicly alleged that on September 28.

There were indications that extremists with possible al Qaeda connections were involved, but also evidence that the attacks could have erupted spontaneously, they said, adding that government experts wanted to be cautious about pointing fingers prematurely.}

Hey, but you need to lie for Obama, you are a drone and must sacrifice integrity for the party.

Party above all, hack.
 
The 3am CALL:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yr7odFUARg]Hillary Clinton Ad - 3 AM White House Ringing Phone - YouTube[/ame]

The sad part of this HILLARY's campaign sponsored this Ad and yet she and OBAMA both turned their backs as Americans died.. Obama literally went back to sleep.. NO PROTECTION, NOTHING. .. Left them there on their own, even after they pleaded for security TO DIE.
 
Fox news now showing American Air Bases less than 480 miles away that could have helped saved our people's lives.... BUT NO CALL..

NOTHING............................... SILENCE....................... AND Obama went back to sleep.
 
This is sad but no surprise smh

What is really sad is the forum leftist shamelessly defending these lies.

I've said before that Obama could decapitate a young girl on Al Jazeera and forum leftists would praise him for it. This is proof of that assertion.
 
You guys should read your own linked articles.

You should lie, because protecting the party is the only thing that matters.

{The emails, obtained by Reuters from government sources not connected with U.S. spy agencies or the State Department and who requested anonymity, specifically mention that the Libyan group called Ansar al-Sharia had asserted responsibility for the attacks.

The brief emails also show how U.S. diplomats described the attack, even as it was still under way, to Washington.

U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the Benghazi assault, which President Barack Obama and other U.S. officials ultimately acknowledged was a "terrorist" attack carried out by militants with suspected links to al Qaeda affiliates or sympathizers.

Administration spokesmen, including White House spokesman Jay Carney, citing an unclassified assessment prepared by the CIA, maintained for days that the attacks likely were a spontaneous protest against an anti-Muslim film.

While officials did mention the possible involvement of "extremists," they did not lay blame on any specific militant groups or possible links to al Qaeda or its affiliates until intelligence officials publicly alleged that on September 28.

There were indications that extremists with possible al Qaeda connections were involved, but also evidence that the attacks could have erupted spontaneously, they said, adding that government experts wanted to be cautious about pointing fingers prematurely.}

Hey, but you need to lie for Obama, you are a drone and must sacrifice integrity for the party.

Party above all, hack.

Wrong. Here is what I posted earlier, an article from 9/12/12 that mentions Ansar al Sharia possibly being involved.

Reuters article from 9/12/12 states the following:

U.S. government officials said the Benghazi attack may have been planned in advance and there were indications that members of a militant faction calling itself Ansar al Sharia - which translates as Supporters of Islamic Law - may have been involved.

Obama vows to track down ambassador's killers | Reuters
 
How can you try to protect this administration at a time like this. Are you not concerned about our country?

The clear answer is "no," he doesn't give a fuck about the country, or anyone in it. He serves his party and will do or say ANYTHING to increase the power of the party.
 
:rofl: you are certifiably nutzoid!!!! but funny to watch!!! :lol:

So, no big deal right?

Obama lying for weeks, then lying again during the debates that he didn't know is of no concern to you?

I mean, party above all, right? We can't get caught up with integrity, the party alone matters. So what if the President covers up a terrorist attack and repeatedly lies to the American people - it's not like he tapped his foot or something.
 
You guys should read your own linked articles.

You should lie, because protecting the party is the only thing that matters.

{The emails, obtained by Reuters from government sources not connected with U.S. spy agencies or the State Department and who requested anonymity, specifically mention that the Libyan group called Ansar al-Sharia had asserted responsibility for the attacks.

The brief emails also show how U.S. diplomats described the attack, even as it was still under way, to Washington.

U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the Benghazi assault, which President Barack Obama and other U.S. officials ultimately acknowledged was a "terrorist" attack carried out by militants with suspected links to al Qaeda affiliates or sympathizers.

Administration spokesmen, including White House spokesman Jay Carney, citing an unclassified assessment prepared by the CIA, maintained for days that the attacks likely were a spontaneous protest against an anti-Muslim film.

While officials did mention the possible involvement of "extremists," they did not lay blame on any specific militant groups or possible links to al Qaeda or its affiliates until intelligence officials publicly alleged that on September 28.

There were indications that extremists with possible al Qaeda connections were involved, but also evidence that the attacks could have erupted spontaneously, they said, adding that government experts wanted to be cautious about pointing fingers prematurely.}

Hey, but you need to lie for Obama, you are a drone and must sacrifice integrity for the party.

Party above all, hack.

Wrong. Here is what I posted earlier, an article from 9/12/12 that mentions Ansar al Sharia possibly being involved.

Reuters article from 9/12/12 states the following:

U.S. government officials said the Benghazi attack may have been planned in advance and there were indications that members of a militant faction calling itself Ansar al Sharia - which translates as Supporters of Islamic Law - may have been involved.

Obama vows to track down ambassador's killers | Reuters

Oh, so the truth is, right after the attack, the administration acknowledged the possible involvement of Ansar al Sharia?

lol. So this was all in the public domain for over a month?

LOLOL
 
We just don't give a fuck about what you haters say he did.

You don't give a fuck about anything other than the party.

You are mindless and devoid of even a hint of integrity. How did Stalin butcher 65 million? Mindless automatons like Sarah G.
 
your continued reference to my age....

btw....one can not help their age...be they young or old

but one can help being a name calling fact ignoring moron......one can....you cant

Speaking of age, I know who LGS is from a different venue, where she used to be in her 40's, so she said.
Magically, now she's here, claiming to be in her 20's.

Don't let her horseshit get to you, she has less than zero credibility.

PS, I bitch slapped her wrinkled ass so hard she put me on ignore. She's a coward to boot.
 
Last edited:
Anyone else wonder what the weather is like on LGS's planet?

If anyone ever wonders how men like Pol Pot, Stalin, and Kim Jung Il retained power, they need only look at you.

Precisely what I said.. I had wondered up until today , how Germans sat silently as an entire people were nearly SLAUGHTERED.. The leftists we see here are frigtheningly no different. That will turn a blind eye, lie to cover it up even with evidence and proof.. ANYTHING, even the deaths of fellow Americans, to further their vile thirst for power.
 
Maybe Mitt will bring it up on the stump today?

He doesn't need to. This is major news. This is worse than Watergate. If by some strange occurrence (fraud) Obama is elected, he will be impeached and removed from office over this.

You can pretend it means nothing, but it is the biggest presidential issue since Nixon.
 
You should lie, because protecting the party is the only thing that matters.

{The emails, obtained by Reuters from government sources not connected with U.S. spy agencies or the State Department and who requested anonymity, specifically mention that the Libyan group called Ansar al-Sharia had asserted responsibility for the attacks.

The brief emails also show how U.S. diplomats described the attack, even as it was still under way, to Washington.

U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the Benghazi assault, which President Barack Obama and other U.S. officials ultimately acknowledged was a "terrorist" attack carried out by militants with suspected links to al Qaeda affiliates or sympathizers.

Administration spokesmen, including White House spokesman Jay Carney, citing an unclassified assessment prepared by the CIA, maintained for days that the attacks likely were a spontaneous protest against an anti-Muslim film.

While officials did mention the possible involvement of "extremists," they did not lay blame on any specific militant groups or possible links to al Qaeda or its affiliates until intelligence officials publicly alleged that on September 28.

There were indications that extremists with possible al Qaeda connections were involved, but also evidence that the attacks could have erupted spontaneously, they said, adding that government experts wanted to be cautious about pointing fingers prematurely.}

Hey, but you need to lie for Obama, you are a drone and must sacrifice integrity for the party.

Party above all, hack.

Wrong. Here is what I posted earlier, an article from 9/12/12 that mentions Ansar al Sharia possibly being involved.

Reuters article from 9/12/12 states the following:

U.S. government officials said the Benghazi attack may have been planned in advance and there were indications that members of a militant faction calling itself Ansar al Sharia - which translates as Supporters of Islamic Law - may have been involved.

Obama vows to track down ambassador's killers | Reuters

Oh, so the truth is, right after the attack, the administration acknowledged the possible involvement of Ansar al Sharia?

lol. So this was all in the public domain for over a month?

LOLOL

Posted twice now with no response. No surprise there.
 
Everyone has to remember that only 21% of this entire country, claim to be as batshit crazy as the whackjob libs on this site.. We have the ultra liberal nutters who come here for one purpose: PROPAGANDA and LIES.. Every day Americans are angry and outraged over a President who DID ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to protect and save the lives of our fellow citizens, then lied to cover it all up.. So take heart, these loons are no one but basement bullies in their tightie-whities chunking down twinkies with their food stamp card at the ready!
 
George W. Bush?

Really?

Shall we contrast and compare White House statements in both cases?

Look, you're a hack who holds party above country, but what would you and the other drones have been programmed to say if Bush had come out on 9/12 and claimed that the first 9/11 terror attack was an understandable reaction to an internet video? I mean, you don't actually know what you would have said, only your programmers do. But you would have been programmed to call for impeachment and criminal charges.
 
Wrong. Here is what I posted earlier, an article from 9/12/12 that mentions Ansar al Sharia possibly being involved.

Oh, so the truth is, right after the attack, the administration acknowledged the possible involvement of Ansar al Sharia?

lol. So this was all in the public domain for over a month?

LOLOL

Posted twice now with no response. No surprise there.

She can't defend her opinion, so she just keeps everyone on block that has descending opinion. It is highly entertaining.

Even other republicans/conservatives have abandoned this thread.
 
WH has just said the emails were not official intelligence communications and also it doesn't prelude a group from also using the video as one excuse to attack.

There is no conspiracy except in some people's minds!
 

Forum List

Back
Top