Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
- Feb 8, 2011
- 110,434
- 39,503
Wrong. Here is what I posted earlier, an article from 9/12/12 that mentions Ansar al Sharia possibly being involved.
Reuters article from 9/12/12 states the following:
U.S. government officials said the Benghazi attack may have been planned in advance and there were indications that members of a militant faction calling itself Ansar al Sharia - which translates as Supporters of Islamic Law - may have been involved.
Obama vows to track down ambassador's killers | Reuters
And you think that mitigates the cascade of lies from this corrupt administration.
But it doesn't, drone.
{This is a fairly volatile situation and it is in response not to United States policy, not to obviously the administration, not to the American people, White House spokesman Jay Carney said Friday. It is in response to a video, a film that we have judged to be reprehensible and disgusting. That in no way justifies any violent reaction to it, but this is not a case of protests directed at the United States writ large or at U.S. policy. This is in response to a video that is offensive to Muslims.} - direct lie
{Tapper was skeptical. The group around the Benghazi post was well armed, he said. It was a well-coordinated attack. Do you think it was a spontaneous protest against a movie?
Look, this is obviously under investigation, Carney said.} - direct lie, we now find out that Obama and the administration knew full well it was a terrorist attack - nothing to investigate.
{"there are no words that excuse the killing of innocent" and "no video that justifies an attack on an embassy."} - Lying fuck Obama
{Lets be clear: these protests were in reaction to a video that had spread to the region, said Carney. We have no information to suggest that it was a preplanned attack.} - Direct lie
{The unrest around the region has been in response to the video.} - Direct lie
{What we have seen is unrest around the region in response to a video that Muslims find offensive.} - Direct lie
{We are working to ensure that our diplomatic personnel and our diplomatic facilities are secure as we deal with the response to this video, which we believe is offensive and disgusting.} - Direct lie
{The cause of the unrest was a video. And that continues today, as you know, as we anticipated. And it may continue for some time.} - Direct lie
{The reason why theres unrest is because of the film. This is in response to the film this is not a film that the United States government had anything to do with. We reject its message and its contents we find it both reprehensible.} - Direct lie
{My point was simply that we are responding to and coping with and dealing with unrest brought about by this offensive video.} - Direct lie
If Obama fails to resign today, start the impeachment process.