CA must consider earlier parole for sex offenders judge says

MindWars

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2016
42,227
10,763
2,040
California must consider earlier parole for potentially thousands of sex offenders, maybe even those convicted of pimping children, a state judge said Friday.
CA must consider earlier parole for sex offenders, judge says



Nothing to see here folks, we are just playing Russian roulette with our kids that's all, Liberals don't mind though since it's showing such a loving concern for humanity oh and esp. if they are illegals. You know those ones that have been deported six times for sex offenses already.
 
Last edited:
He has a point. A non-violent felony offense IS a non-violent felony offense. If the voters don't like then they must petition their government to press for more stringent, restrictive sentencing guidelines. If they want to cherry pick then they must increase jail sentences or create a special category for sex offenses that eliminates early release.
 
Last edited:
California must consider earlier parole for potentially thousands of sex offenders, maybe even those convicted of pimping children, a state judge said Friday.
CA must consider earlier parole for sex offenders, judge says



Nothing to see here folks, we are just playing Russian roulette with our kids that's all, Liberals don't mind though since it's sowing such a loving concern for humanity oh and esp. if they are illegals. You know those ones that have been deported six times for sex offenses already.
Registered sex offenders in the US include people convicted of nonviolent crimes such as solicitation, public urination, streaking, and consensual sex with teenagers (even teenagers they subsequently marry). 9 out of 10 sex offenders are no danger to the community. What we need to do is find the one in 10 that is a danger and keep them locked up.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
The only ones I can see this being a fair deal are the young men who have had " CONSENSUAL" sex with their GF who was a year younger or so and the poor kid got sent up because the parents decided to press charges. Young men are being sent up like in epidemic or plaque.
 
California must consider earlier parole for potentially thousands of sex offenders, maybe even those convicted of pimping children, a state judge said Friday.
CA must consider earlier parole for sex offenders, judge says



Nothing to see here folks, we are just playing Russian roulette with our kids that's all, Liberals don't mind though since it's sowing such a loving concern for humanity oh and esp. if they are illegals. You know those ones that have been deported six times for sex offenses already.
Registered sex offenders in the US include people convicted of nonviolent crimes such as solicitation, public urination, streaking, and consensual sex with teenagers (even teenagers they subsequently marry). 9 out of 10 sex offenders are no danger to the community. What we need to do is find the one in 10 that is a danger and keep them locked up.
This is very very true. I personally know of one such case where a man urinated in an alley that led to a courtyard which had a school situated on one side. However, because he 'exposed' himself within 1000 feet of a school the DA wanted to prosecute him under a sex offense statute.
There was no way that any student could have possibly seen him from his position. His saving grace; he was completely alone (sec cam), urinating at 2 a.m. on a Saturday morning. His attorney was able to successfully argue the timing and position of his client as such. However, if he would have been convicted, he would have had to register as a sex offender in every jurisdiction which he lived...for pissing in an alley at 2 a.m.
Gentlemen...use a toilet. DA's dont give a rat's ass about anything but their conviction rate. You are just another notch on their hammer.
 
California must consider earlier parole for potentially thousands of sex offenders, maybe even those convicted of pimping children, a state judge said Friday.
CA must consider earlier parole for sex offenders, judge says



Nothing to see here folks, we are just playing Russian roulette with our kids that's all, Liberals don't mind though since it's showing such a loving concern for humanity oh and esp. if they are illegals. You know those ones that have been deported six times for sex offenses already.
. Yet another swamp rat straight out of Demon-crat Hell. Strip him of his law liscense, because he is yet another deplorable activist judge. Go figure. Upon reading other post here, some great points are being made. Still not sure about these judges though. Hard to trust the judges these days.
 
Last edited:
California must consider earlier parole for potentially thousands of sex offenders, maybe even those convicted of pimping children, a state judge said Friday.
CA must consider earlier parole for sex offenders, judge says



Nothing to see here folks, we are just playing Russian roulette with our kids that's all, Liberals don't mind though since it's sowing such a loving concern for humanity oh and esp. if they are illegals. You know those ones that have been deported six times for sex offenses already.
Registered sex offenders in the US include people convicted of nonviolent crimes such as solicitation, public urination, streaking, and consensual sex with teenagers (even teenagers they subsequently marry). 9 out of 10 sex offenders are no danger to the community. What we need to do is find the one in 10 that is a danger and keep them locked up.
This is very very true. I personally know of one such case where a man urinated in an alley that led to a courtyard which had a school situated on one side. However, because he 'exposed' himself within 1000 feet of a school the DA wanted to prosecute him under a sex offense statute.
There was no way that any student could have possibly seen him from his position. His saving grace; he was completely alone (sec cam), urinating at 2 a.m. on a Saturday morning. His attorney was able to successfully argue the timing and position of his client as such. However, if he would have been convicted, he would have had to register as a sex offender in every jurisdiction which he lived...for pissing in an alley at 2 a.m.
Gentlemen...use a toilet. DA's dont give a rat's ass about anything but their conviction rate. You are just another notch on their hammer.
. So this guy had a judge with some sense.
 
California must consider earlier parole for potentially thousands of sex offenders, maybe even those convicted of pimping children, a state judge said Friday.
CA must consider earlier parole for sex offenders, judge says



Nothing to see here folks, we are just playing Russian roulette with our kids that's all, Liberals don't mind though since it's showing such a loving concern for humanity oh and esp. if they are illegals. You know those ones that have been deported six times for sex offenses already.
That is not the basis of the lawsuit.
 
California must consider earlier parole for potentially thousands of sex offenders, maybe even those convicted of pimping children, a state judge said Friday.
CA must consider earlier parole for sex offenders, judge says



Nothing to see here folks, we are just playing Russian roulette with our kids that's all, Liberals don't mind though since it's showing such a loving concern for humanity oh and esp. if they are illegals. You know those ones that have been deported six times for sex offenses already.
. Yet another swamp rat straight out of Demon-crat Hell. Strip him of his law liscense, because he is yet another deplorable activist judge. Go figure. Upon reading other post here, some great points are being made. Still not sure about these judges though. Hard to trust the judges these days.
It's the way the ballot measure that was approved was written...
 
California must consider earlier parole for potentially thousands of sex offenders, maybe even those convicted of pimping children, a state judge said Friday.
CA must consider earlier parole for sex offenders, judge says



Nothing to see here folks, we are just playing Russian roulette with our kids that's all, Liberals don't mind though since it's showing such a loving concern for humanity oh and esp. if they are illegals. You know those ones that have been deported six times for sex offenses already.


Well of course. If California does not drastically cut prison time for these creeps, their jails will be overrun with them! And the state cannot afford to pay for all of that. Oddly enough, 2/3rds of the politicians in California are guilty of something, from tax evasion to something else and how many of them have been arrested and prosecuted in jail? I bet ZERO.
 
California must consider earlier parole for potentially thousands of sex offenders, maybe even those convicted of pimping children, a state judge said Friday.
CA must consider earlier parole for sex offenders, judge says



Nothing to see here folks, we are just playing Russian roulette with our kids that's all, Liberals don't mind though since it's showing such a loving concern for humanity oh and esp. if they are illegals. You know those ones that have been deported six times for sex offenses already.


Well of course. If California does not drastically cut prison time for these creeps, their jails will be overrun with them! And the state cannot afford to pay for all of that. Oddly enough, 2/3rds of the politicians in California are guilty of something, from tax evasion to something else and how many of them have been arrested and prosecuted in jail? I bet ZERO.
. California sounds like the place criminals will be flocking to before it's all said and done. Maybe the criminals will over run Californias borders like the Mexican's are over running the whole of the southern border. I bet they'd say they could afford that if it were Mexican's over running them. Oh wait.
 
California must consider earlier parole for potentially thousands of sex offenders, maybe even those convicted of pimping children, a state judge said Friday.
CA must consider earlier parole for sex offenders, judge says



Nothing to see here folks, we are just playing Russian roulette with our kids that's all, Liberals don't mind though since it's showing such a loving concern for humanity oh and esp. if they are illegals. You know those ones that have been deported six times for sex offenses already.
That is not the basis of the lawsuit.

so
 
I'm now convinced that liberals are pedophile-voyeurs; they get off on the idea of someone fucking children. It also explains why they're so madly protective of the pedophile-founded, pedophile-doctrine, child-bride pedo orgy, Islam.
 
California must consider earlier parole for potentially thousands of sex offenders, maybe even those convicted of pimping children, a state judge said Friday.
CA must consider earlier parole for sex offenders, judge says



Nothing to see here folks, we are just playing Russian roulette with our kids that's all, Liberals don't mind though since it's sowing such a loving concern for humanity oh and esp. if they are illegals. You know those ones that have been deported six times for sex offenses already.
Registered sex offenders in the US include people convicted of nonviolent crimes such as solicitation, public urination, streaking, and consensual sex with teenagers (even teenagers they subsequently marry). 9 out of 10 sex offenders are no danger to the community. What we need to do is find the one in 10 that is a danger and keep them locked up.
This is very very true. I personally know of one such case where a man urinated in an alley that led to a courtyard which had a school situated on one side. However, because he 'exposed' himself within 1000 feet of a school the DA wanted to prosecute him under a sex offense statute.
There was no way that any student could have possibly seen him from his position. His saving grace; he was completely alone (sec cam), urinating at 2 a.m. on a Saturday morning. His attorney was able to successfully argue the timing and position of his client as such. However, if he would have been convicted, he would have had to register as a sex offender in every jurisdiction which he lived...for pissing in an alley at 2 a.m.
Gentlemen...use a toilet. DA's dont give a rat's ass about anything but their conviction rate. You are just another notch on their hammer.
The problem is we classify sex offenders not based on the actual crime and the circumstances of the crime but sections of state law being violated. Although there are national guidelines, whether a person has to register as a sex offender really depends on the state where the offense occurred. Once on the list, you generally stay on it. Nonviolent offenders are on list for 10+ years and if any violence is involved it's for life.
 
Sacramento County Superior Court Judge Allen Sumner on Friday said California must consider early parole for thousands of sex offenders, the Associated Press reported.

About the Lawsuit

Janice Bellucci, a Sacramento attorney and president of Alliance for Constitutional Sex Offense Laws, was the one who filed the lawsuit on behalf of sex offenders. According to Bellucci, the rules the CDCR were putting in place directly conflicted "with the ballot measure's language and voter's intent in approving Proposition 57."

From the Associated Press:

Bellucci argued the measure requires earlier parole consideration for any sex crime not on the state's narrow list of 23 violent felonies, which includes murder, kidnapping and forcible rape.

That could allow earlier parole for those convicted of raping a drugged or unconscious victim, intimately touching someone who is unlawfully restrained, incest, pimping a minor, indecent exposure and possessing child pornography.

The judge said corrections officials can make the case for excluding those offenders as they rewrite the regulations, but Bellucci said she will sue again if officials go too far.

According to a press release on the group's website, Bellucci's focus is primarily on how the term "non-violent felony" is defined:

The focus of the pending lawsuit is how the term “non-violent felony” is to be defined. Although Prop. 57 does not include a definition of “non-violent felony”, petitioners argued that current state law which defines “violent felony” should be used in CDCR’s regulations. If CDCR used that law (Penal Code Section 667.5), only 9 out of more than 100 sex offenses would be excluded from early parole consideration. The judge did not agree with this argument because he said there is insufficient evidence to identify the voters’ intent regarding use of that current law.

Judge's Ruling May Give Roughly 20,000 Sex Offenders Early Parole
 
I'm now convinced that liberals are pedophile-voyeurs; they get off on the idea of someone fucking children. It also explains why they're so madly protective of the pedophile-founded, pedophile-doctrine, child-bride pedo orgy, Islam.

You mean like Trump? It's well documented that he walked in on underage beauty contestants as they dressed. He thought it was a fun thing to do. You mean pedophile-voyeurs like him?
 
They will legalize pedophilia people just don't pay attention nor can they decode what's right in front of them..

upload_2018-2-11_22-8-11.png


Pa. mayor defends fire company's choice of sex offender as chief
 

Forum List

Back
Top