California AG: Employers who Cooperate With Federal Immigration Raids Will be Prosecuted

[iceberg]

Under the WTF category, this looney tunes liberal should have his Law License Revoked.

And ICE should arrest him and anyone else who wants to disobey Federal Law.

California AG: Employers who Cooperate With Federal Immigration Raids Will be Prosecuted

WATCH: California AG Threatens To Prosecute Private Citizens Who Help ICE Enforce Laws

YOU ARE GUILTY OF FOLLOWING THE LAW!!!!

this should be an interesting prison dance.

 

[The Original Tree]

The DOJ and ICE needs to put an end to this Sanctuary Shithole shit, PRONTO!

 

[Bleipriester]

And the US soldier is out there to bring rule of law elsewhere. Looks like it is up to the American people to get rid of their traitors and oppressors of their interests.

 

[bodecea]

Under the WTF category, this looney tunes liberal should have his Law License Revoked.

And ICE should arrest him and anyone else who wants to disobey Federal Law.

California AG: Employers who Cooperate With Federal Immigration Raids Will be Prosecuted

WATCH: California AG Threatens To Prosecute Private Citizens Who Help ICE Enforce Laws

Well, he can try....I don't see that kind of thing holding up tho.

 

[iceberg]

The DOJ and ICE needs to put an end to this Sanctuary Shithole shit, PRONTO!

 

[The Original Tree]

Under the WTF category, this looney tunes liberal should have his Law License Revoked.

And ICE should arrest him and anyone else who wants to disobey Federal Law.

California AG: Employers who Cooperate With Federal Immigration Raids Will be Prosecuted

WATCH: California AG Threatens To Prosecute Private Citizens Who Help ICE Enforce Laws

YOU ARE GUILTY OF FOLLOWING THE LAW!!!!

this should be an interesting prison dance.

I can see in California in the future a bunch of Judge Dredd or Robo Cop Characters running around and passing sentence on people for following Federal Law!

 

[OKTexas]

It's time to cut off all law enforcement aid to CA and just bankrupt that shit hole.


.

 

[OnePercenter]

Looks like the California AG is telling employers to follow the law.

Authored by San Francisco Democratic Assemblyman David Chiu, the bill:

▪ Requires employers to ask immigration agents for a warrant before granting access to a worksite.

▪ Prevents employers from voluntarily sharing confidential employee information without a subpoena.

▪ Requires employers to notify their workers before a federal audit of employee records.

▪ Gives the attorney general and labor commissioner exclusive authority to enforce new provisions of state labor laws.

▪ Prohibits employers from re-verifying information on employment verification forms, unless compelled to by federal law.

‘We will prosecute’ employers who help immigration sweeps, California AG says

 

[Preacher]

WATCH: Following Federal Immigration Law? You Just Became a Criminal in California...

Wow...talk about gestapo like tactics. Yall voted for these whack jobs!

 

[WillMunny]

The leftist maggots who run this state are pure human evil....absolutely PURE! Diseased, self-hating-American traitors who have the nerve to insult American citizens who don't like to be taxed to death to give essentially an informal invading army a free ride. For them, all other considerations can go to hell, it's like the only thing that even exists to these monsters are the illegal Mexicans. I hope someone sues for this.

 

[Norman]

Meanwhile the criminals go free.

It's the democrat model.

 

[protectionist]

Law is a quite interesting thing. It has clear black & white areas, but often, it has many shades of gray too, which get cleared up in court cases. For those of us who have fought cases in the courtroom, we know well how unclear laws can be, and how subjective they can be in the minds of cops, prosecutors, defense attorneys and judges.

California's attorney General Xavier Beccera has decided to push the limits regarding immigration law, and how business may deal with illegal aliens and federal officials looking to arrest them. Under a new California law – the Immigration Worker Protection Act – employers and businesses could face fines of up to $10,000 if they provide employee information to U.S. Immigration Customs, Becerra said.

If employers “start giving up information about their employees or access to their employees in ways that contradict our new California laws, they subject themselves to actions by my office. We will prosecute those who violate the law,” he said at a news conference

Problem here could be a big one for the AG, as well as the governor, and all those legislators who made this law. They could all be in violation of federal law >> US Code 8, Section 1324, and could be arrested for harboring illegal aliens. The jist would be if what they have done meets the definition of "harboring". How one defines it probably depends on how favorable or unfavorable they look upon illegal immigration, generally.

Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and abetting any of the preceding acts.

In any case, this would be another one of those gray areas of jurisprudence, which can become better focused and standardized after court actions. But the question of the OP is whether Becerra and his colleagues who do appear to be harboring illegal aliens are in violation of US Code 8 Section 1324, or not.

1907. Title 8, U.S.C. 1324(a) Offenses | USAM | Department of Justice

Here is the federal law's definition of "Harboring" >>

Harboring -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation.

Since this California law could also easily be seen as encouraging people to come to the US illegally, the US Code 8, Section 1324 definition of "Encouraging" could also come into play >>

Encouraging/Inducing -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an offense for any person who -- encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Law is a quite interesting thing. It has clear black & white areas, but often, it has many shades of gray too, which get cleared up in court cases. For those of us who have fought cases in the courtroom, we know well how unclear laws can be, and how subjective they can be in the minds of cops, prosecutors, defense attorneys and judges.

California's attorney General Xavier Beccera has decided to push the limits regarding immigration law, and how business may deal with illegal aliens and federal officials looking to arrest them. Under a new California law – the Immigration Worker Protection Act – employers and businesses could face fines of up to $10,000 if they provide employee information to U.S. Immigration Customs, Becerra said.

If employers “start giving up information about their employees or access to their employees in ways that contradict our new California laws, they subject themselves to actions by my office. We will prosecute those who violate the law,” he said at a news conference

Problem here could be a big one for the AG, as well as the governor, and all those legislators who made this law. They could all be in violation of federal law >> US Code 8, Section 1324, and could be arrested for harboring illegal aliens. The jist would be if what they have done meets the definition of "harboring". How one defines it probably depends on how favorable or unfavorable they look upon illegal immigration, generally.

Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and abetting any of the preceding acts.

In any case, this would be another one of those gray areas of jurisprudence, which can become better focused and standardized after court actions. But the question of the OP is whether Becerra and his colleagues who do appear to be harboring illegal aliens are in violation of US Code 8 Section 1324, or not.

1907. Title 8, U.S.C. 1324(a) Offenses | USAM | Department of Justice

No...Drawn and quartered, beheaded, shot, hung, or electrocuted, but not arrested...

 

[protectionist]

No...Drawn and quartered, beheaded, shot, hung, or electrocuted, but not arrested...

Don't you want to give him a fair trial ? Maybe he could plead the insanity defense.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Ironically, I heard the head of ICE last night say that if any of the local police in California are in trouble and need assistance he has directed ICE agents to assist in any way they can. He didn't with a personal opinion about the AG of California.

Not only is he ordering the California police to defy the federal government with his stance, he is telling these officers to betray their oath. Some people take oaths, Rule of Law, life, liberty and the American Way quite seriously. He's not out there in a uniform risking his behind, these men are on a daily basis. They should make their own decisions about how important upholding the law is.

 

[jillian]

Law is a quite interesting thing. It has clear black & white areas, but often, it has many shades of gray too, which get cleared up in court cases. For those of us who have fought cases in the courtroom, we know well how unclear laws can be, and how subjective they can be in the minds of cops, prosecutors, defense attorneys and judges.

California's attorney General Xavier Beccera has decided to push the limits regarding immigration law, and how business may deal with illegal aliens and federal officials looking to arrest them. Under a new California law – the Immigration Worker Protection Act – employers and businesses could face fines of up to $10,000 if they provide employee information to U.S. Immigration Customs, Becerra said.

If employers “start giving up information about their employees or access to their employees in ways that contradict our new California laws, they subject themselves to actions by my office. We will prosecute those who violate the law,” he said at a news conference

Problem here could be a big one for the AG, as well as the governor, and all those legislators who made this law. They could all be in violation of federal law >> US Code 8, Section 1324, and could be arrested for harboring illegal aliens. The jist would be if what they have done meets the definition of "harboring". How one defines it probably depends on how favorable or unfavorable they look upon illegal immigration, generally.

Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and abetting any of the preceding acts.

In any case, this would be another one of those gray areas of jurisprudence, which can become better focused and standardized after court actions. But the question of the OP is whether Becerra and his colleagues who do appear to be harboring illegal aliens are in violation of US Code 8 Section 1324, or not.

1907. Title 8, U.S.C. 1324(a) Offenses | USAM | Department of Justice

Here is the federal law's definition of "Harboring" >>

Harboring -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation.

Since this California law could also easily be seen as encouraging people to come to the US illegally, the US Code 8, Section 1324 definition of "Encouraging" could also come into play >>

Encouraging/Inducing -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an offense for any person who -- encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.

you loons are mentally ill. seriously.

 

[Pete7469]

Typical of leftist sociopaths and their hatred of the USA.

 

[protectionist]

you loons are mentally ill. seriously.

1. You mean the whole state of California ? Yeah, that's why Ieft that loon state 29 years ago.

2. If the shoe fits, wear it.

 

[Votto]

If Dims worked as hard for blacks as they do illegals they would all be in the top 1%

 

[bodecea]

Law is a quite interesting thing. It has clear black & white areas, but often, it has many shades of gray too, which get cleared up in court cases. For those of us who have fought cases in the courtroom, we know well how unclear laws can be, and how subjective they can be in the minds of cops, prosecutors, defense attorneys and judges.

California's attorney General Xavier Beccera has decided to push the limits regarding immigration law, and how business may deal with illegal aliens and federal officials looking to arrest them. Under a new California law – the Immigration Worker Protection Act – employers and businesses could face fines of up to $10,000 if they provide employee information to U.S. Immigration Customs, Becerra said.

If employers “start giving up information about their employees or access to their employees in ways that contradict our new California laws, they subject themselves to actions by my office. We will prosecute those who violate the law,” he said at a news conference

Problem here could be a big one for the AG, as well as the governor, and all those legislators who made this law. They could all be in violation of federal law >> US Code 8, Section 1324, and could be arrested for harboring illegal aliens. The jist would be if what they have done meets the definition of "harboring". How one defines it probably depends on how favorable or unfavorable they look upon illegal immigration, generally.

Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and abetting any of the preceding acts.

In any case, this would be another one of those gray areas of jurisprudence, which can become better focused and standardized after court actions. But the question of the OP is whether Becerra and his colleagues who do appear to be harboring illegal aliens are in violation of US Code 8 Section 1324, or not.

1907. Title 8, U.S.C. 1324(a) Offenses | USAM | Department of Justice

Here is the federal law's definition of "Harboring" >>

Harboring -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation.

Since this California law could also easily be seen as encouraging people to come to the US illegally, the US Code 8, Section 1324 definition of "Encouraging" could also come into play >>

Encouraging/Inducing -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an offense for any person who -- encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.

you loons are mentally ill. seriously.

No....just very very very very very very very very very into physical violence....lived vicariously and safely from behind their keyboards.