California ordered to remove 1.5 million voters from the books.

[beautress]

People die and people move and their names stay on the rolls because there is no good system to remove them. This doesn’t mean that illegal votes are being cast like Trump has implied. I’m not seeing what the big deal is here

States across the country are being forced to update their voter rolls............via Legal Action.

It's the State's job to do so....................To keep it honest.

Truth the Vote has also done the same. An org targeted by the IRS under Obama.

Ho hum

That’s fine, the rolls should be cleaned up and closely managed. I’m still not seeing where the stink is here

The problem is every time a State cleans up its rolls and removes names the democrats have a fit and claim voter suppression. It is a FEDERAL law to removes names.

Is that because they think it makes it harder for poor people to vote by making them reregister?

It makes it harder for illegals to cheat when the precinct chairmen in the election has all its voter apples in a row. Makes it really, really hard to cheat when nobody's looking their way.

 

[eagle1462010]

California loses against Judicial Watch and in a settlement agreement is Removing 1.5 million voters from the voter registration due to inactivity.

More details at Judicial Watch.

California Begins Massive Voter Roll Clean-Up – Notifies Up to 1.5 Million ‘Inactive’ Voters as Part of Judicial Watch Lawsuit Settlement - Judicial Watch

Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it has been informed that Los Angeles County has sent notices to as many as 1.5 million inactive voters on its voter rolls. This mailing is a step toward removing the names of voters who have moved, died, or are otherwise ineligible to vote. The massive mailing is the result of a settlement agreement with Judicial Watch requiring the County to remove as many as 1.5 million inactive registrations. In addition, the California secretary of state has alerted other California counties to clean up their voter registration lists to comply with the federal National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), as the secretary promised to do in that same settlement agreement.

All of this is the result of a federal lawsuit Judicial Watch filed in 2017 to force the cleanup of Los Angeles County’s voter rolls (Judicial Watch, Inc., et al. v. Dean C. Logan, et al. (No. 2:17-cv-08948)). Judicial Watch sued on its own behalf and on behalf of Wolfgang Kupka, Rhue Guyant, Jerry Griffin, and Delores M. Mars, who are lawfully registered voters in Los Angeles County. Judicial Watch was joined in this lawsuit by Election Integrity Project California, Inc., a public interest group that has long been involved in monitoring California’s voter rolls.

Under the terms of the settlement agreement, voters who do not respond to the notices sent by the county and who do not vote in the next two federal elections must be removed from the voting rolls. Secretary Padilla also agreed to update the state’s online NVRA manual in order to make clear that ineligible names must be removed and to notify each California county that they are obliged to do this. On April 11, Secretary Padilla notified Judicial Watch that this part of the settlement agreement had been implemented.

Hey idiot. If they are inactive, it means no votes were being cast.

Take them off the rolls.

How many have left the state........

How many have died............

How many live in another district.........

Under the Law passed by Dems............they are REQUIRED TO UPDATE the Voter Rolls..........I have shown the Supreme Court Decision that NOW FORCES IT.

So get off your liberal butts...........and update the dang Voter Registration.........It's the LAW.'

Too bad for you.

 

[beautress]

States across the country are being forced to update their voter rolls............via Legal Action.

It's the State's job to do so....................To keep it honest.

Truth the Vote has also done the same. An org targeted by the IRS under Obama.

Ho hum

That’s fine, the rolls should be cleaned up and closely managed. I’m still not seeing where the stink is here

The problem is every time a State cleans up its rolls and removes names the democrats have a fit and claim voter suppression. It is a FEDERAL law to removes names.

Is that because they think it makes it harder for poor people to vote by making them reregister?

Same Statist line.............lol

Same Pravda................Clean the records so this doesn't happen.

I was asking a question

No, you were trolling for the opportunity to beat up on President Trump. I saw you.

 

[beautress]

States across the country are being forced to update their voter rolls............via Legal Action.

It's the State's job to do so....................To keep it honest.

Truth the Vote has also done the same. An org targeted by the IRS under Obama.

Ho hum

That’s fine, the rolls should be cleaned up and closely managed. I’m still not seeing where the stink is here

The problem is every time a State cleans up its rolls and removes names the democrats have a fit and claim voter suppression. It is a FEDERAL law to removes names.

Is that because they think it makes it harder for poor people to vote by making them reregister?

No it is required to keep the rolls accurate and remove inactive voters to avoid fraud and problems.

What kind of fraud is it avoiding? And how is it avoiding it?

Oh, please. all you've done today is say >>>

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

California loses against Judicial Watch and in a settlement agreement is Removing 1.5 million voters from the voter registration due to inactivity.

More details at Judicial Watch.

California Begins Massive Voter Roll Clean-Up – Notifies Up to 1.5 Million ‘Inactive’ Voters as Part of Judicial Watch Lawsuit Settlement - Judicial Watch

Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it has been informed that Los Angeles County has sent notices to as many as 1.5 million inactive voters on its voter rolls. This mailing is a step toward removing the names of voters who have moved, died, or are otherwise ineligible to vote. The massive mailing is the result of a settlement agreement with Judicial Watch requiring the County to remove as many as 1.5 million inactive registrations. In addition, the California secretary of state has alerted other California counties to clean up their voter registration lists to comply with the federal National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), as the secretary promised to do in that same settlement agreement.

All of this is the result of a federal lawsuit Judicial Watch filed in 2017 to force the cleanup of Los Angeles County’s voter rolls (Judicial Watch, Inc., et al. v. Dean C. Logan, et al. (No. 2:17-cv-08948)). Judicial Watch sued on its own behalf and on behalf of Wolfgang Kupka, Rhue Guyant, Jerry Griffin, and Delores M. Mars, who are lawfully registered voters in Los Angeles County. Judicial Watch was joined in this lawsuit by Election Integrity Project California, Inc., a public interest group that has long been involved in monitoring California’s voter rolls.

Under the terms of the settlement agreement, voters who do not respond to the notices sent by the county and who do not vote in the next two federal elections must be removed from the voting rolls. Secretary Padilla also agreed to update the state’s online NVRA manual in order to make clear that ineligible names must be removed and to notify each California county that they are obliged to do this. On April 11, Secretary Padilla notified Judicial Watch that this part of the settlement agreement had been implemented.

Hey idiot. If they are inactive, it means no votes were being cast.

Yeah, go read the rest of the thread, bud.

.

 

[Slade3200]

Here is the honest and objective analysis... it’s very simple. We have a Right leaning Supreme Court right now. If they ruled against Trump on this census business then it was obviously unconstitutional. I really don’t see how you can argue otherwise. If you want the law changed then congress will need to change it.

They refused it do to wording on the question. Which can be re written and challenged again.

Again.......The Census determines the number of Reps in Congress........and illegals shouldn't be counted towards that total.

Well I guess that’s the debate. They aren’t voting for the Reps so the question really is, should they be counted as part of the population... they are people who are living here so technically they are populating our cities

They shouldn't be voting for anyone. They shouldn't be here in the first place. Therefore, they should not require government representation. They are populating our CITIES illegally. Of course the Dems want them represented. The biggest schism in our political profile is actually urban vs. rural. Gotta have those illegals, populating the CITIES, authorized to vote in order to overcome urban voices.
They are not officially here and therefore should not have any official representation. Send them back to the shitholes they crawled from. Let them make their own countries great again.

They aren’t voting, that’s the point

They aren't even here, officially. So why the push to provide them representation? So, assuming they aren't voting, let's legitimize their occupation in order to increase the number of representatives from that district. Let's deprive rural AMERICANS their political voice in favor of a bunch of criminal invaders who prefer congregating in urban areas. Why is asking whether they are citizens or legal residents such a bad thing?

All good points and good questions. Are the district reps there to represent all the people living in their area? All citizens living in their area. Or all registered voters living in an area? Any idea what the law says about that?

 

[beautress]

Unless they cut the 4 million beaners here illegally, this is a net gain for tardentia.

4 million?
Shit, we had 4 million wetbacks here 20 years ago...we have 10 million cockroaches at minimum nowadays. In many cities and communities here you couldn’t throw a rock in any direction without hitting a wetbback in the head. The place is disgusting and crawling with subhuman brown cockroaches.

We've been getting over a million a year for over 2 decades............

They are just Lying...............What the left is BEST AT ANYWAYS..............They know it no matter how they post and scream injustice.

They are LIARS................says all I need to know about them.

Let's be fair.

A bunch of GOP asswipes are also for unmitigated illegal invasion.

.

Not those of us who honor what President Trump has tried to do--resolve the border problem and restore the laws and protocols of immigration to include people from all 192 countries who have people petitioning for immigrating here. The neighbors are pawning off their prison population on the USA, and President Trump has said nothing doing, taken steps to stop the insanity against a Congress so hateful its members like Maxine Waters sick their dogs on anyone who works for the White House. They don't give a damn that the Constitution says leave the other branches of government alone. They're in it fist over fist, abrogating their respect for Constitutional law and protocols. And the American public has had enough of this Sociocommunisitc Democrat madness.

 

[eagle1462010]

More info how this all started.

Did Ballot-Harvesting By Illegals Flip Seats To Dems? | Investor's Business Daily

Ballot-Harvesting In Orange County
According to the San Diego Tribune, Fred Whitaker, the chairman of the Republican Party in Orange County, told supporters that GOP losses in the county were the "direct result of ballot harvesting allowed under California law for the first time."

It gets worse from there. In California, at least, it's possible that at least some of the ballots harvested by Dreamers were from people who were themselves ineligible to vote.

That's in part because for decades California wasn't clearing out its voter database of inactive voters.

In fact, it took a lawsuit by Judicial Watch to get the state and Los Angeles County to start removing 1.5 million inactive names from the registration list that could be invalid, as required by the National Voter Registration Act.

Judicial Watch found that the state has more registered voters than it does possible voters. Los Angeles County, it found, "has a registration rate of 112% of its adult citizen population."

Forcing California to purge its registration list of deadbeat voters will, Judicial Watch says, "help ensure cleaner elections."


Is it any wonder that Democrats are now refusing to support even the rudimentary step of securing the southern border? As California has shown, an army of noncitizens can help sway elections. And keeping the border open will only bring in more.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

They refused it do to wording on the question. Which can be re written and challenged again.

Again.......The Census determines the number of Reps in Congress........and illegals shouldn't be counted towards that total.

Well I guess that’s the debate. They aren’t voting for the Reps so the question really is, should they be counted as part of the population... they are people who are living here so technically they are populating our cities

They shouldn't be voting for anyone. They shouldn't be here in the first place. Therefore, they should not require government representation. They are populating our CITIES illegally. Of course the Dems want them represented. The biggest schism in our political profile is actually urban vs. rural. Gotta have those illegals, populating the CITIES, authorized to vote in order to overcome urban voices.
They are not officially here and therefore should not have any official representation. Send them back to the shitholes they crawled from. Let them make their own countries great again.

They aren’t voting, that’s the point

They aren't even here, officially. So why the push to provide them representation? So, assuming they aren't voting, let's legitimize their occupation in order to increase the number of representatives from that district. Let's deprive rural AMERICANS their political voice in favor of a bunch of criminal invaders who prefer congregating in urban areas. Why is asking whether they are citizens or legal residents such a bad thing?

All good points and good questions. Are the district reps there to represent all the people living in their area? All citizens living in their area. Or all registered voters living in an area? Any idea what the law says about that?

They represent all the "people" but I think we should distinguish between people here legally and those who are not. It gives incentives to the political class to import warm bodies for the purpose of gaining more power.

Again, nothing could stop Alaska from doing the same with illegal Siberians or Canadians. Florida could roll out the red carpet for the entire Caribbean.

It will not change the political make up of those states, but will grant them a shit ton more power....illegitimately.

People here illegally should not be counted. They should be removed.

Continuing on this path of importing electoral power is a recipe for civil war.
.

 

[Billy000]

California loses against Judicial Watch and in a settlement agreement is Removing 1.5 million voters from the voter registration due to inactivity.

More details at Judicial Watch.

California Begins Massive Voter Roll Clean-Up – Notifies Up to 1.5 Million ‘Inactive’ Voters as Part of Judicial Watch Lawsuit Settlement - Judicial Watch

Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it has been informed that Los Angeles County has sent notices to as many as 1.5 million inactive voters on its voter rolls. This mailing is a step toward removing the names of voters who have moved, died, or are otherwise ineligible to vote. The massive mailing is the result of a settlement agreement with Judicial Watch requiring the County to remove as many as 1.5 million inactive registrations. In addition, the California secretary of state has alerted other California counties to clean up their voter registration lists to comply with the federal National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), as the secretary promised to do in that same settlement agreement.

All of this is the result of a federal lawsuit Judicial Watch filed in 2017 to force the cleanup of Los Angeles County’s voter rolls (Judicial Watch, Inc., et al. v. Dean C. Logan, et al. (No. 2:17-cv-08948)). Judicial Watch sued on its own behalf and on behalf of Wolfgang Kupka, Rhue Guyant, Jerry Griffin, and Delores M. Mars, who are lawfully registered voters in Los Angeles County. Judicial Watch was joined in this lawsuit by Election Integrity Project California, Inc., a public interest group that has long been involved in monitoring California’s voter rolls.

Under the terms of the settlement agreement, voters who do not respond to the notices sent by the county and who do not vote in the next two federal elections must be removed from the voting rolls. Secretary Padilla also agreed to update the state’s online NVRA manual in order to make clear that ineligible names must be removed and to notify each California county that they are obliged to do this. On April 11, Secretary Padilla notified Judicial Watch that this part of the settlement agreement had been implemented.

Hey idiot. If they are inactive, it means no votes were being cast.

Take them off the rolls.

How many have left the state........

How many have died............

How many live in another district.........

Under the Law passed by Dems............they are REQUIRED TO UPDATE the Voter Rolls..........I have shown the Supreme Court Decision that NOW FORCES IT.

So get off your liberal butts...........and update the dang Voter Registration.........It's the LAW.'

Too bad for you.

Lol dude I don’t give a shit these are being taken off. They should be taken off. The only point that matters however is ACTIVE voting fraud.

 

[Slade3200]

People die and people move and their names stay on the rolls because there is no good system to remove them. This doesn’t mean that illegal votes are being cast like Trump has implied. I’m not seeing what the big deal is here

their names stay on the rolls because there is no good system to remove them.
sure there is....as you get returned mail pieces from the PO with explanations of why it wasnt delivered....you update your list...

My father passed away a few years back and the last time I went to my polling station to vote I saw his name on the rolls. I told the person working there that he was no longer with us and asked what I needed to do to get his name off the rolls. Nobody there knew. It was not malicious or fraud or shady, they just didn’t have a clear known system on how to handle it. His name is probably still there

 

[eagle1462010]

California loses against Judicial Watch and in a settlement agreement is Removing 1.5 million voters from the voter registration due to inactivity.

More details at Judicial Watch.

California Begins Massive Voter Roll Clean-Up – Notifies Up to 1.5 Million ‘Inactive’ Voters as Part of Judicial Watch Lawsuit Settlement - Judicial Watch

Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it has been informed that Los Angeles County has sent notices to as many as 1.5 million inactive voters on its voter rolls. This mailing is a step toward removing the names of voters who have moved, died, or are otherwise ineligible to vote. The massive mailing is the result of a settlement agreement with Judicial Watch requiring the County to remove as many as 1.5 million inactive registrations. In addition, the California secretary of state has alerted other California counties to clean up their voter registration lists to comply with the federal National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), as the secretary promised to do in that same settlement agreement.

All of this is the result of a federal lawsuit Judicial Watch filed in 2017 to force the cleanup of Los Angeles County’s voter rolls (Judicial Watch, Inc., et al. v. Dean C. Logan, et al. (No. 2:17-cv-08948)). Judicial Watch sued on its own behalf and on behalf of Wolfgang Kupka, Rhue Guyant, Jerry Griffin, and Delores M. Mars, who are lawfully registered voters in Los Angeles County. Judicial Watch was joined in this lawsuit by Election Integrity Project California, Inc., a public interest group that has long been involved in monitoring California’s voter rolls.

Under the terms of the settlement agreement, voters who do not respond to the notices sent by the county and who do not vote in the next two federal elections must be removed from the voting rolls. Secretary Padilla also agreed to update the state’s online NVRA manual in order to make clear that ineligible names must be removed and to notify each California county that they are obliged to do this. On April 11, Secretary Padilla notified Judicial Watch that this part of the settlement agreement had been implemented.

Hey idiot. If they are inactive, it means no votes were being cast.

Take them off the rolls.

How many have left the state........

How many have died............

How many live in another district.........

Under the Law passed by Dems............they are REQUIRED TO UPDATE the Voter Rolls..........I have shown the Supreme Court Decision that NOW FORCES IT.

So get off your liberal butts...........and update the dang Voter Registration.........It's the LAW.'

Too bad for you.

Lol dude I don’t give a shit these are being taken off. They should be taken off. The only point that matters however is ACTIVE voting fraud.

The Heritage Foundation

 

[Slade3200]

People die and people move and their names stay on the rolls because there is no good system to remove them. This doesn’t mean that illegal votes are being cast like Trump has implied. I’m not seeing what the big deal is here

Keep those blinders double tight, Slade3200. The manure has hit the fan and you want none of it in your eye.

What am I blind to? Please explain...

 

[Billy000]

California loses against Judicial Watch and in a settlement agreement is Removing 1.5 million voters from the voter registration due to inactivity.

More details at Judicial Watch.

California Begins Massive Voter Roll Clean-Up – Notifies Up to 1.5 Million ‘Inactive’ Voters as Part of Judicial Watch Lawsuit Settlement - Judicial Watch

Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it has been informed that Los Angeles County has sent notices to as many as 1.5 million inactive voters on its voter rolls. This mailing is a step toward removing the names of voters who have moved, died, or are otherwise ineligible to vote. The massive mailing is the result of a settlement agreement with Judicial Watch requiring the County to remove as many as 1.5 million inactive registrations. In addition, the California secretary of state has alerted other California counties to clean up their voter registration lists to comply with the federal National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), as the secretary promised to do in that same settlement agreement.

All of this is the result of a federal lawsuit Judicial Watch filed in 2017 to force the cleanup of Los Angeles County’s voter rolls (Judicial Watch, Inc., et al. v. Dean C. Logan, et al. (No. 2:17-cv-08948)). Judicial Watch sued on its own behalf and on behalf of Wolfgang Kupka, Rhue Guyant, Jerry Griffin, and Delores M. Mars, who are lawfully registered voters in Los Angeles County. Judicial Watch was joined in this lawsuit by Election Integrity Project California, Inc., a public interest group that has long been involved in monitoring California’s voter rolls.

Under the terms of the settlement agreement, voters who do not respond to the notices sent by the county and who do not vote in the next two federal elections must be removed from the voting rolls. Secretary Padilla also agreed to update the state’s online NVRA manual in order to make clear that ineligible names must be removed and to notify each California county that they are obliged to do this. On April 11, Secretary Padilla notified Judicial Watch that this part of the settlement agreement had been implemented.

Hey idiot. If they are inactive, it means no votes were being cast.

Take them off the rolls.

How many have left the state........

How many have died............

How many live in another district.........

Under the Law passed by Dems............they are REQUIRED TO UPDATE the Voter Rolls..........I have shown the Supreme Court Decision that NOW FORCES IT.

So get off your liberal butts...........and update the dang Voter Registration.........It's the LAW.'

Too bad for you.

Lol dude I don’t give a shit these are being taken off. They should be taken off. The only point that matters however is ACTIVE voting fraud.

The Heritage Foundation

Dude no one ever said this fraud didn’t happen. The point is that it is RARE and INSIGNIFICANT therefore it isn’t necessary to make reforms. This article said what 1100? I’m guessing that means all through history don’t you think?

 

[eagle1462010]

California loses against Judicial Watch and in a settlement agreement is Removing 1.5 million voters from the voter registration due to inactivity.

More details at Judicial Watch.

California Begins Massive Voter Roll Clean-Up – Notifies Up to 1.5 Million ‘Inactive’ Voters as Part of Judicial Watch Lawsuit Settlement - Judicial Watch

Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it has been informed that Los Angeles County has sent notices to as many as 1.5 million inactive voters on its voter rolls. This mailing is a step toward removing the names of voters who have moved, died, or are otherwise ineligible to vote. The massive mailing is the result of a settlement agreement with Judicial Watch requiring the County to remove as many as 1.5 million inactive registrations. In addition, the California secretary of state has alerted other California counties to clean up their voter registration lists to comply with the federal National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), as the secretary promised to do in that same settlement agreement.

All of this is the result of a federal lawsuit Judicial Watch filed in 2017 to force the cleanup of Los Angeles County’s voter rolls (Judicial Watch, Inc., et al. v. Dean C. Logan, et al. (No. 2:17-cv-08948)). Judicial Watch sued on its own behalf and on behalf of Wolfgang Kupka, Rhue Guyant, Jerry Griffin, and Delores M. Mars, who are lawfully registered voters in Los Angeles County. Judicial Watch was joined in this lawsuit by Election Integrity Project California, Inc., a public interest group that has long been involved in monitoring California’s voter rolls.

Under the terms of the settlement agreement, voters who do not respond to the notices sent by the county and who do not vote in the next two federal elections must be removed from the voting rolls. Secretary Padilla also agreed to update the state’s online NVRA manual in order to make clear that ineligible names must be removed and to notify each California county that they are obliged to do this. On April 11, Secretary Padilla notified Judicial Watch that this part of the settlement agreement had been implemented.

Hey idiot. If they are inactive, it means no votes were being cast.

Take them off the rolls.

How many have left the state........

How many have died............

How many live in another district.........

Under the Law passed by Dems............they are REQUIRED TO UPDATE the Voter Rolls..........I have shown the Supreme Court Decision that NOW FORCES IT.

So get off your liberal butts...........and update the dang Voter Registration.........It's the LAW.'

Too bad for you.

Lol dude I don’t give a shit these are being taken off. They should be taken off. The only point that matters however is ACTIVE voting fraud.

The Heritage Foundation

Dude no one ever said this fraud didn’t happen. The point is that it is RARE and INSIGNIFICANT therefore it isn’t necessary to make reforms. This article said what 1100? I’m guessing that means all through history don’t you think?

9 accused of bribing Skid Row homeless in voter fraud scheme

skid row case Los Angeles.

We could go back to the Rotten Acorn group for some other schemes to rig the election.

A little history of significant voter fraud cases.
Where There's Smoke, There's Fire: 100,000 Stolen Votes in Chicago

 

[Slade3200]

People die and people move and their names stay on the rolls because there is no good system to remove them. This doesn’t mean that illegal votes are being cast like Trump has implied. I’m not seeing what the big deal is here

States across the country are being forced to update their voter rolls............via Legal Action.

It's the State's job to do so....................To keep it honest.

Truth the Vote has also done the same. An org targeted by the IRS under Obama.

Ho hum

That’s fine, the rolls should be cleaned up and closely managed. I’m still not seeing where the stink is here

More blinder obfuscation and this >>>

Sorry but just calling me blind really means nothing. If you have a point to make them make it it... otherwise you can save the childish insults for the playground

 

[Slade3200]

People die and people move and their names stay on the rolls because there is no good system to remove them. This doesn’t mean that illegal votes are being cast like Trump has implied. I’m not seeing what the big deal is here

States across the country are being forced to update their voter rolls............via Legal Action.

It's the State's job to do so....................To keep it honest.

Truth the Vote has also done the same. An org targeted by the IRS under Obama.

Ho hum

That’s fine, the rolls should be cleaned up and closely managed. I’m still not seeing where the stink is here

The problem is every time a State cleans up its rolls and removes names the democrats have a fit and claim voter suppression. It is a FEDERAL law to removes names.

Is that because they think it makes it harder for poor people to vote by making them reregister?

It makes it harder for illegals to cheat when the precinct chairmen in the election has all its voter apples in a row. Makes it really, really hard to cheat when nobody's looking their way.

How exactly do you think illegals are cheating?

 

[Dragonlady]

People die and people move and their names stay on the rolls because there is no good system to remove them. This doesn’t mean that illegal votes are being cast like Trump has implied. I’m not seeing what the big deal is here

States across the country are being forced to update their voter rolls............via Legal Action.

It's the State's job to do so....................To keep it honest.

Truth the Vote has also done the same. An org targeted by the IRS under Obama.

Ho hum

That’s fine, the rolls should be cleaned up and closely managed. I’m still not seeing where the stink is here

The problem is every time a State cleans up its rolls and removes names the democrats have a fit and claim voter suppression. It is a FEDERAL law to removes names.

That’s because the red states, and True the Vote delete names without notification or verification.

Note that California has NOT been ordered to delete any names so your thread title is a lie. They have been ordered to verify the voting roll for inactive voters. The first step is to send notifications to all those people who are listed but not voting and ask them to confirm residency.

What they are NOT doing, is just arbitrarily deleting names from the voting record like red states have done and which gets True the Vote into all sorts of voting rights trouble.

 

[DOTR]

People die and people move and their names stay on the rolls because there is no good system to remove them. This doesn’t mean that illegal votes are being cast like Trump has implied. I’m not seeing what the big deal is here

States across the country are being forced to update their voter rolls............via Legal Action.

It's the State's job to do so....................To keep it honest.

Truth the Vote has also done the same. An org targeted by the IRS under Obama.

Ho hum

That’s fine, the rolls should be cleaned up and closely managed. I’m still not seeing where the stink is here

The stink is they had to be sued to do it.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

What they are NOT doing, is just arbitrarily deleting names from the voting record like red states have done and which gets True the Vote into all sorts of voting rights trouble.

No one is advocating an arbitrary purging. Who would benefit from that?

What red states have arbitrarily deleted names from the voting rolls?

.