California Passes Law Limiting Each Person to 50 Gallons of Water per Day

We are overpopulated. ...



No, we are not.
Sure instead of lowering the population to manageable levels we can engineer another solution like taking salt out of the salt water. Stupid humans. Parasites

What’s too many?

Oh, your three word reply was not convincing or compelling. I’m winning

Lowering the population to manageable levels? WHAT THE HOLY FUCK?

That's the soros globalists dreams. Kill em all.
No you stupid fools. The rich want the markets flooded with low wage workers.

Are you for the poor single women who have four kids and she’s on welfare? So we don’t really need to kill em do we? Those poor women on welfare should only have one mistake not 2-5


You're the one wanting the earth to purge itself.
 
So what do "conservatives" conserve? Apparently it's not water since you can't get your minds around the concept.

Standards will be based on a formula that is made up of three main factors: an allowance of 55 gallons per person per day for indoor water use — dropping to 50 gallons by 2030; a yet-to-be determined amount for residential outdoor use that will vary depending on regional climates; and a standard for water loss due to leak rates in water system pipes.

Easily done with low flow toilets and energy efficient washing machines for inside. Graywater and rainwater collection systems for outside.


Utter bullshit.

You Stalinists seek to impose severe restrictions on the ability of proles to survive, whilst exempting yourselves.

If Kim Jong Brown and his goons seek to try and enforce this (note: Dictator Brown has NOT signed it) then he best dig a hole in WIlliam Land Park to shit in, because if they hypocritical Stalinist exempt themselves and the Oligarch in Silicone Valley, the normals WILL resist using any force necessary.
 
No, we are not.
Sure instead of lowering the population to manageable levels .....


No one asked you, of all people, to manage anything, loser. Typical democrat attitude.
Right and that's why we are overpopulated and trying to figure out how to get salt out of ocean water.

Just because you have your head buried in the sand doesn't mean shit to me bro.

We do not know if today’s population of seven billion is remotely sustainable, or what the limit is

God I hate this saying "It is not the number of people on the planet that is the issue – but the number of consumers and the scale and nature of their consumption," What does that mean? So we don't have too many people we just have too many people consuming too much? Well I know one way to solve that. Less people. Are you going to engineer a way to get people to consume less? Good luck with that bro.

The number of "modern human beings" (Homo sapiens) on Earth has been comparatively small until very recently. Just 10,000 years ago there might have been no more than a few million people on the planet. The one billion mark was not passed until the early 1800s; the two billion mark not until the 1920s.

As it stands now, though, the world's population is over 7.3 billion. According to United Nations predictions it could reach 9.7 billion people by 2050, and over 11 billion by 2100.

You think we will be ok with 11 billion? You're an idiot.

You said the population would eventually go down? How's that gonna happen? Well however it is, it'll be a glorious day because as I've said before, we are overpopulated.

Population growth has been so rapid that there is no real precedent we can turn to for clues about the possible consequences. In other words, while the planet might hold over 11 billion people by the end of the century, our current level of knowledge does not allow us to predict whether such a large population is sustainable, simply because it has never happened before.

Satterthwaite says that most of the growth over the next two decades is predicted to be in urban centres in what are currently low and middle-income countries.

One way to be able to handle all these people is to go Green but dumb ass Republicans like you don't want to so here we are.





We are not overpopulated, and we are not going to be. This has been explained to you before, but you are too stupid and afraid to let go of your false crisis.
You’ve never explained anything Coach.



If you’re too stupid to pay attention, that’s on you.
 
No, we are not.
Sure instead of lowering the population to manageable levels we can engineer another solution like taking salt out of the salt water. Stupid humans. Parasites

What’s too many?

Oh, your three word reply was not convincing or compelling. I’m winning

Lowering the population to manageable levels? WHAT THE HOLY FUCK?

That's the soros globalists dreams. Kill em all.
No you stupid fools. The rich want the markets flooded with low wage workers.

Are you for the poor single women who have four kids and she’s on welfare? So we don’t really need to kill em do we? Those poor women on welfare should only have one mistake not 2-5
The rich want the markets flooded with low wage workers.

That's why Democrats love open borders.
Well that’s why it started on Reagan’s watch.

And why work raids went away on gw bushs watch.

And they called obama the deporter in chief.

We just think a wall is stupid
 
So what do "conservatives" conserve? Apparently it's not water since you can't get your minds around the concept.

Standards will be based on a formula that is made up of three main factors: an allowance of 55 gallons per person per day for indoor water use — dropping to 50 gallons by 2030; a yet-to-be determined amount for residential outdoor use that will vary depending on regional climates; and a standard for water loss due to leak rates in water system pipes.

Easily done with low flow toilets and energy efficient washing machines for inside. Graywater and rainwater collection systems for outside.


Utter bullshit.

You Stalinists seek to impose severe restrictions on the ability of proles to survive, whilst exempting yourselves.

If Kim Jong Brown and his goons seek to try and enforce this (note: Dictator Brown has NOT signed it) then he best dig a hole in WIlliam Land Park to shit in, because if they hypocritical Stalinist exempt themselves and the Oligarch in Silicone Valley, the normals WILL resist using any force necessary.
I stopped reading after Stalinist. You wasted your time House slave
 
Sure instead of lowering the population to manageable levels we can engineer another solution like taking salt out of the salt water. Stupid humans. Parasites

What’s too many?

Oh, your three word reply was not convincing or compelling. I’m winning

Lowering the population to manageable levels? WHAT THE HOLY FUCK?

That's the soros globalists dreams. Kill em all.
No you stupid fools. The rich want the markets flooded with low wage workers.

Are you for the poor single women who have four kids and she’s on welfare? So we don’t really need to kill em do we? Those poor women on welfare should only have one mistake not 2-5
The rich want the markets flooded with low wage workers.

That's why Democrats love open borders.
Well that’s why it started on Reagan’s watch.

And why work raids went away on gw bushs watch.

And they called obama the reporter in chief.

We just think a wall is stupid
That why Obama built a wall around his home, they're stupid?

Terrorism dropped 98% when Israel built their wall.
 
No, we are not.
Sure instead of lowering the population to manageable levels we can engineer another solution like taking salt out of the salt water. Stupid humans. Parasites

What’s too many?

Oh, your three word reply was not convincing or compelling. I’m winning

Lowering the population to manageable levels? WHAT THE HOLY FUCK?

That's the soros globalists dreams. Kill em all.
No you stupid fools. The rich want the markets flooded with low wage workers.

Are you for the poor single women who have four kids and she’s on welfare? So we don’t really need to kill em do we? Those poor women on welfare should only have one mistake not 2-5


You're the one wanting the earth to purge itself.
1. Are you a republican?

2. Do you believe in giving all the poor mothers in America welfare/foodstamps? I’m going to assume no so

3. Do you wish in the future all poor women on welfare with one child would stop at one? Even if by abstinence?

So we agree.
 
Lowering the population to manageable levels? WHAT THE HOLY FUCK?

That's the soros globalists dreams. Kill em all.
No you stupid fools. The rich want the markets flooded with low wage workers.

Are you for the poor single women who have four kids and she’s on welfare? So we don’t really need to kill em do we? Those poor women on welfare should only have one mistake not 2-5
The rich want the markets flooded with low wage workers.

That's why Democrats love open borders.
Well that’s why it started on Reagan’s watch.

And why work raids went away on gw bushs watch.

And they called obama the reporter in chief.

We just think a wall is stupid
That why Obama built a wall around his home, they're stupid?

Terrorism dropped 98% when Israel built their wall.
There are better easier cheaper solutions.

Where do our soldiers go through basic training? Why not move that to our southern border?
 
That's the soros globalists dreams. Kill em all.
No you stupid fools. The rich want the markets flooded with low wage workers.

Are you for the poor single women who have four kids and she’s on welfare? So we don’t really need to kill em do we? Those poor women on welfare should only have one mistake not 2-5
The rich want the markets flooded with low wage workers.

That's why Democrats love open borders.
Well that’s why it started on Reagan’s watch.

And why work raids went away on gw bushs watch.

And they called obama the reporter in chief.

We just think a wall is stupid
That why Obama built a wall around his home, they're stupid?

Terrorism dropped 98% when Israel built their wall.
There are better easier cheaper solutions.

Where do our soldiers go through basic training? Why not move that to our southern border?
That's funny. A leftist pretending to be concerned about government spending.

Troops on the border can change every election. The wall is permanent.
 
No you stupid fools. The rich want the markets flooded with low wage workers.

Are you for the poor single women who have four kids and she’s on welfare? So we don’t really need to kill em do we? Those poor women on welfare should only have one mistake not 2-5
The rich want the markets flooded with low wage workers.

That's why Democrats love open borders.
Well that’s why it started on Reagan’s watch.

And why work raids went away on gw bushs watch.

And they called obama the reporter in chief.

We just think a wall is stupid
That why Obama built a wall around his home, they're stupid?

Terrorism dropped 98% when Israel built their wall.
There are better easier cheaper solutions.

Where do our soldiers go through basic training? Why not move that to our southern border?
That's funny. A leftist pretending to be concerned about government spending.

Troops on the border can change every election. The wall is permanent.
Wall is ridiculous if not guarded.

No reason to stop training on the southern border. Fuck Fort Knox or all the other places we train the military, move those to the southern border.
 
California politicians watch millions of gallons of rain water wash down hill into the ocean every year and never propose a way to retain some of that...water has become a political weapon in this one party ruled state....they don't want more water they want the power that comes from a lack of water....
They sure as hell aren’t building any dams to save some water for when they need it.

Allright there sportcheck, where exactly do you propose building these dams to save water for when they need it?


The Sacramento Delta, Auburn, Placerville, Coloma, on down the American and along the Sacramento.

Why do you ask?

How about rational damns along the San Gabriel and Santa Anna? Prado works , but the Santa Ana is a long river.
 
No you stupid fools. The rich want the markets flooded with low wage workers.

Are you for the poor single women who have four kids and she’s on welfare? So we don’t really need to kill em do we? Those poor women on welfare should only have one mistake not 2-5
The rich want the markets flooded with low wage workers.

That's why Democrats love open borders.
Well that’s why it started on Reagan’s watch.

And why work raids went away on gw bushs watch.

And they called obama the reporter in chief.

We just think a wall is stupid
That why Obama built a wall around his home, they're stupid?

Terrorism dropped 98% when Israel built their wall.
There are better easier cheaper solutions.

Where do our soldiers go through basic training? Why not move that to our southern border?
That's funny. A leftist pretending to be concerned about government spending.

Troops on the border can change every election. The wall is permanent.
Funny a righty who’s suddenly not interested in debt.

Is this a stimulus? Who gets the contract a trump company fosho
 
That's why Democrats love open borders.
Well that’s why it started on Reagan’s watch.

And why work raids went away on gw bushs watch.

And they called obama the reporter in chief.

We just think a wall is stupid
That why Obama built a wall around his home, they're stupid?

Terrorism dropped 98% when Israel built their wall.
There are better easier cheaper solutions.

Where do our soldiers go through basic training? Why not move that to our southern border?
That's funny. A leftist pretending to be concerned about government spending.

Troops on the border can change every election. The wall is permanent.
Funny a righty who’s suddenly not interested in debt.

Is this a stimulus? Who gets the contract a trump company fosho
What was the finial cost of 9-11-01?

Worth the investment.
 
California politicians watch millions of gallons of rain water wash down hill into the ocean every year and never propose a way to retain some of that...water has become a political weapon in this one party ruled state....they don't want more water they want the power that comes from a lack of water....
They sure as hell aren’t building any dams to save some water for when they need it.

Allright there sportcheck, where exactly do you propose building these dams to save water for when they need it?


The Sacramento Delta, Auburn, Placerville, Coloma, on down the American and along the Sacramento.

Why do you ask?

How about rational damns along the San Gabriel and Santa Anna? Prado works , but the Santa Ana is a long river.
He thinks California is flat like Florida.
 
Too many people want to live in California. Not enough water.

They should have been building desalination plants on the coast 30 years ago.
From what I hear that’s still too expensive. They should be working on it, though.

They do it in the Middle East. I agree, it's probably expensive, but what in California isn't? It's cost of living there. SoCal is the primary consumer of water from Lake Mead here in Nevada and it's going to screw all of us in the southwest if they don't do something.
Well..there is that small town in the desert..you know..Las Vegas? they use a bit of water too.

Yes, California has too many people..hopefully these restriction will send a coupla million of them inland. hmmm...that would make for some interesting political changes, eh?
 
Too many people want to live in California. Not enough water.

They should have been building desalination plants on the coast 30 years ago.
From what I hear that’s still too expensive. They should be working on it, though.

They do it in the Middle East. I agree, it's probably expensive, but what in California isn't? It's cost of living there. SoCal is the primary consumer of water from Lake Mead here in Nevada and it's going to screw all of us in the southwest if they don't do something.
Well..there is that small town in the desert..you know..Las Vegas? they use a bit of water too.

Yes, California has too many people..hopefully these restriction will send a coupla million of them inland. hmmm...that would make for some interesting political changes, eh?

I thought this thread was unscientific and I am wrong again. California needs a contingency plan for the water crisis. Putting band aids on it will give the flower people a false sense of security. California should invade Oregon and steal their water.
 
8 minute shower - 17 gallons
1 load of laundry- 40 gallons

The left have a train to nowhere to build, no time for water infrastructure.

New California Law Limits How Much Water People Can Use


Yep it's a mess in California, it has been for years. They should have built more reseviors when they had the opportunity. But I don't think it takes 40 gallons of water to do one load of laundry. If you think about it, do you personally use 50 gallons of water a day? So a family of 4 would be 200 gallons a day, which seems more than sufficient.

No watering lawns though.
 
Well that’s why it started on Reagan’s watch.

And why work raids went away on gw bushs watch.

And they called obama the reporter in chief.

We just think a wall is stupid
That why Obama built a wall around his home, they're stupid?

Terrorism dropped 98% when Israel built their wall.
There are better easier cheaper solutions.

Where do our soldiers go through basic training? Why not move that to our southern border?
That's funny. A leftist pretending to be concerned about government spending.

Troops on the border can change every election. The wall is permanent.
Funny a righty who’s suddenly not interested in debt.

Is this a stimulus? Who gets the contract a trump company fosho
What was the finial cost of 9-11-01?

Worth the investment.
They didn’t sneak across the Mexican border
 

Forum List

Back
Top