Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here's liberal "logical" for you
" I can punish you for not serving a gay, you can't punish me for murdering an unborn child"
You dumb fucks really need to do the world a favor and just kill yourselves.
Apple meet screwdriver
He probably finds it deeply unfair, that abortions are only provided for women.I think the "will catholic hospitals be required to perform abortions" concept pretty much is the harbinger for how this AZ lawsuit will turn out.After all, women have a right to an abortion. (an action, not an inborn trait). Men "have the right" to marry men.... (an action, not an inborn trait)
Is anyone forced to perform abortions?
And these rules cannot be derived from "law" that sets one set of behaviors (homosexuality) above another (polyamory/polygamy). All or none may access those protections. So, as I said, if your cult doesn't want it's legal gains to unravel before your eyes, you'd better start stumping and stumping hard for polygamists to have the same rights. Otherwise adios.
Using this moronic logic, the behaviors of heterosexuality not do have a right to marriage as well. Remember: All or none may access those protections according to your standards. Something tells me you have a nice self-serving exemption for those behaviors, though.
Bingo , no one has a right to a government sanctioned marriage. A state could just throw up their hands and say "we're not issuing marriage licenses anymore (and who gave the government the authority to do so anyway) and there is nothing anyone can do about it. But , if the government DOES offer a service, they must offer it to all.
And what level of protection would that be, PA laws apply to all those still breathing?As an individual, you are free to hate anyone you wish
Nobody can force you to invite someone you don't like into your home. Nobody can force you to have blacks or gays to dinner.
But once you open a business, your business is subject to the rules of your community and the Constitution. These rules include what you must pay your workers, business hours, building codes, public safety and public accommodation
If you do not like the rules being applied to your business, you are free to seek another occupation
Please explain the "logic" you use to determine that the government can force me to allow people into my business, but not my home.
There is none. It's just a wedge created by the broad interpretation of the Commerce Clause. If and when they find a similar wedge into our homes, it will be used.
Of course there is none. Not only that, as I've explained , the idiots don't even understand that they PA laws are in violation of the 14th Amendment b/c they don't give equal protection to all Americans.
Who, is not covered?
The states won't. Civil marriage is not going to disappear, and since that's the case, same sex marriage retains the right of equal protection under civil marriage laws.
He probably finds it deeply unfair, that abortions are only provided for women.I think the "will catholic hospitals be required to perform abortions" concept pretty much is the harbinger for how this AZ lawsuit will turn out.
Is anyone forced to perform abortions?
And these rules cannot be derived from "law" that sets one set of behaviors (homosexuality) above another (polyamory/polygamy). All or none may access those protections. So, as I said, if your cult doesn't want it's legal gains to unravel before your eyes, you'd better start stumping and stumping hard for polygamists to have the same rights. Otherwise adios.
Using this moronic logic, the behaviors of heterosexuality not do have a right to marriage as well. Remember: All or none may access those protections according to your standards. Something tells me you have a nice self-serving exemption for those behaviors, though.
Bingo , no one has a right to a government sanctioned marriage. A state could just throw up their hands and say "we're not issuing marriage licenses anymore (and who gave the government the authority to do so anyway) and there is nothing anyone can do about it. But , if the government DOES offer a service, they must offer it to all.
Here's liberal "logical" for you
" I can punish you for not serving a gay, you can't punish me for murdering an unborn child"
You dumb fucks really need to do the world a favor and just kill yourselves.
Apple meet screwdriver
Only b/c you are patently stupid and dishonest.
The point remains however. You stupid authoritarians on the left and the right ALWAYS want to use the government behaviors that you approve of and scream bloody murder when the "other side" does the same.
Two = same race, now any race.Simple....your rights to freedom of association do not apply to your business
We don't serve negroes here...is no longer allowed
Negroes = race. Gay behaviors = behaviors. That is a legal problem for you. Work it out soon or your gains will unravel. BTW, when are you going to start stumping for polygamists to marry? If man/woman is "unfair", so is "two"... Check the 14th for details...
The states won't. Civil marriage is not going to disappear, and since that's the case, same sex marriage retains the right of equal protection under civil marriage laws.
...while polygamy does not....
You'd better get to work on that one...and fast... Don't let the two gals in AZ beat you to it.
The states won't. Civil marriage is not going to disappear, and since that's the case, same sex marriage retains the right of equal protection under civil marriage laws.
...while polygamy does not....
You'd better get to work on that one...and fast... Don't let the two gals in AZ beat you to it.
Here's liberal "logical" for you
" I can punish you for not serving a gay, you can't punish me for murdering an unborn child"
You dumb fucks really need to do the world a favor and just kill yourselves.
Apple meet screwdriver
Only b/c you are patently stupid and dishonest.
The point remains however. You stupid authoritarians on the left and the right ALWAYS want to use the government behaviors that you approve of and scream bloody murder when the "other side" does the same.
The same can be said of stupid authoritarians on the right. To wit: I heard very little complaining about religion being granted protected class status, with all the privileges that grants via PA laws. But when we try to add sexual orientation, they're all up in arms about it. Precious few people make the effort to see things from both sides.
Simple....your rights to freedom of association do not apply to your business
We don't serve negroes here...is no longer allowed
Negroes = race. Gay behaviors = behaviors. That is a legal problem for you. Work it out soon or your gains will unravel. BTW, when are you going to start stumping for polygamists to marry? If man/woman is "unfair", so is "two"... Check the 14th for details...
Simple....your rights to freedom of association do not apply to your business
We don't serve negroes here...is no longer allowed
Negroes = race. Gay behaviors = behaviors. That is a legal problem for you. Work it out soon or your gains will unravel. BTW, when are you going to start stumping for polygamists to marry? If man/woman is "unfair", so is "two"... Check the 14th for details...
Two = same race, now any race.
Two = same religion, now any religion
Two = opposite sex, now same sex
Two = unrelated, soon related
Two = just two, soon three or more
We aren't going backwards, we're going forwards.
The states won't. Civil marriage is not going to disappear, and since that's the case, same sex marriage retains the right of equal protection under civil marriage laws.
...while polygamy does not....
You'd better get to work on that one...and fast... Don't let the two gals in AZ beat you to it.
Polygamy is a good example
Polygamy was an accepted practice of the Mormon Church. The "Government" forced them to abandon the practice.
Isn't that the Government FORCING you to go against your religion?
If the Court ruled that polygamy was sufficiently similar to monogamy to make them equal under the law, then polygamy would be a right equal to monogamy.
Name one, just one, that has?And what level of protection would that be, PA laws apply to all those still breathing?As an individual, you are free to hate anyone you wish
Nobody can force you to invite someone you don't like into your home. Nobody can force you to have blacks or gays to dinner.
But once you open a business, your business is subject to the rules of your community and the Constitution. These rules include what you must pay your workers, business hours, building codes, public safety and public accommodation
If you do not like the rules being applied to your business, you are free to seek another occupation
Please explain the "logic" you use to determine that the government can force me to allow people into my business, but not my home.
There is none. It's just a wedge created by the broad interpretation of the Commerce Clause. If and when they find a similar wedge into our homes, it will be used.
Of course there is none. Not only that, as I've explained , the idiots don't even understand that they PA laws are in violation of the 14th Amendment b/c they don't give equal protection to all Americans.
Who, is not covered?
Who's not covered? You fucking dolt, there are more classes of people NOT covered than there are covered.
A business can legally discriminate based on hair color, eye color, names, state of origin, and right on down the line.
Simple....your rights to freedom of association do not apply to your business
We don't serve negroes here...is no longer allowed
Negroes = race. Gay behaviors = behaviors. That is a legal problem for you. Work it out soon or your gains will unravel. BTW, when are you going to start stumping for polygamists to marry? If man/woman is "unfair", so is "two"... Check the 14th for details...Two = same race, now any race.
Two = same religion, now any religion
Two = opposite sex, now same sex
Two = unrelated, soon related
Two = just two, soon three or more
We aren't going backwards, we're going forwards.
Um, again, if a mother and father are no longer legally important to children, what makes the number "two" special at all? Either all people may marry or there are exceptions. The number two is less significant than providing both a mother and father. Sexual orientation is sexual orientation. You don't get to pick your favorites.
