Canklegate: The End Of The Clinton Crime Cabal?

[westwall]

He was a door gunner in a LOACH so I doubt it. He was 1st of the 9th, so yeah, he did way more crap than you did. If you were even there. I never mock real service personnel. You though, strike me as a Walter Mitty type. Too many inconsistencies. The fact that you deride me for "mocking" your service, and then engage in that very same behavior with people you have no clue about, tells me a whole bunch about your character...and it ain't good.

And wrapping your BS in patriotism is laughable. It is unpatriotic to burn the flag. It is unpatriotic to support enemies of this country, questioning your service is far from unpatriotic. Especially when there are so many asshats claiming service who never did.

You don't know diddly about "character" or anything else, loser. Claiming you hang out with Viet Vets is comical....none of us have anything to do with leftist pieces of shit like you. What you believe or don't believe means nothing to me or anybody else here...you're a joke.

FYI to readers.... the LOACH was a small, speedy observation and bait bird with little or no use for a door-gunner. It's major role was as a spotter and flying low over the canopy to draw fire so the trailing Cobra could follow on and eliminate the battery....it was replaced by the Kiowa.

He was a door gunner in a LOACH so I doubt it. He was 1st of the 9th, so yeah, he did way more crap than you did. If you were even there. I never mock real service personnel. You though, strike me as a Walter Mitty type. Too many inconsistencies. The fact that you deride me for "mocking" your service, and then engage in that very same behavior with people you have no clue about, tells me a whole bunch about your character...and it ain't good.

And wrapping your BS in patriotism is laughable. It is unpatriotic to burn the flag. It is unpatriotic to support enemies of this country, questioning your service is far from unpatriotic. Especially when there are so many asshats claiming service who never did.[/QUOTE]

You don't know diddly about "character" or anything else, loser. Claiming you hang out with Viet Vets is comical....none of us have anything to do with leftist pieces of shit like you. What you believe or don't believe means nothing to me or anybody else here...you're a joke.

FYI to readers.... the LOACH was a small, speedy observation and bait bird with little or no use for a door-gunner. It's major role was as a spotter and flying low over the canopy to draw fire so the trailing Cobra could follow on and eliminate the battery....it was replaced by the Kiowa.[/QUOTE]






What were those pairings called? As far as door gunners not being necessary, they inflicted more casualties on the enemy than almost any other source. Some claim they did more than the gunships, though I doubt that. They certainly did more than any leg outfit.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Hillary Haldeman will be the candidate because she knows she can count on the masses of left wing democrat Gruberites. Not just sheeple but really dumb sheeple.

The Republican nominee is going to be Jeb Bush, whose policies are 95% indistinguishable from Ms. Clinton's. I wouldn't throw too many rocks if I were you.

Jeb Bush, though not my choice, isn't a combo of Pat Nixon, Richard Nixon, H.R. Haldeman and doesn't belong in prison as Hillary does.

I'm just saying: Ms. Clinton doesn't have the "sheeple" demographic cornered.

Jeb Bush is going to be the GOP nominee; it's a statistical inevitability. In your fevered (ultimately futile) attempts to keep Hillary Clinton out of the White House, Republicans are going to become as pro-Jeb as any human beings can possibly be.

I'm not condemning you for it, but we should acknowledge that Mr. Bush is ostensibly owned by the same interests as Ms. Clinton, and that it really doesn't matter who Americans vote into the White House. That's the stark reality of a plutocratic two-party system.

I'm not that defeatist. Remember she was supposed to win in 2008.

 

[BullKurtz]

What were those pairings called? As far as door gunners not being necessary, they inflicted more casualties on the enemy than almost any other source. Some claim they did more than the gunships, though I doubt that. They certainly did more than any leg outfit.

Again, the LOACH wasn't a gun-ship...adding a door gun just slowed them down...you wouldn't know a LOACH from a Piper Cub, hippie.....take a hike.

 

[westwall]

What were those pairings called? As far as door gunners not being necessary, they inflicted more casualties on the enemy than almost any other source. Some claim they did more than the gunships, though I doubt that. They certainly did more than any leg outfit.

Again, the LOACH wasn't a gun-ship...adding a door gun just slowed them down...you wouldn't know a LOACH from a Piper Cub, hippie.....take a hike.

What were the pairings of the two aircraft called? It's a simple question. And, I never said it was. However, they were far more effective than any of the armor units on the ground.

 

[daws101]

He was a door gunner in a LOACH so I doubt it. He was 1st of the 9th, so yeah, he did way more crap than you did. If you were even there. I never mock real service personnel. You though, strike me as a Walter Mitty type. Too many inconsistencies. The fact that you deride me for "mocking" your service, and then engage in that very same behavior with people you have no clue about, tells me a whole bunch about your character...and it ain't good.

And wrapping your BS in patriotism is laughable. It is unpatriotic to burn the flag. It is unpatriotic to support enemies of this country, questioning your service is far from unpatriotic. Especially when there are so many asshats claiming service who never did.

You don't know diddly about "character" or anything else, loser. Claiming you hang out with Viet Vets is comical....none of us have anything to do with leftist pieces of shit like you. What you believe or don't believe means nothing to me or anybody else here...you're a joke.

FYI to readers.... the LOACH was a small, speedy observation and bait bird with little or no use for a door-gunner. It's major role was as a spotter and flying low over the canopy to draw fire so the trailing Cobra could follow on and eliminate the battery....it was replaced by the Kiowa.

He was a door gunner in a LOACH so I doubt it. He was 1st of the 9th, so yeah, he did way more crap than you did. If you were even there. I never mock real service personnel. You though, strike me as a Walter Mitty type. Too many inconsistencies. The fact that you deride me for "mocking" your service, and then engage in that very same behavior with people you have no clue about, tells me a whole bunch about your character...and it ain't good.

And wrapping your BS in patriotism is laughable. It is unpatriotic to burn the flag. It is unpatriotic to support enemies of this country, questioning your service is far from unpatriotic. Especially when there are so many asshats claiming service who never did.

You don't know diddly about "character" or anything else, loser. Claiming you hang out with Viet Vets is comical....none of us have anything to do with leftist pieces of shit like you. What you believe or don't believe means nothing to me or anybody else here...you're a joke.

FYI to readers.... the LOACH was a small, speedy observation and bait bird with little or no use for a door-gunner. It's major role was as a spotter and flying low over the canopy to draw fire so the trailing Cobra could follow on and eliminate the battery....it was replaced by the Kiowa.[/QUOTE]






What were those pairings called? As far as door gunners not being necessary, they inflicted more casualties on the enemy than almost any other source. Some claim they did more than the gunships, though I doubt that. They certainly did more than any leg outfit.[/QUOTE] I seriously doubt bullshit saw in action at all, if he actually was in Vietnam...well maybe the kind you pay for.

 

[daws101]

Hillary Haldeman will be the candidate because she knows she can count on the masses of left wing democrat Gruberites. Not just sheeple but really dumb sheeple.

The Republican nominee is going to be Jeb Bush, whose policies are 95% indistinguishable from Ms. Clinton's. I wouldn't throw too many rocks if I were you.

Jeb Bush, though not my choice, isn't a combo of Pat Nixon, Richard Nixon, H.R. Haldeman and doesn't belong in prison as Hillary does.

I'm just saying: Ms. Clinton doesn't have the "sheeple" demographic cornered.

Jeb Bush is going to be the GOP nominee; it's a statistical inevitability. In your fevered (ultimately futile) attempts to keep Hillary Clinton out of the White House, Republicans are going to become as pro-Jeb as any human beings can possibly be.

I'm not condemning you for it, but we should acknowledge that Mr. Bush is ostensibly owned by the same interests as Ms. Clinton, and that it really doesn't matter who Americans vote into the White House. That's the stark reality of a plutocratic two-party system.

I'm not that defeatist. Remember she was supposed to win in 2008.

that's just more proof you can't tell the difference between reality and fantasy.

 

[syonidv]

Hillary Haldeman will be the candidate because she knows she can count on the masses of left wing democrat Gruberites. Not just sheeple but really dumb sheeple.

The Republican nominee is going to be Jeb Bush, whose policies are 95% indistinguishable from Ms. Clinton's. I wouldn't throw too many rocks if I were you.

Jeb Bush, though not my choice, isn't a combo of Pat Nixon, Richard Nixon, H.R. Haldeman and doesn't belong in prison as Hillary does.

I'm just saying: Ms. Clinton doesn't have the "sheeple" demographic cornered.

Jeb Bush is going to be the GOP nominee; it's a statistical inevitability. In your fevered (ultimately futile) attempts to keep Hillary Clinton out of the White House, Republicans are going to become as pro-Jeb as any human beings can possibly be.

I'm not condemning you for it, but we should acknowledge that Mr. Bush is ostensibly owned by the same interests as Ms. Clinton, and that it really doesn't matter who Americans vote into the White House. That's the stark reality of a plutocratic two-party system.

I'm not that defeatist. Remember she was supposed to win in 2008.

...and the only reason she didn't is because a hip, young, black, community organizin', hope n' changin', Ivy Leaguin', Nobel prize winnin', Washington outsidin', mania causin' progressive idol rode a crystal unicorn down a rainbow into America's heart and edged her out in the Democratic leadership race.

That's not going to happen this time.

Ask yourself: How are you going to feel when she wins the Democratic party nomination?

How are you going to feel when she wins the 2016 Presidency?

Do you really think you can stand the taunts and the jeers of the USMB Democrats: "Hillary won! You poopy heads! Hillary won! You fart faces! ..." as though the victory is some great feat, when we know now--18 months in advance--that it's a statistical inevitability?

Embrace reality now. It's not pessimism or defeatism, it's realism. Listen to your head, not your heart.

For what it's worth: I'm sorry.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Hillary Haldeman will be the candidate because she knows she can count on the masses of left wing democrat Gruberites. Not just sheeple but really dumb sheeple.

The Republican nominee is going to be Jeb Bush, whose policies are 95% indistinguishable from Ms. Clinton's. I wouldn't throw too many rocks if I were you.

Jeb Bush, though not my choice, isn't a combo of Pat Nixon, Richard Nixon, H.R. Haldeman and doesn't belong in prison as Hillary does.

I'm just saying: Ms. Clinton doesn't have the "sheeple" demographic cornered.

Jeb Bush is going to be the GOP nominee; it's a statistical inevitability. In your fevered (ultimately futile) attempts to keep Hillary Clinton out of the White House, Republicans are going to become as pro-Jeb as any human beings can possibly be.

I'm not condemning you for it, but we should acknowledge that Mr. Bush is ostensibly owned by the same interests as Ms. Clinton, and that it really doesn't matter who Americans vote into the White House. That's the stark reality of a plutocratic two-party system.

I'm not that defeatist. Remember she was supposed to win in 2008.

...and the only reason she didn't is because a hip, young, black, community organizin', hope n' changin', Ivy Leaguin', Nobel prize winnin', Washington outsidin', mania causin' progressive idol rode a crystal unicorn down a rainbow into America's heart and edged her out in the Democratic leadership race.

That's not going to happen this time.

Ask yourself: How are you going to feel when she wins the Democratic party nomination?

How are you going to feel when she wins the 2016 Presidency?

Do you really think you can stand the taunts and the jeers of the USMB Democrats: "Hillary won! You poopy heads! Hillary won! You fart faces! ..." as though the victory is some great feat, when we know now--18 months in advance--that it's a statistical inevitability?

Embrace reality now. It's not pessimism or defeatism, it's realism. Listen to your head, not your heart.

For what it's worth: I'm sorry.

You have a very interesting writing style...

 

[dannyboys]

He was a door gunner in a LOACH so I doubt it. He was 1st of the 9th, so yeah, he did way more crap than you did. If you were even there. I never mock real service personnel. You though, strike me as a Walter Mitty type. Too many inconsistencies. The fact that you deride me for "mocking" your service, and then engage in that very same behavior with people you have no clue about, tells me a whole bunch about your character...and it ain't good.

And wrapping your BS in patriotism is laughable. It is unpatriotic to burn the flag. It is unpatriotic to support enemies of this country, questioning your service is far from unpatriotic. Especially when there are so many asshats claiming service who never did.

You don't know diddly about "character" or anything else, loser. Claiming you hang out with Viet Vets is comical....none of us have anything to do with leftist pieces of shit like you. What you believe or don't believe means nothing to me or anybody else here...you're a joke.

FYI to readers.... the LOACH was a small, speedy observation and bait bird with little or no use for a door-gunner. It's major role was as a spotter and flying low over the canopy to draw fire so the trailing Cobra could follow on and eliminate the battery....it was replaced by the Kiowa.

Agreed. One can literally smell a fucking yellow LIB coward. They shit themselves and puked and fucking deserted when the first mortar round landed a mile away.
I can't stand to be in the same room as them.
And who turns out to be the fucking LIB coward poster-boy for them? Fucking LIB coward poser scumbag Kerry. And who did BOBO the fucking Socialist/Marxist clown put in charge of negotiating with Iran? That's right. Fucking Kerry. The Iranians know all about what a fucking coward Kerry is and they are laughing all the way to where they are busy building the bomb. What a sick sad joke.
We ended up positioning them ten miles from where they could get in the way. And where the regular field combat troops would never see them for fear of 'friendly fire. That's not even how bad it really was.
Imagine a bunch of grown men dressed in women's clothing prancing around in the gay bars in Saigon. !00% of them were fucking cock sucking yellow belly LIBs.

Ever heard the term "Chickenhawk"? Generally means Republicans who want to go to war, but don't want to go themselves. Who do they want to send? I'm guessing - liberals.

I know the LIB pyjama-boys who were drafted and didn't desert were kept away from combat troops. The intake interviews identified them as potential 'pukers'.
Couldn't trust them to not to surrender to the first Vietnamese granny they saw.

 

[daws101]

The Republican nominee is going to be Jeb Bush, whose policies are 95% indistinguishable from Ms. Clinton's. I wouldn't throw too many rocks if I were you.

Jeb Bush, though not my choice, isn't a combo of Pat Nixon, Richard Nixon, H.R. Haldeman and doesn't belong in prison as Hillary does.

I'm just saying: Ms. Clinton doesn't have the "sheeple" demographic cornered.

Jeb Bush is going to be the GOP nominee; it's a statistical inevitability. In your fevered (ultimately futile) attempts to keep Hillary Clinton out of the White House, Republicans are going to become as pro-Jeb as any human beings can possibly be.

I'm not condemning you for it, but we should acknowledge that Mr. Bush is ostensibly owned by the same interests as Ms. Clinton, and that it really doesn't matter who Americans vote into the White House. That's the stark reality of a plutocratic two-party system.

I'm not that defeatist. Remember she was supposed to win in 2008.

...and the only reason she didn't is because a hip, young, black, community organizin', hope n' changin', Ivy Leaguin', Nobel prize winnin', Washington outsidin', mania causin' progressive idol rode a crystal unicorn down a rainbow into America's heart and edged her out in the Democratic leadership race.

That's not going to happen this time.

Ask yourself: How are you going to feel when she wins the Democratic party nomination?

How are you going to feel when she wins the 2016 Presidency?

Do you really think you can stand the taunts and the jeers of the USMB Democrats: "Hillary won! You poopy heads! Hillary won! You fart faces! ..." as though the victory is some great feat, when we know now--18 months in advance--that it's a statistical inevitability?

Embrace reality now. It's not pessimism or defeatism, it's realism. Listen to your head, not your heart.

For what it's worth: I'm sorry.

You have a very interesting writing style...

I think it's called florid

• elaborately or excessively intricate or complicated:

 

[Statistikhengst]

Jeb Bush, though not my choice, isn't a combo of Pat Nixon, Richard Nixon, H.R. Haldeman and doesn't belong in prison as Hillary does.

I'm just saying: Ms. Clinton doesn't have the "sheeple" demographic cornered.

Jeb Bush is going to be the GOP nominee; it's a statistical inevitability. In your fevered (ultimately futile) attempts to keep Hillary Clinton out of the White House, Republicans are going to become as pro-Jeb as any human beings can possibly be.

I'm not condemning you for it, but we should acknowledge that Mr. Bush is ostensibly owned by the same interests as Ms. Clinton, and that it really doesn't matter who Americans vote into the White House. That's the stark reality of a plutocratic two-party system.

I'm not that defeatist. Remember she was supposed to win in 2008.

...and the only reason she didn't is because a hip, young, black, community organizin', hope n' changin', Ivy Leaguin', Nobel prize winnin', Washington outsidin', mania causin' progressive idol rode a crystal unicorn down a rainbow into America's heart and edged her out in the Democratic leadership race.

That's not going to happen this time.

Ask yourself: How are you going to feel when she wins the Democratic party nomination?

How are you going to feel when she wins the 2016 Presidency?

Do you really think you can stand the taunts and the jeers of the USMB Democrats: "Hillary won! You poopy heads! Hillary won! You fart faces! ..." as though the victory is some great feat, when we know now--18 months in advance--that it's a statistical inevitability?

Embrace reality now. It's not pessimism or defeatism, it's realism. Listen to your head, not your heart.

For what it's worth: I'm sorry.

You have a very interesting writing style...

I think it's called florid

• elaborately or excessively intricate or complicated:

Or floridly socky....

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk