oldsalt
Active Member
- Jun 10, 2011
- 994
- 61
- 28
No she wasn't but neither am IHERE
I was reading through the logs again and I think the proof of the lie is there. On the stand today she said he and ICA were both on computer on the 17th....they took turns.
On page 21 phone logs indicate that btwn 10:59 and 22:23 (10:23 PM) Cindy placed 14 calls to ICA. Four calls btwn 2 and 2:30 when the google searches were done ( I am pretty sure) and one lasted 8 minutes.
Cindy wasn't credible. And, someone should tell her it's falling ON the sword, not near itCo-workers, etc will probably be used in rebuttal. Seems that no one, not even a workplace, is immune to winding up under the anthony bus. Also, as a concerned grandparent, where are all the other hazards and things she searched for?
I was wrong about the date of the calls, not March but JuneThe page 11 time sheet was right but I should leave the detecting to the experts ..
sorry
I still think a ton of evidence will come on in rebuttal. Just my opinion, but it seems that ICA, Cindy and George seem to think they can lie at will, with impunity.
![doubt :doubt: :doubt:](/styles/smilies/doubt.gif)