Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
With all due respect, because I realize so many now are blaming the prosecution, I fault the jury.
And here is why. Please bear with me. The jury is comprised of individuals who actually beleive that they have to be standing over the body of the deceased as a murderer is killing said victim.
Because nothing else would be real to them.
A jury these days are 12 people who do anything and everything that is not for real.
These are people/individuals who have no basis in reality. Their lives are twitter.
Herein lies a jury. In Florida. La la land.
She'll be shopping at Target with stolen checks by sundown.
She'll probably get a make believe job within a week too.
She'll get herself a new pair of tits as well.
I believe these are alternate jurors who agreed to make a statement at a later date. Hope it works out for them.
I hope the best for them also...sad to even imagine that one of them would pay the ultimate price for doing their civic duty...
Such is the world we live in; absolutely disgusting...
Why aren't all of them releasing their names? Are they not proud of their decision?
What's the problem here?
Surely they are rejoicing at reaching this verdict freeing this woman. Why would they be ashamed of their verdict?
She'll probably get a make believe job within a week too.
She'll get herself a new pair of tits as well.
I could actually see her doing this.
As much as I think she is guilty, I think the jury came up with the right verdict based on the evidence presented. Too often juries convict innocent people because they ignore the evidence and go with their gut feeling. The prosecution should have waited to see if they could gather anymore evidence and try her at a later time. Funny thing about cases like this; eventually people say things that bring out the truth. Had they waited, they may have been able to come up with enough evidence to actually get a conviction. Since the jury came back with such a quick verdict, it's obvious there wasn't much doubt in any jurors mind as to their decision.
That's bullshit. The evidence proved her guilt. The jury got it wrong. They must have had ear plugs in.
I believe these are alternate jurors who agreed to make a statement at a later date. Hope it works out for them.
I hope the best for them also...sad to even imagine that one of them would pay the ultimate price for doing their civic duty...
Such is the world we live in; absolutely disgusting...
Why aren't all of them releasing their names? Are they not proud of their decision?
What's the problem here?
Surely they are rejoicing at reaching this verdict freeing this woman. Why would they be ashamed of their verdict?
I dont doubt some will make money off this case, most notably her lawyer and his future career. Having said that it does not change the innept job the prosecution did.
With all due respect, because I realize so many now are blaming the prosecution, I fault the jury.
And here is why. Please bear with me. The jury is comprised of individuals who actually beleive that they have to be standing over the body of the deceased as a murderer is killing said victim.
Because nothing else would be real to them.
A jury these days are 12 people who do anything and everything that is not for real.
These are people/individuals who have no basis in reality. Their lives are twitter.
Herein lies a jury. In Florida. La la land.
They haven't said a word of why they came to their decision. So how in the world do you know they "believe they had to be standing over the body...?" All they have done is exactly what the State asked of them; to render their opinion on Ms. Anthony's guilt or innocence. Leave them be...
With all due respect, because I realize so many now are blaming the prosecution, I fault the jury.
And here is why. Please bear with me. The jury is comprised of individuals who actually beleive that they have to be standing over the body of the deceased as a murderer is killing said victim.
Because nothing else would be real to them.
A jury these days are 12 people who do anything and everything that is not for real.
These are people/individuals who have no basis in reality. Their lives are twitter.
Herein lies a jury. In Florida. La la land.
They haven't said a word of why they came to their decision. So how in the world do you know they "believe they had to be standing over the body...?" All they have done is exactly what the State asked of them; to render their opinion on Ms. Anthony's guilt or innocence. Leave them be...
Hell no. And why should I leave them alone. Here comes the game. What part of you make a decision and then others respond to your decision don't you get?
This time round, I really want to know who they all are. They'll all be on tv shows up and coming.
So that makes them fair game. This is a far cry from the jury on OJ's trial. And every single jury member for OJ should have been nuked for the bs decision they made.
I want answers on how they reached their decision.
And I deserve that.
So does Caylee. Most importantly, I think Caylee with the duct tape over her mouth, Caylee deserves an answer on how they reached their verdict.
I agree with the verdict and ill tell you why its right.
The prosecutor insisted the method of murder was suffocation by duct tape. Yet NO ONE could announce much less prove the cause of death.
I wasn't there to hear all the evidence the jury did but trying to insist on a weapon that caused the death without being able to prove a cause of death is nothing but contridictory.
I don't know and never will the depth to which she was involved but then again unlike some of you I know my idea about her guilt or innocence is irrelevant. The only relevant thoughts on guilt were the 12 that found her not guilty.
Our justice system worked as it was designed too.
I love and adore murder. I follow cases just because I adore death and justice. This one is a no brainer that the mother did it.
I want to bazooka barf at this moment. This is a sad day. A mother looked into her babys eyes and duct taped her mouth shut. A mother. And then she killed her.
This is OJ redux. And the jury is going to be on every tv show tomorrow. This has nothing to do with justice.
It has everything to do with 12 pukes who want to make a fortune at the expense of a childs death.
The fact that you follow murder cases is irrelevant to this case. Each case is unique and presents its own challenges to the prosecution to prove guilt. This prosecutor did not, its just that simple. We dont comprimise our civil liberties to suit our emotions of the moment.
And your assertion that 12 complete strangers conspired to let a guilty person go free just for the sake of making a few thousand bucks at the risk of themselves being imprisoned is obsurd to say the least.
She'll get herself a new pair of tits as well.
I could actually see her doing this.
Wow! You could SHE her doing it? What a talent!
I hope the best for them also...sad to even imagine that one of them would pay the ultimate price for doing their civic duty...
Such is the world we live in; absolutely disgusting...
Why aren't all of them releasing their names? Are they not proud of their decision?
What's the problem here?
Surely they are rejoicing at reaching this verdict freeing this woman. Why would they be ashamed of their verdict?
Because they know there are people like you and even worse out there that cant control their emmotions and they dont want to risk harm to themselves or their families? Not saying you would but the display your puttin on now is the exact thing they shouldnt have to deal with.
Oh come on the jury wasn't stupid. I do not understand blaming a jury because the prosecution messed up. They should have waited, someone would have slipped up and given them concrete evidence. Now, she can never be convicted.
This is a great example of why you should innocent until proven guilty. While I think she "probably" killed her child-I don't know that-and neither does anybody here. Only Casey knows that.
However the constitution was followed properly. She had every right-just like any of us have-to have a fair trial, and a jury of her peers, and the right to plead the 5th (which isn't designed to protect guilty).
The prosecution had all circumstantial evidence, in a criminal case you need to remove all reasonable doubt. It's the prosecution's job to prove the defendant guilty-NOT the defense's job to find the defendant innocent. It's the law of the land. Is it perfect? No. Is it the best process for a fair, and realistic trial? Yes (in my opinion).
In the end I support the decision of the jury-regardless of the way they ruled. It's the way it should be.
I wish more juries ruled as this one. Maybe then we would have many less innocent people behind bars. While juries can never all get it right, it really is up to the prosecution to prove guilt, not for the defense to prove innocence, and this is where people who are upset about this decision just don't get it. If I, or anyone here, were ever charged with a crime that we did not commit, we certainly would want the prosecution to have to actually prove our guilt before being convicted. That is the right of every American. Unfortunately, many juries have gotten away from that; maybe they never really were that good at following rules to begin with, I don't know. But jurors need to understand their role. It's to determine guilt based on actual evidence, not the prevailing thought of the media and the rest of society.
Oh come on the jury wasn't stupid. I do not understand blaming a jury because the prosecution messed up. They should have waited, someone would have slipped up and given them concrete evidence. Now, she can never be convicted.
Break it down. She was convicted of lying.
Now why?
She knew the baby was dead - she admitted it only after the body being discovered.
- so why sit in jail for three years?
- George hid it? - no proof, only OS bs and again why sit in jail for three years
- abuse, again only OS bs
I don't give this bunch the benefit of doubt. OS are not evidence.
They haven't said a word of why they came to their decision. So how in the world do you know they "believe they had to be standing over the body...?" All they have done is exactly what the State asked of them; to render their opinion on Ms. Anthony's guilt or innocence. Leave them be...
Hell no. And why should I leave them alone. Here comes the game. What part of you make a decision and then others respond to your decision don't you get?
This time round, I really want to know who they all are. They'll all be on tv shows up and coming.
So that makes them fair game. This is a far cry from the jury on OJ's trial. And every single jury member for OJ should have been nuked for the bs decision they made.
I want answers on how they reached their decision.
And I deserve that.
So does Caylee. Most importantly, I think Caylee with the duct tape over her mouth, Caylee deserves an answer on how they reached their verdict.
Since I don't agree with your opinion, why don't you give me your name and address so I can come over, burn your house down, kick your dog, then flog you in front of your neighbors.
Take a valium; you don't deserve a damn thing. Which is exactly why the Judge didn't release information about the jury.
I am finding it humorous watching everyone flop around. Reading this thread was so entertaining I had to join. The prosection did not prove their case period. The jurors did their job. Ashton is so embarassed he just announced he's retiring.
