PaintMyHouse
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #61
The land is privately own and many do not wish to sell. Now what?You want to have it in both ways. You did not corner me although you are quite sure you did. This is not an issue of a spotted owl need to move to another tree. It is national security issue. Yes, in the protection of all, including the property owner, there should be arrangements made of land purchase to establish a defensive zone on the border line. Also, we are not talking about orchards, and wheat fields on the border line. It shouldn't be that expensive as a lot in Manhattan. Most of the land is "waste land" what I saw on the news when showing illegal border crossings.There's no spin. Either you respect property rights in this case or you don't? You can't have it both ways.Trying to spin again? Eminent domain is "the right thing to do" only to fit your agenda? How are we paying for billions of $ "foreign aid?"So you're going to just take the land, so much for property rights, and how would we pay for this 1,950 miles of fence? Wall? Ditch? What exactly?That would be a great project for people on welfare. Remember FDR??? Public works? Building shit? Heck, China built the great wall without bulldozers and other earth moving machinery. Private land? Do you think eminent domain should be used only when it serves the purpose of government land confiscation such as "preservation" of wetlands?No. So, how would you do it? 1,950 miles, much of it private land. Go...
I am not in the Army Corps of Engineers to devise, decide and implement the best plan. That's the problem with you, on one hand you believe in omnipotency (such as a leader - not that I am one - should be an expert from astronomy to zymurgy and everything in between) on the other hand you ridicule other people who believe in it.