Charlie Rangel says Food Stamps and Social Security is in the Bible

OK? Well, it's not in the constitution so who gives a shit what the bible says about it.
The Constitution doesn't say anything concerning the poor. So why care about the poor? Let them all eat what you seem to be dishing out so freely...

Individuals are free to care or not care about "the poor". The government on the other hand, doesn't have the enumerated ppower to confiscate wealth for redistribution purposes.


You're welcome.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Vox
Does the Bible also give the permission to Charlie Rangel to steal and lie as he did?

The Bible doesn't give permission for anything. It's a book. A book that contains the Word of God. but still a book.
 
Yeah he's right it does.

Its under "Those who do not work, should not eat."

That would mean that every church, and everyone in its congregation who contributes to that church,

if it gives charity in the form of food to the poor, which of course would include many who aren't working,

those churches are acting contrary to the teachings of the Bible?

Why then do you give money to your church?

Actually rhey help the needy get their life back on track. Not make them dependent on welfare for life. Like liberals do, all for a vote. Lol amazing
 
Yeah he's right it does.

Its under "Those who do not work, should not eat."

That would mean that every church, and everyone in its congregation who contributes to that church,

if it gives charity in the form of food to the poor, which of course would include many who aren't working,

those churches are acting contrary to the teachings of the Bible?

Why then do you give money to your church?

Actually rhey help the needy get their life back on track. Not make them dependent on welfare for life. Like liberals do, all for a vote. Lol amazing

Really? So which churches kick you out of their soup kitchen or food pantry if you've been there too many times?
 
It's also in the bible that abortion is wrong. Thou shalt not kill.

The resident Bible 'experts' around here like to say that the correct interpretation of that commandment is 'thou shall not murder.'

Since in most cases in the US, an abortion is not the crime of murder,

that commandment does not apply.
 
That would mean that every church, and everyone in its congregation who contributes to that church,

if it gives charity in the form of food to the poor, which of course would include many who aren't working,

those churches are acting contrary to the teachings of the Bible?

Why then do you give money to your church?

Actually rhey help the needy get their life back on track. Not make them dependent on welfare for life. Like liberals do, all for a vote. Lol amazing

Really? So which churches kick you out of their soup kitchen or food pantry if you've been there too many times?
No, actually churches will not turn the needy away, but most people with morals won't take advantage of their nieghbors. Liberals create dependency through lack of education and encourages life long dependency on welfare, all for a vote.
 
It's also in the bible that abortion is wrong. Thou shalt not kill.

The resident Bible 'experts' around here like to say that the correct interpretation of that commandment is 'thou shall not murder.'

Since in most cases in the US, an abortion is not the crime of murder,

that commandment does not apply.

Why, because a judge said so? A baby is a gift from God and shouldn't be killed.
 
Atrocious indeed :eusa_whistle:

Sheep and goats

Matt 25:31 - 46

And that is what Rangel quoted, not what the OP suggested he said, although...are the GOP sheep or goats?
 
It's also in the bible that abortion is wrong. Thou shalt not kill.

The resident Bible 'experts' around here like to say that the correct interpretation of that commandment is 'thou shall not murder.'

Since in most cases in the US, an abortion is not the crime of murder,

that commandment does not apply.

Why, because a judge said so? A baby is a gift from God and shouldn't be killed.

We are a nation of laws, not of gods.
 
Yeah he's right it does.

Its under "Those who do not work, should not eat."

That would mean that every church, and everyone in its congregation who contributes to that church,

if it gives charity in the form of food to the poor, which of course would include many who aren't working,

those churches are acting contrary to the teachings of the Bible?

Why then do you give money to your church?

The surfer dude would agree with you. He doesn't want to work and thinks he should be supported too.

Imagine a world who believes in the kind of God you imagine, that no one works. They all become poor through desire to be a layabout.
 
Actually rhey help the needy get their life back on track. Not make them dependent on welfare for life. Like liberals do, all for a vote. Lol amazing

Really? So which churches kick you out of their soup kitchen or food pantry if you've been there too many times?
No, actually churches will not turn the needy away, but most people with morals won't take advantage of their nieghbors. Liberals create dependency through lack of education and encourages life long dependency on welfare, all for a vote.

I remember reading some time ago that military families, because of the pay rates, were in some cases eligible for food stamps.

Do you label those families as immoral if they did in fact take advantage of that eligibility?
 
Yeah he's right it does.

Its under "Those who do not work, should not eat."

That would mean that every church, and everyone in its congregation who contributes to that church,

if it gives charity in the form of food to the poor, which of course would include many who aren't working,

those churches are acting contrary to the teachings of the Bible?

Why then do you give money to your church?

The surfer dude would agree with you. He doesn't want to work and thinks he should be supported too.

Imagine a world who believes in the kind of God you imagine, that no one works. They all become poor through desire to be a layabout.

Are pedophile priests sufficient cause to outlaw the Catholic Church?
 
Really? So which churches kick you out of their soup kitchen or food pantry if you've been there too many times?
No, actually churches will not turn the needy away, but most people with morals won't take advantage of their nieghbors. Liberals create dependency through lack of education and encourages life long dependency on welfare, all for a vote.

I remember reading some time ago that military families, because of the pay rates, were in some cases eligible for food stamps.

Do you label those families as immoral if they did in fact take advantage of that eligibility?

I don't find it imoral at all. What is wrong is when peopld become reliant on tbem cause they won't try to better themselves. Liberals encourage life long welfare dependancy. All for a vote.
 
It's also in the bible that abortion is wrong. Thou shalt not kill.

The resident Bible 'experts' around here like to say that the correct interpretation of that commandment is 'thou shall not murder.'

Since in most cases in the US, an abortion is not the crime of murder,

that commandment does not apply.

Why, because a judge said so? A baby is a gift from God and shouldn't be killed.

If you want to govern your country according to a holy book, this is how you do it:

This is from the Iraqi Constitution:

Article 2: First: Islam is the official religion of the State and is a foundation source of legislation:

A. No law may be enacted that contradicts the established provisions of Islam
 
The resident Bible 'experts' around here like to say that the correct interpretation of that commandment is 'thou shall not murder.'

Since in most cases in the US, an abortion is not the crime of murder,

that commandment does not apply.

Why, because a judge said so? A baby is a gift from God and shouldn't be killed.

If you want to govern your country according to a holy book, this is how you do it:

This is from the Iraqi Constitution:

Article 2: First: Islam is the official religion of the State and is a foundation source of legislation:

A. No law may be enacted that contradicts the established provisions of Islam

Kiling is acceptable? Wow.
 
The resident Bible 'experts' around here like to say that the correct interpretation of that commandment is 'thou shall not murder.'

Since in most cases in the US, an abortion is not the crime of murder,

that commandment does not apply.

Why, because a judge said so? A baby is a gift from God and shouldn't be killed.

If you want to govern your country according to a holy book, this is how you do it:

This is from the Iraqi Constitution:

Article 2: First: Islam is the official religion of the State and is a foundation source of legislation:

A. No law may be enacted that contradicts the established provisions of Islam
you don't get it, a baby to me is a gift from God. I guess for you it would be a gift from the big bang theory or from your religion of global warming. Either way a baby should not be murdered
¡
 

Forum List

Back
Top