Charlottesville Driver May have Been Panicked into Losing Control of His Car

[jillian]

The Holicaust was just because one morning Hitler was startled when a Jew asked him for directions

So you think that nervously and unintentionally stepping on the gas too hard is equal to a protracted genocidal strategy?

I've unintentionally stepped on the gas pedal too hard before, myself. I let off before I ran over a bunch of people and killed at least one, but that's just me.

And were you surrounded by a mob screaming at you? beating on your car? please give all the details how you kept your cool in that situation. Also, please explain why peaceful anti fascist protestors would even be beating on a car driving slow. Doesn't that seem at all odd to you?
Most likely everything is just as originally reported with this driver but the actions of the crowd did not help the situation. So many times you see protestors blocking freeways and intimidating motorists, all it takes is one person behind the wheel to be mentally unstable and they are just asking for something terrible to happen.

it's so cute watching atl-right neonazi garbage defend the pond scum white supremacist loser.

 

[BlackFlag]

The Holicaust was just because one morning Hitler was startled when a Jew asked him for directions

So you think that nervously and unintentionally stepping on the gas too hard is equal to a protracted genocidal strategy?

I've unintentionally stepped on the gas pedal too hard before, myself. I let off before I ran over a bunch of people and killed at least one, but that's just me.

And were you surrounded by a mob screaming at you? beating on your car? please give all the details how you kept your cool in that situation. Also, please explain why peaceful anti fascist protestors would even be beating on a car driving slow. Doesn't that seem at all odd to you?
Most likely everything is just as originally reported with this driver but the actions of the crowd did not help the situation. So many times you see protestors blocking freeways and intimidating motorists, all it takes is one person behind the wheel to be mentally unstable and they are just asking for something terrible to happen.

it's so cute watching atl-right neonazi garbage defend the pond scum white supremacist loser.

That guy could have flown a plane into the new One World Trade Center and murdered all of its thousands of occupants... and they would defend it.

 

[Montrovant]

There have been a lot of accusations about one side or another in the protests being the instigators of violence. Other than the driver of the car, is there any evidence of who started any of the violence that occurred between the two groups, or is it all just assumption?

 

[jillian]

The Holicaust was just because one morning Hitler was startled when a Jew asked him for directions

So you think that nervously and unintentionally stepping on the gas too hard is equal to a protracted genocidal strategy?

I've unintentionally stepped on the gas pedal too hard before, myself. I let off before I ran over a bunch of people and killed at least one, but that's just me.

And were you surrounded by a mob screaming at you? beating on your car? please give all the details how you kept your cool in that situation. Also, please explain why peaceful anti fascist protestors would even be beating on a car driving slow. Doesn't that seem at all odd to you?
Most likely everything is just as originally reported with this driver but the actions of the crowd did not help the situation. So many times you see protestors blocking freeways and intimidating motorists, all it takes is one person behind the wheel to be mentally unstable and they are just asking for something terrible to happen.

it's so cute watching atl-right neonazi garbage defend the pond scum white supremacist loser.

That guy could have flown a plane into the new One World Trade Center and murdered all of its thousands of occupants... and they would defend it.

they'd defend anything if they thought it bothered normal people.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Why do you think the charges were reduced to second degree murder?

 

[Rambunctious]

If this is true than the media knows it too. Where is the reporting on this possibility?

 

[BULLDOG]

The Holicaust was just because one morning Hitler was startled when a Jew asked him for directions

So you think that nervously and unintentionally stepping on the gas too hard is equal to a protracted genocidal strategy?

I've unintentionally stepped on the gas pedal too hard before, myself. I let off before I ran over a bunch of people and killed at least one, but that's just me.

And were you surrounded by a mob screaming at you? beating on your car? please give all the details how you kept your cool in that situation. Also, please explain why peaceful anti fascist protestors would even be beating on a car driving slow. Doesn't that seem at all odd to you?
Most likely everything is just as originally reported with this driver but the actions of the crowd did not help the situation. So many times you see protestors blocking freeways and intimidating motorists, all it takes is one person behind the wheel to be mentally unstable and they are just asking for something terrible to happen.

Lots of videos to look at. The crowd didn't attack him. He drove into it running over people. Hell yes they were beating on the car.

 

[bgrouse]

Sorry y'all, but there are videos that show this dude running into the crowd, and then AFTER he'd ran people over, that was when someone hit his rear window with a baseball bat.



If you look at the video at 4 seconds, you would see him plow into the crowd, but more importantly, you would see that his rear window is intact. At about 7 sec. you see a guy go up to the back of the car with a bat and bash a hole in the rear window. The video is only 11 sec. so it won't take much time to watch.

Sorry, but the dude attacked with the car FIRST, then he was attacked by the crowd.

He was also hit with a bat (or some other object that looks like a bat) BEFORE he hit the crowd if you watch the video I posted. Your claim is based on the silly premise that he could only have been attacked once. Having seen a few other reports of him being attacked, I suspect he was attacked before the video I posted even starts. Clearly that crowd was filled with violent liberal criminals. This guy must have wrongly assumed it was a peaceful protest and figured he could just drive through it instead of, for example, cleansing the area with a tactical nuke first.

You must have a 55-gallon drum of the self-delusion flavor of Kool-Aid.

Essplain to the class, if he was innocently driving through a "peaceful protest" --- after driving out from the far side of Ohio, standing with a Nazi group chanting racist shit and none of that had anything to do with coming in for the purpose of vehicular assault ------------------------------ then why did he have his airbags disabled?

Hm?

How should I know? And why do you think they were disabled? Furthermore, what does disabling airbags have to do with this? Do airbags on that model come out of the front bumper to dampen the blow for pedestrians?

 

[Pogo]

Sorry y'all, but there are videos that show this dude running into the crowd, and then AFTER he'd ran people over, that was when someone hit his rear window with a baseball bat.



If you look at the video at 4 seconds, you would see him plow into the crowd, but more importantly, you would see that his rear window is intact. At about 7 sec. you see a guy go up to the back of the car with a bat and bash a hole in the rear window. The video is only 11 sec. so it won't take much time to watch.

Sorry, but the dude attacked with the car FIRST, then he was attacked by the crowd.

He was also hit with a bat (or some other object that looks like a bat) BEFORE he hit the crowd if you watch the video I posted. Your claim is based on the silly premise that he could only have been attacked once. Having seen a few other reports of him being attacked, I suspect he was attacked before the video I posted even starts. Clearly that crowd was filled with violent liberal criminals. This guy must have wrongly assumed it was a peaceful protest and figured he could just drive through it instead of, for example, cleansing the area with a tactical nuke first.

You must have a 55-gallon drum of the self-delusion flavor of Kool-Aid.

Essplain to the class, if he was innocently driving through a "peaceful protest" --- after driving out from the far side of Ohio, standing with a Nazi group chanting racist shit and none of that had anything to do with coming in for the purpose of vehicular assault ------------------------------ then why did he have his airbags disabled?

Hm?

How should I know? And why do you think they were disabled? Furthermore, what does disabling airbags have to do with this? Do airbags on that model come out of the front bumper to dampen the blow for pedestrians?

Do you drive a car?

There's only one reason a car's airbags would not deploy upon a head-on crash like that, and that is that they were deliberately disabled before the crash. It's clear from the front shot of the car, after the collision, that no air bags deployed.

That tells us he disabled them beforehand, and that in turn tells us his collision was premeditated. And THAT in turn mops the floor with the ridiculously desperate premise of this thread hoping against hope to find an excuse for this terrorist asshole.

And you'll notice that the OP who started it ran away. Which is coincidentally, probably your best option at this point. Unless of course you'd like to grow a pair and admit you were engaging in the same apologism.

 

[bgrouse]

bgrouse, post: 17939182

So I guess your "peaceful college town" filled with peaceful liberals who cherish "diversity and higher education" are so violent they would beat someone's brains in for holding an unpopular belief.

An 'unpopular belief'? There is no violence if the Nazis don't show up.

It's like saying there would have been no jews killed in Germany if they all moved to Madagascar!

I don't condone any kind of violence. The point is Nazis did their share of beating brains in.

The point is that has nothing to do with this discussion. The liberals were the ones being violent here. Yes, your peace loving, ultra tolerant, college-educated liberals.

You make excuses for a murderous Nazi coward who pleasures himself by marching around with other likeminded goons that would annihilate entire races and religions if they had enough numbers. That is if their beliefs became popular.

Instead of discussing hypothetical situations involving hypothetical Nazis and hypothetical numbers, why don't we stick to the topic and discuss your ACTUALLY violent liberals?

 

[bgrouse]

Sorry y'all, but there are videos that show this dude running into the crowd, and then AFTER he'd ran people over, that was when someone hit his rear window with a baseball bat.



If you look at the video at 4 seconds, you would see him plow into the crowd, but more importantly, you would see that his rear window is intact. At about 7 sec. you see a guy go up to the back of the car with a bat and bash a hole in the rear window. The video is only 11 sec. so it won't take much time to watch.

Sorry, but the dude attacked with the car FIRST, then he was attacked by the crowd.

He was also hit with a bat (or some other object that looks like a bat) BEFORE he hit the crowd if you watch the video I posted. Your claim is based on the silly premise that he could only have been attacked once. Having seen a few other reports of him being attacked, I suspect he was attacked before the video I posted even starts. Clearly that crowd was filled with violent liberal criminals. This guy must have wrongly assumed it was a peaceful protest and figured he could just drive through it instead of, for example, cleansing the area with a tactical nuke first.

You must have a 55-gallon drum of the self-delusion flavor of Kool-Aid.

Essplain to the class, if he was innocently driving through a "peaceful protest" --- after driving out from the far side of Ohio, standing with a Nazi group chanting racist shit and none of that had anything to do with coming in for the purpose of vehicular assault ------------------------------ then why did he have his airbags disabled?

Hm?

How should I know? And why do you think they were disabled? Furthermore, what does disabling airbags have to do with this? Do airbags on that model come out of the front bumper to dampen the blow for pedestrians?

Do you drive a car?

There's only one reason a car's airbags would not deploy upon a head-on crash like that, and that is that they were deliberately disabled before the crash.

Or the crash sensor didn't activate the airbags. Or the steering wheel assembly didn't have an airbag.

It's clear from the front shot of the car, after the collision, that no air bags deployed.

That tells us he disabled them beforehand, and that in turn tells us his collision was premeditated. And THAT in turn mops the floor with the ridiculously desperate premise of this thread hoping against hope to find an excuse for this terrorist asshole.

And you'll notice that the OP who started it ran away.

So he KNEW he would be in a crash, a situation in which a person can actually benefit from airbags, and disabled them because of that? It's like selling your parachute because you know you'll be jumping out of a plane. Makes perfect sense!

 

[BULLDOG]

Sorry y'all, but there are videos that show this dude running into the crowd, and then AFTER he'd ran people over, that was when someone hit his rear window with a baseball bat.



If you look at the video at 4 seconds, you would see him plow into the crowd, but more importantly, you would see that his rear window is intact. At about 7 sec. you see a guy go up to the back of the car with a bat and bash a hole in the rear window. The video is only 11 sec. so it won't take much time to watch.

Sorry, but the dude attacked with the car FIRST, then he was attacked by the crowd.

He was also hit with a bat (or some other object that looks like a bat) BEFORE he hit the crowd if you watch the video I posted. Your claim is based on the silly premise that he could only have been attacked once. Having seen a few other reports of him being attacked, I suspect he was attacked before the video I posted even starts. Clearly that crowd was filled with violent liberal criminals. This guy must have wrongly assumed it was a peaceful protest and figured he could just drive through it instead of, for example, cleansing the area with a tactical nuke first.

You must have a 55-gallon drum of the self-delusion flavor of Kool-Aid.

Essplain to the class, if he was innocently driving through a "peaceful protest" --- after driving out from the far side of Ohio, standing with a Nazi group chanting racist shit and none of that had anything to do with coming in for the purpose of vehicular assault ------------------------------ then why did he have his airbags disabled?

Hm?

How should I know? And why do you think they were disabled? Furthermore, what does disabling airbags have to do with this? Do airbags on that model come out of the front bumper to dampen the blow for pedestrians?

Do you drive a car?

There's only one reason a car's airbags would not deploy upon a head-on crash like that, and that is that they were deliberately disabled before the crash.

Or the crash sensor didn't activate the airbags. Or the steering wheel assembly didn't have an airbag.

It's clear from the front shot of the car, after the collision, that no air bags deployed.

That tells us he disabled them beforehand, and that in turn tells us his collision was premeditated. And THAT in turn mops the floor with the ridiculously desperate premise of this thread hoping against hope to find an excuse for this terrorist asshole.

And you'll notice that the OP who started it ran away.

So he KNEW he would be in a crash, a situation in which a person can actually benefit from airbags, and disabled them because of that? It's like selling your parachute because you know you'll be jumping out of a plane. Makes perfect sense!

Not sure how the airbag matters. You can be assured the car will be examined, and if the airbag did or didn't go off, and why, will be well known. Again, what does it have to do with what happened?

 

[Yarddog]

The Holicaust was just because one morning Hitler was startled when a Jew asked him for directions

So you think that nervously and unintentionally stepping on the gas too hard is equal to a protracted genocidal strategy?

I've unintentionally stepped on the gas pedal too hard before, myself. I let off before I ran over a bunch of people and killed at least one, but that's just me.

And were you surrounded by a mob screaming at you? beating on your car? please give all the details how you kept your cool in that situation. Also, please explain why peaceful anti fascist protestors would even be beating on a car driving slow. Doesn't that seem at all odd to you?
Most likely everything is just as originally reported with this driver but the actions of the crowd did not help the situation. So many times you see protestors blocking freeways and intimidating motorists, all it takes is one person behind the wheel to be mentally unstable and they are just asking for something terrible to happen.

it's so cute watching atl-right neonazi garbage defend the pond scum white supremacist loser.

Im not defending him, I was simply commenting on the crowd. were they attacking the car before he ran into the crowd or after? I'm actually not really sure. But you know, we don't need to attack each other for asking questions that might relate to the incident. At least be honest enough to admit both crowds had violent elements in them. The Alt - Left group brought a flame thrower, so what was that for? roasting marshmellows?

 

[bgrouse]

He was also hit with a bat (or some other object that looks like a bat) BEFORE he hit the crowd if you watch the video I posted. Your claim is based on the silly premise that he could only have been attacked once. Having seen a few other reports of him being attacked, I suspect he was attacked before the video I posted even starts. Clearly that crowd was filled with violent liberal criminals. This guy must have wrongly assumed it was a peaceful protest and figured he could just drive through it instead of, for example, cleansing the area with a tactical nuke first.

You must have a 55-gallon drum of the self-delusion flavor of Kool-Aid.

Essplain to the class, if he was innocently driving through a "peaceful protest" --- after driving out from the far side of Ohio, standing with a Nazi group chanting racist shit and none of that had anything to do with coming in for the purpose of vehicular assault ------------------------------ then why did he have his airbags disabled?

Hm?

How should I know? And why do you think they were disabled? Furthermore, what does disabling airbags have to do with this? Do airbags on that model come out of the front bumper to dampen the blow for pedestrians?

Do you drive a car?

There's only one reason a car's airbags would not deploy upon a head-on crash like that, and that is that they were deliberately disabled before the crash.

Or the crash sensor didn't activate the airbags. Or the steering wheel assembly didn't have an airbag.

It's clear from the front shot of the car, after the collision, that no air bags deployed.

That tells us he disabled them beforehand, and that in turn tells us his collision was premeditated. And THAT in turn mops the floor with the ridiculously desperate premise of this thread hoping against hope to find an excuse for this terrorist asshole.

And you'll notice that the OP who started it ran away.

So he KNEW he would be in a crash, a situation in which a person can actually benefit from airbags, and disabled them because of that? It's like selling your parachute because you know you'll be jumping out of a plane. Makes perfect sense!

Not sure how the airbag matters.

Ask the guy who brought it up. I have no idea.

You can be assured the car will be examined, and if the airbag did or didn't go off, and why, will be well known. Again, what does it have to do with what happened?

How the fuck should I know? I'm not the one who brought it up.

 

[Pogo]

Sorry y'all, but there are videos that show this dude running into the crowd, and then AFTER he'd ran people over, that was when someone hit his rear window with a baseball bat.



If you look at the video at 4 seconds, you would see him plow into the crowd, but more importantly, you would see that his rear window is intact. At about 7 sec. you see a guy go up to the back of the car with a bat and bash a hole in the rear window. The video is only 11 sec. so it won't take much time to watch.

Sorry, but the dude attacked with the car FIRST, then he was attacked by the crowd.

He was also hit with a bat (or some other object that looks like a bat) BEFORE he hit the crowd if you watch the video I posted. Your claim is based on the silly premise that he could only have been attacked once. Having seen a few other reports of him being attacked, I suspect he was attacked before the video I posted even starts. Clearly that crowd was filled with violent liberal criminals. This guy must have wrongly assumed it was a peaceful protest and figured he could just drive through it instead of, for example, cleansing the area with a tactical nuke first.

You must have a 55-gallon drum of the self-delusion flavor of Kool-Aid.

Essplain to the class, if he was innocently driving through a "peaceful protest" --- after driving out from the far side of Ohio, standing with a Nazi group chanting racist shit and none of that had anything to do with coming in for the purpose of vehicular assault ------------------------------ then why did he have his airbags disabled?

Hm?

How should I know? And why do you think they were disabled? Furthermore, what does disabling airbags have to do with this? Do airbags on that model come out of the front bumper to dampen the blow for pedestrians?

Do you drive a car?

There's only one reason a car's airbags would not deploy upon a head-on crash like that, and that is that they were deliberately disabled before the crash.

Or the crash sensor didn't activate the airbags. Or the steering wheel assembly didn't have an airbag.

BULL. FUCKING SHIT.

**ALL** cars made since 1998 have airbags by law.

 

[BULLDOG]

The Holicaust was just because one morning Hitler was startled when a Jew asked him for directions

So you think that nervously and unintentionally stepping on the gas too hard is equal to a protracted genocidal strategy?

I've unintentionally stepped on the gas pedal too hard before, myself. I let off before I ran over a bunch of people and killed at least one, but that's just me.

And were you surrounded by a mob screaming at you? beating on your car? please give all the details how you kept your cool in that situation. Also, please explain why peaceful anti fascist protestors would even be beating on a car driving slow. Doesn't that seem at all odd to you?
Most likely everything is just as originally reported with this driver but the actions of the crowd did not help the situation. So many times you see protestors blocking freeways and intimidating motorists, all it takes is one person behind the wheel to be mentally unstable and they are just asking for something terrible to happen.

it's so cute watching atl-right neonazi garbage defend the pond scum white supremacist loser.

Im not defending him, I was simply commenting on the crowd. were they attacking the car before he ran into the crowd or after? I'm actually not really sure. But you know, we don't need to attack each other for asking questions that might relate to the incident. At least be honest enough to admit both crowds had violent elements in them. The Alt - Left group brought a flame thrower, so what was that for? roasting marshmellows?

Look at the video. There are several different ones. The people didn't care about him until he drove into the crowd.

 

[Pogo]

He was also hit with a bat (or some other object that looks like a bat) BEFORE he hit the crowd if you watch the video I posted. Your claim is based on the silly premise that he could only have been attacked once. Having seen a few other reports of him being attacked, I suspect he was attacked before the video I posted even starts. Clearly that crowd was filled with violent liberal criminals. This guy must have wrongly assumed it was a peaceful protest and figured he could just drive through it instead of, for example, cleansing the area with a tactical nuke first.

You must have a 55-gallon drum of the self-delusion flavor of Kool-Aid.

Essplain to the class, if he was innocently driving through a "peaceful protest" --- after driving out from the far side of Ohio, standing with a Nazi group chanting racist shit and none of that had anything to do with coming in for the purpose of vehicular assault ------------------------------ then why did he have his airbags disabled?

Hm?

How should I know? And why do you think they were disabled? Furthermore, what does disabling airbags have to do with this? Do airbags on that model come out of the front bumper to dampen the blow for pedestrians?

Do you drive a car?

There's only one reason a car's airbags would not deploy upon a head-on crash like that, and that is that they were deliberately disabled before the crash.

Or the crash sensor didn't activate the airbags. Or the steering wheel assembly didn't have an airbag.

It's clear from the front shot of the car, after the collision, that no air bags deployed.

That tells us he disabled them beforehand, and that in turn tells us his collision was premeditated. And THAT in turn mops the floor with the ridiculously desperate premise of this thread hoping against hope to find an excuse for this terrorist asshole.

And you'll notice that the OP who started it ran away.

So he KNEW he would be in a crash, a situation in which a person can actually benefit from airbags, and disabled them because of that? It's like selling your parachute because you know you'll be jumping out of a plane. Makes perfect sense!

Not sure how the airbag matters. You can be assured the car will be examined, and if the airbag did or didn't go off, and why, will be well known. Again, what does it have to do with what happened?

Once again, sixth time now and second on this page ----- if the airbag is disabled, that's a conscious act by the driver. If he disabled the airbag before tearing up that street it means he KNEW he was going to ram a car -- which he had already been casing from a distance.

He knew exactly where he was going and what would happen when he hit that car, and didn't want an air bag in his way when he threw it into reverse to get away.

THAT destroys the ludicrous argument that "uh, this was all an accident --- yeah that's the ticket". You don't disable your air bags for an "accident". You do it so you can get away without a bulbous mass of sex doll in your face. That slows you down.

Same reason cars in a demolition derby don't have air bags.

Again, if I were the prosecuting attorney and he tried to take the "accident" approach, I'd destroy him with this.

 

[jillian]

The Holicaust was just because one morning Hitler was startled when a Jew asked him for directions

So you think that nervously and unintentionally stepping on the gas too hard is equal to a protracted genocidal strategy?

I've unintentionally stepped on the gas pedal too hard before, myself. I let off before I ran over a bunch of people and killed at least one, but that's just me.

And were you surrounded by a mob screaming at you? beating on your car? please give all the details how you kept your cool in that situation. Also, please explain why peaceful anti fascist protestors would even be beating on a car driving slow. Doesn't that seem at all odd to you?
Most likely everything is just as originally reported with this driver but the actions of the crowd did not help the situation. So many times you see protestors blocking freeways and intimidating motorists, all it takes is one person behind the wheel to be mentally unstable and they are just asking for something terrible to happen.

it's so cute watching atl-right neonazi garbage defend the pond scum white supremacist loser.

Im not defending him, I was simply commenting on the crowd. were they attacking the car before he ran into the crowd or after? I'm actually not really sure. But you know, we don't need to attack each other for asking questions that might relate to the incident. At least be honest enough to admit both crowds had violent elements in them. The Alt - Left group brought a flame thrower, so what was that for? roasting marshmellows?

he intentionally drove a car into a group of protesters.

there is zero evidence or even assertion that he "lost control" of the vehicle. so, again, if you aren't defending the lowlife piece of garbage, I'm not sure why you're making up things that you think exonerate him when those "things" don't exist and didn't happen.

 

[jillian]

You must have a 55-gallon drum of the self-delusion flavor of Kool-Aid.

Essplain to the class, if he was innocently driving through a "peaceful protest" --- after driving out from the far side of Ohio, standing with a Nazi group chanting racist shit and none of that had anything to do with coming in for the purpose of vehicular assault ------------------------------ then why did he have his airbags disabled?

Hm?

How should I know? And why do you think they were disabled? Furthermore, what does disabling airbags have to do with this? Do airbags on that model come out of the front bumper to dampen the blow for pedestrians?

Do you drive a car?

There's only one reason a car's airbags would not deploy upon a head-on crash like that, and that is that they were deliberately disabled before the crash.

Or the crash sensor didn't activate the airbags. Or the steering wheel assembly didn't have an airbag.

It's clear from the front shot of the car, after the collision, that no air bags deployed.

That tells us he disabled them beforehand, and that in turn tells us his collision was premeditated. And THAT in turn mops the floor with the ridiculously desperate premise of this thread hoping against hope to find an excuse for this terrorist asshole.

And you'll notice that the OP who started it ran away.

So he KNEW he would be in a crash, a situation in which a person can actually benefit from airbags, and disabled them because of that? It's like selling your parachute because you know you'll be jumping out of a plane. Makes perfect sense!

Not sure how the airbag matters. You can be assured the car will be examined, and if the airbag did or didn't go off, and why, will be well known. Again, what does it have to do with what happened?

Once again, sixth time now and second on this page ----- if the airbag is disabled, that's a conscious act by the driver. If he disabled the airbag before tearing up that street it means he KNEW he was going to ram a car -- which he had already been casing from a distance.

He knew exactly where he was going and what would happen when he hit that car, and didn't want an air bag in his way when he threw it into reverse to get away.

THAT destroys the ludicrous argument that "uh, this was all an accident --- yeah that's the ticket". You don't disable your air bags for an "accident". You do it so you can get away without a bulbous mass of sex doll in your face. That slows you down.

Same reason cars in a demolition derby don't have air bags.

Again, if I were the prosecuting attorney and he tried to take the "accident" approach, I'd destroy him with this.

the question, of course, is why is the o/p asserting this fallacy when it isn't even being put forth by the rabid racists.

if the driver of the car were a muslim I'm pretty sure that no one would call it anything other than terrorism.

 

[MikeK]

[...]

There's only one reason a car's airbags would not deploy upon a head-on crash like that, and that is that they were deliberately disabled before the crash. It's clear from the front shot of the car, after the collision, that no air bags deployed.

That tells us he disabled them beforehand, and that in turn tells us his collision was premeditated. And THAT in turn mops the floor with the ridiculously desperate premise of this thread hoping against hope to find an excuse for this terrorist asshole.

And you'll notice that the OP who started it ran away. Which is coincidentally, probably your best option at this point. Unless of course you'd like to grow a pair and admit you were engaging in the same apologism.

Why would he disable the airbags?

And the fact that he did not remove or otherwise alter his license plates raises serious question about premeditation.