Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry but I watched the video from the start and the cave monkey accelerated way before the car was attacked. His acceleration is what caused the guy to take a swing.I know this will not even penetrate into the minds of our SJWs who just wanna have ANY reason at all to hate some random white guy, but it seems that the driver was hit with a bat and that might have panicked him.
It might be that the driver in Charlottesville was panicked into losing control of his car, and did not intentionally run his car into the crowd.
VIDEO: Protesters Attacked Charlottesville Driver's Car With Baseball Bat
Thanks. The OP's video was in slow mo, making it appear that the guy was proceeding at a crawl to get through the group when his car got hit with the bat. I was wondering why they would hit his car to begin with--unless he was wearing his hood, how would they know whose side he was on-- but the fact that he was plowing through them like a driver from New Jersey would answer that question.
Actually that would be a driver from Connecticut. A New Jersey driver would just be lost with no sense of direction whatsoever.
NOT SO, oh Great One. Connecticut drivers are far more technically savvy than to mess up their paint job by plowing into a crowd. NJ drivers are second only to Mass for driving like maniacal assholes; particularly NJ drivers in Porsches.
Sorry but I watched the video from the start and the cave monkey accelerated way before the car was attacked. His acceleration is what caused the guy to take a swing.I know this will not even penetrate into the minds of our SJWs who just wanna have ANY reason at all to hate some random white guy, but it seems that the driver was hit with a bat and that might have panicked him.
It might be that the driver in Charlottesville was panicked into losing control of his car, and did not intentionally run his car into the crowd.
VIDEO: Protesters Attacked Charlottesville Driver's Car With Baseball Bat
Thanks. The OP's video was in slow mo, making it appear that the guy was proceeding at a crawl to get through the group when his car got hit with the bat. I was wondering why they would hit his car to begin with--unless he was wearing his hood, how would they know whose side he was on-- but the fact that he was plowing through them like a driver from New Jersey would answer that question.
Actually that would be a driver from Connecticut. A New Jersey driver would just be lost with no sense of direction whatsoever.
NOT SO, oh Great One. Connecticut drivers are far more technically savvy than to mess up their paint job by plowing into a crowd. NJ drivers are second only to Mass for driving like maniacal assholes; particularly NJ drivers in Porsches.
Well I'm just thinking of Connecticut drivers and their infatuation with the rear end of the car in front of them. That's more predictable than anything that has ever happened anywhere on a New Jersey road.
--- not the least of which is actually figuring out where you're going.........
Sorry but I watched the video from the start and the cave monkey accelerated way before the car was attacked. His acceleration is what caused the guy to take a swing.
Thanks. The OP's video was in slow mo, making it appear that the guy was proceeding at a crawl to get through the group when his car got hit with the bat. I was wondering why they would hit his car to begin with--unless he was wearing his hood, how would they know whose side he was on-- but the fact that he was plowing through them like a driver from New Jersey would answer that question.
Actually that would be a driver from Connecticut. A New Jersey driver would just be lost with no sense of direction whatsoever.
NOT SO, oh Great One. Connecticut drivers are far more technically savvy than to mess up their paint job by plowing into a crowd. NJ drivers are second only to Mass for driving like maniacal assholes; particularly NJ drivers in Porsches.
Well I'm just thinking of Connecticut drivers and their infatuation with the rear end of the car in front of them. That's more predictable than anything that has ever happened anywhere on a New Jersey road.
--- not the least of which is actually figuring out where you're going.........
You're not wrong there; Connecticut drivers give you about three inches of space and that's it--no quarter whatsoever. I will never forget one Good Friday evening, trying to get the hell to Maine, bumper to bumper, three lanes solid, and going a steady 82 miles an hour with no more than a foot's margin of error between us. I was absolutely terrified. No one could blink, sneeze or hit the brakes during that one. Fortunately, no one did.
But back to the thread. I am not amused by this plowing people down with vehicles thing. Danged ISIS starting a trend. I am very, very, glad, though that everyone kept their guns in their pockets. Wonder when that will start....
But back to the thread. I am not amused by this plowing people down with vehicles thing. Danged ISIS starting a trend.
Yes, and that argument can be used for anyone that uses lethal force in self defense, 'He could have not gone to Charlottesville!'Of course, but he had ample opportunity to avoid the situation in the first place.
Not as ridiculous as that, because he had every right to assume he could join a legal protest without fear of attack from violent leftists. Like I said, however, when you see a group of people in the street in front of you, stop. How much simpler does it have to be?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
WHO "joins a legal protest" by ramming his car directly into it??
And WHO has a right to expect he can run people over --- in two directions --- "without fear of attack" in retaliation?
And WHAT THE FUCK does "leftist" have to do with anything when you're being run over with that car?
Might could be that you need to think your posts through rather than "sending from your iPhone using Tapatalk" during TV commercials.
Yes. every time I feel a bump on the left rear of my car, I end up running over people and killing as many as I can.
Why would he disable the airbags?[...]
There's only one reason a car's airbags would not deploy upon a head-on crash like that, and that is that they were deliberately disabled before the crash. It's clear from the front shot of the car, after the collision, that no air bags deployed.
That tells us he disabled them beforehand, and that in turn tells us his collision was premeditated. And THAT in turn mops the floor with the ridiculously desperate premise of this thread hoping against hope to find an excuse for this terrorist asshole.
And you'll notice that the OP who started it ran away. Which is coincidentally, probably your best option at this point. Unless of course you'd like to grow a pair and admit you were engaging in the same apologism.
And the fact that he did not remove or otherwise alter his license plates raises serious question about premeditation.
I've already explained like six times why he would disable the air bags and why it matters if he did.
The fact that he didn't remove or cover his license plates --- or wear a disguise, or decline to be photographed earlier chanting racist memes with a Vanguard shield, or not have a Nosebook page festooned with Nazi shit or have a history going back to high school of what's been called "infatuation with Nazis" --- means that he obviously didn't think of everything and obviously isn't the sharpest knife in the proverbial drawer.
Disabling the air bags takes a few seconds and can easily have been thought of just prior to the attack, independent of all of the above. The air bag switch and indicator is right in front of the driver; the license plate is not.
- Sit on perch casing the street, assess what one sees.... a straight street with people at the end one defines as "the enemy"....
- Muse that "if I just gun it from here to there, I can take me out some Liburruls"... then I'll slam it into reverse and get away"....
- Further muse that "if I run into that car my air bag will be all up in my face and smother me, that will make it hard to see, better kill that"
- Disable air bag
- Hit gas
The rest is bloody history.
NOT SO, oh Great One. Connecticut drivers are far more technically savvy than to mess up their paint job by plowing into a crowd. NJ drivers are second only to Mass for driving like maniacal assholes; particularly NJ drivers in Porsches.
NOT SO, oh Great One. Connecticut drivers are far more technically savvy than to mess up their paint job by plowing into a crowd. NJ drivers are second only to Mass for driving like maniacal assholes; particularly NJ drivers in Porsches.
I think people from the great state of Maryland can never be left out of such a discussion; the worst drivers in the country.
Yes. every time I feel a bump on the left rear of my car, I end up running over people and killing as many as I can.
Wow...so you routinely drive through violent areas with people carrying bats and clubs?
You didn't watch the video did you?
If you did - you would notice 3 things...
1) Prior to the mob surrounding his car...he was driving normally.
2) He swerved away from the person who clubbed his car.
3) Immediately after his car was hit, right before the video ends...you can clearly see the mob surrounding his car.
All of this at the very least allows a reasonable person to investigate the claim.
The video certainly supports the claim he was being attacked by multiple people immediately before accelerating.
The bottom line remains, though, that violent counter protesting has become mainstream in America. This will not stop, but will only accelerate. More people will die.
Yes. every time I feel a bump on the left rear of my car, I end up running over people and killing as many as I can.
Wow...so you routinely drive through violent areas with people carrying bats and clubs?
You didn't watch the video did you?
If you did - you would notice 3 things...
1) Prior to the mob surrounding his car...he was driving normally.
2) He swerved away from the person who clubbed his car.
3) Immediately after his car was hit, right before the video ends...you can clearly see the mob surrounding his car.
All of this at the very least allows a reasonable person to investigate the claim.
The video certainly supports the claim he was being attacked by multiple people immediately before accelerating.
iF THAT WASN'T SO SAD, IT WOULD BE FUNNY
1) Yes, he was driving normally as anyone can when they drive into a crowd of people. They didn't come off the sidewalks at him. They were already standing there long before he ran into them. It's not like he was driving highway speeds and he didn't have time to stop well before he was anywhere near them. he had more than enough opportunity to stop, or even turn off on another road.
2) When his car was struck, he had already hit several people.
3) Those surrounding the car were just luck he missed them as he sped through the crowd.
4) You're nuts. Why are you trying to defend someone who intentionally drove into a crowd?
I've never had the pleasure. I remember Rustic repeating about twenty times in a thread that he would rather die than vacation in Maryland.NOT SO, oh Great One. Connecticut drivers are far more technically savvy than to mess up their paint job by plowing into a crowd. NJ drivers are second only to Mass for driving like maniacal assholes; particularly NJ drivers in Porsches.
I think people from the great state of Maryland can never be left out of such a discussion; the worst drivers in the country.
Why not explain it again -- or point me to a message number.I've already explained like six times why he would disable the air bags and why it matters if he did.
Maryland has some beautiful scenery and wonderful people, but driving around the Beltway is definitely automotive combatI've never had the pleasure. I remember Rustic repeating about twenty times in a thread that he would rather die than vacation in Maryland.
Sounds like a great place. LOL
Why not explain it again -- or point me to a message number.I've already explained like six times why he would disable the air bags and why it matters if he did.
I'm not asking for a calculus formula. A simple sentence should do.
Assuming the airbags were disabled the question as to when they were disabled arises -- and why. This is an extremely speculative question with no evidence value.If an airbag goes off, it doesn't fold back up in the steering wheel, it stays where it is, deflated and in the way. If you are planning on doing something where you may experience a crash and feel that you may need to get away afterwards, you would disable the airbag so that they won't impede your vision or your ability to operate the car.
And yeah, it's a calculated risk. Before the 80's, there were no airbags.
Why would he disable the airbags?[...]
There's only one reason a car's airbags would not deploy upon a head-on crash like that, and that is that they were deliberately disabled before the crash. It's clear from the front shot of the car, after the collision, that no air bags deployed.
That tells us he disabled them beforehand, and that in turn tells us his collision was premeditated. And THAT in turn mops the floor with the ridiculously desperate premise of this thread hoping against hope to find an excuse for this terrorist asshole.
And you'll notice that the OP who started it ran away. Which is coincidentally, probably your best option at this point. Unless of course you'd like to grow a pair and admit you were engaging in the same apologism.
And the fact that he did not remove or otherwise alter his license plates raises serious question about premeditation.
I've already explained like six times why he would disable the air bags and why it matters if he did.
The fact that he didn't remove or cover his license plates --- or wear a disguise, or decline to be photographed earlier chanting racist memes with a Vanguard shield, or not have a Nosebook page festooned with Nazi shit or have a history going back to high school of what's been called "infatuation with Nazis" --- means that he obviously didn't think of everything and obviously isn't the sharpest knife in the proverbial drawer.
Disabling the air bags takes a few seconds and can easily have been thought of just prior to the attack, independent of all of the above. The air bag switch and indicator is right in front of the driver; the license plate is not.
- Sit on perch casing the street, assess what one sees.... a straight street with people at the end one defines as "the enemy"....
- Muse that "if I just gun it from here to there, I can take me out some Liburruls"... then I'll slam it into reverse and get away"....
- Further muse that "if I run into that car my air bag will be all up in my face and smother me, that will make it hard to see, better kill that"
- Disable air bag
- Hit gas
The rest is bloody history.
How many people think a deployed airbag will block a driver's vision? From personal experience being t-boned by another car, I can tell you that they completely deflate before you're even aware they deployed.
It remains to be proven that he deliberately disabled them, for any reason.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't know about Ferguson, but it would invoke recollection of the O.J. Simpson debacle.And if he did, Ferguson would look like a gentlemanly disagreement. I think he's toast.
