Chief Justice Roberts Rebukes Trump

U.S. law - in compliance with international law - requires that anyone presenting himself at our border and requesting "asylum" be given a hearing to determine whether the claim is legitimate under international law. Asylum must be granted if a number of conditions are met. They must present themselves and request asylum in the FIRST COUNTRY they encounter where the dangers they are fleeing are not present. The request must be based on a real, verifiable claim that their lives and safety are in jeopardy in their home country, based on race, ethnicity, or religion.

You cannot be granted asylum if you come here to "seek a better life," or get a better job, or exploit our social safety net.

Thus, essentially NONE of the people in the so-called Caravan have a legitimate claim for asylum under U.S. and international law.

Trump's order simply tried to make the coming situation a little more manageable; Each of these fukkers is entitled to a hearing (or two), which will be an administrative nightmare, lasting many, many months, during which all of these people will have to be housed in one way or another, as U.S. taxpayer expense.

The court ruling may be correct, but it won't change the end results; all of these pathetic travelers will be rejected (and some, undoubtedly, will make it through).
You just rebuked Trump's policy.

The law is the law
 
ROFL! Wrong. He's doing exactly what we want him to do. The fact that you're so pissed is the proof.

The above asshole "thinks" that he is justified in helping elect a fucking moron to the oval office was simply to piss off others........THAT is why Trump stated that he "LOVED THE POORLY EDUCATED"........
 
ROFL! Wrong. He's doing exactly what we want him to do. The fact that you're so pissed is the proof.

The above asshole "thinks" that he is justified in helping elect a fucking moron to the oval office was simply to piss off others........THAT is why Trump stated that he "LOVED THE POORLY EDUCATED"........

Team Trump whooped your ass and you are a butthurt sore loser.
 
The 9th regularily rules for the left...............and so it goes to higher courts.

The current battle is that the Refugees may only apply for asylum at legal points of entry............aka......they can't sneak in and when caught go I CLAIM ASYLUM............If they cross illegally and are caught..........well they committed a crime.............yelling Asylum is not a get out of jail free card when caught and never should be.

This will end up in the Supreme Court..................and right now the back log in places like Tijuana are backing up ticking off Mexico.........because Catch and Release is dead............and they are waiting in line........

Interesting times..........they are waiting for what almost certainly will be a ride back to the country of their origin.
Trump should tell that judge to go fuck himself. If you break the law you cannot ask for asylum and get it. Stay in the other side of the wall and go to a legal port of entry otherwise you are breaking the law.

He basically did with his response.
This will be decided at the Supreme Court...........yet again......see how the 9th fairs this time........they get overturned all the time.

Good luck. It's already established law that migrants fleeing persecution can come here to ask for asylum.
Not when they cross illegally and get caught.........so they can go oh shit I got caught ..........ASYLUM............you are going to have a hard time in the Supreme Court on that one..............that is the issue.......not the process through legal check points.
 
Not when they cross illegally and get caught.........so they can go oh shit I got caught ..........ASYLUM............you are going to have a hard time in the Supreme Court on that one..............that is the issue.......not the process through legal check points.

Very few are ever granted asylum...but by LAW...they have the right to petition for it
 
Not when they cross illegally and get caught.........so they can go oh shit I got caught ..........ASYLUM............you are going to have a hard time in the Supreme Court on that one..............that is the issue.......not the process through legal check points.

Very few are ever granted asylum...but by LAW...they have the right to petition for it
When they come forward yes............not when caught breaking the law..........They are not guaranteed a hearing when they are in process for deportation from being here illegally .........which is the reason for a SCOTUS confirmation on that point alone.

And your side is losing in SCOTUS............you lost the bond issue......you lost on the Travel Ban.............you may very well lose here as well..................it's coming.
 
Not when they cross illegally and get caught.........so they can go oh shit I got caught ..........ASYLUM............you are going to have a hard time in the Supreme Court on that one..............that is the issue.......not the process through legal check points.

Very few are ever granted asylum...but by LAW...they have the right to petition for it

They can petition Mexico. :itsok:
 
He also wrongly voted for Obamacare, and Didn't do the job he was sworn to do, and ADMITTED IT! Thanks Bush! Another Progressive, just like you GWB.
Yeah, what does a Supreme Court Justice homo muslim democrat America hater know about the constitutionality of Obamacare.

You know better than he does.
Trump is a genius. Impeach Kavanaugh! and Disband the SCOTUS! are now Defend all judges!

FYI - if there’s a Trump judge there’s an Obama judge.
 
Roberts spoke out when Obama called out citizens united.
Roberts spoke out when Trump called out judges.
Trump has called out just about every one who wont agree with him.
its getting scary when our lack of trust now extends to the supreme court.
 
Trump did something unconstitutional. If he was a black guy, the pseuedocons would have added that to their growing List O'Reasons To Impeach they used to copy and paste on this forum a few years ago.

A federal judge placed an injunction on Trump's action.

So, as predictable as the sun rising in the east (thanks to Emperor Trump!), our President whined about the judge being an "Obama judge".


The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court normally keeps himself above the fray, but I guess yet another criticism of a judge by Perpetual Defendant Donald got to him. So he told Trump to knock it off.

Which means, of course. that John Roberts is a fucking homo muslim democrat America hater.

In rare rebuke, Chief Justice Roberts slams Trump for comment about 'Obama judge'


For these liberals when a plutocratic judge speaks it is as if God spoke. And if its one of these rulings that are a temporary political victory which will later be overturned..like the muslim ban... then its always a "rebuke" for the the media. So whats the difference?

I myself dont care what John Roberts says because he obviously lying. There are liberal judges and conservative judges. Constitutionalist judges and make it up as they go judges. Obama judges and Trump judges.
The liberal ones dont care about the law. Fort instance on DACA the Clinton appointed Garaufis said ""You can't come into court to espouse a position that is heartless" and immigrants are "making the country stronger".
Never mind the law. This "independent judiciary" has decided to impose its morals on us and legislate itself because the real legislature is "heartless".

Or take homosexual "marriage". "“The nature of marriage is that, through its enduring bond, two persons together can find other freedoms, such as expression, intimacy, and spirituality.”

That isnt law. That is in the realm of "mystical aphorisms on a fortune cookie"

We dont have an independent judiciary. We have a judiciary attacking our independent executive and independent legislative branches. And it is time President Trump brought then to heel.

By the way it isnt "rare' for the media to interpret any decision as a "rebuke" if it means unelected judges are attacking our President.

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

The Daily 202: Trump gets rebuked by another federal judge as he tests the limits on immigration law - The Washington Post

A federal judge on Monday became the latest to rebuke the Trump administration for its immigration practices

https://www.aclunv.org/en/news/supreme-court-rebuke-trump-administration-daca

Learn the language of propaganda and be aware of it.
 
Trump did something unconstitutional. If he was a black guy, the pseuedocons would have added that to their growing List O'Reasons To Impeach they used to copy and paste on this forum a few years ago.

A federal judge placed an injunction on Trump's action.

So, as predictable as the sun rising in the east (thanks to Emperor Trump!), our President whined about the judge being an "Obama judge".


The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court normally keeps himself above the fray, but I guess yet another criticism of a judge by Perpetual Defendant Donald got to him. So he told Trump to knock it off.

Which means, of course. that John Roberts is a fucking homo muslim democrat America hater.

In rare rebuke, Chief Justice Roberts slams Trump for comment about 'Obama judge'


For these liberals when a plutocratic judge speaks it is as if God spoke. And if its one of these rulings that are a temporary political victory which will later be overturned..like the muslim ban... then its always a "rebuke" for the the media. So whats the difference?

I myself dont care what John Roberts says because he obviously lying. There are liberal judges and conservative judges. Constitutionalist judges and make it up as they go judges. Obama judges and Trump judges.
The liberal ones dont care about the law. Fort instance on DACA the Clinton appointed Garaufis said ""You can't come into court to espouse a position that is heartless" and immigrants are "making the country stronger".
Never mind the law. This "independent judiciary" has decided to impose its morals on us and legislate itself because the real legislature is "heartless".

Or take homosexual "marriage". "“The nature of marriage is that, through its enduring bond, two persons together can find other freedoms, such as expression, intimacy, and spirituality.”

That isnt law. That is in the realm of "mystical aphorisms on a fortune cookie"

We dont have an independent judiciary. We have a judiciary attacking our independent executive and independent legislative branches. And it is time President Trump brought then to heel.

By the way it isnt "rare' for the media to interpret any decision as a "rebuke" if it means unelected judges are attacking our President.

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

Analysis | The Daily 202: Trump gets rebuked by another federal judge as he tests the limits on immigration law

A federal judge on Monday became the latest to rebuke the Trump administration for its immigration practices

https://www.aclunv.org/en/news/supreme-court-rebuke-trump-administration-daca

Learn the language of propaganda and be aware of it.
 
LMAO the SCOTUS routinely overturns the liberal 9th circuit court of appeals decisions proving Trump correct. The judiciary may not like hearing they are corrupt and biased, too bad we elected Trump to set them straight.

This is the misconception you right wingers all have. It's because you've been brainwashed by FOX NEWS to believe it.

Judges, all judges, regardless of which side of the isle appoints them are dutifuly sworn to abide by the U.S Constitution. PERIOD

They are Apolitical, meaning not political, nor will it ever cross their minds, that since R or D appointed me, that's where my decision will go.

You don't have enough fingers and toes on the number of times that a Justice has gone against the party or President that has appointed them.
What an absurd fairy land you live in! Incredible! Comical! At odds with the clear evidence.
You truly think judges are apolitical automatons whose personal biases and political feelings play no role in their rulings?
That is just stunning! Simply stunning!
 
Trump did something unconstitutional. If he was a black guy, the pseuedocons would have added that to their growing List O'Reasons To Impeach they used to copy and paste on this forum a few years ago.

A federal judge placed an injunction on Trump's action.

So, as predictable as the sun rising in the east (thanks to Emperor Trump!), our President whined about the judge being an "Obama judge".


The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court normally keeps himself above the fray, but I guess yet another criticism of a judge by Perpetual Defendant Donald got to him. So he told Trump to knock it off.

Which means, of course. that John Roberts is a fucking homo muslim democrat America hater.

In rare rebuke, Chief Justice Roberts slams Trump for comment about 'Obama judge'

Roberts is welcomed to his view on the judiciary.

Which is wrong, of course.
 
“In rare rebuke, Chief Justice Roberts slams Trump for comment about 'Obama judge'”

Further proof that Trump is unfit to be president, that he has no understanding of the law and responsible pubic policy.

It’s rare because we haven’t had a president with such contempt for the rule of law since Nixon.

Thanks for admitting you've been in a coma for the last fifty years.

Why don't you catch up for before posting things that reveal what a moron you are.
 
Trump did something unconstitutional. If he was a black guy, the pseuedocons would have added that to their growing List O'Reasons To Impeach they used to copy and paste on this forum a few years ago.

A federal judge placed an injunction on Trump's action.

So, as predictable as the sun rising in the east (thanks to Emperor Trump!), our President whined about the judge being an "Obama judge".


The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court normally keeps himself above the fray, but I guess yet another criticism of a judge by Perpetual Defendant Donald got to him. So he told Trump to knock it off.

Which means, of course. that John Roberts is a fucking homo muslim democrat America hater.

In rare rebuke, Chief Justice Roberts slams Trump for comment about 'Obama judge'

Roberts is welcomed to his view on the judiciary.

Which is wrong, of course.
Haha, looks like we have us a real legal expert! You should contact Roberts with your analysis.
 
I give no fucks to what the says oligarch who performed some of the most convoluted mental contortions in human history, in order to declare Ocommiecare constitutional....Might as well quote what Judge Jewdy has to say about the subject.
Like I said. Roberts is obviously a fucking homo muslim democrat America hater.

That's not what he said....idiot.

If you've got something that further supports your moronic assertion...please feel free.
 
Trump did something unconstitutional. If he was a black guy, the pseuedocons would have added that to their growing List O'Reasons To Impeach they used to copy and paste on this forum a few years ago.

A federal judge placed an injunction on Trump's action.

So, as predictable as the sun rising in the east (thanks to Emperor Trump!), our President whined about the judge being an "Obama judge".


The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court normally keeps himself above the fray, but I guess yet another criticism of a judge by Perpetual Defendant Donald got to him. So he told Trump to knock it off.

Which means, of course. that John Roberts is a fucking homo muslim democrat America hater.

In rare rebuke, Chief Justice Roberts slams Trump for comment about 'Obama judge'

Roberts is welcomed to his view on the judiciary.

Which is wrong, of course.
Haha, looks like we have us a real legal expert! You should contact Roberts with your analysis.

Would be great if you could tell me what a legal expert is.

Roberts clearly forgot his confirmation and didn't pay attention to the most recent one.

And you've got your head up your ass.

Obama was a "constitutional scholar" by his own claim....and yet he knew nothing about it.

So please go to your ANTIFA meeting and STFU.
 
He also wrongly voted for Obamacare, and Didn't do the job he was sworn to do, and ADMITTED IT! Thanks Bush! Another Progressive, just like you GWB.
Yeah, what does a Supreme Court Justice homo muslim democrat America hater know about the constitutionality of Obamacare.

You know better than he does.

Just about everyone does.

But he proved it with his twisted stupid decision.
 

Forum List

Back
Top