Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seems the only voice in this debate, is the voice of the Homosexual and the Activist. Now its time to here from the children being adopted into, "families". Children know right from wrong despite what the "experts", think.
Child of lesbian couple speaks out against gay marriage Denny Burk
Contrary to what the gay lobby claims, Lopez writes, children raised by same-sex parents “deeply feel the loss of a father or mother, no matter how much we love our gay parents.”
These children know they are “powerless to stop the decision to deprive them of a father or mother,” he adds. And this decision comes with serious and often permanent consequences. For instance, they “feel disconnected from the gender cues of people around them,” and long for a role model of the opposite sex.
While they love the people who raised them, they experience anger at their decision to deprive them of one or both biological parents—and “shame or guilt for resenting their loving parents.”
The so-called “consensus” by psychologists and pediatricians on the soundness of same-sex parenting is, Lopez writes, “frankly bogus.” The truth is, there is no data to support that assertion.
Instead, as political scientists Leon Kass of the University of Chicago and Harvey Mansfield of Harvard University note, “Claims that science provides support for constitutionalizing a right to same-sex marriage must rest necessarily on ideology”—and “ideology is not science.”
From the article:
Instead, as political scientists Leon Kass of the University of Chicago and Harvey Mansfield of Harvard University note, “Claims that science provides support for constitutionalizing a right to same-sex marriage must rest necessarily on ideology”—and “ideology is not science.”
Which is something sensible people have always understood. Only ideologues have never been honest about that as they manufacture junk science to suit their ideology.
From the article:
Instead, as political scientists Leon Kass of the University of Chicago and Harvey Mansfield of Harvard University note, “Claims that science provides support for constitutionalizing a right to same-sex marriage must rest necessarily on ideology”—and “ideology is not science.”
Which is something sensible people have always understood. Only ideologues have never been honest about that as they manufacture junk science to suit their ideology.
Opposition to same-sex marriage is based upon religious beliefs, not science.
Granting everyone the right to marry the consenting adult of their choice is a matter of equality under the law, not science.
Your feeble attempt to use "science" as a blunt weapon in your homophobic opposition to same-sex marriage is going nowhere because you don't even understand the concepts involved.
From the article:
Instead, as political scientists Leon Kass of the University of Chicago and Harvey Mansfield of Harvard University note, “Claims that science provides support for constitutionalizing a right to same-sex marriage must rest necessarily on ideology”—and “ideology is not science.”
Which is something sensible people have always understood. Only ideologues have never been honest about that as they manufacture junk science to suit their ideology.
Opposition to same-sex marriage is based upon religious beliefs, not science.
Granting everyone the right to marry the consenting adult of their choice is a matter of equality under the law, not science.
Your feeble attempt to use "science" as a blunt weapon in your homophobic opposition to same-sex marriage is going nowhere because you don't even understand the concepts involved.
the grass always seems greener on the other side of the fence, yet it hardly ever is...
I've not yet met one person raised in a heterosexual family who has expressed the wish to be raised by two fathers and no mother.
Going solely on my own experience I can't say that I agree with you that people find the grass greener on the other side of the fence.
You seriously have no idea what you are talking about.
The percentage of hetero couples compared to the percentage of same sex couples and then find the percentage of "so-called" troubled children from each category, that is the percentage that you compare.
Again you have no idea what you are talking about.
But try doing the percentage of troubled children from hetero sexual couples and compared to same sex couples.
Get back to us when the math makes sense.
And we all know how wonderful conventional marriage parenting is and how their offspring turn out.
You mean the 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% of all people that ever walked the face of the planet?
Overall, not bad
You think the percentage is different? 99.9999999999999999999999999 % of all people are from the same source
Of course 100% of all people are from opposite sex coupling.
Tell me you knew that
Same sex coupling has never produced a child.
Sorry if you were unaware if that
Seems the only voice in this debate, is the voice of the Homosexual and the Activist. Now its time to here from the children being adopted into, "families". Children know right from wrong despite what the "experts", think.
Child of lesbian couple speaks out against gay marriage Denny Burk
Contrary to what the gay lobby claims, Lopez writes, children raised by same-sex parents “deeply feel the loss of a father or mother, no matter how much we love our gay parents.”
These children know they are “powerless to stop the decision to deprive them of a father or mother,” he adds. And this decision comes with serious and often permanent consequences. For instance, they “feel disconnected from the gender cues of people around them,” and long for a role model of the opposite sex.
While they love the people who raised them, they experience anger at their decision to deprive them of one or both biological parents—and “shame or guilt for resenting their loving parents.”
The so-called “consensus” by psychologists and pediatricians on the soundness of same-sex parenting is, Lopez writes, “frankly bogus.” The truth is, there is no data to support that assertion.
Instead, as political scientists Leon Kass of the University of Chicago and Harvey Mansfield of Harvard University note, “Claims that science provides support for constitutionalizing a right to same-sex marriage must rest necessarily on ideology”—and “ideology is not science.”
Can't miss something you've never known as with missing both mother and a father if you've never had that. And if you have and thus miss it, it's merely a change of status to be adapted to. There's no inherit benefit to male-female parents vs homosexual parents.
How many male-female marriages end where children are raised by just one parent? Are we proposing to forbid divorce now since both parents do so much better than just one?
Yes....and?Really?
You believe this to be true.
Explain then in vitro fertilization to us. Please.
Excellent reasoning you must be some product of a charter school.
All other and real conventional wisdom arrives at a more reasonable statement.
Keep on trucking.
-
All people are from opposite sex coupling.
Is this some sort of a surprise?
You MUST couple sperm with an EGG.
Unless you're speaking of some sort of exotic frog species, and egg is the product of females and the sperm is the product of males.
Capice.
It's really not that tough. It's always, ALWAYS, opposite sex coupling that creates babies
Synthetic sperm and egg splitting are very bad investments.
Thank me later
There's more to conception?
Please, go on
maybe in stupid troll land its not, but here in reality its the bases for everything.Testimony and fact are not a premise.
Seems the only voice in this debate, is the voice of the Homosexual and the Activist. Now its time to here from the children being adopted into, "families". Children know right from wrong despite what the "experts", think.
Child of lesbian couple speaks out against gay marriage Denny Burk
Contrary to what the gay lobby claims, Lopez writes, children raised by same-sex parents “deeply feel the loss of a father or mother, no matter how much we love our gay parents.”
These children know they are “powerless to stop the decision to deprive them of a father or mother,” he adds. And this decision comes with serious and often permanent consequences. For instance, they “feel disconnected from the gender cues of people around them,” and long for a role model of the opposite sex.
While they love the people who raised them, they experience anger at their decision to deprive them of one or both biological parents—and “shame or guilt for resenting their loving parents.”
The so-called “consensus” by psychologists and pediatricians on the soundness of same-sex parenting is, Lopez writes, “frankly bogus.” The truth is, there is no data to support that assertion.
Instead, as political scientists Leon Kass of the University of Chicago and Harvey Mansfield of Harvard University note, “Claims that science provides support for constitutionalizing a right to same-sex marriage must rest necessarily on ideology”—and “ideology is not science.”
Can't miss something you've never known as with missing both mother and a father if you've never had that. And if you have and thus miss it, it's merely a change of status to be adapted to. There's no inherit benefit to male-female parents vs homosexual parents.
How many male-female marriages end where children are raised by just one parent? Are we proposing to forbid divorce now since both parents do so much better than just one?
First, lets start at the end of your statement, are we to forbid divorce? We certainly discourage divorce as any man who has went through divorce can attest to so you are kind of wrong thinking there are no restrictions or incentives not to divorce, especially with children and a mother that does not work.
Further, there is nothing we can do about divorce or death, so that is the natural way of things.
Second, children adopted into a homosexual man-man relationship, are forced into a family of your design and your choosing, a relationship that for the first time in history is a government/activist designed ruled and regulated relationship. So when there is a divorce or death in this New Social Unit of your design, any failure is thus a failure you have created. You will put children into that situation. Much different than being born into that situation.
Third, "Can't miss something you've never known". a statement more applicable is, "Can't understand something you've never lived".
Actually there is a benefit to having a Mother and Father, Mommy and Daddy make us, so that is one minor benefit.
Parents means Mother and Father, not homosexual man-man playing daddy and mommy. In a homosexual relationship, there is no Father or Mother, there are no parents, its a misuse of words to imply, Father, Mother, Parents, are words that are like a jacket, something you can put on when you feel like it.
Parents means Mother and Father, not homosexual man-man playing daddy and mommy. In a homosexual relationship, there is no Father or Mother, there are no parents, its a misuse of words to imply, Father, Mother, Parents, are words that are like a jacket, something you can put on when you feel like it.
if I find one example of someone bitching about how being raised in a fundamentalist Christian home fucked up his life...
Yes
Yes....and?Really?
You believe this to be true.
Explain then in vitro fertilization to us. Please.
All people are from opposite sex coupling.
Is this some sort of a surprise?
You MUST couple sperm with an EGG.
Unless you're speaking of some sort of exotic frog species, and egg is the product of females and the sperm is the product of males.
Capice.
It's really not that tough. It's always, ALWAYS, opposite sex coupling that creates babies
Synthetic sperm and egg splitting are very bad investments.
Thank me later
There's more to conception?
Please, go on
Sorry but yes they have. Science is a bit beyond for some.
You seriously have no idea what you are talking about.
The percentage of hetero couples compared to the percentage of same sex couples and then find the percentage of "so-called" troubled children from each category, that is the percentage that you compare.
Again you have no idea what you are talking about.
But try doing the percentage of troubled children from hetero sexual couples and compared to same sex couples.
Get back to us when the math makes sense.
You mean the 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% of all people that ever walked the face of the planet?
Overall, not bad
You think the percentage is different? 99.9999999999999999999999999 % of all people are from the same source
Of course 100% of all people are from opposite sex coupling.
Tell me you knew that
Same sex coupling has never produced a child.
Sorry if you were unaware if that
Lesbians are well known for being eugenicists - they put more effort into shopping for sperm than you did in buying a house.The complainant grew up an A student, and now has a doctorate and is a professor and author.
How dare those two women ruin his life!!!!!!!
Lesbians are well known for being eugenicists - they put more effort into shopping for sperm than you did in buying a house.The complainant grew up an A student, and now has a doctorate and is a professor and author.
How dare those two women ruin his life!!!!!!!
Parental influence delivered through home life, doesn't have much impact, (crushing the delusions of parents everywhere) so his success was mostly attributed to the high quality sperm his mother bought and combined with her egg.
Being bought like a commodity tends to upset children.
Me and my grandparents. lolSorry but yes they have. Science is a bit beyond for some.
You seriously have no idea what you are talking about.
The percentage of hetero couples compared to the percentage of same sex couples and then find the percentage of "so-called" troubled children from each category, that is the percentage that you compare.
Again you have no idea what you are talking about.
But try doing the percentage of troubled children from hetero sexual couples and compared to same sex couples.
Get back to us when the math makes sense.
You think the percentage is different? 99.9999999999999999999999999 % of all people are from the same source
Of course 100% of all people are from opposite sex coupling.
Tell me you knew that
Same sex coupling has never produced a child.
Sorry if you were unaware if that
Please name one child born with shared DNA of two males or two females.
