Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have addressed you directly You are a coward and run away from me everytime I address you. You are in fear and in denial. You are the definition of a coward, because you will not address the facts, but will continue to say they are lies.
NIST in its final report issued in November 2008 did finally acknowledge that Building 7 descended at free fall. According to NIST, This free fall drop continued for approximately 8 stories, or 32.0 meters (105 ft), the distance traveled between times t = 1.75 s and t = 4.0 s [a period of 2.25 seconds].
The collapse we see cannot be due to a column failure, or a few column failures, or a sequence of column failures. All 24 interior columns and 58 perimeter columns had to have been removed over the span of 8 floors low in the building simultaneously to within a small fraction of a second, and in such a way that the top half of the building remains intact and uncrumpled.
Only explosives can instantaneously remove 8 stories allowing the upper structure to accelerate downwards in free fall. The absolute free fall of Building 7 over a period of 2.25 seconds is by itself overwhelming evidence that explosives were used to bring down the building.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw&feature=related
You are a coward, I will state that indirectly, or directly to you. Address the facts, or continue your sad case of denial.
BuildingWhat? - Building 7 | Stand with the 911 families demanding a NEW Building 7 investigation - What is Building 7 ?
Please do let us know when this paper you keep pushing at us has been peer reviewed by experts who are not part of the .01% of the engineers and architects who are part of the truther movement. Or should I say truther trickle?
Only explosives can instantaneously remove 8 stories allowing the upper structure to accelerate downwards in free fall. The absolute free fall of Building 7 over a period of 2.25 seconds is by itself overwhelming evidence that explosives were used to bring down the building.
You are a coward dude, stop.
Only explosives can instantaneously remove 8 stories allowing the upper structure to accelerate downwards in free fall. The absolute free fall of Building 7 over a period of 2.25 seconds is by itself overwhelming evidence that explosives were used to bring down the building.
You are a coward dude, stop.
According to physics bumble bees are not supposed to be able to fly and you honestly think physics holds the only answers.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFPobKeSzKQ&feature=player_embedded
You are too immature to watch this video and respond with intelligent input.
I saw that vid when it first came out. As usual Geraldo was inanely hysterical, the fact that you use him as a source speaks volumes.
The fact I use Geraldo as source speaks volumes?
The fact that I use PHYSICS speaks volumes. Stop ignoring the physics, you are afraid.
Only explosives can instantaneously remove 8 stories allowing the upper structure to accelerate downwards in free fall. The absolute free fall of Building 7 over a period of 2.25 seconds is by itself overwhelming evidence that explosives were used to bring down the building.
This. Is. A. Fact.
You can't handle it. You are weak lol
I'm serious when I ask, are you man enough to even look into these facts im presenting before disrespecting them?
buildingwhat.org/free-fall-collapse/
The collapse we see cannot be due to a column failure, or a few column failures, or a sequence of column failures. All 24 interior columns and 58 perimeter columns had to have been removed over the span of 8 floors low in the building simultaneously to within a small fraction of a second, and in such a way that the top half of the building remains intact and uncrumpled.
Only explosives can instantaneously remove 8 stories allowing the upper structure to accelerate downwards in free fall. The absolute free fall of Building 7 over a period of 2.25 seconds is by itself overwhelming evidence that explosives were used to bring down the building.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWorDrTC0Qg&feature=player_embedded
Translation:
I'm serious when I ask, are you man enough to even look into these facts im presenting before disrespecting them?
You are as much of a coward as Ollie. NYC Coalition For Accountability Now
Translation:
I'm serious when I ask, are you man enough to even look into these facts im presenting before disrespecting them?
You are as much of a coward as Ollie. NYC Coalition For Accountability Now
Here's an idea. Since you and Christophera both live in Santa Barbara, why don't the two of you meet up somewhere so you can discuss your competing theories of 9/11?
The resulting argument would be epic!
Make sure you bring a camera crew to film it. You could release it to the public, and probably make enough money to fund the new investigation you so desire.
Just title it, "My Dinner with Stupid".
Translation:
I'm serious when I ask, are you man enough to even look into these facts im presenting before disrespecting them?
You are as much of a coward as Ollie. NYC Coalition For Accountability Now
Here's an idea. Since you and Christophera both live in Santa Barbara, why don't the two of you meet up somewhere so you can discuss your competing theories of 9/11?
The resulting argument would be epic!
Make sure you bring a camera crew to film it. You could release it to the public, and probably make enough money to fund the new investigation you so desire.
Just title it, "My Dinner with Stupid".
I'm serious when I ask, are you man enough to even look into these facts im presenting before disrespecting them?
I'm serious when I ask, are you man enough to even look into these facts im presenting before disrespecting them?
You are as much of a coward as Ollie. NYC Coalition For Accountability Now
Here's an idea. Since you and Christophera both live in Santa Barbara, why don't the two of you meet up somewhere so you can discuss your competing theories of 9/11?
The resulting argument would be epic!
Make sure you bring a camera crew to film it. You could release it to the public, and probably make enough money to fund the new investigation you so desire.
Just title it, "My Dinner with Stupid".
Because I have facts, not theories.
I'm serious when I ask, are you man enough to even look into these facts im presenting before disrespecting them?
buildingwhat.org/free-fall-collapse/
The collapse we see cannot be due to a column failure, or a few column failures, or a sequence of column failures. All 24 interior columns and 58 perimeter columns had to have been removed over the span of 8 floors low in the building simultaneously to within a small fraction of a second, and in such a way that the top half of the building remains intact and uncrumpled.
Only explosives can instantaneously remove 8 stories allowing the upper structure to accelerate downwards in free fall. The absolute free fall of Building 7 ov
Here's an idea. Since you and Christophera both live in Santa Barbara, why don't the two of you meet up somewhere so you can discuss your competing theories of 9/11?
The resulting argument would be epic!
Make sure you bring a camera crew to film it. You could release it to the public, and probably make enough money to fund the new investigation you so desire.
Just title it, "My Dinner with Stupid".
Because I have facts, not theories.
I'm serious when I ask, are you man enough to even look into these facts im presenting before disrespecting them?
buildingwhat.org/free-fall-collapse/
The collapse we see cannot be due to a column failure, or a few column failures, or a sequence of column failures. All 24 interior columns and 58 perimeter columns had to have been removed over the span of 8 floors low in the building simultaneously to within a small fraction of a second, and in such a way that the top half of the building remains intact and uncrumpled.
Only explosives can instantaneously remove 8 stories allowing the upper structure to accelerate downwards in free fall. The absolute free fall of Building 7 ov
Whenever you get around to posting some facts, I'll look at them.
Right now, all you are posting is your theories.
Post a video with the sounds of the hundreds of explosions it would take to blow out the supports in your 8 stories, and I'll watch it.
But don't keep posting the same video you have been showing. I watched it, and guess what? No sounds of CD blasting to be heard.
And I do think you and Chris should get together, so you both can get your facts straight.
Because I have facts, not theories.
I'm serious when I ask, are you man enough to even look into these facts im presenting before disrespecting them?
buildingwhat.org/free-fall-collapse/
The collapse we see cannot be due to a column failure, or a few column failures, or a sequence of column failures. All 24 interior columns and 58 perimeter columns had to have been removed over the span of 8 floors low in the building simultaneously to within a small fraction of a second, and in such a way that the top half of the building remains intact and uncrumpled.
Only explosives can instantaneously remove 8 stories allowing the upper structure to accelerate downwards in free fall. The absolute free fall of Building 7 ov
Whenever you get around to posting some facts, I'll look at them.
Right now, all you are posting is your theories.
Post a video with the sounds of the hundreds of explosions it would take to blow out the supports in your 8 stories, and I'll watch it.
But don't keep posting the same video you have been showing. I watched it, and guess what? No sounds of CD blasting to be heard.
And I do think you and Chris should get together, so you both can get your facts straight.
You need audible recordings of explosions to be convinced physics existed on 9/11? You are in denial.
NIST in its final report issued in November 2008 did finally acknowledge that Building 7 descended at free fall. According to NIST, This free fall drop continued for approximately 8 stories,
Fact.
The collapse we see cannot be due to a column failure, or a few column failures, or a sequence of column failures. All 24 interior columns and 58 perimeter columns had to have been removed over the span of 8 floors low in the building simultaneously to within a small fraction of a second, and in such a way that the top half of the building remains intact and uncrumpled.
Fact.
You are scared of addressing the facts.
Whenever you get around to posting some facts, I'll look at them.
Right now, all you are posting is your theories.
Post a video with the sounds of the hundreds of explosions it would take to blow out the supports in your 8 stories, and I'll watch it.
But don't keep posting the same video you have been showing. I watched it, and guess what? No sounds of CD blasting to be heard.
And I do think you and Chris should get together, so you both can get your facts straight.
You need audible recordings of explosions to be convinced physics existed on 9/11? You are in denial.
NIST in its final report issued in November 2008 did finally acknowledge that Building 7 descended at free fall. According to NIST, “This free fall drop continued for approximately 8 stories,
Fact.
“The collapse we see cannot be due to a column failure, or a few column failures, or a sequence of column failures. All 24 interior columns and 58 perimeter columns had to have been removed over the span of 8 floors low in the building simultaneously to within a small fraction of a second, and in such a way that the top half of the building remains intact and uncrumpled.”
Fact.
You are scared of addressing the facts.
Again, please post some facts.
According to NIST, a portion of the northern facade collapsed at free-fall, not the entire building.
And here's another question. If it was a CD, and fell at free-fall into it's own footprint, how did the debris damage the Verizon Building, and the Post Office, and land on the roof of Fiterman Hall?
You need audible recordings of explosions to be convinced physics existed on 9/11? You are in denial.
NIST in its final report issued in November 2008 did finally acknowledge that Building 7 descended at free fall. According to NIST, “This free fall drop continued for approximately 8 stories,
Fact.
“The collapse we see cannot be due to a column failure, or a few column failures, or a sequence of column failures. All 24 interior columns and 58 perimeter columns had to have been removed over the span of 8 floors low in the building simultaneously to within a small fraction of a second, and in such a way that the top half of the building remains intact and uncrumpled.”
Fact.
You are scared of addressing the facts.
Again, please post some facts.
According to NIST, a portion of the northern facade collapsed at free-fall, not the entire building.
And here's another question. If it was a CD, and fell at free-fall into it's own footprint, how did the debris damage the Verizon Building, and the Post Office, and land on the roof of Fiterman Hall?
Please cite your sources. Your opinions do not change the fact that WTC7 was a controlled demolition. Freefall proves it. How hard is this to grasp?
A high school physics teacher named David Chandler objected to NIST’s initial claim, pointing out that, based on video footage of Building 7’s destruction, NIST’s claim contradicted “a publicly visible, easily measurable quantity.”[iii] Mr. Chandler wrote a comment to NIST, saying, “Acknowledgement of and accounting for an extended period of free fall in the collapse of WTC 7 must be a priority if NIST is to be taken seriously.”[iv]
Responding to the criticism, NIST in its final report issued in November 2008 did finally acknowledge that Building 7 descended at free fall. According to NIST, “This free fall drop continued for approximately 8 stories, or 32.0 meters (105 ft), the distance traveled between times t = 1.75 s and t = 4.0 s [a period of 2.25 seconds].”[v] However, NIST did not attempt to explain how Building 7’s free fall descent could have occurred.
BuildingWhat? - Building 7 | Stand with the 911 families demanding a NEW Building 7 investigation - Free Fall Collapse
Address the facts.
This analysis showed that the 40 percent longer descent time—compared to the 3.9 second free fall time—was due primarily to Stage 1, which corresponded to the buckling of the exterior columns in the lower stories of the north face. During Stage 2, the north face descended essentially in free fall, indicating negligible support from the structure below. This is consistent with the structural analysis model which showed the exterior columns buckling and losing their capacity to support the loads from the structure above. In Stage 3, the acceleration decreased as the upper portion of the north face encountered increased resistance from the collapsed structure and the debris pile below.
2.25 Seconds of freefall in WTC7 proves controlled demolition.
You are afraid to accept this fact.
I'm serious when I ask, are you man enough to even look into these facts im presenting before disrespecting them?
buildingwhat.org/free-fall-collapse/
The collapse we see cannot be due to a column failure, or a few column failures, or a sequence of column failures. All 24 interior columns and 58 perimeter columns had to have been removed over the span of 8 floors low in the building simultaneously to within a small fraction of a second, and in such a way that the top half of the building remains intact and uncrumpled.
Only explosives can instantaneously remove 8 stories allowing the upper structure to accelerate downwards in free fall. The absolute free fall of Building 7 over a period of 2.25 seconds is by itself overwhelming evidence that explosives were used to bring down the building.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWorDrTC0Qg&feature=player_embedded
Translation:
I'm serious when I ask, are you man enough to even look into these facts im presenting before disrespecting them?
You are as much of a coward as Ollie. NYC Coalition For Accountability Now
I have addressed you directly You are a coward and run away from me everytime I address you. You are in fear and in denial. You are the definition of a coward, because you will not address the facts, but will continue to say they are lies.I'm serious when I ask, are you man enough to even look into these facts im presenting before disrespecting them?
You are as much of a coward as Ollie. NYC Coalition For Accountability Now
Child, when you want to call me names, at least be man enough to address me directly.
NIST in its final report issued in November 2008 did finally acknowledge that Building 7 descended at free fall. According to NIST, This free fall drop continued for approximately 8 stories, or 32.0 meters (105 ft), the distance traveled between times t = 1.75 s and t = 4.0 s [a period of 2.25 seconds].
The collapse we see cannot be due to a column failure, or a few column failures, or a sequence of column failures. All 24 interior columns and 58 perimeter columns had to have been removed over the span of 8 floors low in the building simultaneously to within a small fraction of a second, and in such a way that the top half of the building remains intact and uncrumpled.
Only explosives can instantaneously remove 8 stories allowing the upper structure to accelerate downwards in free fall. The absolute free fall of Building 7 over a period of 2.25 seconds is by itself overwhelming evidence that explosives were used to bring down the building.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw&feature=related[/ame]
You are a coward, I will state that indirectly, or directly to you. Address the facts, or continue your sad case of denial.
BuildingWhat? - Building 7 | Stand with the 911 families demanding a NEW Building 7 investigation - What is Building 7 ?
Translation:
I'm serious when I ask, are you man enough to even look into these facts im presenting before disrespecting them?
You are as much of a coward as Ollie. NYC Coalition For Accountability Now
First of all, I'm not a man...I'm a woman.
Hence the "Lady Templar" moniker just below my username near my avvy.
Duh!
Secondly...I've read all this bullshit before, and it's the same bullshit from that assplug alex jones, and loosecoins.
Lastly -- you've still not answer my questions.
Where do you hail from? Where do your loyalties lie?
Much ado you make...distraction is your game.
Pray tell -- why?
Democratic Party of Japan lawmaker Yukihisa Fujita addresses the Diet and Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda on his doubts about the official story of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the U.S
Distraction is my game? Have you even looked over the BuildingWhat? - Building 7 | Stand with the 911 families demanding a NEW Building 7 investigation - What is Building 7 ? website?
You do know this was on the news correct?
You do know that the Japanese Democrat majority leader is in support of a reinvestigation after being informed of the facts by ae911truth right?
Democratic Party of Japan lawmaker Yukihisa Fujita addresses the Diet and Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda on his doubts about the official story of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the U.S
Lawmaker takes 9/11 doubts global | The Japan Times Online
Great. Australia is a nice country.You do know that Aussie union leader of over 400,000 people has publicly questioned 9/11 because of the facts learned from physics and ae911truth, right?
Oh really?You do know AE911truth has enlightened over 1409+ Architects and engineers?
You do know that 9/11 was a controlled demolition right? It's a fact. these aren't distractions or debates. It. Is. A. Fact.
Where do my loyalties lie? The truth, the US, and our soldiers overseas. 9/11 needs to be reinvestigated. You do not even care to debate the facts, and just type bunk.
2.25 seconds of freefall PROVES controlled demolition. Fact.
Are you able to digest this, or are you going to continue to accept the Government's lies?
It's embarrassing......
Distraction is my game? Have you even looked over the BuildingWhat? - Building 7 | Stand with the 911 families demanding a NEW Building 7 investigation - What is Building 7 ? website?
Hmmm...Let's see.
I said I've read all the bullshit, and now you're asking me again if I've read it.
Something tells me you have a comprehension problem.
I'll just wait for you to catch up.
In the meantime -- how much do you pay in hosting fees to maintain that site, and push your very own agenda on the subject?
You do know this was on the news correct?
And THAT makes it truth?
Yes....comprehension.
Good for him.
Now, what should that matter to me? HE'S IN JAPAN!
Great. Australia is a nice country.
But, it IS Australia. Good on them, ay mate?
Oh really?
Do you know how many UNENLIGHTENED architects and engineers there are in the world? In Japan?! IN AUSTRALIA!!!!????
You do know that 9/11 was a controlled demolition right? It's a fact. these aren't distractions or debates. It. Is. A. Fact.
Beeeecauuuussee....YOU SAY SO!
Where do my loyalties lie? The truth, the US, and our soldiers overseas. 9/11 needs to be reinvestigated. You do not even care to debate the facts, and just type bunk.
2.25 seconds of freefall PROVES controlled demolition. Fact.
Are you able to digest this, or are you going to continue to accept the Government's lies?
It's embarrassing......
Yep....a clear lack of compassion. As I noted a page or two ago.
Your little "hobby" has the blood of over 3000 lives splashed all over it.
Care to see a few crisped bodies from the Pentagon?
How about body parts laying in the streets of Manhattan?
I told you about the pictoral evidence, available to anyone, brought fourth in the Moussaoui trial...But, interestingly enough, you ignored it.
Don't you want more evidence for your little "hobby"?
A "hobby" that grinds its heals into the bodies that hit the ground after leaping to their deaths. Don't you think more people would've jumped, had they heard explosion after explosion?
Odd...that. Ay?
