TemplarKormac
Political Atheist
They weren't boycotted because they were Christian.
They were boycotted because they were bigots.
And as I said they made the mistake of pissing off enough of their market to take a mortal financial wound so they put themselves out of business.
I doubt it. So, since Truett Kathy made his stances known about what charities he donated to, why didn't the rest of the restaurant industry abandon Chick-fil-a? And so, the moral of your argument is:
Homosexuals are incapable of being bigots themselves.
Because having a stance and donating to charities is not the same as turning away customers based on sexual orientation. Last I checked chick-fil-a will cater a gay wedding.
But in both instances LGBT folks called for boycotts. Interesting is it not? They both had the intent of destroying the said business in question. This bakery was put out of business because nobody is allowed to be politically incorrect in this society.