Christine Ford - The facts and their weight

[jc456]

Ford won't allow herself to be questioned. She cannot articulate a single fact.

I wouldn’t either. Flush

 

[Crixus]

I believe Ford. The facts are pretty convincing and support her credibility. I am listing the facts, and scoring them for their probative value on a 1 - 5 scale.


Revealed the attack in 2012 - 5
There would be no reason for her to make up this story in 2012. She stated then that the two individuals involved had become prominent members of Washington society, and that is true for Kavanaugh and Judge.

Revealed Kavanaugh's name in 2012 - 2
That she revealed the name only to her husband drastically reduces the impact of this piece of information. We can't ignore the possibility that her husband is willing to lie to support her. But we also cannot discount his statements simply because he is her husband. If there were potential for some kind of tangible benefit for this couple to gain, I would score this a "1", but any possible benefit to be gained would be several steps removed, at best.

Anonymous July letter - 3
Anyone can submit an anonymous letter and say anything. In and of itself it doesn't mean much, and by itself it wouldn't doing much with. But what is significant here is that Ford is not, in any way, trying to launch a last minute torpedo to delay Kavanaugh's confirmation. She submitted an "FYI" letter to inform her Senator, but she didn't want to be in the spotlight. Feinstein's office probably handled this in a very partisan way, playing political games. But that is no reflection on Ford's credibility. Ford only came forward after the letter was leaked and made public.

Going into hiding - 3
In conjunction with the previous point, it is pretty clear that Ford is looking for 15 minutes of fame. To the contrary, she would rather stay out of the spotlight. She didn't have to step forward and reveal herself, and she doesn't like being in the spotlight, but she's done it anyway. What we're seeing is much more consistent with a sexual assault victim who is struggling for the strength to speak out, than a partisan who is making salacious lies. This doesn't speak directly to the veracity of her claims. But her reluctance to testify is consistent with the fact that she hadn't wanted to come forward in the first place, which supports her credibility.

Request for FBI, other investigations - 4
While not wanting to testify in front of the entire nation, she has said that she would want the FBI to investigate. This would be consistent with a sexual assault victim who longs for privacy. But perhaps more importantly, it would open her up to legal liability. And that fully neutralizes the suggestions by some that her reluctance to testify her way of trying to avoid perjury.

Classmate claims to have known about incident - 1
Contemporary knowledge of the incident would be a powerfully convincing fact. If what this classmate is saying is true, it's devastating and puts seals the deal. However, much more is needed before it can be afforded significant weight. As it stands now, this classmate could easily be lying and just trying to tip the scales for partisan reasons. This classmate suggests that the incident became general knowledge among much of the student body. So we should be able to expect there to be other classmates who would also remember hearing about the incident. If others come forward, this point could become strong enough to eliminate all doubt. Until then, it is a very weak piece of evidence. Especially because every indication from Ford thus far is that she kept the incident secret out of embarrassment.

Or, DIFI threw her under the bus and that’s why she is trying to crawfish out of having to answer to her accusation. She is a stupid bitch and should either go before Congress and make her accusation, or crawl back under her rock. I would sue the whore into oblivion if it were me.

 

[jc456]

I believe Ford. The facts are pretty convincing and support her credibility. I am listing the facts, and scoring them for their probative value on a 1 - 5 scale.


Revealed the attack in 2012 - 5
There would be no reason for her to make up this story in 2012. She stated then that the two individuals involved had become prominent members of Washington society, and that is true for Kavanaugh and Judge.

Revealed Kavanaugh's name in 2012 - 2
That she revealed the name only to her husband drastically reduces the impact of this piece of information. We can't ignore the possibility that her husband is willing to lie to support her. But we also cannot discount his statements simply because he is her husband. If there were potential for some kind of tangible benefit for this couple to gain, I would score this a "1", but any possible benefit to be gained would be several steps removed, at best.

Anonymous July letter - 3
Anyone can submit an anonymous letter and say anything. In and of itself it doesn't mean much, and by itself it wouldn't doing much with. But what is significant here is that Ford is not, in any way, trying to launch a last minute torpedo to delay Kavanaugh's confirmation. She submitted an "FYI" letter to inform her Senator, but she didn't want to be in the spotlight. Feinstein's office probably handled this in a very partisan way, playing political games. But that is no reflection on Ford's credibility. Ford only came forward after the letter was leaked and made public.

Going into hiding - 3
In conjunction with the previous point, it is pretty clear that Ford is looking for 15 minutes of fame. To the contrary, she would rather stay out of the spotlight. She didn't have to step forward and reveal herself, and she doesn't like being in the spotlight, but she's done it anyway. What we're seeing is much more consistent with a sexual assault victim who is struggling for the strength to speak out, than a partisan who is making salacious lies. This doesn't speak directly to the veracity of her claims. But her reluctance to testify is consistent with the fact that she hadn't wanted to come forward in the first place, which supports her credibility.

Request for FBI, other investigations - 4
While not wanting to testify in front of the entire nation, she has said that she would want the FBI to investigate. This would be consistent with a sexual assault victim who longs for privacy. But perhaps more importantly, it would open her up to legal liability. And that fully neutralizes the suggestions by some that her reluctance to testify her way of trying to avoid perjury.

Classmate claims to have known about incident - 1
Contemporary knowledge of the incident would be a powerfully convincing fact. If what this classmate is saying is true, it's devastating and puts seals the deal. However, much more is needed before it can be afforded significant weight. As it stands now, this classmate could easily be lying and just trying to tip the scales for partisan reasons. This classmate suggests that the incident became general knowledge among much of the student body. So we should be able to expect there to be other classmates who would also remember hearing about the incident. If others come forward, this point could become strong enough to eliminate all doubt. Until then, it is a very weak piece of evidence. Especially because every indication from Ford thus far is that she kept the incident secret out of embarrassment.

Or, DIFI threw her under the bus and that’s why she is trying to crawfish out of having to answer to her accusation. She is a stupid bitch and should either go before Congress and make her accusation, or crawl back under her rock. I would sue the whore into oblivion if it were me.

I’d go after difi. She created this, and went against the request of Ford!

 

[Crixus]

I believe Ford. The facts are pretty convincing and support her credibility. I am listing the facts, and scoring them for their probative value on a 1 - 5 scale.


Revealed the attack in 2012 - 5
There would be no reason for her to make up this story in 2012. She stated then that the two individuals involved had become prominent members of Washington society, and that is true for Kavanaugh and Judge.

Revealed Kavanaugh's name in 2012 - 2
That she revealed the name only to her husband drastically reduces the impact of this piece of information. We can't ignore the possibility that her husband is willing to lie to support her. But we also cannot discount his statements simply because he is her husband. If there were potential for some kind of tangible benefit for this couple to gain, I would score this a "1", but any possible benefit to be gained would be several steps removed, at best.

Anonymous July letter - 3
Anyone can submit an anonymous letter and say anything. In and of itself it doesn't mean much, and by itself it wouldn't doing much with. But what is significant here is that Ford is not, in any way, trying to launch a last minute torpedo to delay Kavanaugh's confirmation. She submitted an "FYI" letter to inform her Senator, but she didn't want to be in the spotlight. Feinstein's office probably handled this in a very partisan way, playing political games. But that is no reflection on Ford's credibility. Ford only came forward after the letter was leaked and made public.

Going into hiding - 3
In conjunction with the previous point, it is pretty clear that Ford is looking for 15 minutes of fame. To the contrary, she would rather stay out of the spotlight. She didn't have to step forward and reveal herself, and she doesn't like being in the spotlight, but she's done it anyway. What we're seeing is much more consistent with a sexual assault victim who is struggling for the strength to speak out, than a partisan who is making salacious lies. This doesn't speak directly to the veracity of her claims. But her reluctance to testify is consistent with the fact that she hadn't wanted to come forward in the first place, which supports her credibility.

Request for FBI, other investigations - 4
While not wanting to testify in front of the entire nation, she has said that she would want the FBI to investigate. This would be consistent with a sexual assault victim who longs for privacy. But perhaps more importantly, it would open her up to legal liability. And that fully neutralizes the suggestions by some that her reluctance to testify her way of trying to avoid perjury.

Classmate claims to have known about incident - 1
Contemporary knowledge of the incident would be a powerfully convincing fact. If what this classmate is saying is true, it's devastating and puts seals the deal. However, much more is needed before it can be afforded significant weight. As it stands now, this classmate could easily be lying and just trying to tip the scales for partisan reasons. This classmate suggests that the incident became general knowledge among much of the student body. So we should be able to expect there to be other classmates who would also remember hearing about the incident. If others come forward, this point could become strong enough to eliminate all doubt. Until then, it is a very weak piece of evidence. Especially because every indication from Ford thus far is that she kept the incident secret out of embarrassment.

Or, DIFI threw her under the bus and that’s why she is trying to crawfish out of having to answer to her accusation. She is a stupid bitch and should either go before Congress and make her accusation, or crawl back under her rock. I would sue the whore into oblivion if it were me.

I’d go after difi. She created this, and went against the request of Ford!

Oh to be sure, it Mrs. Ford is an adult and complicit. DIFI is a has been and she knows it. She is out at election time and very soon will just be another dead political elite hack like John McTumor. But Mrs. Ford is a willing participant. She needs her life destroyed.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

I don't. Libs lied with anita hill and they're lying again now. They will lie at any cost to protect their sacrament, abortion.

 

[Freiheit]

Since the Duke La Crosse spectacle, the UVA Rolling Stone Debacle among many debunked claims of sexual and other misconduct I don't believe uncorroborated allegations. Every person should be heard when making allegations of criminal activity. Allegations must be investigated. Every allegation must be viewed from the perspective of innocent until proven guilty.
False allegations should carry the same penalty as the crime alleged and every person who makes a false allegation must be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

 

[jc456]

I believe Ford. The facts are pretty convincing and support her credibility. I am listing the facts, and scoring them for their probative value on a 1 - 5 scale.


Revealed the attack in 2012 - 5
There would be no reason for her to make up this story in 2012. She stated then that the two individuals involved had become prominent members of Washington society, and that is true for Kavanaugh and Judge.

Revealed Kavanaugh's name in 2012 - 2
That she revealed the name only to her husband drastically reduces the impact of this piece of information. We can't ignore the possibility that her husband is willing to lie to support her. But we also cannot discount his statements simply because he is her husband. If there were potential for some kind of tangible benefit for this couple to gain, I would score this a "1", but any possible benefit to be gained would be several steps removed, at best.

Anonymous July letter - 3
Anyone can submit an anonymous letter and say anything. In and of itself it doesn't mean much, and by itself it wouldn't doing much with. But what is significant here is that Ford is not, in any way, trying to launch a last minute torpedo to delay Kavanaugh's confirmation. She submitted an "FYI" letter to inform her Senator, but she didn't want to be in the spotlight. Feinstein's office probably handled this in a very partisan way, playing political games. But that is no reflection on Ford's credibility. Ford only came forward after the letter was leaked and made public.

Going into hiding - 3
In conjunction with the previous point, it is pretty clear that Ford is looking for 15 minutes of fame. To the contrary, she would rather stay out of the spotlight. She didn't have to step forward and reveal herself, and she doesn't like being in the spotlight, but she's done it anyway. What we're seeing is much more consistent with a sexual assault victim who is struggling for the strength to speak out, than a partisan who is making salacious lies. This doesn't speak directly to the veracity of her claims. But her reluctance to testify is consistent with the fact that she hadn't wanted to come forward in the first place, which supports her credibility.

Request for FBI, other investigations - 4
While not wanting to testify in front of the entire nation, she has said that she would want the FBI to investigate. This would be consistent with a sexual assault victim who longs for privacy. But perhaps more importantly, it would open her up to legal liability. And that fully neutralizes the suggestions by some that her reluctance to testify her way of trying to avoid perjury.

Classmate claims to have known about incident - 1
Contemporary knowledge of the incident would be a powerfully convincing fact. If what this classmate is saying is true, it's devastating and puts seals the deal. However, much more is needed before it can be afforded significant weight. As it stands now, this classmate could easily be lying and just trying to tip the scales for partisan reasons. This classmate suggests that the incident became general knowledge among much of the student body. So we should be able to expect there to be other classmates who would also remember hearing about the incident. If others come forward, this point could become strong enough to eliminate all doubt. Until then, it is a very weak piece of evidence. Especially because every indication from Ford thus far is that she kept the incident secret out of embarrassment.

Or, DIFI threw her under the bus and that’s why she is trying to crawfish out of having to answer to her accusation. She is a stupid bitch and should either go before Congress and make her accusation, or crawl back under her rock. I would sue the whore into oblivion if it were me.

I’d go after difi. She created this, and went against the request of Ford!

Oh to be sure, it Mrs. Ford is an adult and complicit. DIFI is a has been and she knows it. She is out at election time and very soon will just be another dead political elite hack like John McTumor. But Mrs. Ford is a willing participant. She needs her life destroyed.

I’m just saying so does difi. Let’s deter the next leftist

 

[Crixus]

I believe Ford. The facts are pretty convincing and support her credibility. I am listing the facts, and scoring them for their probative value on a 1 - 5 scale.


Revealed the attack in 2012 - 5
There would be no reason for her to make up this story in 2012. She stated then that the two individuals involved had become prominent members of Washington society, and that is true for Kavanaugh and Judge.

Revealed Kavanaugh's name in 2012 - 2
That she revealed the name only to her husband drastically reduces the impact of this piece of information. We can't ignore the possibility that her husband is willing to lie to support her. But we also cannot discount his statements simply because he is her husband. If there were potential for some kind of tangible benefit for this couple to gain, I would score this a "1", but any possible benefit to be gained would be several steps removed, at best.

Anonymous July letter - 3
Anyone can submit an anonymous letter and say anything. In and of itself it doesn't mean much, and by itself it wouldn't doing much with. But what is significant here is that Ford is not, in any way, trying to launch a last minute torpedo to delay Kavanaugh's confirmation. She submitted an "FYI" letter to inform her Senator, but she didn't want to be in the spotlight. Feinstein's office probably handled this in a very partisan way, playing political games. But that is no reflection on Ford's credibility. Ford only came forward after the letter was leaked and made public.

Going into hiding - 3
In conjunction with the previous point, it is pretty clear that Ford is looking for 15 minutes of fame. To the contrary, she would rather stay out of the spotlight. She didn't have to step forward and reveal herself, and she doesn't like being in the spotlight, but she's done it anyway. What we're seeing is much more consistent with a sexual assault victim who is struggling for the strength to speak out, than a partisan who is making salacious lies. This doesn't speak directly to the veracity of her claims. But her reluctance to testify is consistent with the fact that she hadn't wanted to come forward in the first place, which supports her credibility.

Request for FBI, other investigations - 4
While not wanting to testify in front of the entire nation, she has said that she would want the FBI to investigate. This would be consistent with a sexual assault victim who longs for privacy. But perhaps more importantly, it would open her up to legal liability. And that fully neutralizes the suggestions by some that her reluctance to testify her way of trying to avoid perjury.

Classmate claims to have known about incident - 1
Contemporary knowledge of the incident would be a powerfully convincing fact. If what this classmate is saying is true, it's devastating and puts seals the deal. However, much more is needed before it can be afforded significant weight. As it stands now, this classmate could easily be lying and just trying to tip the scales for partisan reasons. This classmate suggests that the incident became general knowledge among much of the student body. So we should be able to expect there to be other classmates who would also remember hearing about the incident. If others come forward, this point could become strong enough to eliminate all doubt. Until then, it is a very weak piece of evidence. Especially because every indication from Ford thus far is that she kept the incident secret out of embarrassment.

Or, DIFI threw her under the bus and that’s why she is trying to crawfish out of having to answer to her accusation. She is a stupid bitch and should either go before Congress and make her accusation, or crawl back under her rock. I would sue the whore into oblivion if it were me.

I’d go after difi. She created this, and went against the request of Ford!

Oh to be sure, it Mrs. Ford is an adult and complicit. DIFI is a has been and she knows it. She is out at election time and very soon will just be another dead political elite hack like John McTumor. But Mrs. Ford is a willing participant. She needs her life destroyed.

I’m just saying so does difi. Let’s deter the next leftist

I agree. DIFI is already washed up. DIFI would never have done this a year ago. She is desperate.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

I believe Ford. The facts are pretty convincing and support her credibility. I am listing the facts, and scoring them for their probative value on a 1 - 5 scale.


Revealed the attack in 2012 - 5
There would be no reason for her to make up this story in 2012. She stated then that the two individuals involved had become prominent members of Washington society, and that is true for Kavanaugh and Judge.

Revealed Kavanaugh's name in 2012 - 2
That she revealed the name only to her husband drastically reduces the impact of this piece of information. We can't ignore the possibility that her husband is willing to lie to support her. But we also cannot discount his statements simply because he is her husband. If there were potential for some kind of tangible benefit for this couple to gain, I would score this a "1", but any possible benefit to be gained would be several steps removed, at best.

Anonymous July letter - 3
Anyone can submit an anonymous letter and say anything. In and of itself it doesn't mean much, and by itself it wouldn't doing much with. But what is significant here is that Ford is not, in any way, trying to launch a last minute torpedo to delay Kavanaugh's confirmation. She submitted an "FYI" letter to inform her Senator, but she didn't want to be in the spotlight. Feinstein's office probably handled this in a very partisan way, playing political games. But that is no reflection on Ford's credibility. Ford only came forward after the letter was leaked and made public.

Going into hiding - 3
In conjunction with the previous point, it is pretty clear that Ford is looking for 15 minutes of fame. To the contrary, she would rather stay out of the spotlight. She didn't have to step forward and reveal herself, and she doesn't like being in the spotlight, but she's done it anyway. What we're seeing is much more consistent with a sexual assault victim who is struggling for the strength to speak out, than a partisan who is making salacious lies. This doesn't speak directly to the veracity of her claims. But her reluctance to testify is consistent with the fact that she hadn't wanted to come forward in the first place, which supports her credibility.

Request for FBI, other investigations - 4
While not wanting to testify in front of the entire nation, she has said that she would want the FBI to investigate. This would be consistent with a sexual assault victim who longs for privacy. But perhaps more importantly, it would open her up to legal liability. And that fully neutralizes the suggestions by some that her reluctance to testify her way of trying to avoid perjury.

Classmate claims to have known about incident - 1
Contemporary knowledge of the incident would be a powerfully convincing fact. If what this classmate is saying is true, it's devastating and puts seals the deal. However, much more is needed before it can be afforded significant weight. As it stands now, this classmate could easily be lying and just trying to tip the scales for partisan reasons. This classmate suggests that the incident became general knowledge among much of the student body. So we should be able to expect there to be other classmates who would also remember hearing about the incident. If others come forward, this point could become strong enough to eliminate all doubt. Until then, it is a very weak piece of evidence. Especially because every indication from Ford thus far is that she kept the incident secret out of embarrassment.

Revealed the attack in 2012 - 2
No names given. What she told her therapist isn't what she's saying now. Something may have happened, maybe. That or she was just saying shit because she in therapy and has issues.

Revealed Kavanaugh's name in 2012 - 0
So her husband says, now. And what is his story? Was he the cause of the therapy sessions?

Anonymous July letter - 0
Doesn't match her therapists notes. She's a pussy hat activist and left wing psycho (needs more therapy).

Going into hiding - 0
She wanted to be famous. Congrats you're famous.

Request for FBI, other investigations - 0
Asking for things you know will never happen isn't brave. Why didn't she go file something with the local cops? Oh that's right she has no reliable information.

Classmate claims to have known about incident - negative 5
That blew up in her face. The rest of her witnesses have no idea what the hell she's talking about. The witness department is doing her no favors at all.

So there ya go. you scored a negative 3.

 

[captkaos]

Your analysis and ratings notwithstanding, it is utterly absurd to disqualify an otherwise outstanding person for an incident that happened decades ago before he had reached legal age

That is a fair argument.

and while he was drunk.

That is not.

But the bigger problem I see at this point is one of honesty and integrity. Of course, the Democrats are screwing that up entirely and are once again highlighting their incredible talent for failing when victory is handed to them. There is already significant reason to believe that Kavanaugh has lied under oath during this confirmation process. Now, with these accusations coming forth, he is denying them. Given that the accusations are very credible, his denials appear to be more lies, which seems to put Kavanaugh in a position of being an untrustworthy liar. That is a disqualifying trait for a Supreme Court justice.

 

[Avatar4321]

well I've always heard someone drunk doesn't have full recognition of their thoughts. so how can she remember if she was drunk?

Who said that she was drunk when this happened?

She did

 

[captkaos]

I don't believe anybody who would hold onto this for 36 yrs. I was just out of high school in 1982. Believe me we partied in high school. However if a guy perved on a drunk chick at a party ( not RApe) Just trying to get lucky with a drunk chick. Every female in school would have known about the creepy guy who tried to find out what color her panties were. She obviously went to so many parties and got trashed at 15 that she can't even remember where it was. Perhaps it was just a fantasy . My Question is this how long did it take the Dems to find this floozy. Anonymity in this case just screams" liar" there I said it come on Blasey prove me wrong.

 

[captkaos]

YES, let's go over the ACTUAL facts:

No evidence.
No witnesses.
The 'witnesses' she did cite have stated IT NEVER HAPPENED.
No criminal charges filed.
No desire to testify.
No desire to testify under oath.

The accusation was brought to light - against the 'victims' will, by a desperate corrupt Democrat Senator who compromised national security by climbing into bed with Chicomm leaders years ago to enrich herself and harbored a Chinese spy / facilitated Chinese espionage against her own country for 20 years. She held on to this unsubstantiated 2nd-hand rumor - which she now says she does not even totally believe - until the very last minute / most opportune time t cause maximum damage / delay for the benefit of the party - not Ford, rape / sexual assault victims, choosing to go extremely public with this despite having no evidence to support it.

The 'victim', again, had no desire to go public, asked that this NOT be shared, and has been dragged into the spotlight.

She is an admitted Trump-Hating, Conservative Judge-hating, pu$$y hat-wearing, Womens' March-participating extremely active Progressive Socialist activist who tried to scrub / erase THIS before the media really started digging once Feinstein initiated the 'political hit'.


http://www.usmessageboard.com/attachments/ford-jpg.217477/


This deplorable 'Hail Mary' in the 11th hour before the Kavanaugh confirmation vote, the 'Politics of Personal Destruction' tactic right out of their playbook is brought to you .. again ... by the Party who is right this moment completely ignoring a woman who was abused physically by Keith Ellison, who they are trying to make the #2 man in the DNC. (Unlike Ford, she has produced evidence.)

It is being brought to you by the party who has been so infested with criminal sexual predators / criminals within their ranks in the Senate that their members created a very special committee whose sole responsibility was (still is) to pay for the silence of their members' victims with tax payer dollars FOR DECADES....

It is brought to you by the same party whose President was Impeached, after a career marked with accusations of sexual harassment, sexual assaults, and rapes while his wife bullied, berated, demonized, and silenced his victims...who now claims 'EVERY woman must be believed'.

It is brought to you by the Party who could not come up with a successful argument for why their candidate should be elected but instead pulled this same tactic - women crawling out of the woodwork and law suits being filed while his life was being ripped apart by the Liberal media only to have all of it disappear overnight after he decided he had had enough of the BS and dropped out of the race - Herman Cain.

It is being brought to you by a party that has lost its mind after having lost the House, lost the Senate, and after their proven criminal, national security-compromising traitorous candidate - who could not win her party's nomination after cheating, rigging primaries, and breaking laws ran the worst campaign in US history and lost to Donald Trump....a party who has done NOTHING since then except to attempt to tear down anyone and everything they can to oppose the President and UN-DO the 2016 election results that they refuse to accept.

Review over.

 

[jc456]

I don't believe anybody who would hold onto this for 36 yrs. I was just out of high school in 1982. Believe me we partied in high school. However if a guy perved on a drunk chick at a party ( not RApe) Just trying to get lucky with a drunk chick. Every female in school would have known about the creepy guy who tried to find out what color her panties were. She obviously went to so many parties and got trashed at 15 that she can't even remember where it was. Perhaps it was just a fantasy . My Question is this how long did it take the Dems to find this floozy. Anonymity in this case just screams" liar" there I said it come on Blasey prove me wrong.

dude, they made movies about this stuff. Revenge of the Nerds, Sixteen Candles

 

[Pop23]

I believe Ford. The facts are pretty convincing and support her credibility. I am listing the facts, and scoring them for their probative value on a 1 - 5 scale.


Revealed the attack in 2012 - 5
There would be no reason for her to make up this story in 2012. She stated then that the two individuals involved had become prominent members of Washington society, and that is true for Kavanaugh and Judge.

Revealed Kavanaugh's name in 2012 - 2
That she revealed the name only to her husband drastically reduces the impact of this piece of information. We can't ignore the possibility that her husband is willing to lie to support her. But we also cannot discount his statements simply because he is her husband. If there were potential for some kind of tangible benefit for this couple to gain, I would score this a "1", but any possible benefit to be gained would be several steps removed, at best.

Anonymous July letter - 3
Anyone can submit an anonymous letter and say anything. In and of itself it doesn't mean much, and by itself it wouldn't doing much with. But what is significant here is that Ford is not, in any way, trying to launch a last minute torpedo to delay Kavanaugh's confirmation. She submitted an "FYI" letter to inform her Senator, but she didn't want to be in the spotlight. Feinstein's office probably handled this in a very partisan way, playing political games. But that is no reflection on Ford's credibility. Ford only came forward after the letter was leaked and made public.

Going into hiding - 3
In conjunction with the previous point, it is pretty clear that Ford is looking for 15 minutes of fame. To the contrary, she would rather stay out of the spotlight. She didn't have to step forward and reveal herself, and she doesn't like being in the spotlight, but she's done it anyway. What we're seeing is much more consistent with a sexual assault victim who is struggling for the strength to speak out, than a partisan who is making salacious lies. This doesn't speak directly to the veracity of her claims. But her reluctance to testify is consistent with the fact that she hadn't wanted to come forward in the first place, which supports her credibility.

Request for FBI, other investigations - 4
While not wanting to testify in front of the entire nation, she has said that she would want the FBI to investigate. This would be consistent with a sexual assault victim who longs for privacy. But perhaps more importantly, it would open her up to legal liability. And that fully neutralizes the suggestions by some that her reluctance to testify her way of trying to avoid perjury.

Classmate claims to have known about incident - 1
Contemporary knowledge of the incident would be a powerfully convincing fact. If what this classmate is saying is true, it's devastating and puts seals the deal. However, much more is needed before it can be afforded significant weight. As it stands now, this classmate could easily be lying and just trying to tip the scales for partisan reasons. This classmate suggests that the incident became general knowledge among much of the student body. So we should be able to expect there to be other classmates who would also remember hearing about the incident. If others come forward, this point could become strong enough to eliminate all doubt. Until then, it is a very weak piece of evidence. Especially because every indication from Ford thus far is that she kept the incident secret out of embarrassment.

Revealed the attack in 2012 - 2
No names given. What she told her therapist isn't what she's saying now. Something may have happened, maybe. That or she was just saying shit because she in therapy and has issues.

Revealed Kavanaugh's name in 2012 - 0
So her husband says, now. And what is his story? Was he the cause of the therapy sessions?

Anonymous July letter - 0
Doesn't match her therapists notes. She's a pussy hat activist and left wing psycho (needs more therapy).

Going into hiding - 0
She wanted to be famous. Congrats you're famous.

Request for FBI, other investigations - 0
Asking for things you know will never happen isn't brave. Why didn't she go file something with the local cops? Oh that's right she has no reliable information.

Classmate claims to have known about incident - negative 5
That blew up in her face. The rest of her witnesses have no idea what the hell she's talking about. The witness department is doing her no favors at all.

So there ya go. you scored a negative 3.

Well done. The interweb post of the day!

 

[captkaos]

This Ellison guy is a real piece of work " his accuser is for real she has brought credible evidence I guess it's okay these days for Black guys to sexually assault women for real and not okay for a white guy to not assault women and deny false accusations . Why do they think HRC lost not because of who she is because of what she is a "LIAR" come on Hillary Prove me wrong

 

[jc456]

YES, let's go over the ACTUAL facts:

No evidence.
No witnesses.
The 'witnesses' she did cite have stated IT NEVER HAPPENED.
No criminal charges filed.
No desire to testify.
No desire to testify under oath.

The accusation was brought to light - against the 'victims' will, by a desperate corrupt Democrat Senator who compromised national security by climbing into bed with Chicomm leaders years ago to enrich herself and harbored a Chinese spy / facilitated Chinese espionage against her own country for 20 years. She held on to this unsubstantiated 2nd-hand rumor - which she now says she does not even totally believe - until the very last minute / most opportune time t cause maximum damage / delay for the benefit of the party - not Ford, rape / sexual assault victims, choosing to go extremely public with this despite having no evidence to support it.

The 'victim', again, had no desire to go public, asked that this NOT be shared, and has been dragged into the spotlight.

She is an admitted Trump-Hating, Conservative Judge-hating, pu$$y hat-wearing, Womens' March-participating extremely active Progressive Socialist activist who tried to scrub / erase THIS before the media really started digging once Feinstein initiated the 'political hit'.


http://www.usmessageboard.com/attachments/ford-jpg.217477/


This deplorable 'Hail Mary' in the 11th hour before the Kavanaugh confirmation vote, the 'Politics of Personal Destruction' tactic right out of their playbook is brought to you .. again ... by the Party who is right this moment completely ignoring a woman who was abused physically by Keith Ellison, who they are trying to make the #2 man in the DNC. (Unlike Ford, she has produced evidence.)

It is being brought to you by the party who has been so infested with criminal sexual predators / criminals within their ranks in the Senate that their members created a very special committee whose sole responsibility was (still is) to pay for the silence of their members' victims with tax payer dollars FOR DECADES....

It is brought to you by the same party whose President was Impeached, after a career marked with accusations of sexual harassment, sexual assaults, and rapes while his wife bullied, berated, demonized, and silenced his victims...who now claims 'EVERY woman must be believed'.

It is brought to you by the Party who could not come up with a successful argument for why their candidate should be elected but instead pulled this same tactic - women crawling out of the woodwork and law suits being filed while his life was being ripped apart by the Liberal media only to have all of it disappear overnight after he decided he had had enough of the BS and dropped out of the race - Herman Cain.

It is being brought to you by a party that has lost its mind after having lost the House, lost the Senate, and after their proven criminal, national security-compromising traitorous candidate - who could not win her party's nomination after cheating, rigging primaries, and breaking laws ran the worst campaign in US history and lost to Donald Trump....a party who has done NOTHING since then except to attempt to tear down anyone and everything they can to oppose the President and UN-DO the 2016 election results that they refuse to accept.

Review over.

what's sad is constituents follow these disgusting fks. kiss their slimy feet.

 

[jc456]

what truly cracks me up is on tucker carlson, he always has on Demolosers to allow us to see the slimes they really are, anyway, he will read a quote from a fellow democrat about something slimy and the demoloser on the show will tell him straight faced that isn't what the person said. People these leftists are souless.

 

[easyt65]

what truly cracks me up is on tucker carlson, he always has on Demolosers to allow us to see the slimes they really are, anyway, he will read a quote from a fellow democrat about something slimy and the demoloser on the show will tell him straight faced that isn't what the person said. People these leftists are souless.

What's the Name of the show? Tucker's Crazy F*ers?!

 

[jc456]

YES, let's go over the ACTUAL facts:

No evidence.
No witnesses.
The 'witnesses' she did cite have stated IT NEVER HAPPENED.
No criminal charges filed.
No desire to testify.
No desire to testify under oath.

The accusation was brought to light - against the 'victims' will, by a desperate corrupt Democrat Senator who compromised national security by climbing into bed with Chicomm leaders years ago to enrich herself and harbored a Chinese spy / facilitated Chinese espionage against her own country for 20 years. She held on to this unsubstantiated 2nd-hand rumor - which she now says she does not even totally believe - until the very last minute / most opportune time t cause maximum damage / delay for the benefit of the party - not Ford, rape / sexual assault victims, choosing to go extremely public with this despite having no evidence to support it.

The 'victim', again, had no desire to go public, asked that this NOT be shared, and has been dragged into the spotlight.

She is an admitted Trump-Hating, Conservative Judge-hating, pu$$y hat-wearing, Womens' March-participating extremely active Progressive Socialist activist who tried to scrub / erase THIS before the media really started digging once Feinstein initiated the 'political hit'.


http://www.usmessageboard.com/attachments/ford-jpg.217477/


This deplorable 'Hail Mary' in the 11th hour before the Kavanaugh confirmation vote, the 'Politics of Personal Destruction' tactic right out of their playbook is brought to you .. again ... by the Party who is right this moment completely ignoring a woman who was abused physically by Keith Ellison, who they are trying to make the #2 man in the DNC. (Unlike Ford, she has produced evidence.)

It is being brought to you by the party who has been so infested with criminal sexual predators / criminals within their ranks in the Senate that their members created a very special committee whose sole responsibility was (still is) to pay for the silence of their members' victims with tax payer dollars FOR DECADES....

It is brought to you by the same party whose President was Impeached, after a career marked with accusations of sexual harassment, sexual assaults, and rapes while his wife bullied, berated, demonized, and silenced his victims...who now claims 'EVERY woman must be believed'.

It is brought to you by the Party who could not come up with a successful argument for why their candidate should be elected but instead pulled this same tactic - women crawling out of the woodwork and law suits being filed while his life was being ripped apart by the Liberal media only to have all of it disappear overnight after he decided he had had enough of the BS and dropped out of the race - Herman Cain.

It is being brought to you by a party that has lost its mind after having lost the House, lost the Senate, and after their proven criminal, national security-compromising traitorous candidate - who could not win her party's nomination after cheating, rigging primaries, and breaking laws ran the worst campaign in US history and lost to Donald Trump....a party who has done NOTHING since then except to attempt to tear down anyone and everything they can to oppose the President and UN-DO the 2016 election results that they refuse to accept.

Review over.

what's sad is constituents follow these disgusting fks. kiss their slimy feet.

they have no souls.