Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm well aware of that. You know what - in the past there have been Republican's caught molesting children too. Do you think it's ok to molest children? Just because one party engaged in an illegal activity doesn't mean it's ok for the other party to engage in that illegal activity.It's nothing that Republican Secretary's of state haven't done in the past.Just using a private email server for government business is a crime, you dimwit. You have your face buried so far up Hitlery's old ass you can't even see the forest for the trees. Her private email server violated multiple federal laws (one with regards to public records for oversight, one with regards to data backup, etc.).No they didn't expose any crimes of Hillary Clinton, because she committed NONE.
I'm well aware of that. You know what - in the past there have been Republican's caught molesting children too. Do you think it's ok to molest children? Just because one party engaged in an illegal activity doesn't mean it's ok for the other party to engage in that illegal activity.It's nothing that Republican Secretary's of state haven't done in the past.Just using a private email server for government business is a crime, you dimwit. You have your face buried so far up Hitlery's old ass you can't even see the forest for the trees. Her private email server violated multiple federal laws (one with regards to public records for oversight, one with regards to data backup, etc.).No they didn't expose any crimes of Hillary Clinton, because she committed NONE.
That's ironic coming from the person who claims that WikiLeaks "only" releases information about the U.S.You might want to actually READ something for a change--because you're on this thread actually defending Wikileaks--a clear enemy of this nation.
That's ironic coming from the person who claims that WikiLeaks "only" releases information about the U.S.You might want to actually READ something for a change--because you're on this thread actually defending Wikileaks--a clear enemy of this nation.
WikiLeaks has released information about corruption in Swiss Banks, corruption and murder in the government of Kenya, reports on toxic waste dumps by corporations, and more before they ever released a single secret about the U.S.
You're just pissed off that the left-wing lies were exposed to the American people. That's a typical fascist response.
Yes...but unlike you...I think for myself. I'm not a mindless minion who blindly follows the instructions of a party like you do.You just had the CIA director--Trump's pick--tell you that they consider Wikileaks to be a HOSTILE intelligence service, whom overwhelmingly leaks classified information dangerous to the National Security of the United States.
Yes...but unlike you...I think for myself. I'm not a mindless minion who blindly follows the instructions of a party like you do.You just had the CIA director--Trump's pick--tell you that they consider Wikileaks to be a HOSTILE intelligence service, whom overwhelmingly leaks classified information dangerous to the National Security of the United States.
You dimwit...Assange isn't holed up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London because of the U.S. and George W. Bush. He's holed up there because he's awaiting extradition to Sweden over rape charges.While Julian Assange has been hold'd up in the Ecuador embassy in London for the last 4 years surrounded by U.K. police, in his attempt to avoid extradition back to the U.S. to face charges on what he did to G.W. Bush.
It's not like anyone with a brain could not see that Wikileaks was hostile to the USA and working with the Russians...
They've never posted a single revealing or negative leak on the Russians and their Govt and what their Govt agencies do to spy on their enemies or own people. NOT ONCE!
All the leaks are near always on Americans.
The U.S. has no legitimate charges to hold him on.Well he's partially right I think. Pretty sure Assange was cleared of the rape charges a couple months ago, after all the woman had said she'd lied and it was just the government that was going after him (probably because of the dirt he's posted on higher ups.) So I'm pretty sure the only reason he'd still be holed up is if the US wanted him.
The U.S. has no legitimate charges to hold him on.Well he's partially right I think. Pretty sure Assange was cleared of the rape charges a couple months ago, after all the woman had said she'd lied and it was just the government that was going after him (probably because of the dirt he's posted on higher ups.) So I'm pretty sure the only reason he'd still be holed up is if the US wanted him.
The U.S. has no legitimate charges to hold him on.Well he's partially right I think. Pretty sure Assange was cleared of the rape charges a couple months ago, after all the woman had said she'd lied and it was just the government that was going after him (probably because of the dirt he's posted on higher ups.) So I'm pretty sure the only reason he'd still be holed up is if the US wanted him.
That's a matter of perspective. The US government has demanded that Twitter release Assange's account, there has long been talk of bringing charges for espionage or conspiracy to obtain secret documents (arguing that he had intent to sabotage America's foreign policy and endangered lives. They've also claimed that his publishing of names of Afghans cooperating with the US government was illegal.)
Though it is a rough battle because he's not a US citizen, nor is he held to classification requirements, (and even that typically only applies to government officials.) The question has always been; "Does the Constitution apply to non-citizens?" If they did charge him and win it would be a huge blow to the 1st amendment's protections, it would, for example, undermine the argument that say illegals are protected by the constitution thus should have protection from deportation. Which is generically why folks haven't wanted to touch it with a ten foot pole.
Even so, Assange is a bit paranoid, he's made a lot of enemies over the years so I'm not at all surprised that he feels the US is out to get him.
It is never surprising when fascists such as the OP are infuriated by, and wish to silence, organizations of transparency.
When you can pull a secret link out of your ass regarding any other country, especially Russia that Wikileaks has attacked let me know about it.
That would be /his/ opinion, like I said, he doesn't trust authorities; people, governments, etc.
Me... I think it could come to pass that our government, by "will" of the people, will eventually destroy the constitution sadly. There's too much dislike for the core values for it not to happen frankly. Hopefully it doesn't occur until after I die heh
