Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm really fuzzy on why the dems thing Thomas needs to leave the bench. Sandra Day O'Connor was a RABID supporter of abortion....did anyone ever call for her to step down?
Maddie struggles with basic comprehension.... and, sadly, allows her own opinion to outweigh any facts that do not support it. Even more sad, she will accept as 'fact' anything that does support it - even to the point of using an unpublished 'kiss and tell' manuscript by an ex-girlfriend as legitimate.
PLEASE let's revive the Clarence Thomas is a sexual predator thread.
PLEASE.
LOL.
Yea, where you accused me of 'defending Thomas' because I dared to ask why you were accepting an unpublished manuscript from an ex-girlfriend as factually accurate. You lost that one - big time, Maddie..... but you're too ridiculously blind to know that.
The manuscript (has it been published yet?) was clearly one sided, and she was clearly trying to find a publisher.... and yet you accept its contents as fact. Stupid woman.
PLEASE let's revive the Clarence Thomas is a sexual predator thread.
PLEASE.
LOL.
Yea, where you accused me of 'defending Thomas' because I dared to ask why you were accepting an unpublished manuscript from an ex-girlfriend as factually accurate. You lost that one - big time, Maddie..... but you're too ridiculously blind to know that.
The manuscript (has it been published yet?) was clearly one sided, and she was clearly trying to find a publisher.... and yet you accept its contents as fact. Stupid woman.
Oh but she's not defaming Clarence Thomas right? That's pathetic
Why don't you libs just admit the truth, you hate Thomas because he's not aquiescing to your claim of racial ownership on his opinion.
WTF? This is your first post to this thread, Jroc. You have a point, make it. You dun like a thread, skip it.
Dun be an asshole.
Who’s being an "asshole" I just noticed the damn thread and yes it bothers me when people make assumptions and attempt to defame a good man like Clarence Thomas.
I did not defame Thomas. I insulted him. I criticized him.
There's a difference.
It is amazing that no other Justice in 40 years has gone even a year without speaking. Thomas must have skills that no other Justice has managed
It is amazing that no other Justice in 40 years has gone even a year without speaking. Thomas must have skills that no other Justice has managed
Repeating the petty pointless of this thread does nothing to support your "thesis" that asking "questions" at the oral argument stage does anything to alter or even shape any judicial opinions.
If you insist on pretending to believe that the briefs and the prior proceedings -- as well as precedent and a judge's understanding of the Constitutional requirements of a case -- are somehow not quite enough to serve their purpose, and that "oral arguments" and "questions" are the key determining factors, then you are already far too simplisitc to be persuaded of how silly your position is.
But your position is not just silly. It's stupid.
It would appear Thomas is the placeholder of SCOTUS. He says nothing, and he writes almost nothing. As I said, the man whom you almost cannot tell whether he is there.
Why don't you libs just admit the truth, you hate Thomas because he's not aquiescing to your claim of racial ownership on his opinion.
Yea, where you accused me of 'defending Thomas' because I dared to ask why you were accepting an unpublished manuscript from an ex-girlfriend as factually accurate. You lost that one - big time, Maddie..... but you're too ridiculously blind to know that.
The manuscript (has it been published yet?) was clearly one sided, and she was clearly trying to find a publisher.... and yet you accept its contents as fact. Stupid woman.
Oh but she's not defaming Clarence Thomas right? That's pathetic
Oh no.... no.... and she's 'pwned' me again.... at least in her head. I doubt she'll ever understand the difference between her fantasy and reality.
Why don't you libs just admit the truth, you hate Thomas because he's not aquiescing to your claim of racial ownership on his opinion.
Libs want him out of there before the Health Care bill comes up. This is there pathetic attempt to get him out.
It would appear Thomas is the placeholder of SCOTUS. He says nothing, and he writes almost nothing. As I said, the man whom you almost cannot tell whether he is there.
What do you means he writes nothing?
Opinions by Thomas
And he is the only judge who writes his own stuff. The others rely on clerks.