Cleveland Preparing For Liberal Thuggery / Rioting, and Terrorism During RNC Convention

[daws101]

He does not have to tell you what he meant,

You guessed and you were wrong.

Run along.

He said something that was bullshit.

Nothing I said is bullshit, you on the other hand. .

 

[Correll]

I knew you would not answer, hence my use of the word "rhetorically".

YOu libs just say crap, and when I call you on it, it's like I'm the first person in the world who ever scratched the surface of your bullshit and you've got nothing to back it up.

You couldn't be more wrong.

And yet, you've offered no other basis for your claim.

NOw is the point where you finally come up with some other reason to smear Trump, other than the one I guessed, and then pretend that that was what you meant all along.

Again you couldn't be more wrong. Trump's campaign is a train wreck ..
Not a smear, in your pretentiousness plus your complete lack of objectivity you are unable or unwilling to see that simple fact.
Besides being anice asswipe.

Trump's campaign is a Juggernaut.

And you are full of crap.

(Spit take)
World's smallest juggernaut

LOL!

 

[Correll]

He does not have to tell you what he meant,

You guessed and you were wrong.

Run along.

He said something that was bullshit.

Nothing I said is bullshit, you on the other hand. .

When I ask you what you were talking about, and you refuse to say, sounds like bullshit to me.

 

[daws101]

He does not have to tell you what he meant,

You guessed and you were wrong.

Run along.

He said something that was bullshit.

Nothing I said is bullshit, you on the other hand. .

When I ask you what you were talking about, and you refuse to say, sounds like bullshit to me.

False! I refused nothing .
What I said was so obvious that you either had to be brain dead not to see it or in absolute denial of reality.
In your case it's the former.

 

[Correll]

He does not have to tell you what he meant,

You guessed and you were wrong.

Run along.

He said something that was bullshit.

Nothing I said is bullshit, you on the other hand. .

When I ask you what you were talking about, and you refuse to say, sounds like bullshit to me.

False! I refused nothing .
What I said was so obvious that you either had to be brain dead not to see it or in absolute denial of reality.
In your case it's the former.

Oh, interesting.

Just recently you claimed that you HAD told me.

Did you go looking for what you told me and couldn't find it?

 

[JakeStarkey]

He does not have to tell you what he meant,

You guessed and you were wrong.

Run along.

He said something that was bullshit.

Nothing I said is bullshit, you on the other hand. .

When I ask you what you were talking about, and you refuse to say, sounds like bullshit to me.

False! I refused nothing .
What I said was so obvious that you either had to be brain dead not to see it or in absolute denial of reality.
In your case it's the former.

Oh, interesting.

Just recently you claimed that you HAD told me.

Did you go looking for what you told me and couldn't find it?

He has answered you.

Once again, you act as if he hasn't.

So, no, you don't and never will get 'just once more'

 

[Correll]

He said something that was bullshit.

Nothing I said is bullshit, you on the other hand. .

When I ask you what you were talking about, and you refuse to say, sounds like bullshit to me.

False! I refused nothing .
What I said was so obvious that you either had to be brain dead not to see it or in absolute denial of reality.
In your case it's the former.

Oh, interesting.

Just recently you claimed that you HAD told me.

Did you go looking for what you told me and couldn't find it?

He has answered you.

Once again, you act as if he hasn't.

So, no, you don't and never will get 'just once more'

Before he said he had told me.

Now he is saying it was obvious what he meant.

He changed his story.

Because he realized that he had NOT told me.

But is too dishonest to admit it, and move on.

 

[daws101]

He does not have to tell you what he meant,

You guessed and you were wrong.

Run along.

He said something that was bullshit.

Nothing I said is bullshit, you on the other hand. .

When I ask you what you were talking about, and you refuse to say, sounds like bullshit to me.

False! I refused nothing .
What I said was so obvious that you either had to be brain dead not to see it or in absolute denial of reality.
In your case it's the former.

Oh, interesting.

Just recently you claimed that you HAD told me.

Did you go looking for what you told me and couldn't find it?

Again false! o queen of denial.
You have been told several times .
You are either doing an excellent imitation of being dense or you really are .
Amounts to the same thing.

 

[daws101]

Nothing I said is bullshit, you on the other hand. .

When I ask you what you were talking about, and you refuse to say, sounds like bullshit to me.

False! I refused nothing .
What I said was so obvious that you either had to be brain dead not to see it or in absolute denial of reality.
In your case it's the former.

Oh, interesting.

Just recently you claimed that you HAD told me.

Did you go looking for what you told me and couldn't find it?

He has answered you.

Once again, you act as if he hasn't.

So, no, you don't and never will get 'just once more'

Before he said he had told me.

Now he is saying it was obvious what he meant.

He changed his story.

Because he realized that he had NOT told me.

But is too dishonest to admit it, and move on.

False! it being obvious and you being told are one in the same.
The only one being dishonest here is you or you really are as asinine as you seem .

 

[Correll]

He said something that was bullshit.

Nothing I said is bullshit, you on the other hand. .

When I ask you what you were talking about, and you refuse to say, sounds like bullshit to me.

False! I refused nothing .
What I said was so obvious that you either had to be brain dead not to see it or in absolute denial of reality.
In your case it's the former.

Oh, interesting.

Just recently you claimed that you HAD told me.

Did you go looking for what you told me and couldn't find it?

Again false! o queen of denial.
You have been told several times .
You are either doing an excellent imitation of being dense or you really are .
Amounts to the same thing.

I just don't like it when people lie to me.

Which was it, was it really obvious what you meant, or did you explain what you meant when I asked?

 

[daws101]

Nothing I said is bullshit, you on the other hand. .

When I ask you what you were talking about, and you refuse to say, sounds like bullshit to me.

False! I refused nothing .
What I said was so obvious that you either had to be brain dead not to see it or in absolute denial of reality.
In your case it's the former.

Oh, interesting.

Just recently you claimed that you HAD told me.

Did you go looking for what you told me and couldn't find it?

Again false! o queen of denial.
You have been told several times .
You are either doing an excellent imitation of being dense or you really are .
Amounts to the same thing.

I just don't like it when people lie to me.

Which was it, was it really obvious what you meant, or did you explain what you meant when I asked?

Asked and answered.

 

[Correll]

When I ask you what you were talking about, and you refuse to say, sounds like bullshit to me.

False! I refused nothing .
What I said was so obvious that you either had to be brain dead not to see it or in absolute denial of reality.
In your case it's the former.

Oh, interesting.

Just recently you claimed that you HAD told me.

Did you go looking for what you told me and couldn't find it?

He has answered you.

Once again, you act as if he hasn't.

So, no, you don't and never will get 'just once more'

Before he said he had told me.

Now he is saying it was obvious what he meant.

He changed his story.

Because he realized that he had NOT told me.

But is too dishonest to admit it, and move on.

False! it being obvious and you being told are one in the same.
The only one being dishonest here is you or you really are as asinine as you seem .

That's dumb.

If something is obvious, then it doesn't need explained.

I asked for an explanation, and you refused to give me one.

I just wanted you to say what you based your claim on so that I could address it.

It was a completely reasonable request, imo.

I'm not sure why you got so weird on this.

 

[daws101]

 

[daws101]

False! I refused nothing .
What I said was so obvious that you either had to be brain dead not to see it or in absolute denial of reality.
In your case it's the former.

Oh, interesting.

Just recently you claimed that you HAD told me.

Did you go looking for what you told me and couldn't find it?

He has answered you.

Once again, you act as if he hasn't.

So, no, you don't and never will get 'just once more'

Before he said he had told me.

Now he is saying it was obvious what he meant.

He changed his story.

Because he realized that he had NOT told me.

But is too dishonest to admit it, and move on.

False! it being obvious and you being told are one in the same.
The only one being dishonest here is you or you really are as asinine as you seem .

That's dumb.

If something is obvious, then it doesn't need explained.

I asked for an explanation, and you refused to give me one.

I just wanted you to say what you based your claim on so that I could address it.

It was a completely reasonable request, imo.

I'm not sure why you got so weird on this.

Nothing you post is by any measure reasonable.
If you need to have even the simplest concepts spoon fed to you, then the most prudent thing to do would be to shut the fuck up.

 

[Correll]

Oh, interesting.

Just recently you claimed that you HAD told me.

Did you go looking for what you told me and couldn't find it?

He has answered you.

Once again, you act as if he hasn't.

So, no, you don't and never will get 'just once more'

Before he said he had told me.

Now he is saying it was obvious what he meant.

He changed his story.

Because he realized that he had NOT told me.

But is too dishonest to admit it, and move on.

False! it being obvious and you being told are one in the same.
The only one being dishonest here is you or you really are as asinine as you seem .

That's dumb.

If something is obvious, then it doesn't need explained.

I asked for an explanation, and you refused to give me one.

I just wanted you to say what you based your claim on so that I could address it.

It was a completely reasonable request, imo.

I'm not sure why you got so weird on this.

Nothing you post is by any measure reasonable.
If you need to have even the simplest concepts spoon fed to you, then the most prudent thing to do would be to shut the fuck up.

Asking someone what they meant is not normally considered unreasonable.

YOur reaction is hysterically overblown.

 

[JakeStarkey]

He has answered you.

Once again, you act as if he hasn't.

So, no, you don't and never will get 'just once more'

Before he said he had told me.

Now he is saying it was obvious what he meant.

He changed his story.

Because he realized that he had NOT told me.

But is too dishonest to admit it, and move on.

False! it being obvious and you being told are one in the same.
The only one being dishonest here is you or you really are as asinine as you seem .

That's dumb.

If something is obvious, then it doesn't need explained.

I asked for an explanation, and you refused to give me one.

I just wanted you to say what you based your claim on so that I could address it.

It was a completely reasonable request, imo.

I'm not sure why you got so weird on this.

Nothing you post is by any measure reasonable.
If you need to have even the simplest concepts spoon fed to you, then the most prudent thing to do would be to shut the fuck up.

Asking someone what they meant is not normally considered unreasonable.

YOur reaction is hysterically overblown.

(1) When it is clear and reasonable, it does not need to be repeated.

(2) When you troll because you start asking unreasonable demands, it is obvious you have fail.

You do that a lot, Correll, and I am going to make it a duty to point out every time you do it as I have many times in the past and simply state to you, "no, troll, you don't get just once more.".

 

[daws101]

He has answered you.

Once again, you act as if he hasn't.

So, no, you don't and never will get 'just once more'

Before he said he had told me.

Now he is saying it was obvious what he meant.

He changed his story.

Because he realized that he had NOT told me.

But is too dishonest to admit it, and move on.

False! it being obvious and you being told are one in the same.
The only one being dishonest here is you or you really are as asinine as you seem .

That's dumb.

If something is obvious, then it doesn't need explained.

I asked for an explanation, and you refused to give me one.

I just wanted you to say what you based your claim on so that I could address it.

It was a completely reasonable request, imo.

I'm not sure why you got so weird on this.

Nothing you post is by any measure reasonable.
If you need to have even the simplest concepts spoon fed to you, then the most prudent thing to do would be to shut the fuck up.

Asking someone what they meant is not normally considered unreasonable.

YOur reaction is hysterically overblown.

there goes that absolute pretentiousness again.
as I said before nothing you post is reasonable, your statement in this post is smoking gun proof of that,

 

[Correll]

Before he said he had told me.

Now he is saying it was obvious what he meant.

He changed his story.

Because he realized that he had NOT told me.

But is too dishonest to admit it, and move on.

False! it being obvious and you being told are one in the same.
The only one being dishonest here is you or you really are as asinine as you seem .

That's dumb.

If something is obvious, then it doesn't need explained.

I asked for an explanation, and you refused to give me one.

I just wanted you to say what you based your claim on so that I could address it.

It was a completely reasonable request, imo.

I'm not sure why you got so weird on this.

Nothing you post is by any measure reasonable.
If you need to have even the simplest concepts spoon fed to you, then the most prudent thing to do would be to shut the fuck up.

Asking someone what they meant is not normally considered unreasonable.

YOur reaction is hysterically overblown.

(1) When it is clear and reasonable, it does not need to be repeated.

(2) When you troll because you start asking unreasonable demands, it is obvious you have fail.

You do that a lot, Correll, and I am going to make it a duty to point out every time you do it as I have many times in the past and simply state to you, "no, troll, you don't get just once more.".

There is nothing unreasonable about asking someone what they meant


NOR about pointing out that they never explained what they meant.

That bit where you pretend that asking someone what they meant is trolling?

That is you being an asshole.

 

[Correll]

Before he said he had told me.

Now he is saying it was obvious what he meant.

He changed his story.

Because he realized that he had NOT told me.

But is too dishonest to admit it, and move on.

False! it being obvious and you being told are one in the same.
The only one being dishonest here is you or you really are as asinine as you seem .

That's dumb.

If something is obvious, then it doesn't need explained.

I asked for an explanation, and you refused to give me one.

I just wanted you to say what you based your claim on so that I could address it.

It was a completely reasonable request, imo.

I'm not sure why you got so weird on this.

Nothing you post is by any measure reasonable.
If you need to have even the simplest concepts spoon fed to you, then the most prudent thing to do would be to shut the fuck up.

Asking someone what they meant is not normally considered unreasonable.

YOur reaction is hysterically overblown.

there goes that absolute pretentiousness again.
as I said before nothing you post is reasonable, your statement in this post is smoking gun proof of that,

I am only presenting myself as calm and reasonable. I am not claiming to be smarter than you or better than you.

I asked you what you meant.


Pointing out that you are being hysterical about this, is just the truth, as far as I can see.


Here is my post that upset you so much.


"Soooo, if it wasn't that then, than WTF were you referring to, I ask rhetorically."


I asked rhetorically, because libs like you rarely if ever are willing to discuss why they say the shit they say.

 

[daws101]

False! it being obvious and you being told are one in the same.
The only one being dishonest here is you or you really are as asinine as you seem .

That's dumb.

If something is obvious, then it doesn't need explained.

I asked for an explanation, and you refused to give me one.

I just wanted you to say what you based your claim on so that I could address it.

It was a completely reasonable request, imo.

I'm not sure why you got so weird on this.

Nothing you post is by any measure reasonable.
If you need to have even the simplest concepts spoon fed to you, then the most prudent thing to do would be to shut the fuck up.

Asking someone what they meant is not normally considered unreasonable.

YOur reaction is hysterically overblown.

there goes that absolute pretentiousness again.
as I said before nothing you post is reasonable, your statement in this post is smoking gun proof of that,

I am only presenting myself as calm and reasonable. I am not claiming to be smarter than you or better than you.

I asked you what you meant.


Pointing out that you are being hysterical about this, is just the truth, as far as I can see.


Here is my post that upset you so much.


"Soooo, if it wasn't that then, than WTF were you referring to, I ask rhetorically."


I asked rhetorically, because libs like you rarely if ever are willing to discuss why they say the shit they say.