Climate Change Brings Warmer Global Temps

[Cardinal Carminative]

Pseudo-intellectual business crap? I think not. More like the root cause for your predictable surprises and the reason why victim narratives resonate so deeply with you.

Armchair psychologist too! Woah! TWO TWO TWO things you are bad at now!

 

[Cardinal Carminative]

Incorrect. I'm the one who said I think you are a woman because you are so emotional. You shouldn't be ashamed of being a woman.

Here's your new Avatar for the forum. (I assume someone activated your camera when you weren't looking)

You're gonna get a LOT of dates now!

 

[ding]

Armchair psychologist too! Woah! TWO TWO TWO things you are bad at now!

Actually it's just the one thing and I'm quite good at it.

 

[ding]

Here's your new Avatar for the forum. (I assume someone activated your camera when you weren't looking)

You're gonna get a LOT of dates now!

That's such a woman thing to post.

 

[Sunsettommy]

A question about cut and paste spurred THAT particular insight?

Woah. You live where recreational pot is legal?

No, you have ignored many questions and sourced presentations.

You are just another ordinary warmist/alarmist who isn't impressing anyone here.

I don't do drugs never have and being a free-thinking man, I don't join any groups at all.

 

[Sunsettommy]

That's such a woman thing to post.

This from a person who claims to have a big science degree but lies omit and ignore sourced counterpoints posted and does if for many hours a day even during the weekday too must be unemployed or retired.

This is obviously her,

Terminal disease who knows?

 

[Cardinal Carminative]

I don't do drugs never have and being a free-thinking man, I don't join any groups at all.

Good for you, UPRIGHT AMERICAN!

 

[ding]

UPRIGHT AMERICAN!

What nationality are you?

 

[mamooth]

Because measurements from urban stations are warmer than rural station readings. Use some common sense as to why.

Rural stations have been warming a little faster than urban stations.

That makes anyone who claims "It's the UHI effect!" claim look very stupid.

What? You didn't know that basic fact?

Oh, that's right. You only know what your cult sees fit to tell you, and your cult did not want you to know that.

 

[mamooth]

everything you believe will be proven wrong within 30 years by colder temperatures.

Your IceAgeCult has been saying that non-stop for over 40 years now.

And instead of cooling, it just keeps warming strongly.

Does that diminish your icy zeal at all? Of course not. Like any good end-times cultist, each time your frozen doomsday fails to arrive, you just push the date of armageddon back a little more.

 

[Vegasgiants]

Your last post literally proved it. That was a really stupid thing to say. Who cares that a shit load of examples of warming and cooling trends only went back 10,000 years.

What do you think caused them?

View attachment 630217

A wide variety of things

 

[mamooth]

Incorrect. I'm the one who said I think you are a woman because you are so emotional.

Not all deniers are misogynist wankers, but an oversized proportion of them are, as we can clearly see here.

Ding, point to us on the doll where the bad women touched you.

Oh, they didn't? And that's the problem? I see.

 

[mamooth]

Ha ha ha you can't read it was a Snowball Earth while CO2 was around the 4,000-ppm level that is what he wrote which you never contradicted at all.

Why would I want to contradict what was true?

Try acting like the honest and rational people here. State your point clearly and directly, instead of doing your usual insult-and-run thing.

Specifically, what is the point of proudly announcing "CO2 was at 4000 ppm and the world was still frozen!"?

I agree it proves that CO2 isn't the only thing affecting climate ... but nobody here has ever claimed that, so if you said that was your point, you'd just be attacking a dumb strawman.

See? There's my point stated directly, that you're attacking a dumb strawman as a way to run from the issue. Now you try it.

 

[mamooth]

This from a person who claims to have a big science degree but lies omit and ignore sourced counterpoints posted and does if for many hours a day even during the weekday too must be unemployed or retired.

More projection there than a 12-screen cineplex. The only time you got close to discussing the issue here was when you squealed, at a pitch high enough to make dogs howl, to LOOK AT POST 13.

That image is of historical temperatures of one single spot in Greenland. I think even you can understand that one spot in Greenland is not the world.

An honest person would have posted a graph of global temps, being that was the topic. Your pal didn't, and you endorsed the dishonesty. There's your first faceplant, pretending that your local graph was global.

Your second faceplant is the point I brought up, and which you all ran from. The fact that climate has changed naturally in the past does not prevent humans from changing climate.

We know the current fast warming isn't natural. The stratospheric warming, increase in backradiation, decrease in outgoing OLR in the GHG bands, and the polar amplification are smoking guns for a human cause. Your "It's a natural cycle!" theory can't explain such data, therefore your theory is wrong.

 

[Sunsettommy]

More projection there than a 12-screen cineplex. The only time you got close to discussing the issue here was when you squealed, at a pitch high enough to make dogs howl, to LOOK AT POST 13.

That image is of historical temperatures of one single spot in Greenland. I think even you can understand that one spot in Greenland is not the world.

An honest person would have posted a graph of global temps, being that was the topic. Your pal didn't, and you endorsed the dishonesty. There's your first faceplant, pretending that your local graph was global.

Your second faceplant is the point I brought up, and which you all ran from. The fact that climate has changed naturally in the past does not prevent humans from changing climate.

We know the current fast warming isn't natural. The stratospheric warming, increase in backradiation, decrease in outgoing OLR in the GHG bands, and the polar amplification are smoking guns for a human cause. Your "It's a natural cycle!" theory can't explain such data, therefore your theory is wrong.

You don't understand post 13 neither did PV system since he dodged it over and over and stupidly asked for the source link in which me and Ding answered with the answer.

POST 35

He posted it with the chart from the start on page one.

===

POST 42

"Already told you it is at post 13 you bling FUCK!

Said it at post 34.

Ding told you several times he posted the source for it which is right below the chart he posted the first time he brough it up."

===

The shitstain at POST 38 STILL doesn't understand where the source link is despite that he already saw it at post 16:

"I didn't see the source link. Could you point me to the post where it was?"

===

Then summed it up how stupid this pile of Gook shit couldn't absorb repeated easy to follow answers to his question about where the source for the chart he always dodged anyway:

POST 45

Several times PV system requesting the source for the chart Ding posted which Ding duly answered several times:

Ding at POST 13 showed the 10,000-year Greenland chart for the FIRST time with the source link right below it.

PV replies at post 16,

"That only goes back 10,000 years.

The earth is 4.5BILLION years old."

which shows he at least saw the chart.

Then after several exchanges over the chart PV has seen several times as Ding posted it again and again,

PV writes at POST 23,

"Source the image and maybe I'll take a look at it. If not, then I won't bother."

The very next post 24 Ding posted the chart for the 4th time with this below it a very helpful hint:

"δ18O from the GISP2 ice core for the past 10,000 years."

Ding in POST 25 reply to PV's request for the source of the chart posted the charts source for the SECOND time.

Dumb ass PV statement at POST 29 says,

"Without a citation it's pretty much a random graph."

The moron was already told this 5 minutes earlier,

"δ18O from the GISP2 ice core for the past 10,000 years."

===

Then I jumped in to try helping his slow motion brain to learn the source that was given to him twice already.

POST 34,

"You asked for the source for the chart which he already posted it in POST 13 you sure have trouble reading simple posts and not just here."

The retard replies and keep in mind this is now 58 minutes after Ding at Post 25 gave him the source link for the SECOND time,

PV writes at 6:05,

"I didn't see the source link. Could you point me to the post where it was?"

This after THREE times he was shown where the Source link is.

It is clear we are dealing with another dog eared drooling warmist/alarmist GOOK who can't figure out simple answers to his repeated requests for the source which TWO people answered him several times where it is then he vanished.

===

All the PV Gook needed to do was go to post 13 where the chart first showed up with the Source link right below it.

He saw the whole thing at post 16 when replied to the chart anyway where the freaking link is located right under the chart!

This is what he saw:

δ18O from the GISP2 ice core for the past 10,000 years.

The past is the key to the future: Temperature history of the past 10,000 years​

=====

You bring nothing to the table as usual.

 

[ding]

Your IceAgeCult has been saying that non-stop for over 40 years now.

And instead of cooling, it just keeps warming strongly.

Does that diminish your icy zeal at all? Of course not. Like any good end-times cultist, each time your frozen doomsday fails to arrive, you just push the date of armageddon back a little more.

It's not an ice age cult as it is a recognition of the persistent cooling trend which has been occurring for 50 million years and accelerated over the past 5 million years. It's like you people can't put this discussion in its proper context.

 

[ding]

A wide variety of things

Such as what?

 

[ding]

Not all deniers are misogynist wankers, but an oversized proportion of them are, as we can clearly see here.

Ding, point to us on the doll where the bad women touched you.

Oh, they didn't? And that's the problem? I see.

OMG... you're a chick too.

 

[ding]

Rural stations have been warming a little faster than urban stations.

Dummy says wut?

 

[Sunsettommy]

It's not an ice age cult as it is a recognition of the persistent cooling trend which has been occurring for 50 million years and accelerated over the past 5 million years. It's like you people can't put this discussion in its proper context.

He and many others do not realize Earth is a slowly DYING world where it will continue to get colder and colder into the long future as the North Pole will gain more land over it that will help build a more permanent ice base that expands in time.