Common sense gun regulations--need to be passed now.

[Rustic]

Yep, if you were to believe what the progressive say, everybody in every “red” county in the United States would be dead by now

 

[Dr Grump]

Yep, And furthermore their true intentions is an all out firearm confiscation.
They cannot tolerate anybody they disagree with

No, not confiscation. Just common sense laws around the type of firearms that are allowed on the streets. You can still have your peashooter, pants shitter. You'll still feel like the Big Man on Campus walking around with your poor excuse of a phallic symbol in hand. People will still be going "what a man!! What a real man!! Look at that gun in his hand." You'll still be cock of the walk thinking you're a tough guy. Don't worry, your manhood will still be in place (well, to those of us on this board who know you, you'll still be the pants shitter who needs to hide behind his peashooter because he's scared the sky will fall). But you get the picture....pants shitter...

 

[Rustic]

People in UK have no right to firearm ownership… So there should be zero violence by your account

Doesn't answer his question pants shitter...

No firearms Means no violence... right?
Lol

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

We didn’t ban Airliners just because Muslims used them to murder 3000 Americans

 

[Dr Grump]

[
No firearms Means no violence... right?
Lol

No. No, confiscating specific type of firearms means there are less chances of mass shootings. The only people talking confiscations are the right wing loons like yourselves and the NRA. The VAST majority of people, including Dems, have never talked confiscation of all firearms. Only the pants shitters, scaredy cat, neocon, gun loving wusses have. No leftie I have read about has ever said less guns equals no violence. Ever.

 

[Rustic]

Yep, And furthermore their true intentions is an all out firearm confiscation.
They cannot tolerate anybody they disagree with

No, not confiscation. Just common sense laws around the type of firearms that are allowed on the streets. You can still have your peashooter, pants shitter. You'll still feel like the Big Man on Campus walking around with your poor excuse of a phallic symbol in hand. People will still be going "what a man!! What a real man!! Look at that gun in his hand." You'll still be cock of the walk thinking you're a tough guy. Don't worry, your manhood will still be in place (well, to those of us on this board who know you, you'll still be the pants shitter who needs to hide behind his peashooter because he's scared the sky will fall). But you get the picture....pants shitter...

Go ahead you can say it... You really want an out right firearm confiscation. It’s ok I have known all along.
All of you guys want the same thing to force people you disagree with into submission and misery… The fact
Opinion | Repeal the Second Amendment

 

[Brain357]

so many mass murders here and repub ah's are worried about a wall?

Perhaps you need to stop helping killers then.

You guys got rid of the assault weapon and magazine capacity limits. You threw gas on the fire. Your why we constantly have the new worse mass shooting.

You won't have problem to provide the link when the last time the "assault weapon" was used in school shooting.

The gun used just this week would have been banned under the law.

Gun used was not the assault weapon.

It would have been illegal. FACT.

 

[Rustic]

[
No firearms Means no violence... right?
Lol

No. No, confiscating specific type of firearms means there are less chances of mass shootings. The only people talking confiscations are the right wing loons like yourselves and the NRA. The VAST majority of people, including Dems, have never talked confiscation of all firearms. Only the pants shitters, scaredy cat, neocon, gun loving wusses have. No leftie I have read about has ever said less guns equals no violence. Ever.

You anti-gun nutters talk about firearm confiscation every time you’re on here, I’ve always known about your slippery slope.

 

[Brain357]

Perhaps you need to stop helping killers then.

You guys got rid of the assault weapon and magazine capacity limits. You threw gas on the fire. Your why we constantly have the new worse mass shooting.

You won't have problem to provide the link when the last time the "assault weapon" was used in school shooting.

The gun used just this week would have been banned under the law.

Gun used was not the assault weapon.

It would have been illegal. FACT.

The guns used in the worst mass shooting in US history would have been illegal. But they aren't because republicans decided they wanted more dead children.

 

[Rustic]

So....you can't answer my question....you can't show how Australian gun control laws actually stopped all those shootings from becoming mass public shootings...so you don't even try to answer, because you can't......

Australian gun control did not stop mass shootings there.....dumb luck has been protecting them...and that can't last....

Countries with strong gun control don’t have a mass shooting problem. Fact.

You see that entire list...a list of public shootings.....in a country that banned and confiscated guns....the only thing that keeps those shootings from being mass public shootings is the decision of the shooter, who is shooting people, to not shoot more people, or he simply fails to kill all the people he shoots...

And you respond with that stupidity........

Typical.

Stupid is not recognizing it is a US problem. Nobody else has regular school shootings.

Moron...we know it is a problem, you asswipes just don't have the solution...we do. You get rid of gun free zones and allow some staff, with training, to carry guns....

Funny, mass shootings aren't a problem where there is strong gun control.

Other countries do not have the Second Amendment, firearm ownership is not a right in those countries… So your point is not valid

 

[eddiew37]

Yep, And furthermore their true intentions is an all out firearm confiscation.
They cannot tolerate anybody they disagree with

No, not confiscation. Just common sense laws around the type of firearms that are allowed on the streets. You can still have your peashooter, pants shitter. You'll still feel like the Big Man on Campus walking around with your poor excuse of a phallic symbol in hand. People will still be going "what a man!! What a real man!! Look at that gun in his hand." You'll still be cock of the walk thinking you're a tough guy. Don't worry, your manhood will still be in place (well, to those of us on this board who know you, you'll still be the pants shitter who needs to hide behind his peashooter because he's scared the sky will fall). But you get the picture....pants shitter...

Post of the month ,,,nay,, year

 

[Rustic]

Guns are not the problem. Criminals are.

Gun control sure worked this time:
Milwaukee man accused of plotting machine gun attack at Masonic center still in jail

Problem is we have made mass killing guns legal.

 

[Brain357]

Countries with strong gun control don’t have a mass shooting problem. Fact.

You see that entire list...a list of public shootings.....in a country that banned and confiscated guns....the only thing that keeps those shootings from being mass public shootings is the decision of the shooter, who is shooting people, to not shoot more people, or he simply fails to kill all the people he shoots...

And you respond with that stupidity........

Typical.

Stupid is not recognizing it is a US problem. Nobody else has regular school shootings.

Moron...we know it is a problem, you asswipes just don't have the solution...we do. You get rid of gun free zones and allow some staff, with training, to carry guns....

Funny, mass shootings aren't a problem where there is strong gun control.

Other countries do not have the Second Amendment, firearm ownership is not a right in those countries… So your point is not valid

Antonin Scalia says 2nd Amendment has its limits

 

[Rustic]

Here are my suggestions.
1. Ban semi-automatic weapons and 30 round gun clips.

That first suggestion alone is why you people never get anywhere in your gun control efforts because your definition of "common sense" is anything but. What you want is practically full confiscation. Pretty much every gun out there is semi-automatic, so one, gun owners rightfully never trust you loons when you say you want "common sense" controls because we know you really mean is no guns at all and two, banning all semi-autos would be unconstitutional.

And you have the nerve to refer to others as extremists.

how many mass shootings in japan ,,in australia land??

This is not Japan or Australia, we have firearms ownership as a right here. There is no reason to turn peoples lives upside down just because of bleeding heart pussies

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

how many mass shootings in japan ,,in australia land??

How many mass shootings or how many murders in general? After the 1996 gun ban in Australia they saw higher homicide rates in 1997, 1999, 2000, and 2002. They've seen small spikes and small decreases in other years.

Overall, their rate of murders has declined in the last 20 years, but so has the United States as you can see from the below statistics.

From 1991 to 2016, the murder rate fell by roughly half, from 9.8 killings per 100,000 to 5.3. The murder rate rose last year by an estimated 7.8 percent. With violence at historic lows, modest increases in the murder rate may appear large in percentage terms. Similarly, murder rates in the 30 largest cities increased by 13.2 percent in 2015 and an estimated 14 percent in 2016. These increases were highly concentrated. More than half of the 2015 urban increase (51.8 percent) was caused by just three cities, Baltimore, Chicago, and Washington, D.C. And Chicago alone was responsible for 43.7 percent of the rise in urban murders in 2016. It is important to remember the relatively small base from which the percentage increases are calculated

Crime Trends: 1990-2016

Australia's murder rate declined with a gun ban and ours declined without one. Has Australia had any mass shooting? No, but so what? A murder is a murder. What's the difference if 17 people are killed at once or 17 people are killed individually at 17 different locations. They are all equally dead. The mass shooting simply generates more shock factor and gets more media coverage, so you find it more abhorrent, but the individual victims are just as dead as the mass victims.

And as far as Japan, are you seriously comparing Japanese society to American society? Japan is a homogeneous country with one language and one culture that highly values education, personal honor, and respect for others. They are completely opposite of Americans who are ignorant and crass assholes.

 

[Brain357]

Here are my suggestions.
1. Ban semi-automatic weapons and 30 round gun clips.

That first suggestion alone is why you people never get anywhere in your gun control efforts because your definition of "common sense" is anything but. What you want is practically full confiscation. Pretty much every gun out there is semi-automatic, so one, gun owners rightfully never trust you loons when you say you want "common sense" controls because we know you really mean is no guns at all and two, banning all semi-autos would be unconstitutional.

And you have the nerve to refer to others as extremists.

how many mass shootings in japan ,,in australia land??

This is not Japan or Australia, we have firearms ownership as a right here. There is no reason to turn peoples lives upside down just because of bleeding heart pussies

Antonin Scalia says 2nd Amendment has its limits

 

[Rustic]

The NRA is freedom's safest place. More NRA fewer democrats.

Yah, that's right. Slaughter them with your protected AR-15 before they can breed or get educated. You friggin baby killers.

 

[Rustic]

You guys got rid of the assault weapon and magazine capacity limits. You threw gas on the fire. Your why we constantly have the new worse mass shooting.

You won't have problem to provide the link when the last time the "assault weapon" was used in school shooting.

The gun used just this week would have been banned under the law.

Gun used was not the assault weapon.

It would have been illegal. FACT.

The guns used in the worst mass shooting in US history would have been illegal. But they aren't because republicans decided they wanted more dead children.

Because criminals always obey the laws… Right? LOL

 

[Brain357]

You won't have problem to provide the link when the last time the "assault weapon" was used in school shooting.

The gun used just this week would have been banned under the law.

Gun used was not the assault weapon.

It would have been illegal. FACT.

The guns used in the worst mass shooting in US history would have been illegal. But they aren't because republicans decided they wanted more dead children.

Because criminals always obey the laws… Right? LOL

Nope, but it's better when they get caught trying to get an illegal gun, than after killing.
Milwaukee man accused of plotting machine gun attack at Masonic center still in jail

 

[eddiew37]

how many mass shootings in japan ,,in australia land??

How many mass shootings or how many murders in general? After the 1996 gun ban in Australia they saw higher homicide rates in 1997, 1999, 2000, and 2002. They've seen small spikes and small decreases in other years.

Overall, their rate of murders has declined in the last 20 years, but so has the United States as you can see from the below statistics.

From 1991 to 2016, the murder rate fell by roughly half, from 9.8 killings per 100,000 to 5.3. The murder rate rose last year by an estimated 7.8 percent. With violence at historic lows, modest increases in the murder rate may appear large in percentage terms. Similarly, murder rates in the 30 largest cities increased by 13.2 percent in 2015 and an estimated 14 percent in 2016. These increases were highly concentrated. More than half of the 2015 urban increase (51.8 percent) was caused by just three cities, Baltimore, Chicago, and Washington, D.C. And Chicago alone was responsible for 43.7 percent of the rise in urban murders in 2016. It is important to remember the relatively small base from which the percentage increases are calculated

Crime Trends: 1990-2016

Australia's murder rate declined with a gun ban and ours declined without one. Has Australia had any mass shooting? No, but so what? A murder is a murder. What's the difference if 17 people are killed at once or 17 people are killed individually at 17 different locations. They are all equally dead. The mass shooting simply generates more shock factor and gets more media coverage, so you find it more abhorrent, but the individual victims are just as dead as the mass victims.

And as far as Japan, are you seriously comparing Japanese society to American society? Japan is a homogeneous country with one language and one culture that highly values education, personal honor, and respect for others. They are completely opposite of Americans who are ignorant and crass assholes.

yes taz murder is murder but so many at one time vs one or 2 at a time? If the guy shooting from his hotel window didn't have automatic weapons how many lives would have been saved?