Pogo
Diamond Member
- Dec 7, 2012
- 123,708
- 22,749
Question (I don't really expect an answer):
If the shooter knew that those at the school were armed, would he still have gone on his rampage? I'll give the the only honest answer: no one knows for sure. However since there is at least the POSSIBILITY that innocent lives would have been spared if the shooter THOUGHT he would be met with armed resistance, then gun control was responsible - at least in part - for the carnage.
That is an absolutely absurd and desperate rationalization, stretched to for the sake of bowing down to Lord Gun Almighty. The fact is that if the shooter's mother hadn't bought into the whole "guns are for protection" bullshit story, they would not have been there for his easy access, and none of this goes down.
Ergo, the "guns as protection" canard is responsible - in large part - for the carnage. Period. And all this incessant babbling of the same "protection" horseshit perpetuates it by making guns more and more accessible. As it has in the past and will in the future, Gun World Without End, Amen.