Connecticut SC rules gun maker can be sued

[Auld Phart]

Court rules gun maker can be sued over Newtown shooting

Yup...you make deadly weapons..you die with deadly weapons.

I thought federal law prohibited those suits. Hmmmmm

Liability/wrongful death suits, yes.
But this concerns marketing practices subject to state regulation.

Where did Lanza buy his gun?

he stole them from his survivalist mama....

he stole them from his survivalist mama....

Survivalist?

Where did you get that from?

 

[playtime]

Court rules gun maker can be sued over Newtown shooting

Yup...you make deadly weapons..you die with deadly weapons.

Mr. Lanza, the alleged shooter at Sandy Hook, didn't buy any guns from Remington or anyone else. He stole the weapons.

Further, all Remington did was manufacture it.

Should Hyundai or Tesla or whoever built the car that the guy who ran into the crowd in Charlottesville, be held responsible there?

Its the same thing.

uh - no.

automobiles... by original design.... & sole purpose... is not to kill.

But the principle is the same. Remington will not be held liable because guns were designed to kill. And automobile manufacturers can be held responsible under the same guidelines as firearms.

i never said they would... however, they can be made to be very expensive & difficult to acquire.

 

[Auld Phart]

The overwhelming majority of gun owners are.

yep. & most are for common sense gun laws. but the NRA & gun manufacturers don't.

I keep hearing that. What sort of "common sense" gun laws?

how'z about stronger nationwide uniform background checks, waiting periods, rescind the unbanning by trump of the cray cray 's ability to now own guns, mandate & require passing a training course for all who buy guns, no longer can high velocity ARs be a public possession,grandfather the ones out there now & do what chris rock suggests:..

The nationwide background check system works. The problem is that mental health professionals are not punished for failing to report their patients to the system.

And what mental illnesses (I assume that is what you mean by "cray cray") would you have included? ADHD? Low self esteem? Nymphomania?

straw purchases are a big problem too. & this iis what i was talking about-

The Obama rule would have prevented an estimated 75,000 people with mental disorders from being able to purchase a firearm. It was crafted as part of Obama’s efforts to strengthen the federal background check system in the wake of the 2012 massacre of 20 young students and six staff at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.

FACT CHECK: Did President Trump Revoke Gun Background Checks for Mentally Ill People?

the Obama rule would have prevented an estimated 75,000 people with mental disorders from being able to purchase a firearm.

as designated by someone sitting in a cubicle at the Social Security Office.

 

[playtime]

uh - no.
automobiles... by original design.... & sole purpose... is not to kill.

Wait... you think the sole design and purpose of a gun is to kill?

the original purpose was. the design was to do it quickly, & with less risk to the person shooting. go ahead, correct me.

 

[Auld Phart]

Court rules gun maker can be sued over Newtown shooting

Yup...you make deadly weapons..you die with deadly weapons.

Mr. Lanza, the alleged shooter at Sandy Hook, didn't buy any guns from Remington or anyone else. He stole the weapons.

Further, all Remington did was manufacture it.

Should Hyundai or Tesla or whoever built the car that the guy who ran into the crowd in Charlottesville, be held responsible there?

Its the same thing.

uh - no.

automobiles... by original design.... & sole purpose... is not to kill.

But the principle is the same. Remington will not be held liable because guns were designed to kill. And automobile manufacturers can be held responsible under the same guidelines as firearms.

i never said they would... however, they can be made to be very expensive & difficult to acquire.

however, they can be made to be very expensive & difficult to acquire.

Why should they be?

To keep the lower classes from acquiring them?

How will that keep firearms out of the hands of a criminal?

Usually, they are using YOUR money to buy weapons

 

[playtime]

Court rules gun maker can be sued over Newtown shooting

Yup...you make deadly weapons..you die with deadly weapons.

I thought federal law prohibited those suits. Hmmmmm

Liability/wrongful death suits, yes.
But this concerns marketing practices subject to state regulation.

Where did Lanza buy his gun?

he stole them from his survivalist mama....

he stole them from his survivalist mama....

Survivalist?

Where did you get that from?

it was reported on when it happened. local tv covered it...

 

[M14 Shooter]

uh - no.
automobiles... by original design.... & sole purpose... is not to kill.

Wait... you think the sole design and purpose of a gun is to kill?

the original purpose was

Do you need help moving that goalpost? Sure looks heavy.
I have innumerable guns - I'll give you a list, and you show us how its sole design and purpose is to kill.

 

[playtime]

Court rules gun maker can be sued over Newtown shooting

Yup...you make deadly weapons..you die with deadly weapons.

Mr. Lanza, the alleged shooter at Sandy Hook, didn't buy any guns from Remington or anyone else. He stole the weapons.

Further, all Remington did was manufacture it.

Should Hyundai or Tesla or whoever built the car that the guy who ran into the crowd in Charlottesville, be held responsible there?

Its the same thing.

uh - no.

automobiles... by original design.... & sole purpose... is not to kill.

But the principle is the same. Remington will not be held liable because guns were designed to kill. And automobile manufacturers can be held responsible under the same guidelines as firearms.

i never said they would... however, they can be made to be very expensive & difficult to acquire.

however, they can be made to be very expensive & difficult to acquire.

Why should they be?

To keep the lower classes from acquiring them?

How will that keep firearms out of the hands of a criminal?

Usually, they are using YOUR money to buy weapons

expensive enough...just like cigarettes... or cars.... but the high velocity ammo & muti round mags?

top dolla if you wanna love them long time.............

 

[playtime]

uh - no.
automobiles... by original design.... & sole purpose... is not to kill.

Wait... you think the sole design and purpose of a gun is to kill?

the original purpose was

Do you need help moving that goalpost? Sure looks heavy.
I have innumerable guns - I'll give you a list, and you show us how its sole design and purpose is to kill.

lol... why was a gun invented?

 

[M14 Shooter]

But the principle is the same. Remington will not be held liable because guns were designed to kill. And automobile manufacturers can be held responsible under the same guidelines as firearms.

i never said they would... however, they can be made to be very expensive & difficult to acquire.

You understand that if the state raises the cost of the exercise of right wit the intent to make it more difficult to exercise said right, it violates the constitution.
Right?

 

[Auld Phart]

I thought federal law prohibited those suits. Hmmmmm

Liability/wrongful death suits, yes.
But this concerns marketing practices subject to state regulation.

Where did Lanza buy his gun?

he stole them from his survivalist mama....

he stole them from his survivalist mama....

Survivalist?

Where did you get that from?

it was reported on when it happened. local tv covered it...

I've seen any number of links stating she was a gun enthusiast...

NONE about 'survivalist'.

House wasn't much of a compound, don't remember stocks of non perishables being mentioned.

She was kinda like me...

Likes shooting, but not worried overly about the zombie apocalypse.

 

[M14 Shooter]

uh - no.
automobiles... by original design.... & sole purpose... is not to kill.

Wait... you think the sole design and purpose of a gun is to kill?

the original purpose was

Do you need help moving that goalpost? Sure looks heavy.
I have innumerable guns - I'll give you a list, and you show us how its sole design and purpose is to kill.

lol... why was a gun invented?

What's that?
You know you can't show the sole design and purpose of my guns is to kill?
Thought not. Thanks.

 

[Auld Phart]

uh - no.
automobiles... by original design.... & sole purpose... is not to kill.

Wait... you think the sole design and purpose of a gun is to kill?

the original purpose was

Do you need help moving that goalpost? Sure looks heavy.
I have innumerable guns - I'll give you a list, and you show us how its sole design and purpose is to kill.

lol... why was a gun invented?

as much for defense as attack.

 

[playtime]

So now that the NRA is without all the Russian funding....how long before they fold? Or did they funnel all the Russian money to trump?

More lies?
Sad.

perhaps maria bontins - the little roooskie honey pot is telling the powers that be all she knows....

 

[Auld Phart]

Mr. Lanza, the alleged shooter at Sandy Hook, didn't buy any guns from Remington or anyone else. He stole the weapons.

Further, all Remington did was manufacture it.

Should Hyundai or Tesla or whoever built the car that the guy who ran into the crowd in Charlottesville, be held responsible there?

Its the same thing.

uh - no.

automobiles... by original design.... & sole purpose... is not to kill.

But the principle is the same. Remington will not be held liable because guns were designed to kill. And automobile manufacturers can be held responsible under the same guidelines as firearms.

i never said they would... however, they can be made to be very expensive & difficult to acquire.

however, they can be made to be very expensive & difficult to acquire.

Why should they be?

To keep the lower classes from acquiring them?

How will that keep firearms out of the hands of a criminal?

Usually, they are using YOUR money to buy weapons

expensive enough...just like cigarettes... or cars.... but the high velocity ammo & muti round mags?

top dolla if you wanna love them long time.............

keeping the poor defenseless...


sounds like a plan.

not new, either...

Many dictators have used it.

 

[WinterBorn]

Court rules gun maker can be sued over Newtown shooting

Yup...you make deadly weapons..you die with deadly weapons.

Mr. Lanza, the alleged shooter at Sandy Hook, didn't buy any guns from Remington or anyone else. He stole the weapons.

Further, all Remington did was manufacture it.

Should Hyundai or Tesla or whoever built the car that the guy who ran into the crowd in Charlottesville, be held responsible there?

Its the same thing.

uh - no.

automobiles... by original design.... & sole purpose... is not to kill.

But the principle is the same. Remington will not be held liable because guns were designed to kill. And automobile manufacturers can be held responsible under the same guidelines as firearms.

i never said they would... however, they can be made to be very expensive & difficult to acquire.

So the goal is to remove all firearms? No more target shooting, pest removal or hunting with firearms?

 

[playtime]

so every company is fair game now.....use a product and abuse it and cause a death.....and someone sues....

They can now. But gun makers are one industry that can't be sued. Why is that?
If a jet plane hit me I can sue the company that made it.

almost every politician has taken money from the gun lobbyists........ that's why.

 

[WinterBorn]

But the principle is the same. Remington will not be held liable because guns were designed to kill. And automobile manufacturers can be held responsible under the same guidelines as firearms.

i never said they would... however, they can be made to be very expensive & difficult to acquire.

You understand that if the state raises the cost of the exercise of right wit the intent to make it more difficult to exercise said right, it violates the constitution.
Right?

Absolutely right. Same as requiring ID to vote, or so some have claimed.

 

[playtime]

uh - no.
automobiles... by original design.... & sole purpose... is not to kill.

Wait... you think the sole design and purpose of a gun is to kill?

the original purpose was

Do you need help moving that goalpost? Sure looks heavy.
I have innumerable guns - I'll give you a list, and you show us how its sole design and purpose is to kill.

lol... why was a gun invented?

What's that?
You know you can't show the sole design and purpose of my guns is to kill?
Thought not. Thanks.

the product is not what you use it for... but that doesn't mean anything. you can use your car as a hotel room, but that's not what it's intent by design is used for.

lol... next?

 

[playtime]

uh - no.
automobiles... by original design.... & sole purpose... is not to kill.

Wait... you think the sole design and purpose of a gun is to kill?

the original purpose was

Do you need help moving that goalpost? Sure looks heavy.
I have innumerable guns - I'll give you a list, and you show us how its sole design and purpose is to kill.

lol... why was a gun invented?

as much for defense as attack.

absolutely. that doesn't change the question i asked. or the answer.