protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 57,249
- 18,396
- 2,250
Yes.
Based on what ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes.
FALSE! They were released because Obama (the JIHADIST) is on their side. He WANTS them to fight for jihad. He's one of them. - as proven by Major Nidal Hasan at Fort Hood, his pullout of US troops from Iraq in 2011, and his allowance of ISIS convoys to travel freely on open desert roads (where they were sitting ducks for airstrikes that Obama only pretended to do with his occasional "pinpricks"A lot of those people at Gitmo were innocent, whether a deranged Repug assfuck like you wants to believe it or not. You can't hold people in jail fucking 10 or more years without a trial. We had no evidence, that's why they were released, as difficult as it is for a mentally deranged fascist such as yourself to believe that. Holding them forever is the Repug way of doing things, but not the decent American way of doing things.
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/1990/roll534.xmlImbecile, Republicans control the most of the federal government and they’re not even making an effort to get rid of gun free zones. And why would they when all but one voted aye when it it was put to a vote? And your stupid excuse of a filibuster fails you because Republicans could do away with filibusters if they really wanted to, which they don’t.
As far as state and local jurisdictions, many would follow the federal government’s lead if they were to abolish gun free zones.When was it that >> "all but one voted aye when it it was put to a vote?" Got a link for that ?
The NRA has not opposed the 3 day FBI check for gun purchases. Never have.“NRA blocks law to stop suspected terrorists from buying guns”
Republicans, conservatives, and the NRA lied about this issue, of course.
And that lie was to place those on a no-fly list in the NICS database would ‘violate’ their right to due process, when in fact nothing could be further from the truth.
The fact is that the law authorizing background checks has a provision affording those denied a gun purchase an appeals process – if the FBI can’t justify the denial within three business days, the denial is rescinded, no rights violated, no due process withheld.
FALSE! They were released because Obama (the JIHADIST) is on their side. He WANTS them to fight for jihad. He's one of them. - as proven by Major Nidal Hasan at Fort Hood, his pullout of US troops from Iraq in 2011, and his allowance of ISIS convoys to travel freely on open desert roads (where they were sitting ducks for airstrikes that Obama only pretended to do with his occasional "pinpricks"A lot of those people at Gitmo were innocent, whether a deranged Repug assfuck like you wants to believe it or not. You can't hold people in jail fucking 10 or more years without a trial. We had no evidence, that's why they were released, as difficult as it is for a mentally deranged fascist such as yourself to believe that. Holding them forever is the Repug way of doing things, but not the decent American way of doing things.
Obama released the Gitmo bad boys because he supported them, just like he colluded with al Baghdadi to allow the convoys to move and then raise hell. And then they returned to the battlefield - yeah that's how "innocent" they were.
INSUFFICIENT. Has no information on what they voted for, other than the title of the bill.
Not much of a response, but predictable, since the information is historical fact that can't be refuted.
FALSE! They were released because Obama (the JIHADIST) is on their side. He WANTS them to fight for jihad. He's one of them. - as proven by Major Nidal Hasan at Fort Hood, his pullout of US troops from Iraq in 2011, and his allowance of ISIS convoys to travel freely on open desert roads (where they were sitting ducks for airstrikes that Obama only pretended to do with his occasional "pinpricks"A lot of those people at Gitmo were innocent, whether a deranged Repug assfuck like you wants to believe it or not. You can't hold people in jail fucking 10 or more years without a trial. We had no evidence, that's why they were released, as difficult as it is for a mentally deranged fascist such as yourself to believe that. Holding them forever is the Repug way of doing things, but not the decent American way of doing things.
Obama released the Gitmo bad boys because he supported them, just like he colluded with al Baghdadi to allow the convoys to move and then raise hell. And then they returned to the battlefield - yeah that's how "innocent" they were.
FALSE! They were released because Obama (the JIHADIST) is on their side. He WANTS them to fight for jihad. He's one of them. - as proven by Major Nidal Hasan at Fort Hood, his pullout of US troops from Iraq in 2011, and his allowance of ISIS convoys to travel freely on open desert roads (where they were sitting ducks for airstrikes that Obama only pretended to do with his occasional "pinpricks"A lot of those people at Gitmo were innocent, whether a deranged Repug assfuck like you wants to believe it or not. You can't hold people in jail fucking 10 or more years without a trial. We had no evidence, that's why they were released, as difficult as it is for a mentally deranged fascist such as yourself to believe that. Holding them forever is the Repug way of doing things, but not the decent American way of doing things.
Obama released the Gitmo bad boys because he supported them, just like he colluded with al Baghdadi to allow the convoys to move and then raise hell. And then they returned to the battlefield - yeah that's how "innocent" they were.![]()
FALSE! They were released because Obama (the JIHADIST) is on their side. He WANTS them to fight for jihad. He's one of them. - as proven by Major Nidal Hasan at Fort Hood, his pullout of US troops from Iraq in 2011, and his allowance of ISIS convoys to travel freely on open desert roads (where they were sitting ducks for airstrikes that Obama only pretended to do with his occasional "pinpricks"A lot of those people at Gitmo were innocent, whether a deranged Repug assfuck like you wants to believe it or not. You can't hold people in jail fucking 10 or more years without a trial. We had no evidence, that's why they were released, as difficult as it is for a mentally deranged fascist such as yourself to believe that. Holding them forever is the Repug way of doing things, but not the decent American way of doing things.
Obama released the Gitmo bad boys because he supported them, just like he colluded with al Baghdadi to allow the convoys to move and then raise hell. And then they returned to the battlefield - yeah that's how "innocent" they were.
Like I said....an unsophisticated, mentally ill Repug like yourself simply can't handle the truth.
Let me explain it to you again, mentally ill little child....We had no evidence those Gitmo detainees did anything wrong. That's why they were released.
Yeah, Obama was on the side of the jihadists....that explains why he killed bin Laden, you fucking idiot. Unsophisticated fucking Repug goober.
Are you dense ? They returned to the battlefield. Many were captured again. As for bin Laden, Obama didn't do that, the SEALS did. Even if Obama had a minor hand in it, that's a small price for him to pay to give leftist robots like you a talking point, while he was letting ISIS run roughshod in Iraq, and Hasan to kill 13 US Army soldiers in Fort Hood.Like I said....an unsophisticated, mentally ill Repug like yourself simply can't handle the truth.
Let me explain it to you again, mentally ill little child....We had no evidence those Gitmo detainees did anything wrong. That's why they were released.
Yeah, Obama was on the side of the jihadists....that explains why he killed bin Laden, you fucking idiot. Unsophisticated fucking Repug goober.
A good bit of deprogramming will cure you and Faun both. There's hope.This fucker is crazy!
Are you dense ? They returned to the battlefield. Many were captured again. As for bin Laden, Obama didn't do that, the SEALS did. Even if Obama had a minor hand in it, that's a small price for him to pay to give leftist robots like you a talking point, while he was letting ISIS run roughshod in Iraq, and Hasan to kill 13 US Army soldiers in Fort Hood.Like I said....an unsophisticated, mentally ill Repug like yourself simply can't handle the truth.
Let me explain it to you again, mentally ill little child....We had no evidence those Gitmo detainees did anything wrong. That's why they were released.
Yeah, Obama was on the side of the jihadists....that explains why he killed bin Laden, you fucking idiot. Unsophisticated fucking Repug goober.
When you get your head out of your unsophisticated, programmed, lefty, robot ass, come back and post some more.![]()
Conservatives are now attacking survivors of school shootings
Mohammed IsmailAre you dense ? They returned to the battlefield. Many were captured again. As for bin Laden, Obama didn't do that, the SEALS did. Even if Obama had a minor hand in it, that's a small price for him to pay to give leftist robots like you a talking point, while he was letting ISIS run roughshod in Iraq, and Hasan to kill 13 US Army soldiers in Fort Hood.Like I said....an unsophisticated, mentally ill Repug like yourself simply can't handle the truth.
Let me explain it to you again, mentally ill little child....We had no evidence those Gitmo detainees did anything wrong. That's why they were released.
Yeah, Obama was on the side of the jihadists....that explains why he killed bin Laden, you fucking idiot. Unsophisticated fucking Repug goober.
When you get your head out of your unsophisticated, programmed, lefty, robot ass, come back and post some more.![]()
Yeah? Show me the evidence. You're full of shit.
Why did Bush give up the search for bin Laden? Why didn't Bush get him? Maybe Bush was the jihadist.
So Roosevelt and Truman also deserve no credit for winning WWII. Is that what you stupid Repug ass is saying?
HA HA. Why do you ask idiotic questions ? I said nothing about WWII. As for Bush, I'm no fan of him, but at least he didn't let an Army officer seditiously run jihadist Koran drivel, all over troops in a US Army fort for a year, instead of making him obey orders, and do his job normally.Yeah? Show me the evidence. You're full of shit.
Why did Bush give up the search for bin Laden? Why didn't Bush get him? Maybe Bush was the jihadist.
So Roosevelt and Truman also deserve no credit for winning WWII. Is that what you stupid Repug ass is saying?
wow - what an evil, ignorant, mean, and sick remark. USMB will never be the same.NaziCons are evil, ignorant, mean, and sick.
Are you dense ? They returned to the battlefield. Many were captured again. As for bin Laden, Obama didn't do that, the SEALS did. Even if Obama had a minor hand in it, that's a small price for him to pay to give leftist robots like you a talking point, while he was letting ISIS run roughshod in Iraq, and Hasan to kill 13 US Army soldiers in Fort Hood.Like I said....an unsophisticated, mentally ill Repug like yourself simply can't handle the truth.
Let me explain it to you again, mentally ill little child....We had no evidence those Gitmo detainees did anything wrong. That's why they were released.
Yeah, Obama was on the side of the jihadists....that explains why he killed bin Laden, you fucking idiot. Unsophisticated fucking Repug goober.
When you get your head out of your unsophisticated, programmed, lefty, robot ass, come back and post some more.![]()
HA HA. Why do you ask idiotic questions ? I said nothing about WWII. As for Bush, I'm no fan of him, but at least he didn't let an Army officer seditiously run jihadist Koran drivel, all over troops in a US Army fort for a year, instead of making him obey orders, and do his job normally.Yeah? Show me the evidence. You're full of shit.
Why did Bush give up the search for bin Laden? Why didn't Bush get him? Maybe Bush was the jihadist.
So Roosevelt and Truman also deserve no credit for winning WWII. Is that what you stupid Repug ass is saying?
HA HA. Why do you ask idiotic questions ? I said nothing about WWII. As for Bush, I'm no fan of him, but at least he didn't let an Army officer seditiously run jihadist Koran drivel, all over troops in a US Army fort for a year, instead of making him obey orders, and do his job normally.Yeah? Show me the evidence. You're full of shit.
Why did Bush give up the search for bin Laden? Why didn't Bush get him? Maybe Bush was the jihadist.
So Roosevelt and Truman also deserve no credit for winning WWII. Is that what you stupid Repug ass is saying?