Conservatives push for end of "no fault" divorce

[Soupnazi630]

A huge difference. A vow is not required to be legally married.

No difference

A vow is a verbal contract

 

[struth]

you are no expert personal anecdotes are not evidence

I have provren you to be the idiot with no valid argument

you are OWNED bitch

you have literally proven nothing, I have repeatedly asked you to provide some sort of authority that states with no fault laws don't allow for common law grounds, but you have failed....over and over and over and over again.

 

[Soupnazi630]

you have literally proven nothing, I have repeatedly asked you to provide some sort of authority that states with no fault laws don't allow for common law grounds, but you have failed....over and over and over and over again.

Yes I have

I have orovided the law which you know nothing of

all you have is a big fat fantasy story and an unfounded dishonest claim of expertise

You are owned and you are the one string at failure

 

[struth]

Yes I have

I have orovided the law which you know nothing of

all you have is a big fat fantasy story and an unfounded dishonest claim of expertise

You are owned and you are the one string at failure

maybe I missed it, provide the link again.

 

[Soupnazi630]

maybe I missed it, provide the link again.

The law which you never read

Do not demand what yoiu cannot provide

 

[Hutch Starskey]

No difference

A vow is a verbal contract

Nope.
A vow is simply a promise and is not required in any way to be legally married. It’s only part of a ceremony.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Nope.
A vow is simply a promise and is not required in any way to be legally married. It’s only part of a ceremony.

By definition it is a verbal contract

 

[Hutch Starskey]

By definition it is a verbal contract

Which of course is irrelevant to the law and never mentioned in a divorce proceeding.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Which of course is irrelevant to the law and never mentioned in a divorce proceeding.

But still a foundation meaning marriage for life

Civil marriages are no different than religious based marriages in that respect

 

[Tommy Tainant]

And so by default the man can provide higher standard of living. Best interest of the child suggests the father get custody, and she pay child support, and get visitation.

In the real world. His income would drop if he couldnt go to work..

 

[Tommy Tainant]

But still a foundation meaning marriage for life

Civil marriages are no different than religious based marriages in that respect

All religions allow for divorce. What do you think sharia courts do ?

 

[Soupnazi630]

All religions allow for divorce. What do you think sharia courts do ?

Under certian circumstances yes

Not just because someone feels a litlte less than perfectly satisfied

 

[struth]

The law which you never read

Do not demand what yoiu cannot provide

I know I can’t provide what you claim exist.

Because I know I doesn’t

 

[Blaster]

LOL

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I remember the 60s before nofault divorce

Abusive marriages, constant fighting, domestic abuse, loveless marriages

Some people are just not made to be married

There was a rush to divorce in the 70s

Abuse was always grounds for divorce.

 

[Blaster]

Abuse was always grounds for divorce.

 

[AsherN]

California mandates no fault and willl not consider fault

Meaning they do not consider fault for filing and granting a divorce. Terms, however, can very much consider fault.

 

[AsherN]

But still a foundation meaning marriage for life

Civil marriages are no different than religious based marriages in that respect

Only in your religion.

 

[JoeB131]

What is gained through that sacrifice? What honor is being served by staying in a bad relationship?

Well adjusted kids, to start with.

Study after study shows children do better when both parents are in the home.

 

[Anathema]

And so by default the man can provide higher standard of living. Best interest of the child suggests the father get custody, and she pay child support, and get visitation

Assuming he is the breadwinner then he gets the kids unless she’s moving back in with her parents. Either way visitation needs to be worked out and she only gets money if HE left her.