Cortez is upset

Maybe you should read their faq’s they put out-
https://apps.npr.org/documents/document.html?id=5729035-Green-New-Deal-FAQ pg 2

While the legislation doesn’t have much more in details about the role agriculture will play in this effort, a FAQ sheet released with the Green New Deal does paint a different picture.

In a section of the FAQ sheet asking about the difference between the goal of going “100% clean and renewable” versus “100% renewable” there is a call out about methane emissions in cattle.

“We set a goal to get to net-zero, rather than zero emissions, in 10 years because we aren’t sure that we’ll be able to fully get rid of farting cows and airplanes that fast, but we think we can ramp up renewable manufacturing and power production, retrofit every building in America, build the smart grid, overhaul transportation and agriculture, plant lots of trees and restore our ecosystem to get to net-zero,” the FAQ sheet reads.
Democrat's Green New Deal Wants to Eliminate "Farting Cows"

Who pays for it and how much will it cost . last estimate I heard was 93 trillion of course that isnt including the rest of the world .
 
beefchart.gif
 
After she said Americans should eat less beef she was photographed eating a hamburger poor thing and she was mad about it
She is mad about cow farts but doesn't give a shit about the 25000 jobs she blew in her district
And the beef industry in the US is a $70+ billion dollar a year business. One company alone employees over 200,000 people.
 
Maybe you should read their faq’s they put out-
https://apps.npr.org/documents/document.html?id=5729035-Green-New-Deal-FAQ pg 2

While the legislation doesn’t have much more in details about the role agriculture will play in this effort, a FAQ sheet released with the Green New Deal does paint a different picture.

In a section of the FAQ sheet asking about the difference between the goal of going “100% clean and renewable” versus “100% renewable” there is a call out about methane emissions in cattle.

“We set a goal to get to net-zero, rather than zero emissions, in 10 years because we aren’t sure that we’ll be able to fully get rid of farting cows and airplanes that fast, but we think we can ramp up renewable manufacturing and power production, retrofit every building in America, build the smart grid, overhaul transportation and agriculture, plant lots of trees and restore our ecosystem to get to net-zero,” the FAQ sheet reads.
Democrat's Green New Deal Wants to Eliminate "Farting Cows"

Yes, it's addressed in my link. The FAQ is poorly worded but there is a realization that you can't get rid of beef altogether but to cut down (which let's face it Americans should do) but be a net benefit considering all that it takes to raise cattle. But none of this is going to matter to you because you don't buy it anyway.

The thread is about hypocrisy where none exists.
 
Seems there needs to be some qualifying information here. For starters, how much meat is too much according to AOC? Did she eat more than that amount?

Really weird shit here guys. This place is turning more and more into one of the weird corners of the internet.
dumbass.
 
Seems there needs to be some qualifying information here. For starters, how much meat is too much according to AOC? Did she eat more than that amount?

Really weird shit here guys. This place is turning more and more into one of the weird corners of the internet.
She wants to rid the world of cattle, in her new green deal.

It's a goal we should work toward. We did it with cigarettes mostly.

Who eats cigarettes?
 
Maybe you should read their faq’s they put out-
https://apps.npr.org/documents/document.html?id=5729035-Green-New-Deal-FAQ pg 2

While the legislation doesn’t have much more in details about the role agriculture will play in this effort, a FAQ sheet released with the Green New Deal does paint a different picture.

In a section of the FAQ sheet asking about the difference between the goal of going “100% clean and renewable” versus “100% renewable” there is a call out about methane emissions in cattle.

“We set a goal to get to net-zero, rather than zero emissions, in 10 years because we aren’t sure that we’ll be able to fully get rid of farting cows and airplanes that fast, but we think we can ramp up renewable manufacturing and power production, retrofit every building in America, build the smart grid, overhaul transportation and agriculture, plant lots of trees and restore our ecosystem to get to net-zero,” the FAQ sheet reads.
Democrat's Green New Deal Wants to Eliminate "Farting Cows"

Yes, it's addressed in my link. The FAQ is poorly worded but there is a realization that you can't get rid of beef altogether but to cut down (which let's face it Americans should do) but be a net benefit considering all that it takes to raise cattle. But none of this is going to matter to you because you don't buy it anyway.

The thread is about hypocrisy where none exists.
0*OZkYOG71pNNTBC53
 
Seems there needs to be some qualifying information here. For starters, how much meat is too much according to AOC? Did she eat more than that amount?

Really weird shit here guys. This place is turning more and more into one of the weird corners of the internet.
She wants to rid the world of cattle, in her new green deal.

It's a goal we should work toward. We did it with cigarettes mostly.

Who eats cigarettes?

Rustic sniffs glue, that's about as best I can do for you.
 
Maybe you should read their faq’s they put out-
https://apps.npr.org/documents/document.html?id=5729035-Green-New-Deal-FAQ pg 2

While the legislation doesn’t have much more in details about the role agriculture will play in this effort, a FAQ sheet released with the Green New Deal does paint a different picture.

In a section of the FAQ sheet asking about the difference between the goal of going “100% clean and renewable” versus “100% renewable” there is a call out about methane emissions in cattle.

“We set a goal to get to net-zero, rather than zero emissions, in 10 years because we aren’t sure that we’ll be able to fully get rid of farting cows and airplanes that fast, but we think we can ramp up renewable manufacturing and power production, retrofit every building in America, build the smart grid, overhaul transportation and agriculture, plant lots of trees and restore our ecosystem to get to net-zero,” the FAQ sheet reads.
Democrat's Green New Deal Wants to Eliminate "Farting Cows"

Yes, it's addressed in my link. The FAQ is poorly worded but there is a realization that you can't get rid of beef altogether but to cut down (which let's face it Americans should do) but be a net benefit considering all that it takes to raise cattle. But none of this is going to matter to you because you don't buy it anyway.

The thread is about hypocrisy where none exists.
DxFI9IBUcAAjGrd.jpg
 
After she said Americans should eat less beef she was photographed eating a hamburger poor thing and she was mad about it
This is classic leftist elitism.

The rules apply to the unwashed masses, not commie overlords. Al Gore by himself can have the "cabon footprint" of a third-world country, but he is righteous and is the AGW prophet, so god allows his holy chosen to break the rules.

Bernie Sandars bitches about wealth and wants us to be commies, but he is the leader of a righteous cause, so he gets to have 3 mansions...but not YOU.


Fuck these assholes. I want Texas out of this shit. Fuck this "Union. They haven’t got
Seems there needs to be some qualifying information here. For starters, how much meat is too much according to AOC? Did she eat more than that amount?

Really weird shit here guys. This place is turning more and more into one of the weird corners of the internet.
She wants to rid the world of cattle, in her new green deal.

It's a goal we should work toward. We did it with cigarettes mostly.

Who eats cigarettes?
Tards
 
You see, I go to research for info. All you have to do is read a few of the so-called “legitimate” research papers to come to the conclusion they are manipulating data through models. Do yourself a favor and go research datasets, then read research papers by these so-called climate scientists they quote, and see how they are manipulated to come to a preconceived conclusion. Even their admitted error rates are astronomical.
Maybe you should read their faq’s they put out-
https://apps.npr.org/documents/document.html?id=5729035-Green-New-Deal-FAQ pg 2

While the legislation doesn’t have much more in details about the role agriculture will play in this effort, a FAQ sheet released with the Green New Deal does paint a different picture.

In a section of the FAQ sheet asking about the difference between the goal of going “100% clean and renewable” versus “100% renewable” there is a call out about methane emissions in cattle.

“We set a goal to get to net-zero, rather than zero emissions, in 10 years because we aren’t sure that we’ll be able to fully get rid of farting cows and airplanes that fast, but we think we can ramp up renewable manufacturing and power production, retrofit every building in America, build the smart grid, overhaul transportation and agriculture, plant lots of trees and restore our ecosystem to get to net-zero,” the FAQ sheet reads.
Democrat's Green New Deal Wants to Eliminate "Farting Cows"

Yes, it's addressed in my link. The FAQ is poorly worded but there is a realization that you can't get rid of beef altogether but to cut down (which let's face it Americans should do) but be a net benefit considering all that it takes to raise cattle. But none of this is going to matter to you because you don't buy it anyway.

The thread is about hypocrisy where none exists.
 

Forum List

Back
Top