Creationists

[Youwerecreated]

yours is a dodge the heads of what fields in what sciences

if your talking about entropy everyone excepts it as fact but not that god did it. so again you're intentionally misrepresenting the facts .
as to this: If the moon had started receding from being in contact with the earth, it would have taken only 1.37 billion years to reach its present distance. This is the maximum possible age far too young for evolution and much younger than the radiometric dating method assigned to moon rocks. What say you ?

i say your're full of shit:

Modern dating methodsRadiometric dating has been carried out since 1905 when it was invented by Ernest Rutherford as a method by which one might determine the age of the Earth. In the century since then the techniques have been greatly improved and expanded.[14] Dating can now be performed on samples as small as a nanogram using a mass spectrometer. The mass spectrometer was invented in the 1940s and began to be used in radiometric dating in the 1950s. The mass spectrometer operates by generating a beam of ionized atoms from the sample under test. The ions then travel through a magnetic field, which diverts them into different sampling sensors, known as "Faraday cups", depending on their mass and level of ionization. On impact in the cups, the ions set up a very weak current that can be measured to determine the rate of impacts and the relative concentrations of different atoms in the beams.

[edit] Uranium-lead dating methodMain article: uranium-lead dating

A concordia diagram as used in uranium-lead dating, with data from the Pfunze Belt, Zimbabwe.[16] All the samples show loss of lead isotopes, but the intercept of the errorchron (straight line through the sample points) and the concordia (curve) shows the correct age of the rock.[11]The uranium-lead radiometric dating scheme has been refined to the point that the error margin in dates of rocks can be as low as less than two million years in two-and-a-half billion years.[12][17] An error margin of 2–5 % has been achieved on younger Mesozoic rocks.[18]

Uranium-lead dating is often performed on the mineral zircon (ZrSiO4), though it can be used on other materials, such as baddeleyite.[19] Zircon and baddeleyite incorporate uranium atoms into their crystalline structure as substitutes for zirconium, but strongly reject lead. It has a very high closure temperature, is resistant to mechanical weathering and is very chemically inert. Zircon also forms multiple crystal layers during metamorphic events, which each may record an isotopic age of the event. In situ micro-beam analysis can be achieved via laser ICP-MS or SIMS techniques.[20]

One of its great advantages is that any sample provides two clocks, one based on uranium-235's decay to lead-207 with a half-life of about 700 million years, and one based on uranium-238's decay to lead-206 with a half-life of about 4.5 billion years, providing a built-in crosscheck that allows accurate determination of the age of the sample even if some of the lead has been lost. This can be seen in the concordia diagram, where the samples plot along an errorchron (straight line) which intersects the concordia curve at the age of the sample.

[edit] Samarium-neodymium dating methodMain article: Samarium-neodymium dating
This involves the alpha-decay of 147Sm to 143Nd with a half-life of 1.06 x 1011 years. Accuracy levels of less than twenty million years in two-and-a-half billion years are achievable.[21]

[edit] Potassium-argon dating methodMain article: Potassium-argon dating
This involves electron capture or positron decay of potassium-40 to argon-40. Potassium-40 has a half-life of 1.3 billion years, and so this method is applicable to the oldest rocks. Radioactive potassium-40 is common in micas, feldspars, and hornblendes, though the closure temperature is fairly low in these materials, about 125°C (mica) to 450°C (hornblende).

[edit] Rubidium-strontium dating methodMain article: Rubidium-strontium dating
This is based on the beta decay of rubidium-87 to strontium-87, with a half-life of 50 billion years. This scheme is used to date old igneous and metamorphic rocks, and has also been used to date lunar samples. Closure temperatures are so high that they are not a concern. Rubidium-strontium dating is not as precise as the uranium-lead method, with errors of 30 to 50 million years for a 3-billion-year-old sample.

[edit] Uranium-thorium dating methodMain article: uranium-thorium dating
A relatively short-range dating technique is based on the decay of uranium-234 into thorium-230, a substance with a half-life of about 80,000 years. It is accompanied by a sister process, in which uranium-235 decays into protactinium-231, which has a half-life of 34,300 years.

While uranium is water-soluble, thorium and protactinium are not, and so they are selectively precipitated into ocean-floor sediments, from which their ratios are measured. The scheme has a range of several hundred thousand years. A related method is ionium-thorium dating, which measures the ratio of ionium (thorium-230) to thorium-232 in ocean sediment.

[edit] Radiocarbon dating methodMain article: Radiocarbon dating

Ale's Stones at Kåseberga, around ten kilometres south east of Ystad, Sweden were dated at 600 CE using the carbon-14 method on organic material found at the site.[22]Carbon-14 is a radioactive isotope of carbon, with a half-life of 5,730 years,[23][24] which is very short compared with the above isotopes. In other radiometric dating methods, the heavy parent isotopes were produced by nucleosynthesis in supernovas, meaning that any parent isotope with a short half-life should be extinct by now. Carbon-14, though, is continuously created through collisions of neutrons generated by cosmic rays with nitrogen in the upper atmosphere and thus remains at a near-constant level on Earth. The carbon-14 ends up as a trace component in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2).

An organism acquires carbon during its lifetime. Plants acquire it through photosynthesis, and animals acquire it from consumption of plants and other animals. When an organism dies, it ceases to take in new carbon-14, and the existing isotope decays with a characteristic half-life (5730 years). The proportion of carbon-14 left when the remains of the organism are examined provides an indication of the time elapsed since its death. The carbon-14 dating limit lies around 58,000 to 62,000 years.[25]

The rate of creation of carbon-14 appears to be roughly constant, as cross-checks of carbon-14 dating with other dating methods show it gives consistent results. However, local eruptions of volcanoes or other events that give off large amounts of carbon dioxide can reduce local concentrations of carbon-14 and give inaccurate dates. The releases of carbon dioxide into the biosphere as a consequence of industrialization have also depressed the proportion of carbon-14 by a few percent; conversely, the amount of carbon-14 was increased by above-ground nuclear bomb tests that were conducted into the early 1960s. Also, an increase in the solar wind or the Earth's magnetic field above the current value would depress the amount of carbon-14 created in the atmosphere. These effects are corrected for by the calibration of the radiocarbon dating scale.[26]

[edit] Fission track dating methodMain article: fission track dating

Apatite crystals are widely used in fission track dating.This involves inspection of a polished slice of a material to determine the density of "track" markings left in it by the spontaneous fission of uranium-238 impurities. The uranium content of the sample has to be known, but that can be determined by placing a plastic film over the polished slice of the material, and bombarding it with slow neutrons. This causes induced fission of 235U, as opposed to the spontaneous fission of 238U. The fission tracks produced by this process are recorded in the plastic film. The uranium content of the material can then be calculated from the number of tracks and the neutron flux.

This scheme has application over a wide range of geologic dates. For dates up to a few million years micas, tektites (glass fragments from volcanic eruptions), and meteorites are best used. Older materials can be dated using zircon, apatite, titanite, epidote and garnet which have a variable amount of uranium content.[27] Because the fission tracks are healed by temperatures over about 200°C the technique has limitations as well as benefits. The technique has potential applications for detailing the thermal history of a deposit.

[edit] Chlorine-36 dating methodLarge amounts of otherwise rare 36Cl were produced by irradiation of seawater during atmospheric detonations of nuclear weapons between 1952 and 1958. The residence time of 36Cl in the atmosphere is about 1 week. Thus, as an event marker of 1950s water in soil and ground water, 36Cl is also useful for dating waters less than 50 years before the present. 36Cl has seen use in other areas of the geological sciences, including dating ice and sediments.

[edit] Luminescence dating methodsMain articles: Optical dating and Thermoluminescence dating
Natural sources of radiation in the environment knock loose electrons in, say, a piece of pottery, and these electrons accumulate in defects in the material's crystal lattice structure. Heating or illuminating the object will release the captured electrons, producing a luminescence. When the sample is heated, at a certain temperature it will glow from the emission of electrons released from the defects, and this glow can be used to estimate the age of the sample to a threshold of approximately 15 percent of its true age. The date of a rock is reset when volcanic activity remelts it. The date of a piece of pottery is reset by the heat of the kiln. Typically temperatures greater than 400 degrees Celsius will reset the "clock". This is termed thermoluminescence.

[edit] Other methodsOther methods include:

argon-argon (Ar-Ar)
iodine-xenon (I-Xe)
lanthanum-barium (La-Ba)
lead-lead (Pb-Pb)
lutetium-hafnium (Lu-Hf)
neon-neon (Ne-Ne)
rhenium-osmium (Re-Os)
uranium-lead-helium (U-Pb-He)
uranium-uranium (U-U)

You are still dodging the question. If the universe and everything in it had a beginning,where did the matter come from ?

I could care less about your dating methods, I asked you to do the math and you were given the information to work the formula.

Once you do the math it contradicts the age of the earth and and universe according to the dated moon rocks.

Do you just post crap up whether it answers my question or not ?

It contradicts evolutions timeline.

The Big Bang theory is an effort to explain what happened at the very beginning of our universe. Discoveries in astronomy and physics have shown beyond a reasonable doubt that our universe did in fact have a beginning. Prior to that moment there was nothing; during and after that moment there was something: our universe. The big bang theory is an effort to explain what happened during and after that moment.

According to the standard theory, our universe sprang into existence as "singularity" around 13.7 billion years ago. What is a "singularity" and where does it come from? Well, to be honest, we don't know for sure. Singularities are zones which defy our current understanding of physics. They are thought to exist at the core of "black holes." Black holes are areas of intense gravitational pressure. The pressure is thought to be so intense that finite matter is actually squished into infinite density (a mathematical concept which truly boggles the mind). These zones of infinite density are called "singularities." Our universe is thought to have begun as an infinitesimally small, infinitely hot, infinitely dense, something - a singularity. Where did it come from? We don't know. Why did it appear? We don't know.

Here is an even bigger problem for your time line Daws. The universe is expanding and speeding up,the universe can't be as old as you say.

That formula I gave you was based on the current receding of the moon.

Now look at this.

Nobel Prize for physics: Universe expansion accelerating, not slowing down - CSMonitor.com

How can something that blew up billions of years ago pick up speed ?

 

[daws101]

To many times to count.

only in your wet dreams !

I'm not a pervert Daws ,I don't have those.

then you must have a medical problem

A nocturnal emission involves either ejaculation during sleep for a male, or lubrication of the vagina for a female.[1] It is also called a wet dream, and is sometimes considered a type of spontaneous orgasm.

Nocturnal emissions are most common during adolescence and early young adult years. However, nocturnal emissions may happen any time during or after puberty. The emission may happen with or without an erection, and it is possible to wake up during the ejaculation, or to simply sleep through it.

A wet dream caused by normal biochemical occurrences will be present when the seminal vesicles are full of semen, and an additional burst in the seminal production is observed through the elevation of DHEA and testosterone
In MenThe frequency of nocturnal emissions is highly variable. Some men have experienced large numbers of nocturnal emissions as teenagers, while others have never experienced one. 84% of men in the United States will experience nocturnal emissions at some time in their life.[4] For males who have experienced nocturnal emissions the mean frequency ranges from 0.36 times per week (about once every three weeks) for single 15-year-old males to 0.18 times per week (about once every five-and-a-half weeks) for 40-year-old single males. For married males the mean ranges from 0.23 times per week (about once per month) for 19-year-old married males to 0.15 times per week (about once every two months) for 50-year-old married males.[5] In some parts of the world nocturnal emissions are more common. For example in Indonesia surveys show that 97% of men experience nocturnal emissions by the age of 24.[6]

Some men have the dreams only at a certain age, while others have them throughout their lives following puberty. The frequency that one has nocturnal emissions has not been conclusively linked to frequency of masturbation. Alfred Kinsey found there may be "some correlation between the frequencies of masturbation and the frequencies of nocturnal dreams. In general the males who have the highest frequencies of nocturnal emissions may have somewhat lower rates of masturbation. Some of these males credit the frequent emissions to the fact that they do not masturbate; but it is just as likely that the reverse relationship is true, namely, that they do not masturbate because they have frequent emissions."[7]

more proof that you have some major issues .

 

[UltimateReality]

Please, even if you don't believe in Christianity, don't fall for Holly's lies regarding our nation's history. Nothing she posts can be counted on to be reliable due to her hate agenda. More REAL history from the Library of Congress...

"It is no exaggeration to say that on Sundays in Washington during the administrations of Thomas Jefferson (1801-1809) and of James Madison (1809-1817) the state became the church. Within a year of his inauguration, Jefferson began attending church services in the House of Representatives. Madison followed Jefferson's example, although unlike Jefferson, who rode on horseback to church in the Capitol, Madison came in a coach and four. Worship services in the House--a practice that continued until after the Civil War--were acceptable to Jefferson because they were nondiscriminatory and voluntary. Preachers of every Protestant denomination appeared. (Catholic priests began officiating in 1826.) As early as January 1806 a female evangelist, Dorothy Ripley, delivered a camp meeting-style exhortation in the House to Jefferson, Vice President Aaron Burr, and a "crowded audience." Throughout his administration Jefferson permitted church services in executive branch buildings. The Gospel was also preached in the Supreme Court chambers."

Religion and the Federal Government, Part 2 - Religion and the Founding of the American Republic | Exhibitions - Library of Congress

 

[Youwerecreated]

only in your wet dreams !

I'm not a pervert Daws ,I don't have those.

then you must have a medical problem

A nocturnal emission involves either ejaculation during sleep for a male, or lubrication of the vagina for a female.[1] It is also called a wet dream, and is sometimes considered a type of spontaneous orgasm.

Nocturnal emissions are most common during adolescence and early young adult years. However, nocturnal emissions may happen any time during or after puberty. The emission may happen with or without an erection, and it is possible to wake up during the ejaculation, or to simply sleep through it.

A wet dream caused by normal biochemical occurrences will be present when the seminal vesicles are full of semen, and an additional burst in the seminal production is observed through the elevation of DHEA and testosterone
In MenThe frequency of nocturnal emissions is highly variable. Some men have experienced large numbers of nocturnal emissions as teenagers, while others have never experienced one. 84% of men in the United States will experience nocturnal emissions at some time in their life.[4] For males who have experienced nocturnal emissions the mean frequency ranges from 0.36 times per week (about once every three weeks) for single 15-year-old males to 0.18 times per week (about once every five-and-a-half weeks) for 40-year-old single males. For married males the mean ranges from 0.23 times per week (about once per month) for 19-year-old married males to 0.15 times per week (about once every two months) for 50-year-old married males.[5] In some parts of the world nocturnal emissions are more common. For example in Indonesia surveys show that 97% of men experience nocturnal emissions by the age of 24.[6]

Some men have the dreams only at a certain age, while others have them throughout their lives following puberty. The frequency that one has nocturnal emissions has not been conclusively linked to frequency of masturbation. Alfred Kinsey found there may be "some correlation between the frequencies of masturbation and the frequencies of nocturnal dreams. In general the males who have the highest frequencies of nocturnal emissions may have somewhat lower rates of masturbation. Some of these males credit the frequent emissions to the fact that they do not masturbate; but it is just as likely that the reverse relationship is true, namely, that they do not masturbate because they have frequent emissions."[7]

more proof that you have some major issues .

You must of been dreaming about those humping chickens you brought up once to often.

 

[daws101]

You are still dodging the question. If the universe and everything in it had a beginning,where did the matter come from ?

I could care less about your dating methods, I asked you to do the math and you were given the information to work the formula.

Once you do the math it contradicts the age of the earth and and universe according to the dated moon rocks.

Do you just post crap up whether it answers my question or not ?

It contradicts evolutions timeline.

The Big Bang theory is an effort to explain what happened at the very beginning of our universe. Discoveries in astronomy and physics have shown beyond a reasonable doubt that our universe did in fact have a beginning. Prior to that moment there was nothing; during and after that moment there was something: our universe. The big bang theory is an effort to explain what happened during and after that moment.

According to the standard theory, our universe sprang into existence as "singularity" around 13.7 billion years ago. What is a "singularity" and where does it come from? Well, to be honest, we don't know for sure. Singularities are zones which defy our current understanding of physics. They are thought to exist at the core of "black holes." Black holes are areas of intense gravitational pressure. The pressure is thought to be so intense that finite matter is actually squished into infinite density (a mathematical concept which truly boggles the mind). These zones of infinite density are called "singularities." Our universe is thought to have begun as an infinitesimally small, infinitely hot, infinitely dense, something - a singularity. Where did it come from? We don't know. Why did it appear? We don't know.

Here is an even bigger problem for your time line Daws. The universe is expanding and speeding up,the universe can't be as old as you say.

That formula I gave you was based on the current receding of the moon.

Now look at this.

Nobel Prize for physics: Universe expansion accelerating, not slowing down - CSMonitor.com

How can something that blew up billions of years ago pick up speed ?

and? nothing about this has any effect on evolution.

still no proof god did it!

 

[UltimateReality]

yep your a stupid asshat.
it's no claim you do it constantly .
NO TOO TOUGH A CONCEPT FOR YOU.

While you and Hollie use name calling to distract, it does not distract enough to cover up your lack of knowledge.

another wrong assuption, can't speak for hollie but I name call because when you act like a dick you get called a dick.
simple
your tin hat is showing !

Well I guess I'm the lucky one aren't I. I'll wear tin on my head over an ass anyday!!!

 

[The Irish Ram]

Hollie, would you prefer our founding fathers conducted themselves like Arafat, or Mohammed?
They thought lying about peace while preparing for slaughter was an honorable thing.
Here is Arafat backtracking on his signing of a peace treaty, equating his actions with what Mohammad did:
"This agreement, I am not considering it more than the agreement which had been signed between our prophet Mohammed and Koraish....."
(The agreement with Koraish allowed Mohammed to pray in Mecca, which was under Koraish control, for ten years. When Mohamed grew stronger two years later, he abrogated the agreement, slaughtered the tribe of Koraish and conquered Mecca.)

I’m not making any sense of your comment. If you had been familiar with the Founding Fathers of the US, you would have known that in almost all of their writings, it is evident that many of the FF’s were Deists. They believed in a creator, but not a god or gods such that Christianity or the bible offered.

This is a historical revisionist lie perpetrated by fundie atheist websites intent on destroying American values. The claim has no basis in fact. Shocking!! Since other so called "facts" you claim are also based on the myths of might haves and may haves.

Hollie, not only did they believe in a Creator, they believed in His son, Jesus.
Plese stop this historical revisionist lie perpetrated by fundie atheist websites intent on destroying American values.

 

[daws101]

I'm not a pervert Daws ,I don't have those.

then you must have a medical problem

A nocturnal emission involves either ejaculation during sleep for a male, or lubrication of the vagina for a female.[1] It is also called a wet dream, and is sometimes considered a type of spontaneous orgasm.

Nocturnal emissions are most common during adolescence and early young adult years. However, nocturnal emissions may happen any time during or after puberty. The emission may happen with or without an erection, and it is possible to wake up during the ejaculation, or to simply sleep through it.

A wet dream caused by normal biochemical occurrences will be present when the seminal vesicles are full of semen, and an additional burst in the seminal production is observed through the elevation of DHEA and testosterone
In MenThe frequency of nocturnal emissions is highly variable. Some men have experienced large numbers of nocturnal emissions as teenagers, while others have never experienced one. 84% of men in the United States will experience nocturnal emissions at some time in their life.[4] For males who have experienced nocturnal emissions the mean frequency ranges from 0.36 times per week (about once every three weeks) for single 15-year-old males to 0.18 times per week (about once every five-and-a-half weeks) for 40-year-old single males. For married males the mean ranges from 0.23 times per week (about once per month) for 19-year-old married males to 0.15 times per week (about once every two months) for 50-year-old married males.[5] In some parts of the world nocturnal emissions are more common. For example in Indonesia surveys show that 97% of men experience nocturnal emissions by the age of 24.[6]

Some men have the dreams only at a certain age, while others have them throughout their lives following puberty. The frequency that one has nocturnal emissions has not been conclusively linked to frequency of masturbation. Alfred Kinsey found there may be "some correlation between the frequencies of masturbation and the frequencies of nocturnal dreams. In general the males who have the highest frequencies of nocturnal emissions may have somewhat lower rates of masturbation. Some of these males credit the frequent emissions to the fact that they do not masturbate; but it is just as likely that the reverse relationship is true, namely, that they do not masturbate because they have frequent emissions."[7]

more proof that you have some major issues .

You must of been dreaming about those humping chickens you brought up once to often.

more proof that you have some major issues.
btw you brought up chicking fucking as proof of god.
btw that's too.

 

[Youwerecreated]

The Big Bang theory is an effort to explain what happened at the very beginning of our universe. Discoveries in astronomy and physics have shown beyond a reasonable doubt that our universe did in fact have a beginning. Prior to that moment there was nothing; during and after that moment there was something: our universe. The big bang theory is an effort to explain what happened during and after that moment.

According to the standard theory, our universe sprang into existence as "singularity" around 13.7 billion years ago. What is a "singularity" and where does it come from? Well, to be honest, we don't know for sure. Singularities are zones which defy our current understanding of physics. They are thought to exist at the core of "black holes." Black holes are areas of intense gravitational pressure. The pressure is thought to be so intense that finite matter is actually squished into infinite density (a mathematical concept which truly boggles the mind). These zones of infinite density are called "singularities." Our universe is thought to have begun as an infinitesimally small, infinitely hot, infinitely dense, something - a singularity. Where did it come from? We don't know. Why did it appear? We don't know.

Here is an even bigger problem for your time line Daws. The universe is expanding and speeding up,the universe can't be as old as you say.

That formula I gave you was based on the current receding of the moon.

Now look at this.

Nobel Prize for physics: Universe expansion accelerating, not slowing down - CSMonitor.com

How can something that blew up billions of years ago pick up speed ?

and? nothing about this has any effect on evolution.

still no proof god did it!

The Expanding Universe: From Slowdown to Speed Up: Scientific American

Oh but it does, it greatly reduces the age of the universe,the earth,and when life actually began,so there was not enough time for evolution to take place but we knew that already.

 

[daws101]

While you and Hollie use name calling to distract, it does not distract enough to cover up your lack of knowledge.

another wrong assuption, can't speak for hollie but I name call because when you act like a dick you get called a dick.
simple
your tin hat is showing !

Well I guess I'm the lucky one aren't I. I'll wear tin on my head over an ass anyday!!!

just pointing out that depends comes in silver too.

 

[Youwerecreated]

then you must have a medical problem

A nocturnal emission involves either ejaculation during sleep for a male, or lubrication of the vagina for a female.[1] It is also called a wet dream, and is sometimes considered a type of spontaneous orgasm.

Nocturnal emissions are most common during adolescence and early young adult years. However, nocturnal emissions may happen any time during or after puberty. The emission may happen with or without an erection, and it is possible to wake up during the ejaculation, or to simply sleep through it.

A wet dream caused by normal biochemical occurrences will be present when the seminal vesicles are full of semen, and an additional burst in the seminal production is observed through the elevation of DHEA and testosterone
In MenThe frequency of nocturnal emissions is highly variable. Some men have experienced large numbers of nocturnal emissions as teenagers, while others have never experienced one. 84% of men in the United States will experience nocturnal emissions at some time in their life.[4] For males who have experienced nocturnal emissions the mean frequency ranges from 0.36 times per week (about once every three weeks) for single 15-year-old males to 0.18 times per week (about once every five-and-a-half weeks) for 40-year-old single males. For married males the mean ranges from 0.23 times per week (about once per month) for 19-year-old married males to 0.15 times per week (about once every two months) for 50-year-old married males.[5] In some parts of the world nocturnal emissions are more common. For example in Indonesia surveys show that 97% of men experience nocturnal emissions by the age of 24.[6]

Some men have the dreams only at a certain age, while others have them throughout their lives following puberty. The frequency that one has nocturnal emissions has not been conclusively linked to frequency of masturbation. Alfred Kinsey found there may be "some correlation between the frequencies of masturbation and the frequencies of nocturnal dreams. In general the males who have the highest frequencies of nocturnal emissions may have somewhat lower rates of masturbation. Some of these males credit the frequent emissions to the fact that they do not masturbate; but it is just as likely that the reverse relationship is true, namely, that they do not masturbate because they have frequent emissions."[7]

more proof that you have some major issues .

You must of been dreaming about those humping chickens you brought up once to often.

more proof that you have some major issues.
btw you brought up chicking fucking as proof of god.
btw that's too.

Yeah I had to give you a 6th grade biology lesson.

But you were the one so graphic about it.

 

[daws101]

Here is an even bigger problem for your time line Daws. The universe is expanding and speeding up,the universe can't be as old as you say.

That formula I gave you was based on the current receding of the moon.

Now look at this.

Nobel Prize for physics: Universe expansion accelerating, not slowing down - CSMonitor.com

How can something that blew up billions of years ago pick up speed ?

and? nothing about this has any effect on evolution.

still no proof god did it!

The Expanding Universe: From Slowdown to Speed Up: Scientific American

Oh but it does, it greatly reduces the age of the universe,the earth,and when life actually began,so there was not enough time for evolution to take place but we knew that already.

only in your dreams.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Finally, the masturbation thread I've been looking for........

 

[daws101]

You must of been dreaming about those humping chickens you brought up once to often.

more proof that you have some major issues.
btw you brought up chicking fucking as proof of god.
btw that's too.

Yeah I had to give you a 6th grade biology lesson.

But you were the one so graphic about it.

I had to be since you were so wrong.

 

[Youwerecreated]

and? nothing about this has any effect on evolution.

still no proof god did it!

The Expanding Universe: From Slowdown to Speed Up: Scientific American

Oh but it does, it greatly reduces the age of the universe,the earth,and when life actually began,so there was not enough time for evolution to take place but we knew that already.

only in your dreams.

I was expecting an answer like this. You are consistently ignorant.

 

[daws101]

Finally, the masturbation thread I've been looking for........

god will make you blind for that.
founding fathers deists ....far different attitude about god than todays dogma spewers!

 

[daws101]

The Expanding Universe: From Slowdown to Speed Up: Scientific American

Oh but it does, it greatly reduces the age of the universe,the earth,and when life actually began,so there was not enough time for evolution to take place but we knew that already.

only in your dreams.

I was expecting an answer like this. You are consistently ignorant.

you,re just wrong! how does that make me ignorant.?
what's ignorant here is you using "we"

 

[The Irish Ram]

Finally, the masturbation thread I've been looking for........

god will make you blind for that.

I bet I could still find it........

 

[Hollie]

Please, even if you don't believe in Christianity, don't fall for Holly's lies regarding our nation's history. Nothing she posts can be counted on to be reliable due to her hate agenda. More REAL history from the Library of Congress...

"It is no exaggeration to say that on Sundays in Washington during the administrations of Thomas Jefferson (1801-1809) and of James Madison (1809-1817) the state became the church. Within a year of his inauguration, Jefferson began attending church services in the House of Representatives. Madison followed Jefferson's example, although unlike Jefferson, who rode on horseback to church in the Capitol, Madison came in a coach and four. Worship services in the House--a practice that continued until after the Civil War--were acceptable to Jefferson because they were nondiscriminatory and voluntary. Preachers of every Protestant denomination appeared. (Catholic priests began officiating in 1826.) As early as January 1806 a female evangelist, Dorothy Ripley, delivered a camp meeting-style exhortation in the House to Jefferson, Vice President Aaron Burr, and a "crowded audience." Throughout his administration Jefferson permitted church services in executive branch buildings. The Gospel was also preached in the Supreme Court chambers."

Religion and the Federal Government, Part 2 - Religion and the Founding of the American Republic | Exhibitions - Library of Congress

I’m actually delighted you cut and pasted what you did because it displays in clear terms your frightful ignorance.

The United States of America is not a Christian country or state. The writers of the Constitution said, very wisely, that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, prohibiting the free exercise thereof." In other words, there will be no state church (such as the Church of England), but the people may worship according to their wishes, anytime and anywhere.

That is precisely why you will not see a signature or some record wherein god is noted in the Continental Congress as ratifying the Constitution.

Let's look at what the Constitution says:
"Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."

Seek the words "God", “Almighty Lord" or "Big Cheese" or whatever-- you will not find it in the wording of the law. Why? Because it is impermissible.

Thomas Jefferson, James Madison Abraham Lincoln or B. Hussein making a speech is free speech and therefore they-- like any other president, can make any appeals to deities as they want.

Church services, whether held in the White House or in the Capital building is free speech.

Ignorance is not a virtue, my little wannabe.



Thomas Jefferson

"I have examined all the known superstitions of the world, and I do not find in our particular superstition of Christianity one redeeming feature. They are all alike founded on fables and mythology. Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned. What has been the effect of this coercion? To make one half the world fools and the other half hypocrites; to support roguery and error all over the earth."

SIX HISTORIC AMERICANS,
by John E. Remsburg, letter to William Short

 

[whitehall]

How the hell does someone seriously believe the earth is 6000 years old?

Meh. It baffles me.

Judging by the photo it seems you might baffle easy. Global warmists seem to think the world is only a couple of hundred years old. Why else would they ignore incredible fluctuations in the earth's temperature such as the last couple of ice ages?