Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You and Hollie tell me where you went to college and I will gladly answer your question.
I'll require to practice using more user-friendly monosyllables. The gargantuan fonts and bright colors are required as that will tend to increase the attention span of folks with your educational challenges.
Dodge!
You have obviously been spending too much time worshipping at the altar of Harun Yahya..Evolution is not a science. Your first mistake is in thinking it is. "Science" means "to study". How can you study something that doesn't exist?
Evolution CANNOT be repeated, CANNOT be tested, CANNOT be observed, Cannot be studied...it is NOT science.
One of the dumbest things I've ever heard.
Ever heard of speciation being demonstrated in a laboratory?
Ever heard of genetics studies used to verify common ancestry?
Ever heard of viruses mutating over time?
Ever heard of fossil evidence which clearly shows a linear progression in the anatomy of species over time?
Hmm... yeah. Every one of you're claims about evolution is utterly false. Stick to what you know.
You let us know when this speciation leads to macroevolution.
Have you ever heard that many things have genes similar to humans but they are not related to humans how can that be by your reasoning ?
Again you let us know when mutating viruses are no longer a virus.
Please stop with this nonsense of transitional fossils, good grief.
Everything you claimed are faulty assumptions of the evidence.
You make absolutely no sense. I embrace the fact of evolution because evidence supports the theory. Denial of that reality is, almost exclusively, a fundie Christian syndrome. There does not exist outside of christianity such a frantic, anti- science and anti-knowledge agenda. It is exclusively fundie Christians who drive the anti-science creationist ministries.
Evolution is not a science. Your first mistake is in thinking it is. "Science" means "to study". How can you study something that doesn't exist?
Evolution CANNOT be repeated, CANNOT be tested, CANNOT be observed, Cannot be studied...it is NOT science.
One of the dumbest things I've ever heard.
Ever heard of speciation being demonstrated in a laboratory?
Ever heard of genetics studies used to verify common ancestry?
Ever heard of viruses mutating over time?
Ever heard of fossil evidence which clearly shows a linear progression in the anatomy of species over time?
Hmm... yeah. Every one of you're claims about evolution is utterly false. Stick to what you know.
That's convenient, of course. It allows you an exclusion from meeting any standard of proof or definition. You can just make it up as you go along.
I've witnessed proof.
Really?! What proof was this?!!!
No. As with most of your uneducated comments, your lack of education in science coupled with your religious affliction leaves you unable to make rational choices.Evolution is. not. totally. random.
It's not even random.
It's not even close to random.
It is guided by natural selection. How do you not know this by now???? What has this whole thread been for? Are you trying to take in ANY information presented to you or are you simply denying everything that is written about evolution?
If so, what is the point in us being here? You might as well live in your solipsistic little world and spare us the effort of all this.
So what is guiding natural selection ? Surely it takes intelligence to lead or guide no ?
Your comment make no sense with regard to the process of evolution. If you are referring to gods with your comment: "Surely it takes intelligence to lead or guide no?", that leaves you in the precarious position of defending your gods who can only be described as incompetent and inept as intelligent leaders.
Why would you worship incompetence and ineptitude other than you just mindlessly accepted the religious beliefs of your fundie parents.
You have obviously been spending too much time worshipping at the altar of Harun Yahya..One of the dumbest things I've ever heard.
Ever heard of speciation being demonstrated in a laboratory?
Ever heard of genetics studies used to verify common ancestry?
Ever heard of viruses mutating over time?
Ever heard of fossil evidence which clearly shows a linear progression in the anatomy of species over time?
Hmm... yeah. Every one of you're claims about evolution is utterly false. Stick to what you know.
You let us know when this speciation leads to macroevolution.
Have you ever heard that many things have genes similar to humans but they are not related to humans how can that be by your reasoning ?
Again you let us know when mutating viruses are no longer a virus.
Please stop with this nonsense of transitional fossils, good grief.
Everything you claimed are faulty assumptions of the evidence.
For the science literate (and for those not completely incapacitated by religious fundamentalism), there is an entire world that exists external to the fear and superstition you choose.
Transitional Vertebrate Fossils FAQ
I've witnessed proof.
Really?! What proof was this?!!!
I've witnessed lives that were changed immediatly after accepting Jesus as their Savior. Mine included. I would not be where I'm at now if not for the grace of God.
Really?! What proof was this?!!!
I've witnessed lives that were changed immediatly after accepting Jesus as their Savior. Mine included. I would not be where I'm at now if not for the grace of God.
Just plain old self-delusion.
Really?! What proof was this?!!!
I've witnessed lives that were changed immediatly after accepting Jesus as their Savior. Mine included. I would not be where I'm at now if not for the grace of God.
Just plain old self-delusion.
I've witnessed lives that were changed immediatly after accepting Jesus as their Savior. Mine included. I would not be where I'm at now if not for the grace of God.
Just plain old self-delusion.
Don't judge until you've walked a mile in my shoes.
Just plain old self-delusion.
Don't judge until you've walked a mile in my shoes.
Hey, I'm glad that you feel better about your life, even if you have to convince yourself that a 2000 year old made up guy saved you.
I've witnessed lives that were changed immediatly after accepting Jesus as their Savior. Mine included. I would not be where I'm at now if not for the grace of God.
Just plain old self-delusion.
What if the self-delusion is yours ?
Funny that you should laugh. You have a better method of determining events that happened over 4 billion years ago? Let's see it. How utterly obnoxious can you be?? You sit back and reap all of the benefits of science, from health care to transportation, yet you mock science because it can't deliver a specific or accurate enough date for the inception of the earth? I can't tell you how ridiculous that is, especially when you have nothing better.
I can't tell you how ignorant and inept your response to this comment is. I am not denying the science or the age of the earth, but there is not enough evidence to call it a "fact". Even REAL scientists say they "believe" the earth is 4 billion years old. Heck, I believe it is too, but it is far from a fact my friend. Comprende?
Look Daws, you whiney little girl, I bolded your original post. But I didn't violate forum rules because although I was tempted, I didn't correct your baby talk. No, it a fact mommy. It a fact.
I can't tell you how annoying it is that you continually copt syntactic style as a means to try and belittle those you are responding to. Grow up!
By the way, the fact that you don't like my post doesn't make it ignorant, until you demonstrate how it is ignorant. What is considered a fact has to do with our current epistemology, which in this case, is involved with science. So, considering science is our best and only current method at ascertaining objective reality, we have no other choice but to call it "fact" because belief would simply not be accurate. You're attempt at demoting scientific claims really shows you're bias against science.
I'll require to practice using more user-friendly monosyllables. The gargantuan fonts and bright colors are required as that will tend to increase the attention span of folks with your educational challenges.
Dodge!
Now, now dear. We're only trying to help. For people like you, it is repetitive tasks that are models for success.
On, BTW, is the gargantuan font thing comparable to men with guns? There are studies that suggest feelings of inadequacy and self-hate are some reasons why men buy big guns.
I could send you some reading litersture?
Just plain old self-delusion.
What if the self-delusion is yours ?
How can a 2000 year old dead guy that might not even have existed save you today? That makes no sense.
Your comments are typical of the ignorance promoted by creation ministries.Evolution is not a science. Your first mistake is in thinking it is. "Science" means "to study". How can you study something that doesn't exist?
Evolution CANNOT be repeated, CANNOT be tested, CANNOT be observed, Cannot be studied...it is NOT science.
One of the dumbest things I've ever heard.
Ever heard of speciation being demonstrated in a laboratory?
Ever heard of genetics studies used to verify common ancestry?
Ever heard of viruses mutating over time?
Ever heard of fossil evidence which clearly shows a linear progression in the anatomy of species over time?
Hmm... yeah. Every one of you're claims about evolution is utterly false. Stick to what you know.
Hardly anything you mentioned involves evolution much less proves it.
By all accounts the fossil record should indicate millions of transitional fossils.
A virus mutating is still a virus.
Evolution requires non-living matter to turn into a living organism and this has never been observed.
So when it comes to real science (i.e. things we can actually establish by observation and experiment) life always comes from life! Evolutionists insist life came from nonliving matter but they have no way of proving this. Just saying something repeatedly doesn't make it true!
Worshipping an incompetent, inept configuration of a supermagical entity - now that's funny.No. As with most of your uneducated comments, your lack of education in science coupled with your religious affliction leaves you unable to make rational choices.So what is guiding natural selection ? Surely it takes intelligence to lead or guide no ?
Your comment make no sense with regard to the process of evolution. If you are referring to gods with your comment: "Surely it takes intelligence to lead or guide no?", that leaves you in the precarious position of defending your gods who can only be described as incompetent and inept as intelligent leaders.
Why would you worship incompetence and ineptitude other than you just mindlessly accepted the religious beliefs of your fundie parents.
You funny
You have obviously been spending too much time worshipping at the altar of Harun Yahya..You let us know when this speciation leads to macroevolution.
Have you ever heard that many things have genes similar to humans but they are not related to humans how can that be by your reasoning ?
Again you let us know when mutating viruses are no longer a virus.
Please stop with this nonsense of transitional fossils, good grief.
Everything you claimed are faulty assumptions of the evidence.
For the science literate (and for those not completely incapacitated by religious fundamentalism), there is an entire world that exists external to the fear and superstition you choose.
Transitional Vertebrate Fossils FAQ
Why do you paste things you do not understand ?
That won't shield your inability to post a coherent response.I can't tell you how ignorant and inept your response to this comment is. I am not denying the science or the age of the earth, but there is not enough evidence to call it a "fact". Even REAL scientists say they "believe" the earth is 4 billion years old. Heck, I believe it is too, but it is far from a fact my friend. Comprende?
Look Daws, you whiney little girl, I bolded your original post. But I didn't violate forum rules because although I was tempted, I didn't correct your baby talk. No, it a fact mommy. It a fact.
I can't tell you how annoying it is that you continually copt syntactic style as a means to try and belittle those you are responding to. Grow up!
By the way, the fact that you don't like my post doesn't make it ignorant, until you demonstrate how it is ignorant. What is considered a fact has to do with our current epistemology, which in this case, is involved with science. So, considering science is our best and only current method at ascertaining objective reality, we have no other choice but to call it "fact" because belief would simply not be accurate. You're attempt at demoting scientific claims really shows you're bias against science.
Okay, Hollie.
