Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't have to "think" I do! when in fact I do!wrong ,you said: "They have found that the organ stores bacteria and Enzymes that aid in the digestive system."-YWCDoes the appendix have a function daws ? that was my point.
THAT IS A STATEMENT NOT A QUESTION!
AS ALWAYS YOU'RE BACKPEDALING .
Here dummy.
Researchers at Duke University Medical Center say that the function of the frequently discarded appendix, an organ often credited with little importance and often dismissed as having no significant function, does it seems have a role to play after all.
Researchers in the United States say the appendix produces and protects good germs for the gut by "rebooting" the digestive system.
What does the appendix do? finally an answer!
When are you gonna quit thinking you know more then me you imbecile.
"Creationministries.org"?
Are you a comedian... or perhaps possess the IQ of 10W-30 motor oil?
Why don't you take on what the gentleman states,take on his theories. Because he is a man of faith he is automatically considered a loon by you even though he knows more science then you,why ?
The "gentleman" is a religious loon.
Host a Group or Private Canyon Tour
And there are the mile deep layers of strata which have been removed from above the rim of Grand Canyon...oh, those with a Secular worldview do not like to tell you about this, do they?! Proof is seen in the photo above as Russ delivers his On-The-Rim-Talk.
At the Canyon you will be shown original CREATION rock, Pre-flood strata and Judgment layers which were laid down during the flood. As Russ explains the geology he will also point out the relevance of the Grand Canyon to the authority of God's Word.
As is so typical with creationist loons, his first paragraph reeks of conspiracy theory babble.
Are there really "mile deep layers of strata which have been removed from above the rim of Grand Canyon"? Gee whiz, it must have been those "evilutionists" out under the cover of darkness with rakes and shovels removing those alleged "mile deep layers of strata"
What a sorry, pathetic joke.
The next paragaph is more conspiracy, loonish behavior. So is there really a "CREATION", gawd rock?
Where do they find these loons?
Put another way, scientists are trying to jump start life using the same elements that were on earth at the time. Why do you have a problem with that?
And what happens if we find life on another planet? How does that impact creationism?
Not a bit considering God the creator created all we know exists.
the bible is the only evidence they have (and it's not evidence) of a creator god...everything they claim to be fact, is in fact based on faith and willful ignorance.Put another way, scientists are trying to jump start life using the same elements that were on earth at the time. Why do you have a problem with that?
And what happens if we find life on another planet? How does that impact creationism?
Not a bit considering God the creator created all we know exists.
So why do you have a problem with the way scientists describe the beginning of life on earth? Is it just because a man written bible would be wrong? So you'd rather go against what the creator actually did so that your book won't be exposed as having gotten some things wrong? Seems pretty juvenile to me.
the bible is the only evidence they have (and it's not evidence) of a creator god...everything they claim to be fact, is in fact based on faith and willful ignorance.Not a bit considering God the creator created all we know exists.
So why do you have a problem with the way scientists describe the beginning of life on earth? Is it just because a man written bible would be wrong? So you'd rather go against what the creator actually did so that your book won't be exposed as having gotten some things wrong? Seems pretty juvenile to me.
Funny how you ignore those operative words when they are used for an explanation of your theory. There is no doubt the organ can be removed but it still serves a purpose while in the body. Stay away from them atheiat sitws th we y we kill what little brain you have lwft after doing all those drugs.I don't have to "think" I do! when in fact I do!wrong ,you said: "They have found that the organ stores bacteria and Enzymes that aid in the digestive system."-YWC
THAT IS A STATEMENT NOT A QUESTION!
AS ALWAYS YOU'RE BACKPEDALING .
Here dummy.
Researchers at Duke University Medical Center say that the function of the frequently discarded appendix, an organ often credited with little importance and often dismissed as having no significant function, does it seems have a role to play after all.
Researchers in the United States say the appendix produces and protects good germs for the gut by "rebooting" the digestive system.
What does the appendix do? finally an answer!
When are you gonna quit thinking you know more then me you imbecile.
doctors have trouble deciding if the appendix has any use to the body at all. While everyone agrees that the appendix can be removed without causing any adverse health consequences to the patient, some physicians and researchers believe that the appendix does serve a function as part of the immune system.
again some and believe are the operative words. ass hat!
the bible is the only evidence they have (and it's not evidence) of a creator god...everything they claim to be fact, is in fact based on faith and willful ignorance.Not a bit considering God the creator created all we know exists.
So why do you have a problem with the way scientists describe the beginning of life on earth? Is it just because a man written bible would be wrong? So you'd rather go against what the creator actually did so that your book won't be exposed as having gotten some things wrong? Seems pretty juvenile to me.
the bible is the only evidence they have (and it's not evidence) of a creator god...everything they claim to be fact, is in fact based on faith and willful ignorance.So why do you have a problem with the way scientists describe the beginning of life on earth? Is it just because a man written bible would be wrong? So you'd rather go against what the creator actually did so that your book won't be exposed as having gotten some things wrong? Seems pretty juvenile to me.
Gods word contains scientific facts before it was a scientific fact confirmed by men of science.
the bible is the only evidence they have (and it's not evidence) of a creator god...everything they claim to be fact, is in fact based on faith and willful ignorance.So why do you have a problem with the way scientists describe the beginning of life on earth? Is it just because a man written bible would be wrong? So you'd rather go against what the creator actually did so that your book won't be exposed as having gotten some things wrong? Seems pretty juvenile to me.
Gods word contains scientific facts before it was a scientific fact confirmed by men of science.
wrong as always, can't deny what's not there, it's all hearsay.the bible is the only evidence they have (and it's not evidence) of a creator god...everything they claim to be fact, is in fact based on faith and willful ignorance.So why do you have a problem with the way scientists describe the beginning of life on earth? Is it just because a man written bible would be wrong? So you'd rather go against what the creator actually did so that your book won't be exposed as having gotten some things wrong? Seems pretty juvenile to me.
In your rabid denial dreams.
actually they're not the operative words in science are evidence and test .slapdick!Funny how you ignore those operative words when they are used for an explanation of your theory. There is no doubt the organ can be removed but it still serves a purpose while in the body. Stay away from them atheiat sitws th we y we kill what little brain you have lwft after doing all those drugs.I don't have to "think" I do! when in fact I do!Here dummy.
Researchers at Duke University Medical Center say that the function of the frequently discarded appendix, an organ often credited with little importance and often dismissed as having no significant function, does it seems have a role to play after all.
Researchers in the United States say the appendix produces and protects good germs for the gut by "rebooting" the digestive system.
What does the appendix do? finally an answer!
When are you gonna quit thinking you know more then me you imbecile.
doctors have trouble deciding if the appendix has any use to the body at all. While everyone agrees that the appendix can be removed without causing any adverse health consequences to the patient, some physicians and researchers believe that the appendix does serve a function as part of the immune system.
again some and believe are the operative words. ass hat!
daydream believer and a home coming queen!the bible is the only evidence they have (and it's not evidence) of a creator god...everything they claim to be fact, is in fact based on faith and willful ignorance.So why do you have a problem with the way scientists describe the beginning of life on earth? Is it just because a man written bible would be wrong? So you'd rather go against what the creator actually did so that your book won't be exposed as having gotten some things wrong? Seems pretty juvenile to me.
Gods word contains scientific facts before it was a scientific fact confirmed by men of science.
the bible is the only evidence they have (and it's not evidence) of a creator god...everything they claim to be fact, is in fact based on faith and willful ignorance.
Gods word contains scientific facts before it was a scientific fact confirmed by men of science.
Exactly. Dinsaurs are in there!!! Was it John, who said unto Jesus, "Oh Lord; for that art one big mutherfucking lizard!!"? Or was that one of the other apostles? I keep forgetting.
And boy oh boy, that Noah dude damn near got zapped with lightning, when he queried unto God, "Hey big guy; you do know that a single breeding pair is the fucking definition of extinction; yeah God?"
the bible is the only evidence they have (and it's not evidence) of a creator god...everything they claim to be fact, is in fact based on faith and willful ignorance.So why do you have a problem with the way scientists describe the beginning of life on earth? Is it just because a man written bible would be wrong? So you'd rather go against what the creator actually did so that your book won't be exposed as having gotten some things wrong? Seems pretty juvenile to me.
Gods word contains scientific facts before it was a scientific fact confirmed by men of science.
the bible is the only evidence they have (and it's not evidence) of a creator god...everything they claim to be fact, is in fact based on faith and willful ignorance.
Gods word contains scientific facts before it was a scientific fact confirmed by men of science.
So the world being made in 6 days is scientific fact? Noah being 600 years old is scientific fact?...
the bible is the only evidence they have (and it's not evidence) of a creator god...everything they claim to be fact, is in fact based on faith and willful ignorance.
Gods word contains scientific facts before it was a scientific fact confirmed by men of science.
And these are? Bible was not written by any god it was written by men claiming a god told them to write it.....it actually amounts to no more than hearsay. The problem with this god theory is that no one can prove a god exists and no one can prove a god don't exist. Belief does not equal historical fact.
the bible is the only evidence they have (and it's not evidence) of a creator god...everything they claim to be fact, is in fact based on faith and willful ignorance.
Gods word contains scientific facts before it was a scientific fact confirmed by men of science.
Exactly. Dinsaurs are in there!!! Was it John, who said unto Jesus, "Oh Lord; for that art one big mutherfucking lizard!!"? Or was that one of the other apostles? I keep forgetting.
And boy oh boy, that Noah dude damn near got zapped with lightning, when he queried unto God, "Hey big guy; you do know that a single breeding pair is the fucking definition of extinction; yeah God?"
the bible is the only evidence they have (and it's not evidence) of a creator god...everything they claim to be fact, is in fact based on faith and willful ignorance.
Gods word contains scientific facts before it was a scientific fact confirmed by men of science.
And these are? Bible was not written by any god it was written by men claiming a god told them to write it.....it actually amounts to no more than hearsay. The problem with this god theory is that no one can prove a god exists and no one can prove a god don't exist. Belief does not equal historical fact.
actually they're not the operative words in science are evidence and test .slapdick!Funny how you ignore those operative words when they are used for an explanation of your theory. There is no doubt the organ can be removed but it still serves a purpose while in the body. Stay away from them atheiat sitws th we y we kill what little brain you have lwft after doing all those drugs.I don't have to "think" I do! when in fact I do!
doctors have trouble deciding if the appendix has any use to the body at all. While everyone agrees that the appendix can be removed without causing any adverse health consequences to the patient, some physicians and researchers believe that the appendix does serve a function as part of the immune system.
again some and believe are the operative words. ass hat!
daydream believer and a home coming queen!the bible is the only evidence they have (and it's not evidence) of a creator god...everything they claim to be fact, is in fact based on faith and willful ignorance.
Gods word contains scientific facts before it was a scientific fact confirmed by men of science.
