Crimes against peace class action suit

[TemplarKormac]

And there Luddly goes running from another one of his threads. Moving on.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Eyeah... whatever you say. Your response is indicative of how weak your argument is. So shut it Luddly, before I really take to embarrassing you in your own thread, got it, hotshot?

And just what do YOU think my "argument" is?

Think, child.

And quit trying to hide behind hijacking the thread.

BUSH IS EEEVIIIL!!

Your threads hijack themselves. Maybe if you posted something that isn't obviously baiting, maybe people wouldn't hijack your threads with facts.

[MENTION=43268]TemplarKormac[/MENTION]
So you accuse me of having a "weak argument" when I have actually not stated any argument at all. Then, you run away from that asssinine statement to yet another stupid statement.

Well yes, he is evil. So are his henchmen.

But, that's not really what this thread is about. Why don't you address the actual OP instead of being the coward you always are?

You always do this.

Next, you will post a lot of garbage, most of it written by someone else and then you'll post yet another damn "mea culpa" thread, begging and crying and yecch.

Get lost sonny boy.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

And there Luddly goes running from another one of his threads. Moving on.

[MENTION=43268]TemplarKormac[/MENTION] gets his butt beat again.

Grow up.

 

[OKTexas]

What happened to your contention that the president is never on vacation? Come on hypocrite, explain your inconsistent BS.

 

[deltex1]

?Crimes against Peace?: Historic Class Action Law Suit against George W. Bush | Global Research

The case against Bush is based on the conduct of members of the administration prior to coming into office as well as conduct taking place on and after 9/11. Years before their appointment to the Bush Administration, Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz were vocal advocates of a militant neoconservative ideology that called for the United States to use its armed forces in the Middle East and elsewhere.

They openly chronicled their desire for aggressive wars through a non-profit called The Project for the New American Century (or PNAC). In 1998, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz would personally sign a letter to then-President Clinton, urging the president to implement a “strategy for removing Saddam’s regime from power,” which included a “willingness to undertake military action as diplomacy is clearly failing.”

On 9/11, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz openly pressed for the United States to invade Iraq, even though intelligence at the time confirmed that it was al Qaeda, and not Saddam, that was responsible. Richard Clarke, former National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure Protection and Counter-terrorism, famously told President Bush that attacking Iraq for 9/11 would be like invading Mexico after Pearl Harbor.

We now know that the Bush Administration began a concerted effort to scare and mislead the American public in order to obtain support for the Iraq War. As alleged in the complaint, this included the famous phrase that “the smoking gun could not be a mushroom cloud,” which was used repeatedly by Administration officials on news shows as a way of equating non-action with the vaporization of a United States city. The Administration used bogus and false intelligence to make the case for weapons of mass destruction, and also falsely linked al Qaeda to Iraq, despite the fact that there has never been any evidence of any operational linkages between the two. These were not simple mistakes: this was an intentional campaign by Administration officials to use faulty data to garner support for a war.

The crime of aggression was completed when these officials failed to secure proper authorization for the war. So concerned with their invasion, the Administration dismissed any need for a formal Security Council mandate. Today, Kofi Annan, an official Dutch inquiry, the Costa Rican Supreme Court, a former law lord from the House of Lords (Lord Steyn) and a former chief prosecutor from the Nuremberg Trials (Benjamin Ferencz) have all concluded the Iraq War was illegal under international law.

Yes, he's guilty but I agree with President Obama that bringing him and that dick of a veep to justice might well do more harm that good.

Whatcha think?

Look folks...Luddley has achieved an erection!!!

 

[TemplarKormac]

And just what do YOU think my "argument" is?

Think, child.

And quit trying to hide behind hijacking the thread.

BUSH IS EEEVIIIL!!

Your threads hijack themselves. Maybe if you posted something that isn't obviously baiting, maybe people wouldn't hijack your threads with facts.

@TemplarKormac
So you accuse me of having a "weak argument" when I have actually not stated any argument at all. Then, you run away from that asssinine statement to yet another stupid statement.

Well yes, he is evil. So are his henchmen.

But, that's not really what this thread is about. Why don't you address the actual OP instead of being the coward you always are?

You always do this.

Next, you will post a lot of garbage, most of it written by someone else and then you'll post yet another damn "mea culpa" thread, begging and crying and yecch.

Get lost sonny boy.

Yep, Three Mile Island has nothing on you. Liberal meltdown in progress.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

And there Luddly goes running from another one of his threads. Moving on.

The problem here is that you are so used to having your every little need taken care of by grown ups, you just asssume people will hang on your every word.

You're a very very dumb kid. You think your shit doesn't stink but in fact, you're just plain average or below average.

You are what my dad used to call tits on a pup.

 

[OKTexas]

?Crimes against Peace?: Historic Class Action Law Suit against George W. Bush | Global Research

The case against Bush is based on the conduct of members of the administration prior to coming into office as well as conduct taking place on and after 9/11. Years before their appointment to the Bush Administration, Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz were vocal advocates of a militant neoconservative ideology that called for the United States to use its armed forces in the Middle East and elsewhere.

They openly chronicled their desire for aggressive wars through a non-profit called The Project for the New American Century (or PNAC). In 1998, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz would personally sign a letter to then-President Clinton, urging the president to implement a “strategy for removing Saddam’s regime from power,” which included a “willingness to undertake military action as diplomacy is clearly failing.”

On 9/11, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz openly pressed for the United States to invade Iraq, even though intelligence at the time confirmed that it was al Qaeda, and not Saddam, that was responsible. Richard Clarke, former National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure Protection and Counter-terrorism, famously told President Bush that attacking Iraq for 9/11 would be like invading Mexico after Pearl Harbor.

We now know that the Bush Administration began a concerted effort to scare and mislead the American public in order to obtain support for the Iraq War. As alleged in the complaint, this included the famous phrase that “the smoking gun could not be a mushroom cloud,” which was used repeatedly by Administration officials on news shows as a way of equating non-action with the vaporization of a United States city. The Administration used bogus and false intelligence to make the case for weapons of mass destruction, and also falsely linked al Qaeda to Iraq, despite the fact that there has never been any evidence of any operational linkages between the two. These were not simple mistakes: this was an intentional campaign by Administration officials to use faulty data to garner support for a war.

The crime of aggression was completed when these officials failed to secure proper authorization for the war. So concerned with their invasion, the Administration dismissed any need for a formal Security Council mandate. Today, Kofi Annan, an official Dutch inquiry, the Costa Rican Supreme Court, a former law lord from the House of Lords (Lord Steyn) and a former chief prosecutor from the Nuremberg Trials (Benjamin Ferencz) have all concluded the Iraq War was illegal under international law.

Yes, he's guilty but I agree with President Obama that bringing him and that dick of a veep to justice might well do more harm that good.

Whatcha think?

I hope they named the UN and congress as well.

 

[thereisnospoon]

?Crimes against Peace?: Historic Class Action Law Suit against George W. Bush | Global Research

The case against Bush is based on the conduct of members of the administration prior to coming into office as well as conduct taking place on and after 9/11. Years before their appointment to the Bush Administration, Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz were vocal advocates of a militant neoconservative ideology that called for the United States to use its armed forces in the Middle East and elsewhere.

They openly chronicled their desire for aggressive wars through a non-profit called The Project for the New American Century (or PNAC). In 1998, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz would personally sign a letter to then-President Clinton, urging the president to implement a “strategy for removing Saddam’s regime from power,” which included a “willingness to undertake military action as diplomacy is clearly failing.”

On 9/11, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz openly pressed for the United States to invade Iraq, even though intelligence at the time confirmed that it was al Qaeda, and not Saddam, that was responsible. Richard Clarke, former National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure Protection and Counter-terrorism, famously told President Bush that attacking Iraq for 9/11 would be like invading Mexico after Pearl Harbor.

We now know that the Bush Administration began a concerted effort to scare and mislead the American public in order to obtain support for the Iraq War. As alleged in the complaint, this included the famous phrase that “the smoking gun could not be a mushroom cloud,” which was used repeatedly by Administration officials on news shows as a way of equating non-action with the vaporization of a United States city. The Administration used bogus and false intelligence to make the case for weapons of mass destruction, and also falsely linked al Qaeda to Iraq, despite the fact that there has never been any evidence of any operational linkages between the two. These were not simple mistakes: this was an intentional campaign by Administration officials to use faulty data to garner support for a war.

The crime of aggression was completed when these officials failed to secure proper authorization for the war. So concerned with their invasion, the Administration dismissed any need for a formal Security Council mandate. Today, Kofi Annan, an official Dutch inquiry, the Costa Rican Supreme Court, a former law lord from the House of Lords (Lord Steyn) and a former chief prosecutor from the Nuremberg Trials (Benjamin Ferencz) have all concluded the Iraq War was illegal under international law.

Yes, he's guilty but I agree with President Obama that bringing him and that dick of a veep to justice might well do more harm that good.

Whatcha think?

I don't...This is a nonsensical premise.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Obama says this:



Then promptly adds $7 trillion to the national debt. Amid 176 holes of golf:

http://obamagolfcounter.com/

A jet liner gets shot out of the sky, Obama goes fundraising:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2696366/It-looks-like-terrible-tragedy-Obama-briefly-addresses-Malaysian-plane-crash-emerges-23-U-S-passengers-board.html

 

[TemplarKormac]

I thought as much.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

?Crimes against Peace?: Historic Class Action Law Suit against George W. Bush | Global Research

The case against Bush is based on the conduct of members of the administration prior to coming into office as well as conduct taking place on and after 9/11. Years before their appointment to the Bush Administration, Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz were vocal advocates of a militant neoconservative ideology that called for the United States to use its armed forces in the Middle East and elsewhere.

They openly chronicled their desire for aggressive wars through a non-profit called The Project for the New American Century (or PNAC). In 1998, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz would personally sign a letter to then-President Clinton, urging the president to implement a “strategy for removing Saddam’s regime from power,” which included a “willingness to undertake military action as diplomacy is clearly failing.”

On 9/11, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz openly pressed for the United States to invade Iraq, even though intelligence at the time confirmed that it was al Qaeda, and not Saddam, that was responsible. Richard Clarke, former National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure Protection and Counter-terrorism, famously told President Bush that attacking Iraq for 9/11 would be like invading Mexico after Pearl Harbor.

We now know that the Bush Administration began a concerted effort to scare and mislead the American public in order to obtain support for the Iraq War. As alleged in the complaint, this included the famous phrase that “the smoking gun could not be a mushroom cloud,” which was used repeatedly by Administration officials on news shows as a way of equating non-action with the vaporization of a United States city. The Administration used bogus and false intelligence to make the case for weapons of mass destruction, and also falsely linked al Qaeda to Iraq, despite the fact that there has never been any evidence of any operational linkages between the two. These were not simple mistakes: this was an intentional campaign by Administration officials to use faulty data to garner support for a war.

The crime of aggression was completed when these officials failed to secure proper authorization for the war. So concerned with their invasion, the Administration dismissed any need for a formal Security Council mandate. Today, Kofi Annan, an official Dutch inquiry, the Costa Rican Supreme Court, a former law lord from the House of Lords (Lord Steyn) and a former chief prosecutor from the Nuremberg Trials (Benjamin Ferencz) have all concluded the Iraq War was illegal under international law.

Yes, he's guilty but I agree with President Obama that bringing him and that dick of a veep to justice might well do more harm that good.

Whatcha think?

I don't...This is a nonsensical premise.

Well, we know that Bush et al lied in order to line their own pockets at the expense of the US and other countries. He is probably guilty of "war crimes" and I'd love to know he's painting his idiotic paintings from a jail cell.

Realistically, it would never happen. Even if he were convicted, he would get off.

So, would it be worth it?

Couldn't we just ship him off to, oh, gitmo ... ?

 

[gtarguy921]

Yes, he's guilty but I agree with President Obama that bringing him and that dick of a veep to justice might well do more harm that good.

Whatcha think?

That we're deluding ourselves when we talk about equal justice under the law.

If that were the case, these criminals would be in Leavenworth.

 

[CaféAuLait]

?Crimes against Peace?: Historic Class Action Law Suit against George W. Bush | Global Research

The case against Bush is based on the conduct of members of the administration prior to coming into office as well as conduct taking place on and after 9/11. Years before their appointment to the Bush Administration, Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz were vocal advocates of a militant neoconservative ideology that called for the United States to use its armed forces in the Middle East and elsewhere.

They openly chronicled their desire for aggressive wars through a non-profit called The Project for the New American Century (or PNAC). In 1998, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz would personally sign a letter to then-President Clinton, urging the president to implement a “strategy for removing Saddam’s regime from power,” which included a “willingness to undertake military action as diplomacy is clearly failing.”

On 9/11, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz openly pressed for the United States to invade Iraq, even though intelligence at the time confirmed that it was al Qaeda, and not Saddam, that was responsible. Richard Clarke, former National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure Protection and Counter-terrorism, famously told President Bush that attacking Iraq for 9/11 would be like invading Mexico after Pearl Harbor.

We now know that the Bush Administration began a concerted effort to scare and mislead the American public in order to obtain support for the Iraq War. As alleged in the complaint, this included the famous phrase that “the smoking gun could not be a mushroom cloud,” which was used repeatedly by Administration officials on news shows as a way of equating non-action with the vaporization of a United States city. The Administration used bogus and false intelligence to make the case for weapons of mass destruction, and also falsely linked al Qaeda to Iraq, despite the fact that there has never been any evidence of any operational linkages between the two. These were not simple mistakes: this was an intentional campaign by Administration officials to use faulty data to garner support for a war.

The crime of aggression was completed when these officials failed to secure proper authorization for the war. So concerned with their invasion, the Administration dismissed any need for a formal Security Council mandate. Today, Kofi Annan, an official Dutch inquiry, the Costa Rican Supreme Court, a former law lord from the House of Lords (Lord Steyn) and a former chief prosecutor from the Nuremberg Trials (Benjamin Ferencz) have all concluded the Iraq War was illegal under international law.

Yes, he's guilty but I agree with President Obama that bringing him and that dick of a veep to justice might well do more harm that good.

Whatcha think?

So the premise of the lawsuit is Bush, et, al., planned the war and 9-11 before he ever was elected along with his co-defendants...



What do I think? I think you need to start reading different websites.