Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not murder as non lawyers define the termIf she murdered the guy, dumb ass, she should be executed.......I disagree with the politacally motivated sentence....
Again.....you fail to tell us...what was her motive for murdering the guy who lived in the apartment that was directly above or below her own and her statement she got off on the wrong floor...
Why did she murder the guy? That you refuse to answer that basic investigatory question shows the political nature of the prosecution and verdict.
This should be overturned, and reduced to manslaughter.
She did murder a guy dumbass. She was convicted of it. You place less value on the life she took because he’s black which is why you want her to be released.
if mom is distracted by rowdy children and runs a red light which kills someone she is just a lousy driver, not a murderer
and that seems to be the case here
convicted of murder. In the eyes of the law, she’s a murderer.
And in the "eyes of the law" OJ was innocent. That didn't make it so now did it?
Are you deliberately being a moron or do you actually believe the shit you're posting?
Do you feel that jury decisions should be thrown out due to the way you feel?
Not murder as non lawyers define the termShe did murder a guy dumbass. She was convicted of it. You place less value on the life she took because he’s black which is why you want her to be released.
if mom is distracted by rowdy children and runs a red light which kills someone she is just a lousy driver, not a murderer
and that seems to be the case here
convicted of murder. In the eyes of the law, she’s a murderer.
And in the "eyes of the law" OJ was innocent. That didn't make it so now did it?
Are you deliberately being a moron or do you actually believe the shit you're posting?
Do you feel that jury decisions should be thrown out due to the way you feel?
Did I say that? Did I even suggest that?
Why don't you try addressing the points being made instead of going off on wild tangents? Stop being a lemming, engage in some critical thinking, and present a sound argument as to how a murder charge fit the crime.
Not murder as non lawyers define the term
if mom is distracted by rowdy children and runs a red light which kills someone she is just a lousy driver, not a murderer
and that seems to be the case here
convicted of murder. In the eyes of the law, she’s a murderer.
And in the "eyes of the law" OJ was innocent. That didn't make it so now did it?
Are you deliberately being a moron or do you actually believe the shit you're posting?
Do you feel that jury decisions should be thrown out due to the way you feel?
Did I say that? Did I even suggest that?
Why don't you try addressing the points being made instead of going off on wild tangents? Stop being a lemming, engage in some critical thinking, and present a sound argument as to how a murder charge fit the crime.
She killed a guy in his own home.
Who said the jury decision should be “thrown out?”Not murder as non lawyers define the termIf she murdered the guy, dumb ass, she should be executed.......I disagree with the politacally motivated sentence....
Again.....you fail to tell us...what was her motive for murdering the guy who lived in the apartment that was directly above or below her own and her statement she got off on the wrong floor...
Why did she murder the guy? That you refuse to answer that basic investigatory question shows the political nature of the prosecution and verdict.
This should be overturned, and reduced to manslaughter.
She did murder a guy dumbass. She was convicted of it. You place less value on the life she took because he’s black which is why you want her to be released.
if mom is distracted by rowdy children and runs a red light which kills someone she is just a lousy driver, not a murderer
and that seems to be the case here
convicted of murder. In the eyes of the law, she’s a murderer.
And in the "eyes of the law" OJ was innocent. That didn't make it so now did it?
Are you deliberately being a moron or do you actually believe the shit you're posting?
Do you feel that jury decisions should be thrown out due to the way you feel?
If you believe she intentionally murdered the victim for whatever reason you prefer then she should remain in prison for 30 yearsCouldn’t agree more. She should die in jail.
but otherwise maybe not
If she intentionally murdered the guy she should get the death penalty.....notice, however, that candycorn can't show the Motive for claiming it was murder over manslaughter...... and the only reason she got murder instead was the guy was black and she was a police officer......
Again.....candycorn needs to show us the motive for the off duty police officer to have pre-meditatively killed that man.....still waiting.
Hold your breath.
she was convicted of murder and got a whopping 10 years.
why are you soft on crime?
If she murdered the guy, dumb ass, she should be executed.......I disagree with the politacally motivated sentence....
Again.....you fail to tell us...what was her motive for murdering the guy who lived in the apartment that was directly above or below her own and her statement she got off on the wrong floor...
Why did she murder the guy? That you refuse to answer that basic investigatory question shows the political nature of the prosecution and verdict.
This should be overturned, and reduced to manslaughter.
She did murder a guy dumbass. She was convicted of it. You place less value on the life she took because he’s black which is why you want her to be released.
When you focus laws to target law abiding gun owners, you do nothing to stop gun crime. Criminals using illegal guns drive the gun murder and crime rates.....
convicted of murder. In the eyes of the law, she’s a murderer.
And in the "eyes of the law" OJ was innocent. That didn't make it so now did it?
Are you deliberately being a moron or do you actually believe the shit you're posting?
Do you feel that jury decisions should be thrown out due to the way you feel?
Did I say that? Did I even suggest that?
Why don't you try addressing the points being made instead of going off on wild tangents? Stop being a lemming, engage in some critical thinking, and present a sound argument as to how a murder charge fit the crime.
She killed a guy in his own home.
Remember when I said engage in some critical thinking?
The mere act of "killing a guy in his home" does not automatically constitute a murder charge. A woman who shoots her abusive husband while he's beating her is "killing a guy in his home", yet that is not murder. A person who is fiddling with the radio in his car, blows a red light, and mows down a pedestrian is not a murderer.
So, what are the circumstances that make this case a murder? Where is the intent? Where is the motive?
Who said the jury decision should be “thrown out?”Not murder as non lawyers define the termShe did murder a guy dumbass. She was convicted of it. You place less value on the life she took because he’s black which is why you want her to be released.
if mom is distracted by rowdy children and runs a red light which kills someone she is just a lousy driver, not a murderer
and that seems to be the case here
convicted of murder. In the eyes of the law, she’s a murderer.
And in the "eyes of the law" OJ was innocent. That didn't make it so now did it?
Are you deliberately being a moron or do you actually believe the shit you're posting?
Do you feel that jury decisions should be thrown out due to the way you feel?
Thats your idea not ours
Using the legal process to change a sentence through the appeals process is as responsible and legal as the original decisionWho said the jury decision should be “thrown out?”Not murder as non lawyers define the term
if mom is distracted by rowdy children and runs a red light which kills someone she is just a lousy driver, not a murderer
and that seems to be the case here
convicted of murder. In the eyes of the law, she’s a murderer.
And in the "eyes of the law" OJ was innocent. That didn't make it so now did it?
Are you deliberately being a moron or do you actually believe the shit you're posting?
Do you feel that jury decisions should be thrown out due to the way you feel?
Thats your idea not ours
“This should be overturned, and reduced to manslaughter.”
Certainly, willy-nilly firearms laws such as simple confiscation are ridiculous.
Nevertheless, the concerns of such a vast number of Americans concerning the disquieting problems with 'guns' has to be addressed somehow and to some extent.
Yes...it does. You deal with gun violence by arresting and locking up actual gun criminals, the ones who are actually committing crimes with guns......here is my solution, and it has the benefit of leaving normal gun owning Americans alone and unmolested....
All the other proposals by the democrat party have nothing to do with stopping gun crime.....they don't care about gun crime and they show this with their policies that allow violent, repeat gun offenders out on bond and out of prison with revolving door justice.....
My plan actually works.....
I support a life sentence on any criminal who uses a gun for an actual gun crime..... and 30 years if a criminal is caught in possession of a gun, even if they are not using it at that moment for crime.
This will dry up gun crime over night. Criminals will stop using guns for robberies, rapes and murders.....and those who do will be gone forever......
Criminals will also stop walking around with guns in their pants......which is the leading cause of random gang shootings in our cities. if they are stopped by police, with a gun in their pants, they are gone for 30 years...they will stop carrying those guns, and random gang violence will end.
You implement this with two other things...
1) No More Bargaining Away the Gun Charge.........it must be against the law to bargain away a gun charge as part of a plea deal....this stops.
2) When a criminal is arrested for any crime, and booked in...they will be read the announcement that any use of a crime is a life sentence without parole, owning or carrying a gun as a felon is a 30 year sentence without parole....when they are released from custody...the same will be read to them again....when they meet their parole officer it will be read to them again.....the U.S. government will also buy and send out Public announcements on this policy on t.v. radio. and cable......
That is how you stop gun crime over night.
Mass shooters are different..... but with only 93 people killed in mass public shootings in 2018, they are not the major problem in gun crime.
The value in my plan......it actually targets the individuals actually using guns to commit crimes and murder people....
It does not require new background check laws, it does not require gun licensing, licensing gun owners, gun registration, new taxes, fees or regulations on guns...
By making gun crime a life sentence, criminals will stop using guns for crime and will stop carrying guns around for protection.....
Also....a nurse, with a legal gun, driving from Pennsylvania, to New Jersey, will not be considered a gun criminal.....that will end. Criminals with a record of crime, caught with a gun will get 30 years, no deals.....and criminals who use guns for actual crime...robbing the local store, rape, robbery, murder.....life without parole...
This, of course, eliminates the need for more gun control laws...we can already do this.....
Mass shooters
1) end gun free zones
2) get the media to stop covering mass shootings like it is the Oscars.....
3) We are already seeing this...get people who know these nuts to report these nuts....
4) Make sure the police who know these nuts arrest these nuts when they have the chance so they will pop on background checks....
What does each do to stop mass shooters....
1) keeps shooters from targeting people, since they target gun free zones.
2) The media not covering it like they are the criminal oscars deters copycats...just like they stopped covering teen suicides to stop the copycat effect
3) The only way to stop mass shooters, since they commit no other crime, is for family, coworkers and neighbors to report their violent behavior....the Odessa shooter should have felonies for the crimes he was committing but they didn't report his shooting his weapon from his front porch....
4) The Parkland shooter had 33 contacts with police and numerous contacts with police at his school.....due to Obama's "Promise Program" the police never arrested him for the felonies he committed....so he didn't pop on the background check..
When you focus laws to target law abiding gun owners, you do nothing to stop gun crime. Criminals using illegal guns drive the gun murder and crime rates.....
Sweden is a socialist welfare state... I don't think you really want to use that as an example.
Guns in Sweden — Firearms, gun law and gun control
The regulation of guns in Sweden is categorised as restrictive90
In Sweden, the right to private gun ownership is not guaranteed by law
In Sweden, only licensed gun owners
Genuine Reason Required for Firearm Possession[/paste:font]
Applicants for a gun owner’s licence in Sweden are required to establish a genuine reason to possess a firearm, for example hunting, target shooting, collection and self-defence (but in practice, no such licences are ever granted)91 102
Certainly, willy-nilly firearms laws such as simple confiscation are ridiculous.
Nevertheless, the concerns of such a vast number of Americans concerning the disquieting problems with 'guns' has to be addressed somehow and to some extent.
Yes...it does. You deal with gun violence by arresting and locking up actual gun criminals, the ones who are actually committing crimes with guns......here is my solution, and it has the benefit of leaving normal gun owning Americans alone and unmolested....
All the other proposals by the democrat party have nothing to do with stopping gun crime.....they don't care about gun crime and they show this with their policies that allow violent, repeat gun offenders out on bond and out of prison with revolving door justice.....
My plan actually works.....
I support a life sentence on any criminal who uses a gun for an actual gun crime..... and 30 years if a criminal is caught in possession of a gun, even if they are not using it at that moment for crime.
This will dry up gun crime over night. Criminals will stop using guns for robberies, rapes and murders.....and those who do will be gone forever......
Criminals will also stop walking around with guns in their pants......which is the leading cause of random gang shootings in our cities. if they are stopped by police, with a gun in their pants, they are gone for 30 years...they will stop carrying those guns, and random gang violence will end.
You implement this with two other things...
1) No More Bargaining Away the Gun Charge.........it must be against the law to bargain away a gun charge as part of a plea deal....this stops.
2) When a criminal is arrested for any crime, and booked in...they will be read the announcement that any use of a crime is a life sentence without parole, owning or carrying a gun as a felon is a 30 year sentence without parole....when they are released from custody...the same will be read to them again....when they meet their parole officer it will be read to them again.....the U.S. government will also buy and send out Public announcements on this policy on t.v. radio. and cable......
That is how you stop gun crime over night.
Mass shooters are different..... but with only 93 people killed in mass public shootings in 2018, they are not the major problem in gun crime.
The value in my plan......it actually targets the individuals actually using guns to commit crimes and murder people....
It does not require new background check laws, it does not require gun licensing, licensing gun owners, gun registration, new taxes, fees or regulations on guns...
By making gun crime a life sentence, criminals will stop using guns for crime and will stop carrying guns around for protection.....
Also....a nurse, with a legal gun, driving from Pennsylvania, to New Jersey, will not be considered a gun criminal.....that will end. Criminals with a record of crime, caught with a gun will get 30 years, no deals.....and criminals who use guns for actual crime...robbing the local store, rape, robbery, murder.....life without parole...
This, of course, eliminates the need for more gun control laws...we can already do this.....
Mass shooters
1) end gun free zones
2) get the media to stop covering mass shootings like it is the Oscars.....
3) We are already seeing this...get people who know these nuts to report these nuts....
4) Make sure the police who know these nuts arrest these nuts when they have the chance so they will pop on background checks....
What does each do to stop mass shooters....
1) keeps shooters from targeting people, since they target gun free zones.
2) The media not covering it like they are the criminal oscars deters copycats...just like they stopped covering teen suicides to stop the copycat effect
3) The only way to stop mass shooters, since they commit no other crime, is for family, coworkers and neighbors to report their violent behavior....the Odessa shooter should have felonies for the crimes he was committing but they didn't report his shooting his weapon from his front porch....
4) The Parkland shooter had 33 contacts with police and numerous contacts with police at his school.....due to Obama's "Promise Program" the police never arrested him for the felonies he committed....so he didn't pop on the background check..
Your obsession with guns is laughable. If criminals didn’t have easy access to guns, your crime rate would go down.
Certainly, willy-nilly firearms laws such as simple confiscation are ridiculous.
Nevertheless, the concerns of such a vast number of Americans concerning the disquieting problems with 'guns' has to be addressed somehow and to some extent.
Yes...it does. You deal with gun violence by arresting and locking up actual gun criminals, the ones who are actually committing crimes with guns......here is my solution, and it has the benefit of leaving normal gun owning Americans alone and unmolested....
All the other proposals by the democrat party have nothing to do with stopping gun crime.....they don't care about gun crime and they show this with their policies that allow violent, repeat gun offenders out on bond and out of prison with revolving door justice.....
My plan actually works.....
I support a life sentence on any criminal who uses a gun for an actual gun crime..... and 30 years if a criminal is caught in possession of a gun, even if they are not using it at that moment for crime.
This will dry up gun crime over night. Criminals will stop using guns for robberies, rapes and murders.....and those who do will be gone forever......
Criminals will also stop walking around with guns in their pants......which is the leading cause of random gang shootings in our cities. if they are stopped by police, with a gun in their pants, they are gone for 30 years...they will stop carrying those guns, and random gang violence will end.
You implement this with two other things...
1) No More Bargaining Away the Gun Charge.........it must be against the law to bargain away a gun charge as part of a plea deal....this stops.
2) When a criminal is arrested for any crime, and booked in...they will be read the announcement that any use of a crime is a life sentence without parole, owning or carrying a gun as a felon is a 30 year sentence without parole....when they are released from custody...the same will be read to them again....when they meet their parole officer it will be read to them again.....the U.S. government will also buy and send out Public announcements on this policy on t.v. radio. and cable......
That is how you stop gun crime over night.
Mass shooters are different..... but with only 93 people killed in mass public shootings in 2018, they are not the major problem in gun crime.
The value in my plan......it actually targets the individuals actually using guns to commit crimes and murder people....
It does not require new background check laws, it does not require gun licensing, licensing gun owners, gun registration, new taxes, fees or regulations on guns...
By making gun crime a life sentence, criminals will stop using guns for crime and will stop carrying guns around for protection.....
Also....a nurse, with a legal gun, driving from Pennsylvania, to New Jersey, will not be considered a gun criminal.....that will end. Criminals with a record of crime, caught with a gun will get 30 years, no deals.....and criminals who use guns for actual crime...robbing the local store, rape, robbery, murder.....life without parole...
This, of course, eliminates the need for more gun control laws...we can already do this.....
Mass shooters
1) end gun free zones
2) get the media to stop covering mass shootings like it is the Oscars.....
3) We are already seeing this...get people who know these nuts to report these nuts....
4) Make sure the police who know these nuts arrest these nuts when they have the chance so they will pop on background checks....
What does each do to stop mass shooters....
1) keeps shooters from targeting people, since they target gun free zones.
2) The media not covering it like they are the criminal oscars deters copycats...just like they stopped covering teen suicides to stop the copycat effect
3) The only way to stop mass shooters, since they commit no other crime, is for family, coworkers and neighbors to report their violent behavior....the Odessa shooter should have felonies for the crimes he was committing but they didn't report his shooting his weapon from his front porch....
4) The Parkland shooter had 33 contacts with police and numerous contacts with police at his school.....due to Obama's "Promise Program" the police never arrested him for the felonies he committed....so he didn't pop on the background check..
Your obsession with guns is laughable. If criminals didn’t have easy access to guns, your crime rate would go down.
And in the "eyes of the law" OJ was innocent. That didn't make it so now did it?
Are you deliberately being a moron or do you actually believe the shit you're posting?
Do you feel that jury decisions should be thrown out due to the way you feel?
Did I say that? Did I even suggest that?
Why don't you try addressing the points being made instead of going off on wild tangents? Stop being a lemming, engage in some critical thinking, and present a sound argument as to how a murder charge fit the crime.
She killed a guy in his own home.
Remember when I said engage in some critical thinking?
The mere act of "killing a guy in his home" does not automatically constitute a murder charge. A woman who shoots her abusive husband while he's beating her is "killing a guy in his home", yet that is not murder. A person who is fiddling with the radio in his car, blows a red light, and mows down a pedestrian is not a murderer.
So, what are the circumstances that make this case a murder? Where is the intent? Where is the motive?
the charge and verdict make it a murder. Sorry.
Certainly, willy-nilly firearms laws such as simple confiscation are ridiculous.
Nevertheless, the concerns of such a vast number of Americans concerning the disquieting problems with 'guns' has to be addressed somehow and to some extent.
Yes...it does. You deal with gun violence by arresting and locking up actual gun criminals, the ones who are actually committing crimes with guns......here is my solution, and it has the benefit of leaving normal gun owning Americans alone and unmolested....
All the other proposals by the democrat party have nothing to do with stopping gun crime.....they don't care about gun crime and they show this with their policies that allow violent, repeat gun offenders out on bond and out of prison with revolving door justice.....
My plan actually works.....
I support a life sentence on any criminal who uses a gun for an actual gun crime..... and 30 years if a criminal is caught in possession of a gun, even if they are not using it at that moment for crime.
This will dry up gun crime over night. Criminals will stop using guns for robberies, rapes and murders.....and those who do will be gone forever......
Criminals will also stop walking around with guns in their pants......which is the leading cause of random gang shootings in our cities. if they are stopped by police, with a gun in their pants, they are gone for 30 years...they will stop carrying those guns, and random gang violence will end.
You implement this with two other things...
1) No More Bargaining Away the Gun Charge.........it must be against the law to bargain away a gun charge as part of a plea deal....this stops.
2) When a criminal is arrested for any crime, and booked in...they will be read the announcement that any use of a crime is a life sentence without parole, owning or carrying a gun as a felon is a 30 year sentence without parole....when they are released from custody...the same will be read to them again....when they meet their parole officer it will be read to them again.....the U.S. government will also buy and send out Public announcements on this policy on t.v. radio. and cable......
That is how you stop gun crime over night.
Mass shooters are different..... but with only 93 people killed in mass public shootings in 2018, they are not the major problem in gun crime.
The value in my plan......it actually targets the individuals actually using guns to commit crimes and murder people....
It does not require new background check laws, it does not require gun licensing, licensing gun owners, gun registration, new taxes, fees or regulations on guns...
By making gun crime a life sentence, criminals will stop using guns for crime and will stop carrying guns around for protection.....
Also....a nurse, with a legal gun, driving from Pennsylvania, to New Jersey, will not be considered a gun criminal.....that will end. Criminals with a record of crime, caught with a gun will get 30 years, no deals.....and criminals who use guns for actual crime...robbing the local store, rape, robbery, murder.....life without parole...
This, of course, eliminates the need for more gun control laws...we can already do this.....
Mass shooters
1) end gun free zones
2) get the media to stop covering mass shootings like it is the Oscars.....
3) We are already seeing this...get people who know these nuts to report these nuts....
4) Make sure the police who know these nuts arrest these nuts when they have the chance so they will pop on background checks....
What does each do to stop mass shooters....
1) keeps shooters from targeting people, since they target gun free zones.
2) The media not covering it like they are the criminal oscars deters copycats...just like they stopped covering teen suicides to stop the copycat effect
3) The only way to stop mass shooters, since they commit no other crime, is for family, coworkers and neighbors to report their violent behavior....the Odessa shooter should have felonies for the crimes he was committing but they didn't report his shooting his weapon from his front porch....
4) The Parkland shooter had 33 contacts with police and numerous contacts with police at his school.....due to Obama's "Promise Program" the police never arrested him for the felonies he committed....so he didn't pop on the background check..
Your obsession with guns is laughable. If criminals didn’t have easy access to guns, your crime rate would go down.
Using the legal process to change a sentence through the appeals process is as responsible and legal as the original decisionWho said the jury decision should be “thrown out?”convicted of murder. In the eyes of the law, she’s a murderer.
And in the "eyes of the law" OJ was innocent. That didn't make it so now did it?
Are you deliberately being a moron or do you actually believe the shit you're posting?
Do you feel that jury decisions should be thrown out due to the way you feel?
Thats your idea not ours
“This should be overturned, and reduced to manslaughter.”
Using the legal process to change a sentence through the appeals process is as responsible and legal as the original decisionWho said the jury decision should be “thrown out?”And in the "eyes of the law" OJ was innocent. That didn't make it so now did it?
Are you deliberately being a moron or do you actually believe the shit you're posting?
Do you feel that jury decisions should be thrown out due to the way you feel?
Thats your idea not ours
“This should be overturned, and reduced to manslaughter.”
I agree. Until it gets over turned she is a murderer
Using the legal process to change a sentence through the appeals process is as responsible and legal as the original decisionWho said the jury decision should be “thrown out?”Do you feel that jury decisions should be thrown out due to the way you feel?
Thats your idea not ours
“This should be overturned, and reduced to manslaughter.”
I agree. Until it gets over turned she is a murderer
What is your fixation with this one case? Out of the 10,265 from last year? The ones where you had clear cut cases, of criminals with long histories of crime and violence, and long histories of catch and release by democrat party judges, politicians and prosecutors?
If we stop the democrat party from releasing violent gun offenders over and over again, our gun crime rate would drop 95%.......
Using the legal process to change a sentence through the appeals process is as responsible and legal as the original decisionWho said the jury decision should be “thrown out?”Do you feel that jury decisions should be thrown out due to the way you feel?
Thats your idea not ours
“This should be overturned, and reduced to manslaughter.”
I agree. Until it gets over turned she is a murderer
What is your fixation with this one case? Out of the 10,265 from last year? The ones where you had clear cut cases, of criminals with long histories of crime and violence, and long histories of catch and release by democrat party judges, politicians and prosecutors?
If we stop the democrat party from releasing violent gun offenders over and over again, our gun crime rate would drop 95%.......
