An interesting piece by Fisher Adams opens with this:
A conflict naturally arises when a purely political view of the governments role in society is contradicted by a false economic interpretation:
According to the people running the government economic lies, lots of economic lies, must be told in order to GIVE the people what they want.
Fischer Ames (1758 - 1808) is basically correct although he does not account for detours like Socialism, nor could he possibly have incorporated rigged elections in a representative republic cum democracy into his thinking, or the overwhelming influence of television. In short, the people will eventually take back what they once had, but it will be a long time coming. Look at how many centuries it took for the people to get what they wanted; i.e., limited government, individual liberties, and the Right to work for themselves. And only one country got it!
Determining what the people want is the tricky part in a world constantly bombarded with propaganda and outright lies told by government officials growing the government, abolishing individual liberties, and forcing Americans to work for strangers.
Adams goes on to say:
There is no doubt that organized religion is being driven out of the culture far beyond the intent of the separation of church and state. Indeed, the doctrine of the Separation and State has become the Lefts favorite weapon against organized religions positive influence on the culture. The sad truth is that driving religion out is not enough for Socialists; they must replace religions place in society with a culture of death.
Approaching the norm
A worldwide culture of death is well on its way to becoming the norm. American and Canadian Socialists/Communists partnered with European Socialism and Chinas infanticide policies a long time ago. Roe v. Wade gave us more than 50,000,000 dead infants and Kermit Gosnell. The Affordable Care Act is giving us euthanasia by bureaucratic death panels. Question: How long will it be before American Socialists move to implement Belgiums latest addition to the culture of death:
In order to change the values of any cultures views on the sanctity of life an overwhelming majority must truly believe in legalized killing not have it rammed down their throats. Totalitarian butchers have been trying to establish a culture of death since the turn of the 19th century. The fake science of eugenics was the weapon of choice for progressives the political ancestors of todays liberals.
Contemporary American Socialists had 40 years of its greatest killing machine, Roe v. Wade, to succeed where the eugenicists failed. After forty years of killing babies nowhere near a simple majority of Americans favor death over life regardless of the lies about taxes funding slaughterhouses like Planned Parenthood, and Abortion is about a womans Right to choose. The ACA is the latest lie. This excerpt is from another thread:
Incidentally, feminazis always smirk that no man ever had a baby. Its time they are reminded that no woman ever had a baby without a mans sperm. That fact alone should give every man an equal say in the legality of infanticide.
Finally, a tyrant can only impose his will on the people after he kills everyone who stands up to him. Tyrants must do the killing before it comes to an armed revolt. Barack Taqiyya is no different than every other tyrant. His problem is that does not yet have enough Americans willing to do the killing for him; hence, his creation of a well-armed, well-funded, well-trained Ready Reserve Corps loyal to him rather than loyal to the country, and purging those high-ranking military officers he fears.
See #2 & #10 permalinks in this thread for a few interesting details about purging military officers who are loyal to the Constitution:
Fisher Ames was a great man. He also had a great name (I couldn't resist). But this original, almost completely forgotten Conservative philosopher said something hundreds of years ago that is as relevant in the world today as wigs and horses were back when he said it.
Ames said, "Society is the substratum of government."
By that he meant that culture, in many ways, steers the ship of state. As the values of the culture change, voters will elect people who embody and represent those changing values. It doesn't matter if those changes in morals were brought on by the media, the church, a partisan and biased educational system, or all of the above; the people eventually get what they want. If their wants shift in a certain direction, regardless of the cause, in a representative republic the government will eventually change with it.
A conflict naturally arises when a purely political view of the governments role in society is contradicted by a false economic interpretation:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKjPI6no5ng&feature=player_embedded]Obama: If You've Got A Business, You Didn't Build That - YouTube[/ame]
According to the people running the government economic lies, lots of economic lies, must be told in order to GIVE the people what they want.
Fischer Ames (1758 - 1808) is basically correct although he does not account for detours like Socialism, nor could he possibly have incorporated rigged elections in a representative republic cum democracy into his thinking, or the overwhelming influence of television. In short, the people will eventually take back what they once had, but it will be a long time coming. Look at how many centuries it took for the people to get what they wanted; i.e., limited government, individual liberties, and the Right to work for themselves. And only one country got it!
Determining what the people want is the tricky part in a world constantly bombarded with propaganda and outright lies told by government officials growing the government, abolishing individual liberties, and forcing Americans to work for strangers.
Adams goes on to say:
. . . the left's continuing effort to push religion out of the public space and get biblical teachings branded as hate speech.
XXXXX
In short, the Church was forced to retreat from the public sphere.
XXXXX
. . . religious teachings are criminalized and driven from the public square, literally.
There is no doubt that organized religion is being driven out of the culture far beyond the intent of the separation of church and state. Indeed, the doctrine of the Separation and State has become the Lefts favorite weapon against organized religions positive influence on the culture. The sad truth is that driving religion out is not enough for Socialists; they must replace religions place in society with a culture of death.
Approaching the norm
A worldwide culture of death is well on its way to becoming the norm. American and Canadian Socialists/Communists partnered with European Socialism and Chinas infanticide policies a long time ago. Roe v. Wade gave us more than 50,000,000 dead infants and Kermit Gosnell. The Affordable Care Act is giving us euthanasia by bureaucratic death panels. Question: How long will it be before American Socialists move to implement Belgiums latest addition to the culture of death:
Should children have the right to ask for their own deaths?
In Belgium, where euthanasia is now legal for people over the age of 18, the government is considering extending it to children something that no other country has done. The same bill would offer the right to die to adults with early dementia.
Belgium considering unprecedented law to grant euthanasia for children, dementia patients
By Associated Press,
Belgium considering unprecedented law to grant euthanasia for children, dementia patients - The Washington Post
In order to change the values of any cultures views on the sanctity of life an overwhelming majority must truly believe in legalized killing not have it rammed down their throats. Totalitarian butchers have been trying to establish a culture of death since the turn of the 19th century. The fake science of eugenics was the weapon of choice for progressives the political ancestors of todays liberals.
Contemporary American Socialists had 40 years of its greatest killing machine, Roe v. Wade, to succeed where the eugenicists failed. After forty years of killing babies nowhere near a simple majority of Americans favor death over life regardless of the lies about taxes funding slaughterhouses like Planned Parenthood, and Abortion is about a womans Right to choose. The ACA is the latest lie. This excerpt is from another thread:
As the Obamacare exchanges have gone live this month, it has become evident that it is nearly impossible for individuals seeking exchange plans to identify which, if any, plans on their state exchange exclude abortion.
The new law requires premium payers to be assessed an abortion surcharge every month to pay for abortions. But many pro-life Americans may unwittingly purchase pro-abortion plans because of a marketing secrecy clause embedded in Obamacare which stipulates that the surcharge be minimally disclosed only at the time of enrollment. In other words, bury it in the fine print.
XXXXX
If we fail to ask, the new law will compel us to directly subsidize the killing of unborn children by our surcharge payments to an abortion-only fund. Purchasing a pro-abortion health insurance plans makes us complicit in the culture of death.
Incidentally, feminazis always smirk that no man ever had a baby. Its time they are reminded that no woman ever had a baby without a mans sperm. That fact alone should give every man an equal say in the legality of infanticide.
Finally, a tyrant can only impose his will on the people after he kills everyone who stands up to him. Tyrants must do the killing before it comes to an armed revolt. Barack Taqiyya is no different than every other tyrant. His problem is that does not yet have enough Americans willing to do the killing for him; hence, his creation of a well-armed, well-funded, well-trained Ready Reserve Corps loyal to him rather than loyal to the country, and purging those high-ranking military officers he fears.
See #2 & #10 permalinks in this thread for a few interesting details about purging military officers who are loyal to the Constitution: