David Nunes apologizes for not briefing intel commitee on spy claims

My god, ptbw forever is really abusing the funny rating! Shows how unhinged and irritated he is.
Laughing at idiots and destroying their pathetic arguments over and over again is just how I entertain myself.

What is hilarious is how you claim to be something of an anarchist when you defend a party that believes the government has never done anything wrong.
 
Like "Russian Hacking?" :thup:

Corroborated by all 17 US intelligence agencies and several foreign intelligence agencies. The only conspiracy is that it didn't happen.

Craig Murray claims he received leaked Clinton campaign emails from a “disgusted” Democratic whistleblower, not from Russians.

And Assange CONFIRMED that the DWS emails were leaked by Seth Rich, not hacked.

Say, where IS Seth Rich these days? I hope the fascists didn't get too upset over his leak and do something rash.

Nah, the honorable democrats would never do anything like that..... :eusa_whistle:
 
Last edited:
Rediculous, we've been mulling though HEAPS of evidence of Trump's quite conspicuous relationship with Russians and lying by the surprisingly Kremlin friendly people that he surrounded himself with. The only thing missing now is final proof.

Kewl, then you will have no trouble presenting it.


No?
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Report: Hillary's 2016 Campaign Chairman Has Ties To Putin-Linked Firm

Anytime the fascists make an accusation, it is GUARANTEED that they are doing what they accuse other of.


When all else fails, invent a conspiracy.

Clinton team came up with the biggest freaking fairy tale on the planet.

The Russians did it.

:lol:


And high IRONY, given the revelation that Podesta is up to his neck in dealings with the Russian Mob.

Though the Clinton Mob and the Russian Mob working together DOES make sense..
 
Rediculous, we've been mulling though HEAPS of evidence of Trump's quite conspicuous relationship with Russians and lying by the surprisingly Kremlin friendly people that he surrounded himself with. The only thing missing now is final proof.

Kewl, then you will have no trouble presenting it.


No?


One doesn't flow from the other

there is OF COURSE some problem presenting SAME FUCKING THING 20 TIMES OVER TO YOU IDIOTS, while you keep claiming that nothing was presented.

Here you go, this seems to be a good overview:

What we know about evidence of coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign
 
My god, ptbw forever is really abusing the funny rating! Shows how unhinged and irritated he is.
You need to work on your addition skills.

"Funny" is the only rating that can be construed as negative on the forum. I have 1000s more positive ratings than negative, and that is even with the endless idiocy displayed here every day.
 
Like "Russian Hacking?" :thup:

Corroborated by all 17 US intelligence agencies and several foreign intelligence agencies. The only conspiracy is that it didn't happen.

Craig Murray claims he received leaked Clinton campaign emails from a “disgusted” Democratic whistleblower, not from Russians.

And Assange CONFIRMED that the DWS emails were leaked by Seth Rich, not hacked.

Say, where IS Seth Rich these days? I hope the fascists didn't get too upset over his leak and do something rash.

Nah, the honorable democrats would never do anything like that..... :eusa_whistle:


:lol:

3 dead Dems associated with the Clintons in one month. I think that's a record by any standard.
 
Rediculous, we've been mulling though HEAPS of evidence of Trump's quite conspicuous relationship with Russians and lying by the surprisingly Kremlin friendly people that he surrounded himself with. The only thing missing now is final proof.

Kewl, then you will have no trouble presenting it.


No?


One doesn't flow from the other

there is OF COURSE some problem presenting SAME FUCKING THING 20 TIMES OVER TO YOU IDIOTS, while you keep claiming that nothing was presented.

Here you go, this seems to be a good overview:

What we know about evidence of coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign

In other words, all you have is slander, libel, and innuendo.

From your radical leftist link;

{To be clear, none of this has been confirmed. All the sources CNN quotes in the story are anonymous US officials. We don’t know who these people are or whether they have accurate information. The officials, according to CNN, even cautioned that “the information was not conclusive and that the investigation is ongoing.”}

Even Vox admits that there is no evidence, not a shred.

Trump pissed off the intelligence community, and they have responded by engaging in a smear campaign. The deep state is flexing it's muscles.
 
Ah but you forget Flynn. His name was illegally revealed. A crime punishable by up to 10 years in jail

David Nunes will be the first to serve 10 years for leaking. He gave classified info to the press without taking it to the ranking member first.

It is interesting that you accept what Schif claims without proof. But not Nunes.

Like I said, the only claim David Nunes made is that Trump associates were in contact with foreign agents. I take his word for it.
Nunes gave what to the press? Link?
He said he saw documents. Which is the way whistle blowers are supposed to operate. They take their concerns to the congress.
Unlike the leakers that revealed Flynn to the press.
 
Rediculous, we've been mulling though HEAPS of evidence of Trump's quite conspicuous relationship with Russians and lying by the surprisingly Kremlin friendly people that he surrounded himself with. The only thing missing now is final proof.

Kewl, then you will have no trouble presenting it.


No?


One doesn't flow from the other

there is OF COURSE some problem presenting SAME FUCKING THING 20 TIMES OVER TO YOU IDIOTS, while you keep claiming that nothing was presented.

Here you go, this seems to be a good overview:

What we know about evidence of coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign

In other words, all you have is slander, libel, and innuendo.

From your radical leftist link;

{To be clear, none of this has been confirmed. All the sources CNN quotes in the story are anonymous US officials. We don’t know who these people are or whether they have accurate information. The officials, according to CNN, even cautioned that “the information was not conclusive and that the investigation is ongoing.”}

Even Vox admits that there is no evidence, not a shred.

Trump pissed off the intelligence community, and they have responded by engaging in a smear campaign. The deep state is flexing it's muscles.

Dumbass, the paragraph you {} speaks to the final PROOF: The FBI has information that indicates associates of President Donald Trump communicated with suspected Russian operatives to possibly coordinate the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton's campaign,

While this is yet to be officially hashed out, the article gives an overview of the evidence leading up to this revelation.

There is a REASON Trump specifically (Not Romney, not Bush, Not Clinton and not Obama) is supsected of Russian collusion. This is not a coincidence, but a result of what Trump and people he surrounds himself with have been saying and doing.
 
Last edited:
Rediculous, we've been mulling though HEAPS of evidence of Trump's quite conspicuous relationship with Russians and lying by the surprisingly Kremlin friendly people that he surrounded himself with. The only thing missing now is final proof.

Kewl, then you will have no trouble presenting it.


No?


One doesn't flow from the other

there is OF COURSE some problem presenting SAME FUCKING THING 20 TIMES OVER TO YOU IDIOTS, while you keep claiming that nothing was presented.

Here you go, this seems to be a good overview:

What we know about evidence of coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign

What a lying piece of shit that article is by VOX. Good grief there are so many lies I have to give the five freaking stars for mega fake news.

Unreal.
 
Rediculous, we've been mulling though HEAPS of evidence of Trump's quite conspicuous relationship with Russians and lying by the surprisingly Kremlin friendly people that he surrounded himself with. The only thing missing now is final proof.

Kewl, then you will have no trouble presenting it.


No?


One doesn't flow from the other

there is OF COURSE some problem presenting SAME FUCKING THING 20 TIMES OVER TO YOU IDIOTS, while you keep claiming that nothing was presented.

Here you go, this seems to be a good overview:

What we know about evidence of coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign

In other words, all you have is slander, libel, and innuendo.

From your radical leftist link;

{To be clear, none of this has been confirmed. All the sources CNN quotes in the story are anonymous US officials. We don’t know who these people are or whether they have accurate information. The officials, according to CNN, even cautioned that “the information was not conclusive and that the investigation is ongoing.”}

Even Vox admits that there is no evidence, not a shred.

Trump pissed off the intelligence community, and they have responded by engaging in a smear campaign. The deep state is flexing it's muscles.

Dumbass, the paragraph you {} speaks to the final PROOF: The FBI has information that indicates associates of President Donald Trump communicated with suspected Russian operatives to possibly coordinate the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton's campaign,

While this is yet to be officially hashed out, the article gives an overview of the evidence leading up to this revelation.

There is a REASON Trump specifically (Not Romney, not Bush, Not Clinton and not Obama) is supsected of Russian collusion. This is not a coincidence, but a result of what Trump and people he surrounds himself with have been saying and doing.

Neither you, CNN, nor Vox can offer a shred of evidence to back up the slanderous claims that you make.

You have jack and shit, you seek to smear through a FUD campaign, then slink of to let the impression of wrong doing fester.

It's what you fascists do, it's what you ALWAYS do. You pulled this same shit for 8 years when Bush was in office. Along with your co-conspirators in the corrupt press, you float rumors and innuendo. There is no intent to ever substantiate anything, only to plant the seeds of fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

You are demagogues, nothing more.
 
Rediculous, we've been mulling though HEAPS of evidence of Trump's quite conspicuous relationship with Russians and lying by the surprisingly Kremlin friendly people that he surrounded himself with. The only thing missing now is final proof.

Kewl, then you will have no trouble presenting it.


No?


One doesn't flow from the other

there is OF COURSE some problem presenting SAME FUCKING THING 20 TIMES OVER TO YOU IDIOTS, while you keep claiming that nothing was presented.

Here you go, this seems to be a good overview:

What we know about evidence of coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign

In other words, all you have is slander, libel, and innuendo.

From your radical leftist link;

{To be clear, none of this has been confirmed. All the sources CNN quotes in the story are anonymous US officials. We don’t know who these people are or whether they have accurate information. The officials, according to CNN, even cautioned that “the information was not conclusive and that the investigation is ongoing.”}

Even Vox admits that there is no evidence, not a shred.

Trump pissed off the intelligence community, and they have responded by engaging in a smear campaign. The deep state is flexing it's muscles.

Dumbass, the paragraph you {} speaks to the final PROOF: The FBI has information that indicates associates of President Donald Trump communicated with suspected Russian operatives to possibly coordinate the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton's campaign,

While this is yet to be officially hashed out, the article gives an overview of the evidence leading up to this revelation.

There is a REASON Trump specifically (Not Romney, not Bush, Not Clinton and not Obama) is supsected of Russian collusion. This is not a coincidence, but a result of what Trump and people he surrounds himself with have been saying and doing.

Neither you, CNN, nor Vox can offer a shred of evidence

Good job asshole, way to ignore everything you are explained and keep parroting that same fucking mindless bullshit.
 
Rediculous, we've been mulling though HEAPS of evidence of Trump's quite conspicuous relationship with Russians and lying by the surprisingly Kremlin friendly people that he surrounded himself with. The only thing missing now is final proof.

Kewl, then you will have no trouble presenting it.


No?


One doesn't flow from the other

there is OF COURSE some problem presenting SAME FUCKING THING 20 TIMES OVER TO YOU IDIOTS, while you keep claiming that nothing was presented.

Here you go, this seems to be a good overview:

What we know about evidence of coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign

In other words, all you have is slander, libel, and innuendo.

From your radical leftist link;

{To be clear, none of this has been confirmed. All the sources CNN quotes in the story are anonymous US officials. We don’t know who these people are or whether they have accurate information. The officials, according to CNN, even cautioned that “the information was not conclusive and that the investigation is ongoing.”}

Even Vox admits that there is no evidence, not a shred.

Trump pissed off the intelligence community, and they have responded by engaging in a smear campaign. The deep state is flexing it's muscles.

Dumbass, the paragraph you {} speaks to the final PROOF: The FBI has information that indicates associates of President Donald Trump communicated with suspected Russian operatives to possibly coordinate the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton's campaign,

While this is yet to be officially hashed out, the article gives an overview of the evidence leading up to this revelation.

There is a REASON Trump specifically (Not Romney, not Bush, Not Clinton and not Obama) is supsected of Russian collusion. This is not a coincidence, but a result of what Trump and people he surrounds himself with have been saying and doing.

Neither you, CNN, nor Vox can offer a shred of evidence to back up the slanderous claims that you make.

You have jack and shit, you seek to smear through a FUD campaign, then slink of to let the impression of wrong doing fester.

It's what you fascists do, it's what you ALWAYS do. You pulled this same shit for 8 years when Bush was in office. Along with your co-conspirators in the corrupt press, you float rumors and innuendo. There is no intent to ever substantiate anything, only to plant the seeds of fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

You are demagogues, nothing more.

My head was spinning faster than Linda Blair's in the Exorcist when I freaking hit the quotes from that bullshit dossier by Steele.

And the bullshit from the Ukraine about Manafort. Wow. Just wow. Those freaking Nazis in Kieve working in collusion with the Clinton campaign to smear Manafort is unreal.

I pray he sues the DNC's ass off for the slanderous shit they've said about him.

Even though Politico of all media outlets performed a random act of investigative journalism a piece of shit propaganda site like VOX is still spreading lies about Manafort.

Have you seen this? I think there should be a committe set up to prove collusion with the Ukraine to try to get Clinton the win.

"Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office.

They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election.

And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.

A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

The Ukrainian efforts had an impact in the race, helping to force Manafort’s resignation and advancing the narrative that Trump’s campaign was deeply connected to Ukraine’s foe to the east, Russia."

Bastards one and all. Piss on the D's and the nazis in Kiev.

Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire
 
Kewl, then you will have no trouble presenting it.


No?


One doesn't flow from the other

there is OF COURSE some problem presenting SAME FUCKING THING 20 TIMES OVER TO YOU IDIOTS, while you keep claiming that nothing was presented.

Here you go, this seems to be a good overview:

What we know about evidence of coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign

In other words, all you have is slander, libel, and innuendo.

From your radical leftist link;

{To be clear, none of this has been confirmed. All the sources CNN quotes in the story are anonymous US officials. We don’t know who these people are or whether they have accurate information. The officials, according to CNN, even cautioned that “the information was not conclusive and that the investigation is ongoing.”}

Even Vox admits that there is no evidence, not a shred.

Trump pissed off the intelligence community, and they have responded by engaging in a smear campaign. The deep state is flexing it's muscles.

Dumbass, the paragraph you {} speaks to the final PROOF: The FBI has information that indicates associates of President Donald Trump communicated with suspected Russian operatives to possibly coordinate the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton's campaign,

While this is yet to be officially hashed out, the article gives an overview of the evidence leading up to this revelation.

There is a REASON Trump specifically (Not Romney, not Bush, Not Clinton and not Obama) is supsected of Russian collusion. This is not a coincidence, but a result of what Trump and people he surrounds himself with have been saying and doing.

Neither you, CNN, nor Vox can offer a shred of evidence

Good job asshole, way to ignore everything you are explained and keep parroting that same fucking mindless bullshit.

It's a freaking fairy tale at that Vox link. So many lies in so many sentences.
 
Kewl, then you will have no trouble presenting it.


No?


One doesn't flow from the other

there is OF COURSE some problem presenting SAME FUCKING THING 20 TIMES OVER TO YOU IDIOTS, while you keep claiming that nothing was presented.

Here you go, this seems to be a good overview:

What we know about evidence of coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign

In other words, all you have is slander, libel, and innuendo.

From your radical leftist link;

{To be clear, none of this has been confirmed. All the sources CNN quotes in the story are anonymous US officials. We don’t know who these people are or whether they have accurate information. The officials, according to CNN, even cautioned that “the information was not conclusive and that the investigation is ongoing.”}

Even Vox admits that there is no evidence, not a shred.

Trump pissed off the intelligence community, and they have responded by engaging in a smear campaign. The deep state is flexing it's muscles.

Dumbass, the paragraph you {} speaks to the final PROOF: The FBI has information that indicates associates of President Donald Trump communicated with suspected Russian operatives to possibly coordinate the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton's campaign,

While this is yet to be officially hashed out, the article gives an overview of the evidence leading up to this revelation.

There is a REASON Trump specifically (Not Romney, not Bush, Not Clinton and not Obama) is supsected of Russian collusion. This is not a coincidence, but a result of what Trump and people he surrounds himself with have been saying and doing.

Neither you, CNN, nor Vox can offer a shred of evidence

Good job asshole, way to ignore everything you are explained and keep parroting that same fucking mindless bullshit.

There is nothing to ignore, you have ZERO evidence, none.

You are a demagogue, you depend on smears and lies - which is ALL you have.
 
One doesn't flow from the other

there is OF COURSE some problem presenting SAME FUCKING THING 20 TIMES OVER TO YOU IDIOTS, while you keep claiming that nothing was presented.

Here you go, this seems to be a good overview:

What we know about evidence of coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign

In other words, all you have is slander, libel, and innuendo.

From your radical leftist link;

{To be clear, none of this has been confirmed. All the sources CNN quotes in the story are anonymous US officials. We don’t know who these people are or whether they have accurate information. The officials, according to CNN, even cautioned that “the information was not conclusive and that the investigation is ongoing.”}

Even Vox admits that there is no evidence, not a shred.

Trump pissed off the intelligence community, and they have responded by engaging in a smear campaign. The deep state is flexing it's muscles.

Dumbass, the paragraph you {} speaks to the final PROOF: The FBI has information that indicates associates of President Donald Trump communicated with suspected Russian operatives to possibly coordinate the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton's campaign,

While this is yet to be officially hashed out, the article gives an overview of the evidence leading up to this revelation.

There is a REASON Trump specifically (Not Romney, not Bush, Not Clinton and not Obama) is supsected of Russian collusion. This is not a coincidence, but a result of what Trump and people he surrounds himself with have been saying and doing.

Neither you, CNN, nor Vox can offer a shred of evidence

Good job asshole, way to ignore everything you are explained and keep parroting that same fucking mindless bullshit.

It's a freaking fairy tale at that Vox link. So many lies in so many sentences.

Vox admits that they have zero evidence.
 
In other words, all you have is slander, libel, and innuendo.

From your radical leftist link;

{To be clear, none of this has been confirmed. All the sources CNN quotes in the story are anonymous US officials. We don’t know who these people are or whether they have accurate information. The officials, according to CNN, even cautioned that “the information was not conclusive and that the investigation is ongoing.”}

Even Vox admits that there is no evidence, not a shred.

Trump pissed off the intelligence community, and they have responded by engaging in a smear campaign. The deep state is flexing it's muscles.

Dumbass, the paragraph you {} speaks to the final PROOF: The FBI has information that indicates associates of President Donald Trump communicated with suspected Russian operatives to possibly coordinate the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton's campaign,

While this is yet to be officially hashed out, the article gives an overview of the evidence leading up to this revelation.

There is a REASON Trump specifically (Not Romney, not Bush, Not Clinton and not Obama) is supsected of Russian collusion. This is not a coincidence, but a result of what Trump and people he surrounds himself with have been saying and doing.

Neither you, CNN, nor Vox can offer a shred of evidence

Good job asshole, way to ignore everything you are explained and keep parroting that same fucking mindless bullshit.

It's a freaking fairy tale at that Vox link. So many lies in so many sentences.

Vox admits that they have zero evidence.

No they didn't you are just too fucking dumb to understand what you are reading and my attempts to explain it to you are clearly met with hard system reboot and recovery to yesterday's image.
 
Dumbass, the paragraph you {} speaks to the final PROOF: The FBI has information that indicates associates of President Donald Trump communicated with suspected Russian operatives to possibly coordinate the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton's campaign,

While this is yet to be officially hashed out, the article gives an overview of the evidence leading up to this revelation.

There is a REASON Trump specifically (Not Romney, not Bush, Not Clinton and not Obama) is supsected of Russian collusion. This is not a coincidence, but a result of what Trump and people he surrounds himself with have been saying and doing.

Neither you, CNN, nor Vox can offer a shred of evidence

Good job asshole, way to ignore everything you are explained and keep parroting that same fucking mindless bullshit.

It's a freaking fairy tale at that Vox link. So many lies in so many sentences.

Vox admits that they have zero evidence.

No they didn't you are just too fucking dumb to understand what you are reading and my attempts to explain it to you are clearly met with hard system reboot and recovery to yesterday's image.

Idiot, I posted their words admitting that CNN has nothing but conjecture. Vox itself is nothing but a leftist opinion site.
 

Forum List

Back
Top