Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Until they break the law you do not get to decide who is and is not allowed to own firearms.Spin. I said Radical Muslims, meaning you enemies, and no one wants their enemies to be armed, no one.You want Radical American Muslims to own guns? No, you don't, no one does.I don't hate youI already know the answer. Everyone always wants gun control for their enemies.
You are mistaken. If a Muslim American gains a firearm just as any American gains one - legally - I have no problem with it. You are not a mind reader, PMH, and you do not know what I think unless you ask.
I want them to have free speech just as I have free speech. I want them to obey the law - radical or not. If they are law abiding citizens and can get a gun permit? They get the gun. End of story.
With no guns no guns are needed. If you need to stop a guy beating his wife or child you don't need a gun for that.I am well aware of that. It changes nothing about reality, which you ignore.I already know the answer. Everyone always wants gun control for their enemies.Nice of you to ask a question and answer it too. I guess it saves time, huh?
News flash, PMH. You're not everyone. You do not speak for everyone and you do not decide for everyone.
Reality is that 2nd amendment rights save lives throughout America all the time. The police cannot be everywhere at once... Private citizens have saved the day more than once because they had a concealed carry permit and had a firearm.
A gun isn't for self-defense, it's for killing things, period.Spin. I said Radical Muslims, meaning you enemies, and no one wants their enemies to be armed, no one.You want Radical American Muslims to own guns? No, you don't, no one does.You are mistaken. If a Muslim American gains a firearm just as any American gains one - legally - I have no problem with it. You are not a mind reader, PMH, and you do not know what I think unless you ask.
I want them to have free speech just as I have free speech. I want them to obey the law - radical or not. If they are law abiding citizens and can get a gun permit? They get the gun. End of story.
Let me repeat this for you, PMH. Radical Muslims can get a gun permit and own a gun in America. So long as Americans can own their own firearm? It's not a problem. Why are you so paranoid? Is the idea of self-defense too much for you?
So, you approve of gun control as well. Carry on.I answered your question, I want all US Citizens that are not barred by having a crime on their record to be able to buy firearms. Pretty simple concept, you do not get to second guess what they believe or why they want the firearm.That is not the question, that is the reality. Do you want Radical Muslims to own guns, yes or no?Until they break the law you do not get to decide who is and is not allowed to own firearms.Spin. I said Radical Muslims, meaning you enemies, and no one wants their enemies to be armed, no one.You want Radical American Muslims to own guns? No, you don't, no one does.
I want them to have free speech just as I have free speech. I want them to obey the law - radical or not. If they are law abiding citizens and can get a gun permit? They get the gun. End of story.
With no guns no guns are needed. If you need to stop a guy beating his wife or child you don't need a gun for that.I am well aware of that. It changes nothing about reality, which you ignore.I already know the answer. Everyone always wants gun control for their enemies.
News flash, PMH. You're not everyone. You do not speak for everyone and you do not decide for everyone.
Reality is that 2nd amendment rights save lives throughout America all the time. The police cannot be everywhere at once... Private citizens have saved the day more than once because they had a concealed carry permit and had a firearm.
Oh, so you think banning guns will mean there are no guns out there?? Why didn't we think of that with drugs? Oh yeah, it didn't work. This magical place in your fantasy that banning guns will disarm criminals is absolute lunacy.
Disarm the criminals first. Then we will talk about banning handguns and the like.
My plan is simpler, disarm everyone and should you have a gun and aren't in uniform, you're dead on sight, no questions asked.With no guns no guns are needed. If you need to stop a guy beating his wife or child you don't need a gun for that.I am well aware of that. It changes nothing about reality, which you ignore.I already know the answer. Everyone always wants gun control for their enemies.
News flash, PMH. You're not everyone. You do not speak for everyone and you do not decide for everyone.
Reality is that 2nd amendment rights save lives throughout America all the time. The police cannot be everywhere at once... Private citizens have saved the day more than once because they had a concealed carry permit and had a firearm.
Oh, so you think banning guns will mean there are no guns out there?? Why didn't we think of that with drugs? Oh yeah, it didn't work. This magical place in your fantasy that banning guns will disarm criminals is absolute lunacy.
Disarm the criminals first. Then we will talk about banning handguns and the like.
No, it isn't. No one wants their enemies to be armed dummy.I know what he wants dummy. It's why he's spinning because if he was honest he'd have to admit he does approve of gun control, for his enemies that is. Everyone does.You want Radical American Muslims to own guns? No, you don't, no one does.You are mistaken. If a Muslim American gains a firearm just as any American gains one - legally - I have no problem with it. You are not a mind reader, PMH, and you do not know what I think unless you ask.
Oh, so first you answer the question for him. Then when he corrects you, you insist that you are right about what he wants?
Sad.
But this is not about gun control ONLY for anyone's enemies, now is it?
And your claim to know what he wants is simply another lie.
If you didn't, and we know who you are, you're dead.With no guns no guns are needed. If you need to stop a guy beating his wife or child you don't need a gun for that.I am well aware of that. It changes nothing about reality, which you ignore.News flash, PMH. You're not everyone. You do not speak for everyone and you do not decide for everyone.
Reality is that 2nd amendment rights save lives throughout America all the time. The police cannot be everywhere at once... Private citizens have saved the day more than once because they had a concealed carry permit and had a firearm.
Oh, so you think banning guns will mean there are no guns out there?? Why didn't we think of that with drugs? Oh yeah, it didn't work. This magical place in your fantasy that banning guns will disarm criminals is absolute lunacy.
Disarm the criminals first. Then we will talk about banning handguns and the like.
The criminals will always have firearms and the serial numbers can be filed off so you cannot trace them. That would never work and even if it did I would not surrender the rights of Americans on the 2nd Amendment. Not a chance.
My plan is simpler, disarm everyone and should you have a gun and aren't in uniform, you're dead on sight, no questions asked.With no guns no guns are needed. If you need to stop a guy beating his wife or child you don't need a gun for that.I am well aware of that. It changes nothing about reality, which you ignore.News flash, PMH. You're not everyone. You do not speak for everyone and you do not decide for everyone.
Reality is that 2nd amendment rights save lives throughout America all the time. The police cannot be everywhere at once... Private citizens have saved the day more than once because they had a concealed carry permit and had a firearm.
Oh, so you think banning guns will mean there are no guns out there?? Why didn't we think of that with drugs? Oh yeah, it didn't work. This magical place in your fantasy that banning guns will disarm criminals is absolute lunacy.
Disarm the criminals first. Then we will talk about banning handguns and the like.
And you want him armed eh? No, you don't.No, it isn't. No one wants their enemies to be armed dummy.I know what he wants dummy. It's why he's spinning because if he was honest he'd have to admit he does approve of gun control, for his enemies that is. Everyone does.You want Radical American Muslims to own guns? No, you don't, no one does.
Oh, so first you answer the question for him. Then when he corrects you, you insist that you are right about what he wants?
Sad.
But this is not about gun control ONLY for anyone's enemies, now is it?
And your claim to know what he wants is simply another lie.
Is a radical muslim my enemy? Until he actually does something he is just a loud-mouth with crappy ideas. You know, kinda like you.
And EXACTLY how do you propose to collect arms from gangs and criminals?If you didn't, and we know who you are, you're dead.With no guns no guns are needed. If you need to stop a guy beating his wife or child you don't need a gun for that.I am well aware of that. It changes nothing about reality, which you ignore.
Reality is that 2nd amendment rights save lives throughout America all the time. The police cannot be everywhere at once... Private citizens have saved the day more than once because they had a concealed carry permit and had a firearm.
Oh, so you think banning guns will mean there are no guns out there?? Why didn't we think of that with drugs? Oh yeah, it didn't work. This magical place in your fantasy that banning guns will disarm criminals is absolute lunacy.
Disarm the criminals first. Then we will talk about banning handguns and the like.
The criminals will always have firearms and the serial numbers can be filed off so you cannot trace them. That would never work and even if it did I would not surrender the rights of Americans on the 2nd Amendment. Not a chance.
Easy, we know who they are also.And EXACTLY how do you propose to collect arms from gangs and criminals?If you didn't, and we know who you are, you're dead.With no guns no guns are needed. If you need to stop a guy beating his wife or child you don't need a gun for that.Reality is that 2nd amendment rights save lives throughout America all the time. The police cannot be everywhere at once... Private citizens have saved the day more than once because they had a concealed carry permit and had a firearm.
Oh, so you think banning guns will mean there are no guns out there?? Why didn't we think of that with drugs? Oh yeah, it didn't work. This magical place in your fantasy that banning guns will disarm criminals is absolute lunacy.
Disarm the criminals first. Then we will talk about banning handguns and the like.
The criminals will always have firearms and the serial numbers can be filed off so you cannot trace them. That would never work and even if it did I would not surrender the rights of Americans on the 2nd Amendment. Not a chance.
The Russians need this country like the hole in your paranoid little head.The reason the Russians want us disarmed is very simple. They are planning a day of attack against us. It is far easier to take this nation with the American people disarmed then to have 150 million people armed to the teeth. They would be outnumbered and they know it. Ask Donald.
And EXACTLY how do you propose to collect arms from gangs and criminals?If you didn't, and we know who you are, you're dead.With no guns no guns are needed. If you need to stop a guy beating his wife or child you don't need a gun for that.Reality is that 2nd amendment rights save lives throughout America all the time. The police cannot be everywhere at once... Private citizens have saved the day more than once because they had a concealed carry permit and had a firearm.
Oh, so you think banning guns will mean there are no guns out there?? Why didn't we think of that with drugs? Oh yeah, it didn't work. This magical place in your fantasy that banning guns will disarm criminals is absolute lunacy.
Disarm the criminals first. Then we will talk about banning handguns and the like.
The criminals will always have firearms and the serial numbers can be filed off so you cannot trace them. That would never work and even if it did I would not surrender the rights of Americans on the 2nd Amendment. Not a chance.
So you plan to violate the law and the Constitution to attempt to seize weapons from people you do not actually know are armed?Easy, we know who they are also.And EXACTLY how do you propose to collect arms from gangs and criminals?If you didn't, and we know who you are, you're dead.With no guns no guns are needed. If you need to stop a guy beating his wife or child you don't need a gun for that.
Oh, so you think banning guns will mean there are no guns out there?? Why didn't we think of that with drugs? Oh yeah, it didn't work. This magical place in your fantasy that banning guns will disarm criminals is absolute lunacy.
Disarm the criminals first. Then we will talk about banning handguns and the like.
The criminals will always have firearms and the serial numbers can be filed off so you cannot trace them. That would never work and even if it did I would not surrender the rights of Americans on the 2nd Amendment. Not a chance.
The Russians need this country like the hole in your paranoid little head.The reason the Russians want us disarmed is very simple. They are planning a day of attack against us. It is far easier to take this nation with the American people disarmed then to have 150 million people armed to the teeth. They would be outnumbered and they know it. Ask Donald.
If you didn't, and we know who you are, you're dead.With no guns no guns are needed. If you need to stop a guy beating his wife or child you don't need a gun for that.I am well aware of that. It changes nothing about reality, which you ignore.
Reality is that 2nd amendment rights save lives throughout America all the time. The police cannot be everywhere at once... Private citizens have saved the day more than once because they had a concealed carry permit and had a firearm.
Oh, so you think banning guns will mean there are no guns out there?? Why didn't we think of that with drugs? Oh yeah, it didn't work. This magical place in your fantasy that banning guns will disarm criminals is absolute lunacy.
Disarm the criminals first. Then we will talk about banning handguns and the like.
The criminals will always have firearms and the serial numbers can be filed off so you cannot trace them. That would never work and even if it did I would not surrender the rights of Americans on the 2nd Amendment. Not a chance.
If you didn't, and we know who you are, you're dead.With no guns no guns are needed. If you need to stop a guy beating his wife or child you don't need a gun for that.I am well aware of that. It changes nothing about reality, which you ignore.
Reality is that 2nd amendment rights save lives throughout America all the time. The police cannot be everywhere at once... Private citizens have saved the day more than once because they had a concealed carry permit and had a firearm.
Oh, so you think banning guns will mean there are no guns out there?? Why didn't we think of that with drugs? Oh yeah, it didn't work. This magical place in your fantasy that banning guns will disarm criminals is absolute lunacy.
Disarm the criminals first. Then we will talk about banning handguns and the like.
The criminals will always have firearms and the serial numbers can be filed off so you cannot trace them. That would never work and even if it did I would not surrender the rights of Americans on the 2nd Amendment. Not a chance.
Ya shooting people in the street even when armed goes over so well in black neighborhoods,as Paint knows full well, never gonna happen.If you didn't, and we know who you are, you're dead.With no guns no guns are needed. If you need to stop a guy beating his wife or child you don't need a gun for that.Reality is that 2nd amendment rights save lives throughout America all the time. The police cannot be everywhere at once... Private citizens have saved the day more than once because they had a concealed carry permit and had a firearm.
Oh, so you think banning guns will mean there are no guns out there?? Why didn't we think of that with drugs? Oh yeah, it didn't work. This magical place in your fantasy that banning guns will disarm criminals is absolute lunacy.
Disarm the criminals first. Then we will talk about banning handguns and the like.
The criminals will always have firearms and the serial numbers can be filed off so you cannot trace them. That would never work and even if it did I would not surrender the rights of Americans on the 2nd Amendment. Not a chance.
If you pass a constitutional amendment, which you know you will never have the numbers to do.
And if the legislatures were willing to allow street executions without a trial.
And if the gun owners didn't shoot you first.
