DC Protests Draw 2 Million

Hey blowhard, the senate, lol weak very weak, what did you fuckers do for almost 6 years of total control, answer , nothing and now you bitch
You may want to brush up using a primer on the Legislative Branch and how it operates before you use 'total control' pertaining to the last eight years.
 
Last edited:
Ok, one more time if 60-million (20%)citizens voted Republican, and 70-million (23%) voted Democrat, their total of 130 million from 2008 population of 304-million leaves 174-million of which 74-million are 18 or younger, finally leaving 100-million of voting age who did not vote in 2008.

It's reasonable to believe that Obama's plurality has been shed, and his support is now only about 65 million (splitting the difference), and 65 million would oppose him now. If half the 100-million of voting age now oppose him then that 50 plus the 60 which voted McCain, plus the loss of 5 from (and we know according to Rasmussen his loss is greater than that) his plurality gives us a 115-million pool of citizens from which could easily come my 100-million estimate who now strongly oppose him. Not far fetched at all, because people are more awake than they've been in years.

I don't think you understand. If they aren't awake enough to vote, their opinion doesn't count to me and it is invalid in your numbers.

We have 60 million Republicans. Lets say Obama has lost 5 million or at most 10 million of those who voted for him somehow. That still only leaves the Republicans with around 70 million.

So again, well far away from that 100 million.
 
Ah pp , that 's pure socaialism, i don't care how you look at it, and to think i thought you fuckers hated unions lol

What's socialism? Signing a contract to supply my services to my country...and then be compensated with a life long pension and healthcare for life for me and my family?

Ummmmmmm....you may want to check the definition of socialism before labelling the service of millions of Americans to their country as "socialism".
 
OK HOW YOU PUT IT, THE PUKES HAD CONTROL IN THE HOUSE 00, A 50-50 sEANTE UNTIL THE ONE BOY HAD A BRAIN HEMERORAGE AND VADER HAD THE DECIDING VOTE?
 
Ok, one more time if 60-million (20%)citizens voted Republican, and 70-million (23%) voted Democrat, their total of 130 million from 2008 population of 304-million leaves 174-million of which 74-million are 18 or younger, finally leaving 100-million of voting age who did not vote in 2008.

It's reasonable to believe that Obama's plurality has been shed, and his support is now only about 65 million (splitting the difference), and 65 million would oppose him now. If half the 100-million of voting age now oppose him then that 50 plus the 60 which voted McCain, plus the loss of 5 from (and we know according to Rasmussen his loss is greater than that) his plurality gives us a 115-million pool of citizens from which could easily come my 100-million estimate who now strongly oppose him. Not far fetched at all, because people are more awake than they've been in years.

I don't think you understand. If they aren't awake enough to vote, their opinion doesn't count to me and it is invalid in your numbers.

We have 60 million Republicans. Lets say Obama has lost 5 million or at most 10 million of those who voted for him somehow. That still only leaves the Republicans with around 70 million.

So again, well far away from that 100 million.
I began by giving a possible 100-million estimate of the people that an attendance of 80,000 would represent. I stand by that; it's completely reasonable. To your present point; if their interest remains high, and it has only risen since the first of the T-Parties, then some of those numbers will show up as voters. (since that is now your issue, versus when you started you seemed to be refuting my estimate)
 
SO TELL ME THE DIFFERENCE, THE GOV TAKES CARE OF ALL WHO WORKS FOR A LIVING, OR JUST THE ONE THAT SIGNS A CONTRACT WITH SAID GOV, NOW AS A TAXPAYER, i THINK I GOT SHAFTED EITHER WAY
 
REMEMBER PP , i SERVED AS EVERYONE SHOULD, i JUST CHOSE NOT TO SUCK OFF THE GOV TEAT ALL MY LIFE
 
OK HOW YOU PUT IT, THE PUKES HAD CONTROL IN THE HOUSE 00, A 50-50 sEANTE UNTIL THE ONE BOY HAD A BRAIN HEMERORAGE AND VADER HAD THE DECIDING VOTE?

Nothing gets done without the Senate's approval. Daschle controlled the Senate calender and therefore he controlled whther or not a more thorough investigation into the Iraq war intel was done.
Daschle chose his own selfish needs over the wellbeing of the country.
 
REMEMBER PP , i SERVED AS EVERYONE SHOULD, i JUST CHOSE NOT TO SUCK OFF THE GOV TEAT ALL MY LIFE

Call it what you want. It's pretty obvious here to all of your opinion of career military service members...and quite in line with what liberals generally think of military service.
 
Ah pp so there was at least 4 years you goosesteppers controled everything, why didn't you fix it if it was that fucking easy
 
So you strut, but did i ask you to defend me, nope, 2 to 3 years and done, it's called term limits. Just like congress should have or any gubberment service, what do ya think
 
A sea of protesters filled the west lawn of the Capitol and spilled onto the National Mall on Saturday in the largest rally against President Obama since he took office, a culmination of a summer-long season of protests that began with opposition to a health care overhaul and grew into a broader dissatisfaction with government. - Thousands Rally in Capital to Protest Big Government - NY Times.

With the gathering of tens of thousands of conservative protesters in Washington for a "Taxpayer March on D.C.," Republican officials are attempting to capitalize on a movement that lately has galvanized anti-Obama activists more effectively than the party's elected leaders in Washington. - Conservatives Protest at the Capitol - Washington Post.

A sea or few thousands?
 
Last edited:
So you strut, but did i ask you to defend me, nope, 2 to 3 years and done, it's called term limits. Just like congress should have or any gubberment service, what do ya think

Yeah....we sure would win a lot of wars with a 21 year old 4 star general in charge of the entire free worlds supply of nuclear weapons.:cuckoo:
 
So have have we done latley with the best and the brightest, shall we start with 1950 and work our way forward

remember the civil had several 20 something generals that did very well
 

Forum List

Back
Top