Deep State swamp rat blocks rand paul question

[Dragonlady]

Justice Roberts shows his true colors that he places the Rights of The Individual as nothing compared to what The Mob Wants.

One again, you're dead wrong: Justice Roberts placed the law of the land and the rights of the whistleblower, ahead of the mob of Trump cultists who would threaten his/her safety.

 

[rightwinger]

It is a sleazy act by Paul in an attempt to intimidate and punish whistleblowers

Yep, and he wants the wistleblower's head on a pike so as to make future, would-be whistleblowers, who might report on the Mob Boss's criminality, think twice.

If only Republicans showed the interest in investigating the President that they do in outing the whistleblower

 

[Frankeneinstein]

You know, it's kinda amazing really to watch Trump supporters. When Roberts was appointed, lots of conservatives on here were cheering Trump's choice for SCOTUS and how great he was going to be.

Then? He makes a ruling that the Trumpettes disagree with, and now he's the worst swamp creature ever.

Trump supporters are sure fickle.

Perhaps I am just not reading your post correctly, but from what I can garner from it I would have to say it is not the "fickleness or Trumpettes" that is the problem but either your over active imagination or your complete lack of understanding in this matter...roberts was not "trumps choice for SCOTUS".

 

[ABikerSailor]

If only Republicans showed the interest in investigating the President that they do in outing the whistleblower.

If only they would spend half the effort investigating Trump that they did for Benghazi.

 

[B. Kidd]

John Roberts blocks Rand Paul's question on whistleblower


John Roberts blocks Rand Paul's question on whistleblower

Sen. Rand Paul's (R-Ky.) attempt to ask about the whistleblower whose report helped spark the impeachment inquiry is running into a roadblock in the form of Chief Justice John Roberts.

A source confirmed that Roberts has indicated he would not read a question from Paul regarding the whistleblower at the center of the House impeachment inquiry.

Roberts is the worst republican appointment to the SC since eisenhower picked earl warren

Last Halloween Robert's dressed up as John McShitstain!

True story......

 

[JusticeHammer]

Why would you want to know who the whistleblower is?

Don’t you understand whistleblowers?

We like to know who's Schiff screwing.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

John Roberts blocks Rand Paul's question on whistleblower


John Roberts blocks Rand Paul's question on whistleblower

Sen. Rand Paul's (R-Ky.) attempt to ask about the whistleblower whose report helped spark the impeachment inquiry is running into a roadblock in the form of Chief Justice John Roberts.

A source confirmed that Roberts has indicated he would not read a question from Paul regarding the whistleblower at the center of the House impeachment inquiry.

Roberts is the worst republican appointment to the SC since eisenhower picked earl warren

Term 2, Trump needs to retire Roberts. Sekulow would make a good Chief Justice

Trump can't retire Roberts. Once a SCOTUS is appointed, their term is for life, until they decide to retire themselves, or they are impeached. Might wanna go back to civics class.

Unless, of course, you have information that could lead to the impeachment of Roberts.

Yeah, just watch.

 

[The Original Tree]

CNN:

“The Democrats Really Look Like They Are in Trouble!”

Justice Roberts shows his true colors that he places the Rights of The Individual as nothing compared to what The Mob Wants.

One again, you're dead wrong: Justice Roberts placed the law of the land and the rights of the whistleblower, ahead of the mob of Trump cultists who would threaten his/her safety.

 

[tyroneweaver]

Why would you want to know who the whistleblower is?

Don’t you understand whistleblowers?

actually you and the op are both wrong. He didn't ask who the whistle blower was.
He wanted to know about collusion with obama and house staff

 

[B. Kidd]

The managers keep not answering the posed question. Is not Roberts job to control that. Yesterday Shitts in 3 occasions started his reply with”Let me answer another question posed earlier” Should he be allowed to do that?

I believed Robert's should have intervened!
But he didn't.

 

[WEATHER53]

What law did Paul attempt to break
The “Run your mouth and then hide about it” Law?

He tried to out the whistleblower in violation of the protection act

Rand Paul should be expelled from the Senate for this flagrant attempt to violate the law. He brought disrepute on the Senate and the Chief Justice of the United States. Of course when you are a Trump supporter why would you give damn about being disreputable.

It is a sleazy act by Paul in an attempt to intimidate and punish whistleblowers

It’s a legitimate and fully permissible act and has the message that whistleblowers can’t rely on making the most outrageous charges and then run off and hide and not be accountable.
We know how odious being responsible for what you say and do is to liberals.

 

[Olde Europe]

When Roberts was appointed, lots of conservatives on here were cheering Trump's choice for SCOTUS and how great he was going to be.

You might want to check that.

 

[rightwinger]

Why would you want to know who the whistleblower is?

Don’t you understand whistleblowers?

We like to know who's Schiff screwing.

Another diversion

When are you going to start blaming Hillary?

 

[rightwinger]

What law did Paul attempt to break
The “Run your mouth and then hide about it” Law?

He tried to out the whistleblower in violation of the protection act

Rand Paul should be expelled from the Senate for this flagrant attempt to violate the law. He brought disrepute on the Senate and the Chief Justice of the United States. Of course when you are a Trump supporter why would you give damn about being disreputable.

It is a sleazy act by Paul in an attempt to intimidate and punish whistleblowers

It’s a legitimate and fully permissible act and has the message that whistleblowers can’t rely on making the most outrageous charges and then run off and hide and not be accountable.
We know how odious being responsible for what you say and do is to liberals.

I posted his claim

Why don’t you point out what he said that was outrageous

 

[tyroneweaver]

Why would you want to know who the whistleblower is?

Don’t you understand whistleblowers?

WTF is that supposed to mean?

It means whistleblower has protections
One of those protections is remaining anonymous and protection against retribution

Now, other than to harass, what reason do you have to know his name?

Why would you want to know who the whistleblower is?

Don’t you understand whistleblowers?

WTF is that supposed to mean?

It means whistleblower has protections
One of those protections is remaining anonymous and protection against retribution

Now, other than to harass, what reason do you have to know his name?

ya, it was hearsay. They had to make up a special law to protect hearsay of a whistleblower
The whole thing stinks.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It is a sleazy act by Paul in an attempt to intimidate and punish whistleblowers

Yep, and he wants the wistleblower's head on a pike so as to make future, would-be whistleblowers, who might report on the Mob Boss's criminality, think twice.

If only Republicans showed the interest in investigating the President that they do in outing the whistleblower

He's been investigated since before even entering the White House, and they are probably still investigating him. How much more investigation do you want?

 

[rightwinger]

Why would you want to know who the whistleblower is?

Don’t you understand whistleblowers?

WTF is that supposed to mean?

It means whistleblower has protections
One of those protections is remaining anonymous and protection against retribution

Now, other than to harass, what reason do you have to know his name?

Why would you want to know who the whistleblower is?

Don’t you understand whistleblowers?

WTF is that supposed to mean?

It means whistleblower has protections
One of those protections is remaining anonymous and protection against retribution

Now, other than to harass, what reason do you have to know his name?

ya, it was hearsay. They had to make up a special law to protect hearsay of a whistleblower
The whole thing stinks.

Where does it say that a whistleblower can’t report information that he has heard?

The IG investigated what he reported he had heard and found it had merit

 

[B. Kidd]

No F'in wonder the Dimms want RINO Roberts' to have the final say on witnesses!

But too bad, it don't work dat'z way....

 

[Mac-7]

The law cannot deny trump the right to face his accuser

that is every Americans right

Trump's accuser is the American people, as represented by the House of Representatives, a role currently delegated to the House Managers.

Trump had both the right and the opportunity to face his accusers, but the coward chickened out when he declined the invitation by the House Judiciary Committee.

Bullshit

the accuser is the spy who conspired with the democrats to launch this witch hunt

 

[Mac-7]

John Roberts blocks Rand Paul's question on whistleblower


John Roberts blocks Rand Paul's question on whistleblower

Sen. Rand Paul's (R-Ky.) attempt to ask about the whistleblower whose report helped spark the impeachment inquiry is running into a roadblock in the form of Chief Justice John Roberts.

A source confirmed that Roberts has indicated he would not read a question from Paul regarding the whistleblower at the center of the House impeachment inquiry.

Roberts is the worst republican appointment to the SC since eisenhower picked earl warren

Term 2, Trump needs to retire Roberts. Sekulow would make a good Chief Justice

. . . . Roberts needs a vacation. . . maybe they need to "Scalia" him?

I’m not going there

I’ll let you get carried away in the night by a Deep State goon squad, but not me