No, my position is that economic reality wins, every time.Low skilled, manual labor jobs are being replaced with automation, and as long as the total cost of hiring a human is greater than the total cost of buying a machine that does the same job, will not return.
"Protecting jobs" is a mathematical exercise. If it's cheaper to build a factory in Malaysia than one in Detroit, guess where it's going to be built? And if you try to force it to be built in Detroit, it's going to be populated by machines that do all the work. Either way, prices will go up to cover the added expense of manufacturing in the US.
So your position is that the US is in decline and there's no way to stop it,
at least until we hit economic equilibrium with the rest of the world.
Automation is here to stay, and the days when a guy could leave school at age 16, work the factory floor installing doors on cars for 40 years, raise a family while his wife doesn't get paid to work anywhere, send his kids to college, and retire comfortably with a gold watch are gone forever. Jobs that are repetitive and don't involve a lot of decision making will be done by machines in the near future.
If the US wants to stay ahead of the world, we're going to have to emphasize entrepreneurial thinking and encourage more independence instead of dependence.