Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How about we make unions strong in service jobs so the workers get $$$$.
But we need to address more fundamental changes that are coming prior to the problems swamping us all over.Tariffs, penalizing for going abroad.... those kind of things....would be gov't "making decisions" for them.
We need to develop a robot tax that takes the place of lost humanjobs, so that the government can still fund itself and meet its obligations.
We need to assure people that they wont lose their homes and be thrown out on the streets if they cant find a job.
I dont see another way to do this other than some kind of Nordic Model Socialist economy combined with a Universal Basic Income.
How about we make unions strong in service jobs so the workers get $$$$.
If robots are overused there will be no customers.
But we need to address more fundamental changes that are coming prior to the problems swamping us all over.Tariffs, penalizing for going abroad.... those kind of things....would be gov't "making decisions" for them.
We need to develop a robot tax that takes the place of lost humanjobs, so that the government can still fund itself and meet its obligations.
We need to assure people that they wont lose their homes and be thrown out on the streets if they cant find a job.
I dont see another way to do this other than some kind of Nordic Model Socialist economy combined with a Universal Basic Income.
How about we make unions strong in service jobs so the workers get $$$$.
No one likes unions especially the millennials
78 million millennial's hate unions
BINGO!Corporate taxes should be based on how many people they hire and how well they are compensated. If a company hires few and pays little, they get high taxes. If a company hires many and pays well they pay no taxes.
As long as unions do not have an adversarial approach to their companies management, and do not add to the regulatory burden, sure.Yes and wages are stagnant. Go figure. We were much stronger with strong unions.
But we need to address more fundamental changes that are coming prior to the problems swamping us all over.Tariffs, penalizing for going abroad.... those kind of things....would be gov't "making decisions" for them.
We need to develop a robot tax that takes the place of lost humanjobs, so that the government can still fund itself and meet its obligations.
We need to assure people that they wont lose their homes and be thrown out on the streets if they cant find a job.
I dont see another way to do this other than some kind of Nordic Model Socialist economy combined with a Universal Basic Income.
How about we make unions strong in service jobs so the workers get $$$$.
No one likes unions especially the millennials
78 million millennial's hate unions
Yes and wages are stagnant. Go figure. We were much stronger with strong unions.
That is not what he said.So you think a stronger union will bring in jobs?Yes and wages are stagnant. Go figure. We were much stronger with strong unions.
So start visionarying.We were not prepared for the mass exodus of jobs, we were not visionaries...
But we need to address more fundamental changes that are coming prior to the problems swamping us all over.Tariffs, penalizing for going abroad.... those kind of things....would be gov't "making decisions" for them.
We need to develop a robot tax that takes the place of lost humanjobs, so that the government can still fund itself and meet its obligations.
We need to assure people that they wont lose their homes and be thrown out on the streets if they cant find a job.
I dont see another way to do this other than some kind of Nordic Model Socialist economy combined with a Universal Basic Income.
How about we make unions strong in service jobs so the workers get $$$$.
No one likes unions especially the millennials
78 million millennial's hate unions
Yes and wages are stagnant. Go figure. We were much stronger with strong unions.
So you think a stronger union will bring in jobs?
Lmao
to a degree, but there is a happy median between helping and choking off employers.But we need to address more fundamental changes that are coming prior to the problems swamping us all over.
We need to develop a robot tax that takes the place of lost humanjobs, so that the government can still fund itself and meet its obligations.
We need to assure people that they wont lose their homes and be thrown out on the streets if they cant find a job.
I dont see another way to do this other than some kind of Nordic Model Socialist economy combined with a Universal Basic Income.
How about we make unions strong in service jobs so the workers get $$$$.
No one likes unions especially the millennials
78 million millennial's hate unions
Yes and wages are stagnant. Go figure. We were much stronger with strong unions.
So you think a stronger union will bring in jobs?
Lmao
No, we have jobs, they just pay shitty. Unions would make the jobs we have better.
The middle class makes stuff....it empowers them....which is why democrats take away their ability to make stuff.....Pandora`s box....
Manufacturing will never again be, what it once was, in America....
We need a new vision, a new goal, to lift Americans up.
It doesn't have to be that way. Americans can make socks, gym shoes and even the robots that might replace them. They don't have to be made in some third world crap hole.
IT IS BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE. Sorry to yell. NAFTA would not pass without support from both sides of the aisle. The only way the democrats, at the time, were going to support it was if there was a democrat president pushing for NAFTA. Which Bill and Hillary did harder than anything else during their presidentcy.
We are at a crossroads and a unique opportunity. We can elect someone who the establishment of both sides of the aisle simple loathe. Or elect the establishment darling and nothing will change.
to a degree, but there is a happy median between helping and choking off employers.How about we make unions strong in service jobs so the workers get $$$$.
No one likes unions especially the millennials
78 million millennial's hate unions
Yes and wages are stagnant. Go figure. We were much stronger with strong unions.
So you think a stronger union will bring in jobs?
Lmao
No, we have jobs, they just pay shitty. Unions would make the jobs we have better.
And Hillary will govern like a hybrid of Bill and Obama, giving us the worst of both predecessors.Clinton 1 sold out the US for his own gain. The Clintons have continued their influence peddling through the Clinton Foundation. If anyone thinks Hillary won't continue to plunder the country for her own gain they have nothing more in their heads than a brain stem to keep the air moving and the blood flowing....
They need the pay and not so many of the protections.to a degree, but there is a happy median between helping and choking off employers.No, we have jobs, they just pay shitty. Unions would make the jobs we have better.
So start visionarying.We were not prepared for the mass exodus of jobs, we were not visionaries...
![]()
But we need to address more fundamental changes that are coming prior to the problems swamping us all over.
We need to develop a robot tax that takes the place of lost humanjobs, so that the government can still fund itself and meet its obligations.
We need to assure people that they wont lose their homes and be thrown out on the streets if they cant find a job.
I dont see another way to do this other than some kind of Nordic Model Socialist economy combined with a Universal Basic Income.
How about we make unions strong in service jobs so the workers get $$$$.
No one likes unions especially the millennials
78 million millennial's hate unions
Yes and wages are stagnant. Go figure. We were much stronger with strong unions.
So you think a stronger union will bring in jobs?
Lmao
No, we have jobs, they just pay shitty. Unions would make the jobs we have better.