Democrat Impeachment Managers fabricate quotes. Have to withdraw from evidence.

[Care4all]

Isn't fabricating evidence a crime? Why aren't these Dems facing charges?

Utah’s Mike Lee says trial statements about him were ‘contrary to fact,’ gets record revised

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, succeeded Wednesday in having a Democrat’s statements about him withdrawn from the record during the second day of former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

www.foxnews.com

The impeachment managers withdrew that part of the evidence because it really wasn't very important, and neither is Mike Lee. The remaining evidence is enough to convict.

Tuberville has confirmed the story. And it’s been referred to the ethics committee.

Managers say acquittal could embolden pro-Trump extremists

Link to ethics committee tweet:

Trump accidentally phoned Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) as he sought to get in touch with Tuberville and request that the Alabama senator continue objecting to the election results in order to buy time. Lee, according to reports in Utah’s Deseret News, the Salt Lake Tribune and CNN, passed his phone to the newly-elected lawmaker for the brief call. Lee on Wednesday night objected on the Senate floor to how his role in the call was portrayed.

They were FORCED to withdraw it because it was a lie.

Westwall
Stop lying, you're not good at it!

From he op Fox news article in first post:

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who is presiding over the trial, said that Lee's request was not consistent with the Senate rules. But Lee appealed, requesting a roll call vote on his appeal. This prompted confusion in the chamber on what exactly the Senate was voting on before Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., sent the Senate into a quorum call "while we work this out."


Lee later withdrew his request for a roll call vote and Schumer withdrew his quorum call.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., the lead impeachment manager, then said that "Ciciline correctly and accurately quoted a newspaper account which the distinguished senator has taken objection to. So we're happy to withdraw it on the grounds that it is not true and we are going to withdraw it this evening without any prejudice to the ability to resubmit if possible and then we could debate it if we need it."

They admitted they withdrew it because it wasn't true. IN your own quote. Quick question retard? Was it withdrawn or not?

Lee withdrew his request for a vote and Leahy withdrew the statement, reserving the right to resubmit the statement at a later date.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Isn't fabricating evidence a crime? Why aren't these Dems facing charges?

Utah’s Mike Lee says trial statements about him were ‘contrary to fact,’ gets record revised

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, succeeded Wednesday in having a Democrat’s statements about him withdrawn from the record during the second day of former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

www.foxnews.com

The impeachment managers withdrew that part of the evidence because it really wasn't very important, and neither is Mike Lee. The remaining evidence is enough to convict.

Tuberville has confirmed the story. And it’s been referred to the ethics committee.

Managers say acquittal could embolden pro-Trump extremists

Link to ethics committee tweet:

Trump accidentally phoned Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) as he sought to get in touch with Tuberville and request that the Alabama senator continue objecting to the election results in order to buy time. Lee, according to reports in Utah’s Deseret News, the Salt Lake Tribune and CNN, passed his phone to the newly-elected lawmaker for the brief call. Lee on Wednesday night objected on the Senate floor to how his role in the call was portrayed.

They were FORCED to withdraw it because it was a lie.

Westwall
Stop lying, you're not good at it!

From he op Fox news article in first post:

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who is presiding over the trial, said that Lee's request was not consistent with the Senate rules. But Lee appealed, requesting a roll call vote on his appeal. This prompted confusion in the chamber on what exactly the Senate was voting on before Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., sent the Senate into a quorum call "while we work this out."


Lee later withdrew his request for a roll call vote and Schumer withdrew his quorum call.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., the lead impeachment manager, then said that "Ciciline correctly and accurately quoted a newspaper account which the distinguished senator has taken objection to. So we're happy to withdraw it on the grounds that it is not true and we are going to withdraw it this evening without any prejudice to the ability to resubmit if possible and then we could debate it if we need it."

They admitted they withdrew it because it wasn't true. IN your own quote. Quick question retard? Was it withdrawn or not?

Lee withdrew his request for a vote and Leahy withdrew the statement, reserving the right to resubmit the statement at a later date.

again did it get withdrawn? Yes or no and your own quote says it was false.

 

[Care4all]

Isn't fabricating evidence a crime? Why aren't these Dems facing charges?

Utah’s Mike Lee says trial statements about him were ‘contrary to fact,’ gets record revised

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, succeeded Wednesday in having a Democrat’s statements about him withdrawn from the record during the second day of former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

www.foxnews.com

The impeachment managers withdrew that part of the evidence because it really wasn't very important, and neither is Mike Lee. The remaining evidence is enough to convict.

Tuberville has confirmed the story. And it’s been referred to the ethics committee.

Managers say acquittal could embolden pro-Trump extremists

Link to ethics committee tweet:

Trump accidentally phoned Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) as he sought to get in touch with Tuberville and request that the Alabama senator continue objecting to the election results in order to buy time. Lee, according to reports in Utah’s Deseret News, the Salt Lake Tribune and CNN, passed his phone to the newly-elected lawmaker for the brief call. Lee on Wednesday night objected on the Senate floor to how his role in the call was portrayed.

They were FORCED to withdraw it because it was a lie.

Westwall
Stop lying, you're not good at it!

From he op Fox news article in first post:

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who is presiding over the trial, said that Lee's request was not consistent with the Senate rules. But Lee appealed, requesting a roll call vote on his appeal. This prompted confusion in the chamber on what exactly the Senate was voting on before Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., sent the Senate into a quorum call "while we work this out."


Lee later withdrew his request for a roll call vote and Schumer withdrew his quorum call.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., the lead impeachment manager, then said that "Ciciline correctly and accurately quoted a newspaper account which the distinguished senator has taken objection to. So we're happy to withdraw it on the grounds that it is not true and we are going to withdraw it this evening without any prejudice to the ability to resubmit if possible and then we could debate it if we need it."

They admitted they withdrew it because it wasn't true. IN your own quote. Quick question retard? Was it withdrawn or not?

Lee withdrew his request for a vote and Leahy withdrew the statement, reserving the right to resubmit the statement at a later date.

again did it get withdrawn? Yes or no and your own quote says it was false.

I never said it was not withdrawn.....

 

[Devils_Advocate]

NOPE!

The Dems simply out manueuvered Mike Lee's try to obfuscate the day's presentations....

They had to remove their fake evidence from the record.

They chose to simply remove it, so Mike Lee could not hijack the day's presentations by ending with a vote on whether to remove it or not, by all senators.... of which dems would have won, but the vp would be called in for a tie breaker...

They determined that the smidgen of the record on Mike Lee was not worth going through When it could sidetrack all the other meaningful evidence they had, and turn it in to a partisan fiasco....the right wing news would go wild with.

I do not know if they needed to call the VP seeing Romney might have voted to keep it in...

I would have gambled and left it on the record and see how many Republicans would have went against Lee...

 

[Dragonlady]

Isn't fabricating evidence a crime? Why aren't these Dems facing charges?

Utah’s Mike Lee says trial statements about him were ‘contrary to fact,’ gets record revised

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, succeeded Wednesday in having a Democrat’s statements about him withdrawn from the record during the second day of former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

www.foxnews.com

There is nothing more low down, or ignorant than the dog and pony show that Senator Lee put on at the end of testimony, and here you are making a big fucking deal about that lying piece of shit, Michael Lee, instead of being concerned about the insurrection. Which is of course your whole point.

Mike Lee promoted the lie the election was stolen, and you didn't worry about that lie. Or Trump's lies, which lead to the insurrection. Why didn't you care about Donald Trump making up lies about the election being stolen?

Or the police who were injured that day. Instead, you're still here. Promoting the lies of Donald Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/02/11/important-thing-about-mike-lee-impeachment-trial-dust-up/

But just to be clear about what it was that Lee was trying to cover up:

"But Lee’s objection also served to highlight a subtly vital series of events from that day. The Tuberville call — regardless of the sourcing behind it — reinforces the readily apparent idea that Trump’s focus early in the riot was much more about his own political fate than the danger faced by lawmakers and Capitol staff."

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Isn't fabricating evidence a crime? Why aren't these Dems facing charges?

Utah’s Mike Lee says trial statements about him were ‘contrary to fact,’ gets record revised

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, succeeded Wednesday in having a Democrat’s statements about him withdrawn from the record during the second day of former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

www.foxnews.com

There is nothing more low down, or ignorant than the dog and pony show that Senator Lee put on at the end of testimony, and here you are making a big fucking deal about that lying piece of shit, Michael Lee, instead of being concerned about the insurrection. Which is of course your whole point.

Mike Lee promoted the lie the election was stolen, and you didn't worry about that lie. Or Trump's lies, which lead to the insurrection. Why didn't you care about Donald Trump making up lies about the election being stolen?

Or the police who were injured that day. Instead, you're still here. Promoting the lies of Donald Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/02/11/important-thing-about-mike-lee-impeachment-trial-dust-up/

But just to be clear about what it was that Lee was trying to cover up:

"But Lee’s objection also served to highlight a subtly vital series of events from that day. The Tuberville call — regardless of the sourcing behind it — reinforces the readily apparent idea that Trump’s focus early in the riot was much more about his own political fate than the danger faced by lawmakers and Capitol staff."

Remind me? when in January 2017 the dems all petitioned for the electoral vote to be ignored, did you call them names and call it an insurrection?

 

[Care4all]

NOPE!

The Dems simply out manueuvered Mike Lee's try to obfuscate the day's presentations....

They had to remove their fake evidence from the record.

They chose to simply remove it, so Mike Lee could not hijack the day's presentations by ending with a vote on whether to remove it or not, by all senators.... of which dems would have won, but the vp would be called in for a tie breaker...

They determined that the smidgen of the record on Mike Lee was not worth going through When it could sidetrack all the other meaningful evidence they had, and turn it in to a partisan fiasco....the right wing news would go wild with.

I do not know if they needed to call the VP seeing Romney might have voted to keep it in...

I would have gambled and left it on the record and see how many Republicans would have went against Lee...

Did Lee ever say what part was inaccurate? His request was purposely vague, imo.

 

[Devils_Advocate]

Isn't fabricating evidence a crime? Why aren't these Dems facing charges?

Utah’s Mike Lee says trial statements about him were ‘contrary to fact,’ gets record revised

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, succeeded Wednesday in having a Democrat’s statements about him withdrawn from the record during the second day of former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

www.foxnews.com

There is nothing more low down, or ignorant than the dog and pony show that Senator Lee put on at the end of testimony, and here you are making a big fucking deal about that lying piece of shit, Michael Lee, instead of being concerned about the insurrection. Which is of course your whole point.

Mike Lee promoted the lie the election was stolen, and you didn't worry about that lie. Or Trump's lies, which lead to the insurrection. Why didn't you care about Donald Trump making up lies about the election being stolen?

Or the police who were injured that day. Instead, you're still here. Promoting the lies of Donald Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/02/11/important-thing-about-mike-lee-impeachment-trial-dust-up/

But just to be clear about what it was that Lee was trying to cover up:

"But Lee’s objection also served to highlight a subtly vital series of events from that day. The Tuberville call — regardless of the sourcing behind it — reinforces the readily apparent idea that Trump’s focus early in the riot was much more about his own political fate than the danger faced by lawmakers and Capitol staff."

OP cares about the failure of the insurrection and is upset that Trump and his rioters did not succeed in overthrowing the Federal Government and placing Trump as King for life...

As for Mike Lee the Democrats should have done the vote to see how many GOP would have left it on the record and my bet is Romney along with those like Collins would have kept it there...

 

[Devils_Advocate]

Isn't fabricating evidence a crime? Why aren't these Dems facing charges?

Utah’s Mike Lee says trial statements about him were ‘contrary to fact,’ gets record revised

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, succeeded Wednesday in having a Democrat’s statements about him withdrawn from the record during the second day of former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

www.foxnews.com

There is nothing more low down, or ignorant than the dog and pony show that Senator Lee put on at the end of testimony, and here you are making a big fucking deal about that lying piece of shit, Michael Lee, instead of being concerned about the insurrection. Which is of course your whole point.

Mike Lee promoted the lie the election was stolen, and you didn't worry about that lie. Or Trump's lies, which lead to the insurrection. Why didn't you care about Donald Trump making up lies about the election being stolen?

Or the police who were injured that day. Instead, you're still here. Promoting the lies of Donald Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/02/11/important-thing-about-mike-lee-impeachment-trial-dust-up/

But just to be clear about what it was that Lee was trying to cover up:

"But Lee’s objection also served to highlight a subtly vital series of events from that day. The Tuberville call — regardless of the sourcing behind it — reinforces the readily apparent idea that Trump’s focus early in the riot was much more about his own political fate than the danger faced by lawmakers and Capitol staff."

Remind me? when in January 2017 the dems all petitioned for the electoral vote to be ignored, did you call them names and call it an insurrection?

Did rioters crash through the doors and stop the process?

No, so let be clear because someone protested on the floor of the House and Senate is not insurrection but in your mind it is but when rioters did what they did on January 6th 2021 was insurrection with the blessing of Trump!

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Isn't fabricating evidence a crime? Why aren't these Dems facing charges?

Utah’s Mike Lee says trial statements about him were ‘contrary to fact,’ gets record revised

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, succeeded Wednesday in having a Democrat’s statements about him withdrawn from the record during the second day of former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

www.foxnews.com

There is nothing more low down, or ignorant than the dog and pony show that Senator Lee put on at the end of testimony, and here you are making a big fucking deal about that lying piece of shit, Michael Lee, instead of being concerned about the insurrection. Which is of course your whole point.

Mike Lee promoted the lie the election was stolen, and you didn't worry about that lie. Or Trump's lies, which lead to the insurrection. Why didn't you care about Donald Trump making up lies about the election being stolen?

Or the police who were injured that day. Instead, you're still here. Promoting the lies of Donald Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/02/11/important-thing-about-mike-lee-impeachment-trial-dust-up/

But just to be clear about what it was that Lee was trying to cover up:

"But Lee’s objection also served to highlight a subtly vital series of events from that day. The Tuberville call — regardless of the sourcing behind it — reinforces the readily apparent idea that Trump’s focus early in the riot was much more about his own political fate than the danger faced by lawmakers and Capitol staff."

Remind me? when in January 2017 the dems all petitioned for the electoral vote to be ignored, did you call them names and call it an insurrection?

Did rioters crash through the doors and stop the process?

No, so let be clear because someone protested on the floor of the House and Senate is not insurrection but in your mind it is but when rioters did what they did on January 6th 2021 was insurrection with the blessing of Trump!

and yet the squad claimed the petition was tatamont to the riot and the bitch claimed they tried to murder her by exercising their given authority. Remind me where you were and are on that?

 

[Devils_Advocate]

Isn't fabricating evidence a crime? Why aren't these Dems facing charges?

Utah’s Mike Lee says trial statements about him were ‘contrary to fact,’ gets record revised

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, succeeded Wednesday in having a Democrat’s statements about him withdrawn from the record during the second day of former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

www.foxnews.com

There is nothing more low down, or ignorant than the dog and pony show that Senator Lee put on at the end of testimony, and here you are making a big fucking deal about that lying piece of shit, Michael Lee, instead of being concerned about the insurrection. Which is of course your whole point.

Mike Lee promoted the lie the election was stolen, and you didn't worry about that lie. Or Trump's lies, which lead to the insurrection. Why didn't you care about Donald Trump making up lies about the election being stolen?

Or the police who were injured that day. Instead, you're still here. Promoting the lies of Donald Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/02/11/important-thing-about-mike-lee-impeachment-trial-dust-up/

But just to be clear about what it was that Lee was trying to cover up:

"But Lee’s objection also served to highlight a subtly vital series of events from that day. The Tuberville call — regardless of the sourcing behind it — reinforces the readily apparent idea that Trump’s focus early in the riot was much more about his own political fate than the danger faced by lawmakers and Capitol staff."

Remind me? when in January 2017 the dems all petitioned for the electoral vote to be ignored, did you call them names and call it an insurrection?

Did rioters crash through the doors and stop the process?

No, so let be clear because someone protested on the floor of the House and Senate is not insurrection but in your mind it is but when rioters did what they did on January 6th 2021 was insurrection with the blessing of Trump!

and yet the squad claimed the petition was tatamont to the riot and the bitch claimed they tried to murder her by exercising their given authority. Remind me where you were and are on that?

Again, can you show video of rioters storming the Capitol back in January of 2017 that caused the process to be stopped while chanting to hang Biden?

My bet you can not but you will try to excuse those that did insurrection on January 6th 2021 by saying some mean Democrat said something when Trump was elected, so too you that is good defense for those that followed Trump wish to stop the steal...

I mean seriously you are grasping at straws with the hope you can convince yourself there was no insurrection and Trump is innocent but reality is Trump is guilty of provoking the idiots and you are more upset it failed in my opinion!

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Isn't fabricating evidence a crime? Why aren't these Dems facing charges?

Utah’s Mike Lee says trial statements about him were ‘contrary to fact,’ gets record revised

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, succeeded Wednesday in having a Democrat’s statements about him withdrawn from the record during the second day of former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

www.foxnews.com

There is nothing more low down, or ignorant than the dog and pony show that Senator Lee put on at the end of testimony, and here you are making a big fucking deal about that lying piece of shit, Michael Lee, instead of being concerned about the insurrection. Which is of course your whole point.

Mike Lee promoted the lie the election was stolen, and you didn't worry about that lie. Or Trump's lies, which lead to the insurrection. Why didn't you care about Donald Trump making up lies about the election being stolen?

Or the police who were injured that day. Instead, you're still here. Promoting the lies of Donald Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/02/11/important-thing-about-mike-lee-impeachment-trial-dust-up/

But just to be clear about what it was that Lee was trying to cover up:

"But Lee’s objection also served to highlight a subtly vital series of events from that day. The Tuberville call — regardless of the sourcing behind it — reinforces the readily apparent idea that Trump’s focus early in the riot was much more about his own political fate than the danger faced by lawmakers and Capitol staff."

Remind me? when in January 2017 the dems all petitioned for the electoral vote to be ignored, did you call them names and call it an insurrection?

Did rioters crash through the doors and stop the process?

No, so let be clear because someone protested on the floor of the House and Senate is not insurrection but in your mind it is but when rioters did what they did on January 6th 2021 was insurrection with the blessing of Trump!

and yet the squad claimed the petition was tatamont to the riot and the bitch claimed they tried to murder her by exercising their given authority. Remind me where you were and are on that?

Again, can you show video of rioters storming the Capitol back in January of 2017 that caused the process to be stopped while chanting to hang Biden?

My bet you can not but you will try to excuse those that did insurrection on January 6th 2021 by saying some mean Democrat said something when Trump was elected, so too you that is good defense for those that followed Trump wish to stop the steal...

I mean seriously you are grasping at straws with the hope you can convince yourself there was no insurrection and Trump is innocent but reality is Trump is guilty of provoking the idiots and you are more upset it failed in my opinion!

Look you fucking retard AOC and her cohorts all claimed that every republican congressman and Senator that asked for the Electoral college challenge where the SAME as the rioters. And they CONTINUE to claim it.

 

[Lesh]

Look you fucking retard AOC and her cohorts all claimed that every republican congressman and Senator that asked for the Electoral college challenge where the SAME as the rioters.

That's like claiming peaceful protest is the same as a riot. You'd never do that...would you?

 

[Dragonlady]

Isn't fabricating evidence a crime? Why aren't these Dems facing charges?

Utah’s Mike Lee says trial statements about him were ‘contrary to fact,’ gets record revised

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, succeeded Wednesday in having a Democrat’s statements about him withdrawn from the record during the second day of former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

www.foxnews.com

There is nothing more low down, or ignorant than the dog and pony show that Senator Lee put on at the end of testimony, and here you are making a big fucking deal about that lying piece of shit, Michael Lee, instead of being concerned about the insurrection. Which is of course your whole point.

Mike Lee promoted the lie the election was stolen, and you didn't worry about that lie. Or Trump's lies, which lead to the insurrection. Why didn't you care about Donald Trump making up lies about the election being stolen?

Or the police who were injured that day. Instead, you're still here. Promoting the lies of Donald Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/02/11/important-thing-about-mike-lee-impeachment-trial-dust-up/

But just to be clear about what it was that Lee was trying to cover up:

"But Lee’s objection also served to highlight a subtly vital series of events from that day. The Tuberville call — regardless of the sourcing behind it — reinforces the readily apparent idea that Trump’s focus early in the riot was much more about his own political fate than the danger faced by lawmakers and Capitol staff."

Remind me? when in January 2017 the dems all petitioned for the electoral vote to be ignored, did you call them names and call it an insurrection?

You "whataboutism" is a complete fail, because what the Democrats did was to challenge the Republicans to follow the popular vote - which Clinton won. The reps were within their rights to challenge the electoral college. But there was no months' long campaign to call the election "stolen". Hillary conceded defeat and urged the peaceful transition of power - something Trump has steadfastly refused to do.

Nobody rioted, the Capital was not stormed, and nobody died. The whole process could not have been more different. It was conducted according to the US Constitution.

Thank you for reminding us all what a loathsome piece of shit Trump really is for defying the voters, and unleashing his mob on the legally elected peoples' representative.

 

[Lesh]

Lee is not disputing that the call was made. Idiot Trump called Lee when he meant to call Tubberville.

That's a FACT. It was confirmed by Tubberville and by Lee's office.

There's all sorts of questions regarding that call but what is clear is that Tubberville told Trump what was happening. That there was a MAGA riot taking place and that the VP had just been removed from the room.

Trump's response was NOT to tweet out a stand down order to his MAGArats.

It was to attack the VP and put him in further danger

 

[Dragonlady]

Isn't fabricating evidence a crime? Why aren't these Dems facing charges?

Utah’s Mike Lee says trial statements about him were ‘contrary to fact,’ gets record revised

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, succeeded Wednesday in having a Democrat’s statements about him withdrawn from the record during the second day of former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

www.foxnews.com

There is nothing more low down, or ignorant than the dog and pony show that Senator Lee put on at the end of testimony, and here you are making a big fucking deal about that lying piece of shit, Michael Lee, instead of being concerned about the insurrection. Which is of course your whole point.

Mike Lee promoted the lie the election was stolen, and you didn't worry about that lie. Or Trump's lies, which lead to the insurrection. Why didn't you care about Donald Trump making up lies about the election being stolen?

Or the police who were injured that day. Instead, you're still here. Promoting the lies of Donald Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/02/11/important-thing-about-mike-lee-impeachment-trial-dust-up/

But just to be clear about what it was that Lee was trying to cover up:

"But Lee’s objection also served to highlight a subtly vital series of events from that day. The Tuberville call — regardless of the sourcing behind it — reinforces the readily apparent idea that Trump’s focus early in the riot was much more about his own political fate than the danger faced by lawmakers and Capitol staff."

Remind me? when in January 2017 the dems all petitioned for the electoral vote to be ignored, did you call them names and call it an insurrection?

Did rioters crash through the doors and stop the process?

No, so let be clear because someone protested on the floor of the House and Senate is not insurrection but in your mind it is but when rioters did what they did on January 6th 2021 was insurrection with the blessing of Trump!

and yet the squad claimed the petition was tatamont to the riot and the bitch claimed they tried to murder her by exercising their given authority. Remind me where you were and are on that?

Again, can you show video of rioters storming the Capitol back in January of 2017 that caused the process to be stopped while chanting to hang Biden?

My bet you can not but you will try to excuse those that did insurrection on January 6th 2021 by saying some mean Democrat said something when Trump was elected, so too you that is good defense for those that followed Trump wish to stop the steal...

I mean seriously you are grasping at straws with the hope you can convince yourself there was no insurrection and Trump is innocent but reality is Trump is guilty of provoking the idiots and you are more upset it failed in my opinion!

Look you fucking retard AOC and her cohorts all claimed that every republican congressman and Senator that asked for the Electoral college challenge where the SAME as the rioters. And they CONTINUE to claim it.

That's because every Republican Congressman and Senator that asked for Electoral College challenges ARE the same as the rioters because they're all saying that the election was "stolen". By supporting and confirming Trump's Big Lie, that the election was "stolen". The House Reps and Senators repeated said that there was "massive election fraud", and that they were challenging the Electors because of that "fraud" and that was a complete lie.

So those who participated in the "stolen election" lie, and who did the President's bidding to challenge the Electors, were participating in the insurrection. There was no insurrection around the Clinton challenges to the electors, hence there was no guilt on the part of Democrats.

Every time Republicans do something illegal, immoral, or unConstitutional, especially under Donald Trump, they always try to paint Democrats as having done the very same thing, and they're lying every time they try it. In their naked pursuit for power above all, Republicans have lost all sense of morality, decency, or law. They no longer have the best interests of the American people at the heart of the operations. Not for a very long time.

 

[Correll]

"Lee later withdrew his request for a roll call vote and Schumer withdrew his quorum call.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., the lead impeachment manager, then said that "Ciciline correctly and accurately quoted a newspaper account which the distinguished senator has taken objection to. So we're happy to withdraw it on the grounds that it is not true and we are going to withdraw it this evening without any prejudice to the ability to resubmit if possible and then we could debate it if we need it." "

They put a claim from a news report into the impeachment record?

Even in the absence of a dispute from the "only witness" wouldn't that just be hearsay?



And we've seen that the media lies all the time. WTF? Using their reports as evidence?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Look you fucking retard AOC and her cohorts all claimed that every republican congressman and Senator that asked for the Electoral college challenge where the SAME as the rioters.

That's like claiming peaceful protest is the same as a riot. You'd never do that...would you?

I have not done so, if you are referring to BLM those were not peaceful protests they were violent riots murdering and burning and looting.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

There is already an Impeachment topic this could go into.

I did not realize you were a moderator? When did you achieve that title maaaaam?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Isn't fabricating evidence a crime? Why aren't these Dems facing charges?

Utah’s Mike Lee says trial statements about him were ‘contrary to fact,’ gets record revised

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, succeeded Wednesday in having a Democrat’s statements about him withdrawn from the record during the second day of former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

www.foxnews.com

There is nothing more low down, or ignorant than the dog and pony show that Senator Lee put on at the end of testimony, and here you are making a big fucking deal about that lying piece of shit, Michael Lee, instead of being concerned about the insurrection. Which is of course your whole point.

Mike Lee promoted the lie the election was stolen, and you didn't worry about that lie. Or Trump's lies, which lead to the insurrection. Why didn't you care about Donald Trump making up lies about the election being stolen?

Or the police who were injured that day. Instead, you're still here. Promoting the lies of Donald Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/02/11/important-thing-about-mike-lee-impeachment-trial-dust-up/

But just to be clear about what it was that Lee was trying to cover up:

"But Lee’s objection also served to highlight a subtly vital series of events from that day. The Tuberville call — regardless of the sourcing behind it — reinforces the readily apparent idea that Trump’s focus early in the riot was much more about his own political fate than the danger faced by lawmakers and Capitol staff."

Remind me? when in January 2017 the dems all petitioned for the electoral vote to be ignored, did you call them names and call it an insurrection?

You "whataboutism" is a complete fail, because what the Democrats did was to challenge the Republicans to follow the popular vote - which Clinton won. The reps were within their rights to challenge the electoral college. But there was no months' long campaign to call the election "stolen". Hillary conceded defeat and urged the peaceful transition of power - something Trump has steadfastly refused to do.

Nobody rioted, the Capital was not stormed, and nobody died. The whole process could not have been more different. It was conducted according to the US Constitution.

Thank you for reminding us all what a loathsome piece of shit Trump really is for defying the voters, and unleashing his mob on the legally elected peoples' representative.

And yet AOC and the dems NOW claim anyone oposed to the election and its obvious problems with 4 states violating their own election laws was conducting an insurrection and I have not seen you claim she and they were and are wrong,