Democrat Impeachment Managers fabricate quotes. Have to withdraw from evidence.

[Eric Arthur Blair]

The phone call took place. Lee doesn't dispute that.

Either or Tubberville should be forthcoming as to the substance of that call...but they refuse .

The House managers are going by published newspaper accounts quoting Lee. He refutes that. He should enlighten us and see if it passes the smell test.

Anyone think Trump was calling Tubberville to talk about the weather?

Fallacious comments about Mike Lee were withdrawn by leftist impeachment managers.
Maybe you should grow up and move on.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

PROGS don't care about facts.

When was Trump officially declared Nazi, fascists', racist and stuff like that? That would be the result of the Charlottesville Va. riot, where the left declared Trump had said white supremacist's are good people. It didn't matter to the left Trump didn't. Short-thought PROGS (95% of their base) chose the wrong enemy.

To this day many PROGS believe Trump did exactly that, and the primary reason for it is they need their safes spaces, and validation for their insecurities.

Cowards cannot admit they were wrong, PROGS are cowards.

 

[Nostra]

I vote Jaime Raskin as worst hair in the world.

 

[Care4all]

NOPE!

The Dems simply out manueuvered Mike Lee's try to obfuscate the day's presentations....

They had to remove their fake evidence from the record.

They chose to simply remove it, so Mike Lee could not hijack the day's presentations by ending with a vote on whether to remove it or not, by all senators.... of which dems would have won, but the vp would be called in for a tie breaker...

They determined that the smidgen of the record on Mike Lee was not worth going through When it could sidetrack all the other meaningful evidence they had, and turn it in to a partisan fiasco....the right wing news would go wild with.

They had to remove fabricated "evidence".

Your spin won't change that.

The rules of impeachment says a vote has to be taken on whether to strike from the record, which allows each side to speak on it, then a vote.

We don't know who would have prevailed....I don't know Mike Lee's story....He could be telling the truth or a partial truth, that I don't know....I wasn't paying attention to his claim in any kind of detail....

 

[B. Kidd]

I vote Jaime Raskin as worst hair in the world.

Looks like he has a black colored 'Scrub Daddy' glued to his head!

 

[Nostra]

NOPE!

The Dems simply out manueuvered Mike Lee's try to obfuscate the day's presentations....

They had to remove their fake evidence from the record.

They chose to simply remove it, so Mike Lee could not hijack the day's presentations by ending with a vote on whether to remove it or not, by all senators.... of which dems would have won, but the vp would be called in for a tie breaker...

They determined that the smidgen of the record on Mike Lee was not worth going through When it could sidetrack all the other meaningful evidence they had, and turn it in to a partisan fiasco....the right wing news would go wild with.

They had to remove fabricated "evidence".

Your spin won't change that.

The rules of impeachment says a vote has to be taken on whether to strike from the record, which allows each side to speak on it, then a vote.

We don't know who would have prevailed....I don't know Mike Lee's story....He could be telling the truth or a partial truth, that I don't know....I wasn't paying attention to his claim in any kind of detail....

Cool story.

Doesn't change the fact the House Clowns had to remove their fake "evidence".

 

[westwall]

Isn't fabricating evidence a crime? Why aren't these Dems facing charges?

Utah’s Mike Lee says trial statements about him were ‘contrary to fact,’ gets record revised

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, succeeded Wednesday in having a Democrat’s statements about him withdrawn from the record during the second day of former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

www.foxnews.com

Desperation here, folks. trump Qultist desperation.

No, what is desperate is your constant referrals to q. A non entity other than in your tiny twisted little freak mind.

 

[westwall]

NOPE!

The Dems simply out manueuvered Mike Lee's try to obfuscate the day's presentations....

They had to remove their fake evidence from the record.

They chose to simply remove it, so Mike Lee could not hijack the day's presentations by ending with a vote on whether to remove it or not, by all senators.... of which dems would have won, but the vp would be called in for a tie breaker...

They determined that the smidgen of the record on Mike Lee was not worth going through When it could sidetrack all the other meaningful evidence they had, and turn it in to a partisan fiasco....the right wing news would go wild with.

Stop lying. You are bad at it.

 

[dudmuck]

Isn't fabricating evidence a crime? Why aren't these Dems facing charges?

Utah’s Mike Lee says trial statements about him were ‘contrary to fact,’ gets record revised

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, succeeded Wednesday in having a Democrat’s statements about him withdrawn from the record during the second day of former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

www.foxnews.com

The impeachment managers withdrew that part of the evidence because it really wasn't very important, and neither is Mike Lee. The remaining evidence is enough to convict.

Tuberville has confirmed the story. And it’s been referred to the ethics committee.

Managers say acquittal could embolden pro-Trump extremists

Link to ethics committee tweet:

Trump accidentally phoned Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) as he sought to get in touch with Tuberville and request that the Alabama senator continue objecting to the election results in order to buy time. Lee, according to reports in Utah’s Deseret News, the Salt Lake Tribune and CNN, passed his phone to the newly-elected lawmaker for the brief call. Lee on Wednesday night objected on the Senate floor to how his role in the call was portrayed.

 

[Care4all]

NOPE!

The Dems simply out manueuvered Mike Lee's try to obfuscate the day's presentations....

They had to remove their fake evidence from the record.

They chose to simply remove it, so Mike Lee could not hijack the day's presentations by ending with a vote on whether to remove it or not, by all senators.... of which dems would have won, but the vp would be called in for a tie breaker...

They determined that the smidgen of the record on Mike Lee was not worth going through When it could sidetrack all the other meaningful evidence they had, and turn it in to a partisan fiasco....the right wing news would go wild with.

Stop lying. You are bad at it.

it's what was said on the news, while and after it happened that I was watching...

 

[westwall]

Isn't fabricating evidence a crime? Why aren't these Dems facing charges?

Utah’s Mike Lee says trial statements about him were ‘contrary to fact,’ gets record revised

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, succeeded Wednesday in having a Democrat’s statements about him withdrawn from the record during the second day of former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

www.foxnews.com

The impeachment managers withdrew that part of the evidence because it really wasn't very important, and neither is Mike Lee. The remaining evidence is enough to convict.

Tuberville has confirmed the story. And it’s been referred to the ethics committee.

Managers say acquittal could embolden pro-Trump extremists

Link to ethics committee tweet:

Trump accidentally phoned Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) as he sought to get in touch with Tuberville and request that the Alabama senator continue objecting to the election results in order to buy time. Lee, according to reports in Utah’s Deseret News, the Salt Lake Tribune and CNN, passed his phone to the newly-elected lawmaker for the brief call. Lee on Wednesday night objected on the Senate floor to how his role in the call was portrayed.

They were FORCED to withdraw it because it was a lie.

 

[BluesLegend]

Lying, twisting, distorting dishonestly is what Dems do.

 

[westwall]

NOPE!

The Dems simply out manueuvered Mike Lee's try to obfuscate the day's presentations....

They had to remove their fake evidence from the record.

They chose to simply remove it, so Mike Lee could not hijack the day's presentations by ending with a vote on whether to remove it or not, by all senators.... of which dems would have won, but the vp would be called in for a tie breaker...

They determined that the smidgen of the record on Mike Lee was not worth going through When it could sidetrack all the other meaningful evidence they had, and turn it in to a partisan fiasco....the right wing news would go wild with.

Stop lying. You are bad at it.

it's what was said on the news, while and after it happened that I was watching...

So, you believe propaganda.

 

[Indeependent]

Isn't fabricating evidence a crime? Why aren't these Dems facing charges?

Utah’s Mike Lee says trial statements about him were ‘contrary to fact,’ gets record revised

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, succeeded Wednesday in having a Democrat’s statements about him withdrawn from the record during the second day of former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

www.foxnews.com

I though the evidence was the fact that they're sensitive.

 

[Indeependent]

NOPE!

The Dems simply out manueuvered Mike Lee's try to obfuscate the day's presentations....

They had to remove their fake evidence from the record.

They chose to simply remove it, so Mike Lee could not hijack the day's presentations by ending with a vote on whether to remove it or not, by all senators.... of which dems would have won, but the vp would be called in for a tie breaker...

They determined that the smidgen of the record on Mike Lee was not worth going through When it could sidetrack all the other meaningful evidence they had, and turn it in to a partisan fiasco....the right wing news would go wild with.

Stop lying. You are bad at it.

it's what was said on the news, while and after it happened that I was watching...

So, you believe propaganda.

What do you expect from someone with the user name Care4All?

 

[Nostra]

Isn't fabricating evidence a crime? Why aren't these Dems facing charges?

Utah’s Mike Lee says trial statements about him were ‘contrary to fact,’ gets record revised

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, succeeded Wednesday in having a Democrat’s statements about him withdrawn from the record during the second day of former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

www.foxnews.com

The impeachment managers withdrew that part of the evidence because it really wasn't very important, and neither is Mike Lee. The remaining evidence is enough to convict.

Tuberville has confirmed the story. And it’s been referred to the ethics committee.

Managers say acquittal could embolden pro-Trump extremists

Link to ethics committee tweet:

Trump accidentally phoned Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) as he sought to get in touch with Tuberville and request that the Alabama senator continue objecting to the election results in order to buy time. Lee, according to reports in Utah’s Deseret News, the Salt Lake Tribune and CNN, passed his phone to the newly-elected lawmaker for the brief call. Lee on Wednesday night objected on the Senate floor to how his role in the call was portrayed.

So your argument is that the House Clowns are wasting taxpayer money presenting useless made up "evidence".

Got it.

 

[Pete7469]

Stop lying. You are bad at it.

it's what was said on the news, while and after it happened that I was watching...

So you parrot lies, even though you know it was a lie.

Thanks for proving my assertions.

 

[Care4all]

Isn't fabricating evidence a crime? Why aren't these Dems facing charges?

Utah’s Mike Lee says trial statements about him were ‘contrary to fact,’ gets record revised

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, succeeded Wednesday in having a Democrat’s statements about him withdrawn from the record during the second day of former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

www.foxnews.com

The impeachment managers withdrew that part of the evidence because it really wasn't very important, and neither is Mike Lee. The remaining evidence is enough to convict.

Tuberville has confirmed the story. And it’s been referred to the ethics committee.

Managers say acquittal could embolden pro-Trump extremists

Link to ethics committee tweet:

Trump accidentally phoned Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) as he sought to get in touch with Tuberville and request that the Alabama senator continue objecting to the election results in order to buy time. Lee, according to reports in Utah’s Deseret News, the Salt Lake Tribune and CNN, passed his phone to the newly-elected lawmaker for the brief call. Lee on Wednesday night objected on the Senate floor to how his role in the call was portrayed.

They were FORCED to withdraw it because it was a lie.

Westwall
Stop lying, you're not good at it!

From he op Fox news article in first post:

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who is presiding over the trial, said that Lee's request was not consistent with the Senate rules. But Lee appealed, requesting a roll call vote on his appeal. This prompted confusion in the chamber on what exactly the Senate was voting on before Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., sent the Senate into a quorum call "while we work this out."


Lee later withdrew his request for a roll call vote and Schumer withdrew his quorum call.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., the lead impeachment manager, then said that "Ciciline correctly and accurately quoted a newspaper account which the distinguished senator has taken objection to. So we're happy to withdraw it on the grounds that it is not true and we are going to withdraw it this evening without any prejudice to the ability to resubmit if possible and then we could debate it if we need it."

 

[westwall]

Isn't fabricating evidence a crime? Why aren't these Dems facing charges?

Utah’s Mike Lee says trial statements about him were ‘contrary to fact,’ gets record revised

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, succeeded Wednesday in having a Democrat’s statements about him withdrawn from the record during the second day of former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

www.foxnews.com

The impeachment managers withdrew that part of the evidence because it really wasn't very important, and neither is Mike Lee. The remaining evidence is enough to convict.

Tuberville has confirmed the story. And it’s been referred to the ethics committee.

Managers say acquittal could embolden pro-Trump extremists

Link to ethics committee tweet:

Trump accidentally phoned Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) as he sought to get in touch with Tuberville and request that the Alabama senator continue objecting to the election results in order to buy time. Lee, according to reports in Utah’s Deseret News, the Salt Lake Tribune and CNN, passed his phone to the newly-elected lawmaker for the brief call. Lee on Wednesday night objected on the Senate floor to how his role in the call was portrayed.

They were FORCED to withdraw it because it was a lie.

Westwall
Stop lying, you're not good at it!

From he op Fox news article in first post:

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who is presiding over the trial, said that Lee's request was not consistent with the Senate rules. But Lee appealed, requesting a roll call vote on his appeal. This prompted confusion in the chamber on what exactly the Senate was voting on before Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., sent the Senate into a quorum call "while we work this out."


Lee later withdrew his request for a roll call vote and Schumer withdrew his quorum call.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., the lead impeachment manager, then said that "Ciciline correctly and accurately quoted a newspaper account which the distinguished senator has taken objection to. So we're happy to withdraw it on the grounds that it is not true and we are going to withdraw it this evening without any prejudice to the ability to resubmit if possible and then we could debate it if we need it."

Propaganda is propaganda. It's a shame you aren't capable of identifying it.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Isn't fabricating evidence a crime? Why aren't these Dems facing charges?

Utah’s Mike Lee says trial statements about him were ‘contrary to fact,’ gets record revised

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, succeeded Wednesday in having a Democrat’s statements about him withdrawn from the record during the second day of former President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

www.foxnews.com

The impeachment managers withdrew that part of the evidence because it really wasn't very important, and neither is Mike Lee. The remaining evidence is enough to convict.

Tuberville has confirmed the story. And it’s been referred to the ethics committee.

Managers say acquittal could embolden pro-Trump extremists

Link to ethics committee tweet:

Trump accidentally phoned Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) as he sought to get in touch with Tuberville and request that the Alabama senator continue objecting to the election results in order to buy time. Lee, according to reports in Utah’s Deseret News, the Salt Lake Tribune and CNN, passed his phone to the newly-elected lawmaker for the brief call. Lee on Wednesday night objected on the Senate floor to how his role in the call was portrayed.

They were FORCED to withdraw it because it was a lie.

Westwall
Stop lying, you're not good at it!

From he op Fox news article in first post:

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who is presiding over the trial, said that Lee's request was not consistent with the Senate rules. But Lee appealed, requesting a roll call vote on his appeal. This prompted confusion in the chamber on what exactly the Senate was voting on before Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., sent the Senate into a quorum call "while we work this out."


Lee later withdrew his request for a roll call vote and Schumer withdrew his quorum call.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., the lead impeachment manager, then said that "Ciciline correctly and accurately quoted a newspaper account which the distinguished senator has taken objection to. So we're happy to withdraw it on the grounds that it is not true and we are going to withdraw it this evening without any prejudice to the ability to resubmit if possible and then we could debate it if we need it."

They admitted they withdrew it because it wasn't true. IN your own quote. Quick question retard? Was it withdrawn or not?