Democrat Rioting and Looting?

Why is rioting, looting and costly destruction of private and public property so popular with liberal Democrats?

If people do not invoke authority by the Constitution to enforce laws directly as equals,
they use force or any other means of protest they feel they can access.

There is still a stigma with enforcing Constitutional laws as part of the power culture
for oppressing other people treated like property.

I have tried to explain Constitutional laws to liberal minded friends who feel like victims,
and find a huge gap in concept, like trying to explain God and invoking Christ
to an ATHEIST.

There is a gap, a huge difference in perception of authority as equal or not.

The liberals come from a line of thinking that people have to depend on Govt for rights.
The conservatives from the natural laws that rights are inherent by human nature,
and the people use the LAWS to hold govt in check.

In cases like this, where people feel "disenfranchised" and POWERLESS to check Govt,
that's when turning to physical force to protest and make a statement is used.

They don't feel that suing or going through legislative or legal channels does any good.
So they protest and put public pressure through the MEDIA to change things.

Acting nice does not get a message publicized in the MEDIA.
So people have learned to use violence and force (just like jihadist terrorists do to get
their message through the MEDIA while peaceful Muslims don't get any publicity).

They have more access to public pressure through the MEDIA to express their
grievances than trying to go through courts, legislatures or other means where
they are not treated with equal weight and don't feel they have an equal voice in govt.
 
Why is rioting, looting and costly destruction of private and public property so popular with liberal Democrats?

The thugs aren't democrats. They're thugs that vote for democrats and the democrats stupidly cover for them for votes.

Oh'yess, why do you care about public property? Aren't you a slash, cut and burn kind of person? Why not defund the police and see how that works.

Who are you again? ...:laugh:
Hard to recognize him without science, R&D and infrastructure funding..

Add law enforcement too that! Society must be stable for those other things. ;)
 
Why is rioting, looting and costly destruction of private and public property so popular with liberal Democrats?

Why is dumbing down complex social dynamics into a cheap political points scoreboard so popular with the synapsically shallow?

:dunno:

Got it, even though the Democratic Party controls these areas and have for many years, they shouldn't have to accept responsibility.

..and you're in tantrum mode because I thought it was a topic worthy of discussion...
 
Why is rioting, looting and costly destruction of private and public property so popular with liberal Democrats?

Why is dumbing down complex social dynamics into a cheap political points scoreboard so popular with the synapsically shallow?

:dunno:

Got it, even though the Democratic Party controls these areas and have for many years, they shouldn't have to accept responsibility.

..and you're in tantrum mode because I thought it was a topic worthy of discussion...

So you would use publicly funded police officers to stop the thugs? You'd then use the publicly funded justice system to punish them. Glad to see that we agree. ;)
 
Why is rioting, looting and costly destruction of private and public property so popular with liberal Democrats?
Do you really think that those criminals and thugs who are perpetrating those crimes, actually vote or have the ability to vote with their most likely criminal records?

Those criminals and thugs are a disgrace to themselves. The people who want to make the MINORITY be the face of the majority of people who are not doing such heinous acts, are also (though on a another level) a disgrace.
Restoration of voting rights is pretty much automatic in democratic states of the blue wall of which MD is one.
 
Why is rioting, looting and costly destruction of private and public property so popular with liberal Democrats?
Do you really think that those criminals and thugs who are perpetrating those crimes, actually vote or have the ability to vote with their most likely criminal records?

Those criminals and thugs are a disgrace to themselves. The people who want to make the MINORITY be the face of the majority of people who are not doing such heinous acts, are also (though on a another level) a disgrace.

Can still vote if you commit misdemeanors, only felons can not vote.

Although if the far left had their way, these felons would be able to vote.
 
Why is rioting, looting and costly destruction of private and public property so popular with liberal Democrats?

The thugs aren't democrats. They're thugs that vote for democrats and the democrats stupidly cover for them for votes.

Oh'yess, why do you care about public property? Aren't you a slash, cut and burn kind of person? Why not defund the police and see how that works.

Dear Matthew
I'd like to see the police unions rally collectively
and only police cities or districts where all residents sign
AGREEMENTS to follow laws, not commit premeditated crimes,
and if responsible for a premeditated crime they agree to pay all costs
of damages or debts they incur, including hospital or medical costs,
property damage, damage to persons, and costs of prosecution and incarceration.

And if they don't agree to take financial responsibility for their legal rights and privileges
as citizens, they either don't live in that district that requires such a signed agreement,
they find a sponsor who agrees to sign for full legal and financial responsibility for them,
while they get help to rectify whatever issue prevents them from being legally responsible,
or they move someplace else that accepts to house and police such people in their ranks.

So this would reward districts that adopt a law abiding ordinance,
and districts that don't would get flooded with people who refuse to follow laws.

You would get the population that agrees to the same standards
the district or city agrees to enforce for its citizens so that they are on the
same page with police.
 
Why is rioting, looting and costly destruction of private and public property so popular with liberal Democrats?

Why is dumbing down complex social dynamics into a cheap political points scoreboard so popular with the synapsically shallow?

:dunno:

Got it, even though the Democratic Party controls these areas and have for many years, they shouldn't have to accept responsibility.

..and you're in tantrum mode because I thought it was a topic worthy of discussion...

The democrats are being idiots on this one issue. They're looking like fools on law enforcement and playing to the race shit starters.
 
Rioting, looting and damage to private and public property happening again today in a Democratic Party controlled area of Baltimore. What are the Democrats in power doing wrong?

Clearly the problem is that Democrat city authorities have the trash picked up on Tuesday, where Republicans would have it done on Thursday. Couldn't be more obvious.

Wacko.
:lmao:you're funny and desperate, I like that..
 
Why is rioting, looting and costly destruction of private and public property so popular with liberal Democrats?
Do you really think that those criminals and thugs who are perpetrating those crimes, actually vote or have the ability to vote with their most likely criminal records?

Those criminals and thugs are a disgrace to themselves. The people who want to make the MINORITY be the face of the majority of people who are not doing such heinous acts, are also (though on a another level) a disgrace.
Restoration of voting rights is pretty much automatic in democratic states of the blue wall of which MD is one.

I have no problem with people who have "paid their debt to society" and served their time getting their voting rights restored. Since you bought up MD , let's put it all in perspective:

"A national, bipartisan effort to roll back restrictions on felon voting rights could soon take a big step forward in Maryland. Earlier this month, the Maryland legislature passed a bill that would restore the right to vote to felons immediately after release from prison. Currently, Maryland is one of 20 states that bars felons from voting until they have completed prison time, parole, and probation.

The bill currently sits on the desk of Governor Larry Hogan, a Republican who has backed criminal justice reform. If enacted, the law would make it easier for 40,000 Maryland residents with past convictions to exercise their voting rights, according to the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University.
40 000 Maryland Ex-Cons May Soon Get Their Voting Rights Back Mother Jones

Do you really think that those fools who are rioting are active voters or give a shit about voting? If . :lol:
 
Why is rioting, looting and costly destruction of private and public property so popular with liberal Democrats?

Why is dumbing down complex social dynamics into a cheap political points scoreboard so popular with the synapsically shallow?

:dunno:

Got it, even though the Democratic Party controls these areas and have for many years, they shouldn't have to accept responsibility.

..and you're in tantrum mode because I thought it was a topic worthy of discussion...

Please to essplain to us feeble-brainers, o Lumpster, what "Democratic", "Republican" or "other" party affiliations have to do with declaring what day the trash gets picked up.

:popcorn:

"Responsibility" ... :rofl:
 
I wonder if they are examining the phones of those arrested to discover coordination efforts, who they texted
 
Why is rioting, looting and costly destruction of private and public property so popular with liberal Democrats?

Why is dumbing down complex social dynamics into a cheap political points scoreboard so popular with the synapsically shallow?

:dunno:

Got it, even though the Democratic Party controls these areas and have for many years, they shouldn't have to accept responsibility.

..and you're in tantrum mode because I thought it was a topic worthy of discussion...

So you would use publicly funded police officers to stop the thugs? You'd then use the publicly funded justice system to punish them. Glad to see that we agree. ;)

Yup, then send the bills to the Democrat Party. Why should everyone else keep paying for their failures of governance?

Granted, I know this will never happen but the the thought is pleasing to me...:eusa_dance:
 
Rioting, looting and damage to private and public property happening again today in a Democratic Party controlled area of Baltimore. What are the Democrats in power doing wrong?

Clearly the problem is that Democrat city authorities have the trash picked up on Tuesday, where Republicans would have it done on Thursday. Couldn't be more obvious.

Wacko.
:lmao:you're funny and desperate, I like that..

I'm not the guy imagining political philosophies driving the deep debates in City Hall over how many snowplows should run...
 
Why is rioting, looting and costly destruction of private and public property so popular with liberal Democrats?

And you know these rioters are Democrats, how?

According to Baltimore Police, most of the rioters are underage, many are high schoolers. The riot didn't start until school let out.
 

Forum List

Back
Top