Democrats SUE to stop Arizona Senate from forensic audit of 2020 election

[Lastamender]

The judges refused to hear the evidence.

Judges heard all properly submitted evidence. Don’t lie. But you also just said they never had the evidence until now. Try to be a little more consistent

How is a ballot proven to be illegal not evidence?

When you claim it’s proven but in reality it’s fine and you just don’t know what you’re talking about.

Yeah, that was the very problem. Courts would dismiss cases before adequate time for discovery.

Why are the Democrats trying so hard to hide the audit results?

The courts do not function as grand juries. Why are Republicans trying to hide the methods?

And courts should not interfere with the legislative branch. It is their decision to do the audit not the courts.

 

[busybee01]

Actually it had a lot to do with this case. It was cited by the SCOTUS judges that wanted to hear the the case bought by the Texas AG. The same rights were violated.

The case brought by the Texas AG is also irrelevant to this discussion.

Well, what is relevant is the ballots. Those ballots are the evidence if they are illegal. That can be proven. That is why Democrats are desperate.

Then why are Republicans only looking at ballots in Maricopa county? If they were truly interested in validating their election, they would audit the entire state. Clearly, they are Republicans whose only interest is flipping the election for the Republican candidate.

Because Maricopa’s voting rules were different than the rest of the state, thanks to the corrupt Dems they were in charge of it.

Anymore stupid questions?

Sure, which party controls Maricopa's elections?

Actually it had a lot to do with this case. It was cited by the SCOTUS judges that wanted to hear the the case bought by the Texas AG. The same rights were violated.

The case brought by the Texas AG is also irrelevant to this discussion.

Well, what is relevant is the ballots. Those ballots are the evidence if they are illegal. That can be proven. That is why Democrats are desperate.

Then why are Republicans only looking at ballots in Maricopa county? If they were truly interested in validating their election, they would audit the entire state. Clearly, they are Republicans whose only interest is flipping the election for the Republican candidate.

Because Maricopa’s voting rules were different than the rest of the state, thanks to the corrupt Dems they were in charge of it.

Anymore stupid questions?

Sure, which party controls Maricopa's elections?

The Democrats did. The Maricopa County recorder’s name was Adrian Fontes, a corrupt communist. They did away with voting at precincts and instead made “voting centers” so you could vote anywhere in the county. Problem is votes could not be traced to the original precincts. It was a terrible idea and allowed cheating.

It did not you lying weasel. I applaud Maricopa for helping to make it easier to vote. The election officials are Republican.

 

[busybee01]

The judges refused to hear the evidence.

Judges heard all properly submitted evidence. Don’t lie. But you also just said they never had the evidence until now. Try to be a little more consistent

How is a ballot proven to be illegal not evidence?

When you claim it’s proven but in reality it’s fine and you just don’t know what you’re talking about.

Yeah, that was the very problem. Courts would dismiss cases before adequate time for discovery.

Why are the Democrats trying so hard to hide the audit results?

The courts do not function as grand juries. Why are Republicans trying to hide the methods?

And courts should not interfere with the legislative branch. It is their decision to do the audit not the courts.

The courts have every right to determine whether the effort is honest or not.

 

[busybee01]

Yet you have no proof of that. There are live cameras on the whole thing. You are welcomed to watch.

They’re keeping the media out.

LOL why would corrupt media need to be in there? Cameras are everywhere.

They are a good distance away.

 

[EMH]

Indeed they are "republican" of the 911 w crowd.... Ditto for GA, with homo Raffensberger the chief of ballot dumps for Biden and vote switching via dominion resources.


The 911 traitors of the "republican" bent were all for Biden, the Lincoln project....

 

[busybee01]

yeah, that's it. LOL.

Government has a duty to protect people's info.

there isn't any personal information on a ballot. don't you vote?

dude you are certainly the most out of touch loser in here. and that's saying a lot.

They have access to voters' records.

 

[asaratis]

They’re keeping the media out.

As they should. The fake news media would do nothing but prolong the audit and issue periodic leaks of disinformation to generate more bullshit rumors.

Im sorry, are you under the impression that a ballot is stamped “illegal” on it or something?

The ballots are being individually photographed and scanned with a special light (likely to confirm the presence of a hidden watermark). Watch the live feed cameras. I think it's Camera #9 that shows both of these operations happening at the same table.

Keeping the media out is a sign they’re hiding something.

No it's not. I have no doubt that all of the video and photographs produced will be archived and later released to the public.

The efforts of the Democrats to stop the audit is a sign they're trying to hide what they enabled to happen.

 

[Lastamender]

yeah, that's it. LOL.

Government has a duty to protect people's info.

there isn't any personal information on a ballot. don't you vote?

dude you are certainly the most out of touch loser in here. and that's saying a lot.

They have access to voters' records.

What do they have on those records? They have them as a registerd voter and that is about it. The name of the voter will never be connected to the ballots now. Fraud city.

 

[Turtlesoup]

Actually it had a lot to do with this case. It was cited by the SCOTUS judges that wanted to hear the the case bought by the Texas AG. The same rights were violated.

The case brought by the Texas AG is also irrelevant to this discussion.

Well, what is relevant is the ballots. Those ballots are the evidence if they are illegal. That can be proven. That is why Democrats are desperate.

Then why are Republicans only looking at ballots in Maricopa county? If they were truly interested in validating their election, they would audit the entire state. Clearly, they are Republicans whose only interest is flipping the election for the Republican candidate.

Because Maricopa’s voting rules were different than the rest of the state, thanks to the corrupt Dems they were in charge of it.

Anymore stupid questions?

Sure, which party controls Maricopa's elections?

Actually it had a lot to do with this case. It was cited by the SCOTUS judges that wanted to hear the the case bought by the Texas AG. The same rights were violated.

The case brought by the Texas AG is also irrelevant to this discussion.

Well, what is relevant is the ballots. Those ballots are the evidence if they are illegal. That can be proven. That is why Democrats are desperate.

Then why are Republicans only looking at ballots in Maricopa county? If they were truly interested in validating their election, they would audit the entire state. Clearly, they are Republicans whose only interest is flipping the election for the Republican candidate.

Because Maricopa’s voting rules were different than the rest of the state, thanks to the corrupt Dems they were in charge of it.

Anymore stupid questions?

Sure, which party controls Maricopa's elections?

The Democrats did. The Maricopa County recorder’s name was Adrian Fontes, a corrupt communist. They did away with voting at precincts and instead made “voting centers” so you could vote anywhere in the county. Problem is votes could not be traced to the original precincts. It was a terrible idea and allowed cheating.

It did not you lying weasel. I applaud Maricopa for helping to make it easier to vote. The election officials are Republican.

Easier to cheat.......

250,000 votes likely no good--there are issues.

and fyi MARKZUCKERBERG and his communist party inlaws giving millions to anyone involved in overseeing the elections should be seen as treason...

 

[busybee01]

prove it.

There’s a Simple Reason Workers Covered Windows at a Detroit Vote-Counting Site

what cheaters say when they're caught.

What is your excuse? You are a cheater.

 

[struth]

The judges refused to hear the evidence.

Judges heard all properly submitted evidence. Don’t lie. But you also just said they never had the evidence until now. Try to be a little more consistent

How is a ballot proven to be illegal not evidence?

When you claim it’s proven but in reality it’s fine and you just don’t know what you’re talking about.

Yeah, that was the very problem. Courts would dismiss cases before adequate time for discovery.

Why are the Democrats trying so hard to hide the audit results?

The courts do not function as grand juries. Why are Republicans trying to hide the methods?

we don’t use grand juries in civil cases. Geez

That is what you are asking these judges to do.

nope judges in civil cases don’t indict. another swing and a miss

 

[Oddball]

A Bernie bro is in on the audit....But it's a total RWNJ operation!

Watch this interview....

Episode 903 – The Diesel Dupe of Elections … The First Real Audit to Uncover Election Fraud and MAGA Takeover in SC (w/ Cpt. Maureen Bannon, John Brakey, Tracy Beanz) - Steve Bannon's War Room: Pandemic

“There really hasn’t been any audits,” “It’s no different than an emissions test by Volkswagen passing an emissions test on a diesel car.”

pandemic.warroom.org

 

[Lastamender]

The judges refused to hear the evidence.

Judges heard all properly submitted evidence. Don’t lie. But you also just said they never had the evidence until now. Try to be a little more consistent

How is a ballot proven to be illegal not evidence?

When you claim it’s proven but in reality it’s fine and you just don’t know what you’re talking about.

Yeah, that was the very problem. Courts would dismiss cases before adequate time for discovery.

Why are the Democrats trying so hard to hide the audit results?

The courts do not function as grand juries. Why are Republicans trying to hide the methods?

And courts should not interfere with the legislative branch. It is their decision to do the audit not the courts.

The courts have every right to determine whether the effort is honest or not.

Sorry it is not in their jurisdiction. The branches of government are equal.

 

[EMH]

Non-Democrat Zionists involved with the steal...

Brad Raffensberger
Kavanaugh
Comey Barrett (a left wing Zionist princess, trump's worst pick)
Gorsuch
Chris Wray
McConnell
ROmney
Murkowski
Sasse
Cornyn
Tucker Carlson
Everyone else at fox except Hannity

 

[Lastamender]

View attachment 484614
"Of course, "Cyber Ninjas" is legit! Just look at the
swanky mail-drop Fast Dougie rents here in Philly!"​

Illegal ballots are the physical proof of fraud that will be indisputable. Too bad.

 

[colfax_m]

I posted a link that says the first audit was done by a company not certified to do it. That is a fact, I do not care who hired them.

They hired two certified firms to audit the equipment as well as an accounting firm. Nothing unusual about that.

These Cyber Ninja jokers have no business running an audit.

 

[colfax_m]

No it's not. I have no doubt that all of the video and photographs produced will be archived and later released to the public.

Yes but only video and photographs taken by the auditors themselves. No one else is allowed to have cameras or even notebooks.

I don’t think you understand how transparency works.

 

[colfax_m]

And courts should not interfere with the legislative branch. It is their decision to do the audit not the courts.

Audits have to comply with law. Judges ensure this is the case.

 

[colfax_m]

they do it all the time with their anonymous sources,,

and did you know all the counters have several cameras on them at all times,, and there are live feed cameras too,,

You don’t rely on the auditors to provide you with proof of their own malfeasance.

Independent media is essential to transparency. That’s the case in every free country. This audit is how votes are counted in corrupt democracies, not ours.

These auditors are afraid of something.

 

[progressive hunter]

they do it all the time with their anonymous sources,,

and did you know all the counters have several cameras on them at all times,, and there are live feed cameras too,,

You don’t rely on the auditors to provide you with proof of their own malfeasance.

Independent media is essential to transparency. That’s the case in every free country. This audit is how votes are counted in corrupt democracies, not ours.

These auditors are afraid of something.

all of them are on camera all the time,, and the media cant report what they cant see,, they can see more just watching the live stream,,

sorry your complaints are falling flat but thats just what it is,,